- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 251921, 11 pages
The Role of Nanostructured Al2O3 Layer in Reduction of Hot Corrosion Products in Normal YSZ Layer
Department of Materials, Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
Received 26 December 2012; Accepted 10 February 2013
Academic Editor: Sheng-Rui Jian
Copyright © 2013 Mohammadreza Daroonparvar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
YVO4 crystals and monoclinic ZrO2 are known as hot corrosion products that can considerably reduce the lifetime of thermal barrier coatings during service. The hot corrosion resistance of two types of air plasma sprayed thermal barrier coating systems was investigated: an Inconel 738/NiCrAlY/YSZ (yttria-stabilized zirconia) and an Inconel 738/NiCrAlY/YSZ/nano-Al2O3 as an outer layer. Hot corrosion test was accomplished on the outer surface of coatings in molten salts (45% Na2SO4 + 55% V2O5) at 1000°C for 52 hour. It was found that nanostructured alumina as outer layer of YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating had significantly reduced the infiltration of molten salts into the YSZ layer and resulted in lower reaction of fused corrosive salts with YSZ, as the hot corrosion products had been substantially decreased in YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating in comparison with normal YSZ coating after hot corrosion process.
Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) are extensively used to protect turbine blades against high temperature oxidation and corrosion. The TBC systems usually consist of an MCrAlY bond coat (M = Ni and/or Co) as an oxidation-resistant layer, yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) as a thermally insulating ceramic top coat, and a substrate (Ni-based superalloy) [1–5]. Unfortunately, TBCs fail during service due to oxidation, hot corrosion, and phase transformation which considerably decrease the durability of the coating [4, 6]. Low-quality fuels usually contain impurities such as Na and V which can form Na2SO4 and V2O5 corrosive salts on the coating of turbine blades [7, 8]. These fused corrosive salts can penetrate into the entire thickness of the YSZ through splat boundaries and other YSZ coating defects such as microcracks and open pores . The penetrated salts can then react with yttria (the stabilizer component of YSZ) and depletion of the stabilizer and phase transformation of tetragonal zirconia to monoclinic zirconia can occur in a very rapid and effective manner during cooling [7, 8]. This phase transformation is also accompanied by 3–5% rapid volume expansion, leading to cracking and spallation of TBCs .
It was found that the presence of a dense Al2O3 layer over the YSZ coating in atmospheric plasma sprayed TBCs can considerably reduce the molten salts diffusion into the YSZ layer and results in higher TBC resistivity against hot corrosion [7, 8]. It can be said that a layered composite TBC containing alumina component can considerably prevent hot corrosion . It is interesting to note that Al2O3 cannot be dissolved within the ZrO2. The alumina (as a rigid matrix) can only surround the ZrO2 particles in TBC system. This phenomenon could create local compressive stresses which could prevent the phase transformation of tetragonal zirconia to monoclinic phase [8, 10, 11]. Hence, the main purpose of this research is to improve the hot corrosion resistance of normal TBCs using nanoalumina as a third layer in TBC system. Two types of air plasma sprayed TBC systems were investigated: an Inconel 738/NiCrAlY/normal YSZ, and an Inconel 738/NiCrAlY/normal YSZ/nano-Al2O3 systems. Investigation also includes microstructural characterization of TBCs before and after hot corrosion test.
2. Experimental Procedures
2.1. As-Received Materials
Nickel-based superalloy (Inconel 738) squares of 25 × 25 × 6 mm were grit blasted with alumina particles and were then used as substrate. Three types of commercial powders were selected: Amdry 962 (Ni-22Cr-10Al-1Y, −106 + 52 μm) as bond coat, Metco 204 NS-G (ZrO2-8% Y2O3, −106 + 11 μm), and Inframat LLC 0802 (nano-α-Al2O3 with high purity, 80 nm) as TBC or ceramic layer.
