About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 289641, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/289641
Research Article

Effect of Incorporating Cellulose Nanocrystals from Corncob on the Tensile, Thermal and Barrier Properties of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Nanocomposites

Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Campus Santa Mônica, Avenida João Naves de Ávila 2121, 38400-902 Uberlândia, MG, Brazil

Received 3 May 2013; Revised 11 July 2013; Accepted 23 July 2013

Academic Editor: Tong Wan

Copyright © 2013 Hudson Alves Silvério et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The effect of incorporating cellulose nanocrystals from corncob (CNC) on the tensile, thermal, and barrier properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) nanocomposites was evaluated. The CNC were prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis at 45°C for 60 minutes, using 15 mL of H2SO4 (9.17 M) for each gram of fiber. The CNC60 presented a needle-shaped morphology, high crystallinity (83.7%), good initial degradation temperature (236°C), average length () of  nm, diameter () of  nm, and high aspect ratio () of . PVA/CNC nanocomposite films with different filler loading levels (3, 6, and 9% by wt) were prepared by casting. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS), thermal stability (TS), light transmittance (Tr) and water vapor permeability () of the nanocomposites were measured. When compared to neat PVA film, the UTS of the nanocomposites improved significantly, by 140.2%, decreased up to 28.73%, and there were no significant changes in TS. The nanocomposites also showed excellent Tr in the visible region, maintaining substantially equivalent transparency. These improvements in the nanocomposites' properties suggest a close association between filler and matrix, besides indicating that the CNC were well dispersed and adherent to the polymer matrix.

1. Introduction

The growing interest in environmentally friendly materials has motivated academic and industrial research in the development and use of biopolymers for applications in which synthetic polymers or mineral fillers have been traditionally used. Toward this end, several biopolymers have been modified to attempt to be competitive with petroleum based polymers with respect to performance and cost. One way to improve the properties of biopolymers and greatly enhance their commercial potential is to incorporate nanosized reinforcement into the polymer [13].

In this context, the application of cellulose nanocrystals (CN) as a nanosized reinforcement in polymer matrixes has attracted considerable attention in this field, since it offers a unique combination of desirable physical properties and environmental benefits [4, 5]. CN based nanocomposites generally exhibit significant improvements in thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties compared to the neat polymer or conventional composites [6]. CN are needle-shaped cellulose particles with at least one dimension equal to or less than 100 nm and have a highly crystalline nature (almost defect-free crystallites) [7].

The main features that drive the development of CN as polymer reinforcement agents are their large specific surface area (estimated to be several hundreds of m2·g−1), their very high modulus of elasticity (approximately 150 GPa), their large aspect ratio, and their ability to act as a significant reinforcement at low filler loading levels. Other attractive advantages of CN are their low density (about 1.566 g·cm−3), nonabrasive nature, nontoxic character, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Additionally, CN come from renewable natural sources that are very abundant and therefore low in cost, so it is not necessary to synthesize them, and they allow the production of composite films with excellent visible light transmittance that can be easily modified chemically (their structure has a reactive surface of –OH side groups that facilitate grafting chemical species in order to achieve different surface properties) [3, 5, 7, 8].

CN have been isolated from different vegetable sources, such as cotton and wood pulp [9, 10], the byproducts from the agricultural industry, such as mango seed [11], sugarcane bagasse [12], rice husk [13] and sesame husk [14], and from animal sources, such as tunicates [15].

Whereas agricultural and agroindustrial residues constitute cellulosic sources available cheaply in large quantities, the production of CN utilizing those underutilized residues as feedstock provides a commercial application and adds value to those wastes. In addition, the reuse of these residues does not jeopardize food supplies, improves the rural economy, and allows a significant reduction both in the volume of waste accumulated in the environment and in the extraction of raw materials.

The corncob is the central part of the ear of maize in which the grains are embedded and is a waste generated after the grains are removed. For every 100 kg of ears of maize, about 18 kg are from corncob [16]. Brazil produced about 58 million tons of maize in the 2010/11 crop. Based on these data, it is estimated that 10.4 million tons of corncobs were generated during this period. Corncob is mainly used for producing animal feed and fertilizer. Therefore, corncob is an agroindustrial waste available in huge quantities in Brazil, which deserves to be properly used in other applications [3].

Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) is the largest synthetic water-soluble polymer produced in the world [17]. PVA is biodegradable under aerobic and anaerobic conditions [18]. PVA is widely used in the textile, adhesive, cosmetic, food, drug, paper, and packaging industries. The main functional uses of PVA include filtration, catalysis, membranes, optics, drug release, enzyme mobilization, and tissue engineering, among others [19]. PVA presents remarkable barrier properties against oils and fats, aromas and perfumes, and small molecules (nitrogen, oxygen, etc.). It is one of the few semicrystalline polymers soluble in water and has good interfacial characteristics and mechanical properties, due to being a hydroxylated polymer capable of forming both intra-and intermolecular hydrogen bonds [2022].

This biopolymer has excellent film-forming properties and causes no toxic effects in the human body for it is biocompatible. Films made of this material are transparent, have good chemical and thermal stability, and good mechanical strength, are biodegradable and do not represent a threat to the environment. However, the highly hydrophilic nature of these films (which renders PVA a poor barrier to water) critically limits wider application of this polymer and PVA-based composites. In addition, its thermal stability, despite being considered good (initial temperature of degradation ~200°C), may be improved [18, 2028]. Taking into account the limitations of films made of PVA, the effect of CN as nanosized fillers on the properties of PVA-based nanocomposites is of interest in the development of novel or improved applications for this polymer, for example, in food and biomedical packaging.

In the literature there are several studies that include, the production of nanocomposites materials with nanostructured cellulose dispersed in PVA matrix. It can be highlighted some examples of the studies using as loading, the nanofibers extracted from soybean [29], soybean pods [30], sulphite wood pulp [31], sugar beet [32], kraft pulp [33], microcrystalline cellulose [34], regenerated cellulose fiber and cellulose fiber pure [35]. In other the cellulose nanocrystals extracted from cotton linter [36], kenaf fibers [37], microcrystalline cellulose [38] works were employed as loading and commercial cotton [39].

The objective of the present research was to evaluate the effect of incorporating cellulose nanocrystals from corncob (CNC) on the tensile, thermal, and barrier properties of poly (vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites. In the present paper, the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), water vapor permeability (), light transmittance (Tr), and thermal stability (TS) of several PVA nanocomposites produced were measured at different filler loading levels.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The corncobs were kindly supplied by JC Rações e Insumos Siderurgicos Ltda. (Uberlândia, MG, Brazil). The other reagents employed in this study were sulfuric acid (95.0–98.0 wt%, Vetec, PA), sodium hydroxide (Vetec), potassium hydroxide (Vetec), sodium chlorite (NaClO2, technical grade, 80%, Sigma-Aldrich), glacial acetic acid (Synth), cellulose membrane (D9402, Sigma-Aldrich), phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5, 98.5% Sigma-Aldrich), and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) (MW = 89.000–98.000) powder (Sigma-Aldrich).

2.2. Preparation of Cellulose Nanocrystals

The CN were isolated from corncob and characterized according to previous literature; the following is a summary of the methodology employed [3].

2.2.1. Purification

The untreated corncob was ground into a fine powder and treated with an aqueous 2% (w/w) NaOH solution for 4 h at 100°C, then filtered and washed until neutrality with distilled water. Subsequently this material was bleached at 80°C for 6 h with a solution made up of equal parts (v : v) acetate buffer and aqueous sodium chlorite (1.7 wt%). The bleached fibers were filtered and washed until neutrality with distilled water. The fiber content throughout these chemical treatments was about 4–6% (w/w). These treatments were done in order to purify the cellulose by removing other constituents present in the fibers.

2.2.2. Extraction of Cellulose Nanocrystals

The resulting material from the purification process was used to extract CN. This material was ground into a fine powder. The hydrolysis was performed at 45°C for 60 minutes under vigorous stirring, using 15 mL of H2SO4 (9.17 M) for each gram of fibers. Following hydrolysis, the suspension was diluted 10-fold with cold water and centrifuged for 10 min at 7500 rpm. The precipitate was then dialyzed against water until neutral pH (~4 days) was reached. After the dialysis process, the material was ultrasonicated for 10 min and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C with a few drops of chloroform. According to previously published work, the CNC with an acid hydrolysis time of 60 minutes were called CNC60.