2.2. Granulation of Nano-Al2O3 Powders
It is worth mentioning that, during air plasma spraying, nanopowders (particularly nano ceramic powders) could adhere to the walls of the feeding system making it extremely difficult to move them towards the plasma torch due to their high specific area and low mass. In order to overcome this problem, reconstitution of the nanoparticles into micrometer-sized granules, a process known as granulation treatment, is essential. In this regard, researchers found that the most favorable granule size is in the range of 10 μm–110 μm [12–15]. A dense nanoceramic coating can be produced by using granulated nanopowders which have excellent flow ability and high apparent density . Hence, nano-Al2O3 powders with an average particle size nominally less than 80 nm and PVA (poly-vinyl alcohol as a binder) were used as starting materials. In this method, 50 g of PVA was dissolved in 80 mL of distilled water at 200°C using a magnetic stirrer. At the same time, the nano-Al2O3 particles were dispersed in distilled water by using an ultrasonic machine for 30 min at 60°C. The dispersed nano-Al2O3 solution was then added to the PVA solution with the aid of a magnetic stirrer at 250°C for 45 min. The water from the solution was removed using a rotary-evaporator device, in order to prevent phase segregation . These granulated powders were dried using a normal electric furnace at 200°C for 145 min.
Agglomerated powders were then sieved through 150 μm, 100 μm, and 50 μm meshes, in order to obtain an adequate shape and suitable size for plasma spraying. The final particle size of the granulated nano-Al2O3 powders used for air plasma spraying was estimated to be 80–100 μm .
2.3. Air Plasma Sprayed Coatings for Hot Corrosion Test
Two types of coatings were produced by air plasma spray (APS) method: the normal YSZ and the layer composite of YSZ/nano-Al2O3 as outer layer coatings. Table 1 lists the thickness of coatings, while Table 2 shows the parameters of air plasma spraying method.
2.4. Hot Corrosion Test
A mixture of 55 wt% V2O5 and 45 wt% Na2SO4 powders (see Figure 1) was spread on the outer surface of the coatings with 30 mg/cm2 concentration. To prevent edge corrosion effect, a 4 mm gap from the uncoated edge was spared for all the coatings. The samples were then put in a normal electric furnace with air atmosphere at 1000°C for 52 hr and then cooled down until ambient temperature was reached inside the furnace. These samples were also intermittently checked every 4 hr cycle during the hot corrosion exposure.
2.5. Microstructural Characterization of Coatings
The microstructural characterization of the surface and the cross-section of the coatings before and after hot corrosion test were carried out using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). An X-ray diffraction (XRD) device was used to determine the type of corrosive phases formed on the YSZ layer of TBCs after hot corrosion test at 1000°C.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Morphology Investigation of the Granulated Nano-Al2O3 Powders
Figure 2(a) exhibits the morphology of nano-Al2O3 powders after granulation treatment. It can be observed that (see Figures 2(b) and 2(c)) there are a high number of nano-Al2O3 grains in a granulated particle which can be considered as a plasma sprayable powder in APS method.
3.2. Microstructural Characterization of Air Plasma Sprayed Coatings
Figure 3 demonstrates the cross-sections of two types of as-sprayed TBCs. All the coatings display a lamellar structure which is a characteristic of plasma sprayed coatings [1–5]. Figure 3(a) shows composite of YSZ/nano-Al2O3 as an outer layer on the bond coat after air plasma spraying. On the other hand, Figure 3(b) indicates normal YSZ layer on the NiCrAlY layer indicating that is the normal TBC system.
The morphology of as-sprayed nano-Al2O3 layer was characterized using FESEM equipped with EDS as shown in Figure 4. It shows that dense nanostructured Al2O3 coating has lower pinholes, voids and microcracks compared to those of normal YSZ coating, as shown in Figure 5.
It can be predicted that nano-Al2O3 layer over YSZ coating will considerably prevent the infiltration of molten salts into the YSZ layer during hot corrosion test at elevated temperatures (see Figure 4).
3.3. Microstructural Characterization of Coatings after Hot Corrosion
Figures 6 and 7 indicate the morphology of YSZ layer of TBCs after hot corrosion test. The normal YSZ coating surface appears porous and destroyed with many cracks and crystals deposited (as one of the hot corrosion products) on the surface (Figures 6(a), 6(b), and 6(c)). Figure 7 also shows the surface of YSZ as inner layer of YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating after hot corrosion test at 1000°C.
The detrimental crystals are rod shaped. In the normal YSZ their sizes are larger (80–85 μm) and thicker (2.5–3 μm) (Figure 6(c)) compared to thinner rod crystals (0.5–1.5 μm) with low number and small size (15–20 μm) in YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating (Figure 7(c)). The EDS analysis (see Figure 8) indicated that the rod crystals are mainly composed of yttrium, vanadium, and oxygen. X-ray diffraction analysis identified these crystals as YVO4.
The XRD analysis performed on the YSZ layer of the coatings after hot corrosion test produced results of XRD patterns as shown in Figure 9. Formation of monoclinic ZrO2 and YVO4 crystals was detected on the surface of all the coatings after exposure to molten salts at 1000°C, but the intensity of their peaks was totally different. Monoclinic zirconia is an unstable phase. This phase will be transformed to tetragonal zirconia phase at approximately 1000°C. This tetragonal phase will transform back to monoclinic zirconia phase during cooling which is accompanied by 3–5% volume expansion and finally leads to the spallation of TBC during subsequent thermal cycles of hot corrosion test [10, 17, 18].
and are the intensity of monoclinic ZrO2 () and () peaks, respectively, and is the intensity of tetragonal ZrO2 () peak in XRD patterns after hot corrosion test. The volume fractions of monoclinic zirconia phase (%) in the two types of TBCs are compared as shown in Figure 10. This figure demonstrates that the volume fraction of monoclinic ZrO2 has been reduced from 66% in normal YSZ to 15% in YSZ as inner layer of YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating. This result indicates that phase transformation of tetragonal zirconia to monoclinic zirconia in YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating during cooling is lower compared to normal YSZ coating.
The comparison of XRD results (see Figure 9) indicates that the intensity of principal peak of YVO4 in normal YSZ is considerably higher compared to YSZ as inner layer of YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating. This phenomenon can also be confirmed by measuring the length of the YVO4 rod-shaped crystals. Figure 11 shows that the average length of rod crystals of YVO4 in YSZ as inner layer of YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating has been substantially reduced compared to normal YSZ coating after hot corrosion test at 1000°C.
3.4. The Mechanism of Monoclinic Zirconia and YVO4 Crystals Formation as Hot Corrosion Products in the YSZ Layer
The mechanism of monoclinic zirconia and YVO4 crystals formation as hot corrosion products during corrosion process can be explained by the following reactions:
According to reactions (2)–(4), NaVO3 was formed at elevated temperatures (see Figure 12). NaVO3 then reacted with Y2O3 to generate monoclinic ZrO2, YVO4, and Na2O (reaction (5)) [21–24]. On the other hand, it has been reported that [21, 22] V2O5 can react directly with Y2O3 (stabilizer component of zirconia) to produce monoclinic ZrO2 and YVO4 crystals as hot corrosion products (reaction (6)).
Chen et al.’s investigation  on hot corrosion of plasma sprayed Al2O3 and ZrO2 coatings in molten Na2SO4 showed that NaAlO2 can be formed on the surface of Al2O3 particles (reactions (2), (7)). Hot corrosion rate of Al2O3 coating in molten Na2SO4 was much lower compared to normal ZrO2 coating. In this research NaAlO2 was detected by XRD analysis (see Figure 9(b)) and, as such, it can be said that, the Al2O3 layer is generally protected by NaAlO2 compound during hot corrosion process:
Na2SO4 is known as an accelerator factor of chemical reactions during hot corrosion [25, 26]. It was found that NaVO3 with relatively low melting point (630°C)  will be able to increase the phase transformation of tetragonal ZrO2 to monoclinic ZrO2 during hot corrosion test (reaction (5)) due to the depletion of stabilizer (Y2O3) component of the YSZ coating.
3.5. Hot Corrosion Behavior of Two Types of Thermal Barrier Coatings
The hot corrosion behavior of thermal barrier coatings in this research can be explained by the following steps: (a) molten salts penetrate into the YSZ layer; (b) molten salts react with Y2O3 (stabilizer component of zirconia); (c) tetragonal zirconia will be transformed to monoclinic zirconia phase; and (d) formation of large rod-shaped YVO4 crystals with an average length of 85 μm and outward growth (see Figure 13) in normal YSZ coating which can impose additional stresses to the system. The spallation of normal YSZ coating will occur at the NiCrAlY/YSZ interface due to those supplementary stresses in the coating.
In the meantime, premature YSZ spallation is a result of the formation of large monoclinic ZrO2 and YVO4 crystals (see Figure 13) at the bond coat/normal YSZ interface, while, in YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating, the least amount of molten salts infiltrated through nanoalumina layer towards the YSZ coating and reacted with YSZ at the interface of YSZ/nano-Al2O3. It can be said that due to its short length of about 15–20 μm the YVO4 small crystals did not play a substantial role in the spallation of nano-Al2O3 layer from the YSZ. However, the spallation of nano-Al2O3 layer is mainly related to the formation of monoclinic ZrO2 (15%) at the interface of YSZ/nano-Al2O3 during hot corrosion test at 1000°C. It can be concluded that the linked pinholes and microcracks can provide the pathways for molten salts infiltration into the coating during hot corrosion process. However, in this research, the dense nanostructured Al2O3 layer could significantly prevent the diffusion of molten salts into YSZ layer due to the compactness of the nanostructure. Therefore the amount of monoclinic ZrO2 and YVO4 crystals was substantially lessened in YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating in comparison with normal YSZ coating after hot corrosion test.
Reaction of molten salts containing NaVO3 with Y2O3 (as stabilizer component of ZrO2) led to the formation of monoclinic ZrO2 and YVO4 crystals (as hot corrosion products) on the YSZ layer during hot corrosion test. This phenomenon finally led to the separation of YSZ layer from the bond coat after 12 hr. It was found that a dense nano-Al2O3 layer with lower pinholes can significantly prevent the infiltration of molten salts into YSZ layer and therefore the amount of monoclinic ZrO2 and YVO4 crystals was considerably reduced in YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating in comparison with normal YSZ coating. This phenomenon had caused the separation of nano-Al2O3 layer from the YSZ coating after 52 hr. In other words, the nanostructured Al2O3 layer could maintain YSZ coating as main component of TBC systems during hot corrosion test due to lower formation of monoclinic ZrO2 (15%) at the interface of YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating. Meanwhile, the average length of YVO4 rod crystals in YSZ as inner layer of YSZ/nano-Al2O3 coating was lower compared to that of normal YSZ coating after hot corrosion test.
The authors would like to acknowledge Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) for providing research facilities and financial support under Grant Q.J130000.2524.02H55.
- Y. Wang and G. Sayre, “Commercial thermal barrier coatings with a double-layer bond coat on turbine vanes and the process repeatability,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 203, no. 16, pp. 2186–2192, 2009.
- N. Markocsan, P. Nylén, J. Wigren, X. H. Li, and A. Tricoire, “Effect of thermal aging on microstructure and functional properties of zirconia-base thermal barrier coatings,” Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 201–208, 2009.
- J. Ilavsky and J. K. Stalick, “Phase composition and its changes during annealing of plasma-sprayed YSZ,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 127, no. 2-3, pp. 120–129, 2000.
- A. G. Evans, D. R. Mumm, J. W. Hutchinson, G. H. Meier, and F. S. Pettit, “Mechanisms controlling the durability of thermal barrier coatings,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 505–553, 2001.
- M. Daroonparvar, M. S. Hussain, and M. A. M. Yajid, “The role of formation of continues thermally grown oxide layer on the nanostructured NiCrAlY bond coat during thermal exposure in air,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 261, pp. 287–297, 2012.
- H. Wang, D. Zuo, G. Chen, G. Sun, X. Li, and X. Cheng, “Hot corrosion behaviour of low Al NiCoCrAlY cladded coatings reinforced by nano-particles on a Ni-base super alloy,” Corrosion Science, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 3561–3567, 2010.
- Z. Chen, N. Q. Wu, J. Singh, and S. X. Mao, “Effect of Al2O3 overlay on hot-corrosion behavior of yttria-stabilized zirconia coating in molten sulfate-vanadate salt,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 443, no. 1-2, pp. 46–52, 2003.
- M. Saremi, A. Afrasiabi, and A. Kobayashi, “Bond coat oxidation and hot corrosion behavior of plasma sprayed YSZ coting on Ni superalloy,” Transactions of JWRI, no. 36, pp. 41–45, 2007.
- B. Ma, Y. Li, and K. Su, “Characterization of ceria-yttria stabilized zirconia plasma-sprayed coatings,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 255, no. 16, pp. 7234–7237, 2009.
- Q. L. Ge, T. C. Lei, J. F. Mao, and Y. Zhou, “In situ transmission electron microscopy observations of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation of zirconia in Al2O3-ZrO2 (2 mol % Y2O3) composite,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 819–822, 1993.
- H. C. Chen, Z. Y. Liu, and Y. C. Chuang, “Degradation of plasma-sprayed alumina and zirconia coatings on stainless steel during thermal cycling and hot corrosion,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 1993.
- Y. Qian, L. Du, and W. Zhang, “Preparation of spherical Y2SiO5 powders for thermal-spray coating,” Particuology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 368–372, 2009.
- E. Garcia, J. Mesquita-Guimarães, P. Miranzo et al., “Mullite and mullite/ZrO2-7wt.%Y2O3 powders for thermal spraying of environmental barrier coatings,” Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 286–293, 2010.
- L. Marcinauskas, “Deposition of alumina coatings from nanopowders by plasma spraying,” Medziagotyra, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 47–51, 2010.
- X. Lin, Y. Zeng, S. W. Lee, and C. Ding, “Characterization of alumina-3 wt.% titania coating prepared by plasma spraying of nanostructured powders,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 627–634, 2004.
- M. S. Hussain and M. R. Daroonparvar, “Application of granulated nano Al2O3 powders in thermal barrier coatings at elevated temperatures,” in Proceedings of The International Thermal Spray Conference (ASM International), pp. 200–205, May 2012.
- S. V. Joshi and M. P. Srivastava, “On the thermal cycling life of plasma-sprayed yttria-stabilized zirconia coatings,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 215–224, 1993.
- G. M. Ingo and T. de Caro, “Chemical aspects of plasma spraying of zirconia-based thermal barrier coatings,” Acta Materialia, vol. 56, no. 18, pp. 5177–5187, 2008.
- J. R. Brandon and R. Taylor, “Phase stability of zirconia-based thermal barrier coatings part II. Zirconia-ceria alloys,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 91–101, 1991.
- M. Saremi, A. Keyvani, and M. H. Sohi, “Hot corrosion resistance and mechanical behavior of atmospheric plasma sprayed conventional and nanostructured zirconia coatings,” International Journal of Modern Physics, vol. 5, pp. 720–727, 2012.
- R. L. Jones, “Some aspects of the hot corrosion of thermal barrier coatings,” Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 1997.
- I. Gurrappa, “Thermal barrier coatings for hot corrosion resistance of CM 247 LC superalloy,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 1267–1269, 1998.
- R. L. Jones, Experiences in Seeking Stabilizers for Zirconia Having Hot Corrosion-Resistance and High Temperature Tetragonal (t') Stability, Naval Research Latloratory, Washington, DC, USA, 1996.
- M. H. Habibi, L. Wang, and S. M. Guo, “Evolution of hot corrosion resistance of YSZ, Gd2Zr2O7, and Gd2Zr2O7+YSZ composite thermal barrier coatings in Na 2SO 4+V 2O 5 at 1050°C,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1635–1642, 2012.
- C. Ramachandra, K. N. Lee, and S. N. Tewari, “Durability of TBCs with a surface environmental barrier layer under thermal cycling in air and in molten salt,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 172, no. 2-3, pp. 150–157, 2003.
- S. Y. Park, J. H. Kim, M. C. Kim, H. S. Song, and C. G. Park, “Microscopic observation of degradation behavior in yttria and ceria stabilized zirconia thermal barrier coatings under hot corrosion,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 190, no. 2-3, pp. 357–365, 2005.
- R. C. Weast, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, Ohio, Cleveland, USA, 58th edition, 1987.