2.3. Preparation of CNC/PVA Nanocomposites

Aqueous 1% (w/v) PVA solutions were mixed with an aqueous suspension of CNC60 followed by ultrasonic treatment for 5 min in order to homogenize the distribution of CNC60 in the mixtures. The weight ratios of CNC60 to PVA were controlled at 3 : 97 (3%), 6 : 94 (6%), and 9 : 91 (9%), respectively. PVA/CNC60 nanocomposite films and neat PVA film (control sample), were fabricated by casting at 35°C for 24 h in an air-circulating oven. The final mass of all the films was 0.5 g. The PVA/CNC60 composites and the PVA film were stored in vacuum bags before analysis and testing. The thickness of the films produced ranged from 0.0436 to 0.0583 mm.

2.4. Characterizations and Measurements
2.4.1. Mechanical Properties of PVA/CNC Nanocomposites

The ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the nanocomposite films and neat PVA film were measured with the aid of a universal testing machine (MTS-810 material test system). Sample dimensions were ~30 μm thick, ~7.00 mm wide, and 30 mm in length. They were tested using a crosshead speed of 1 mm·min−1 with a load cell of 1 KN at 25°C. The device was previously calibrated and a total of five measurements were made for each sample to ensure reproducibility of the results.

2.4.2. Water Vapor Permeability ()

Water vapor permeability was measured by Payne’s cup technique using P2O5 as a drying agent. To perform the analysis, permeation to water vapor was set up in a system according to Morelli and Ruvolo Filho [40], in which one can analyze the ability of each sample to permeate through its loss of mass (which in this case is directly proportional to the loss of water flowing through the film).

The weight change was noted as a function of time until a constant flux of water was obtained. Through flow () was determined by the change in mass versus time corrected by the area of the exposed film:

Using Fick’s first law, one can thus determine the coefficient of permeability to water vapor (), knowing the pressure gradient of the water vapor (Δ) and the sample thickness () (2). Two replicates of each sample were placed in a controlled environmental chamber at °C and 0% relative humidity:

The procedure for determining in this work was carried out analogously to the work of Morelli and Ruvolo Filho [40].

2.4.3. Light Transmittance (Tr)

Light transmittance by the nanocomposite films and neat PVA film was measured in a Shimadzu UV-vis spectrometer (model UV-250 1PC) at 25°C and correlated based on the film thicknesses using the Lambert-Beer’s law. The experiments were carried out in the wavelength range of 200–800 nm with 0.5 nm spectral bandwidth. Three samples were used to characterize each material.

2.4.4. Thermal Gravimetric Analysis

Thermal stabilities (TS) of the CNC60 and the nanocomposite films were evaluated using a Shimadzu DTG-60H equipment. The analysis conditions were a nitrogen atmosphere with flow rate of 30 mL·min−1, heating rate of 10°C·min−1, temperature range of 25 to 600°C, sample mass between 5 and 7 mg, and aluminum pans.

3. Results and Discussion

In our previous work, the CNC60 were characterized according to their crystallinity index, morphology, and thermal stability. As reported, CNC60 presented a needle-shaped nature, high crystallinity (83.7%), good initial degradation temperature (236°C), average length () of  nm, diameter () of  nm, and high aspect ratio () of . The AFM image (Figure 1) supports this evidence for the development of CN on the nanometric scale [3].

289641.fig.001
Figure 1: AFM image of CNC60.
3.1. The Ultimate Tensile Strengths (UTS) and Water Vapor Permeability () of the Nanocomposites

The effect of the loading content on the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was evaluated using the CNC60 as a model filler in the PVA matrix. The of the PVA/CNC60 nanocomposites and neat PVA film are presented in Figure 2.

289641.fig.002
Figure 2: Ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and water vapor permeability () of CNC/PVA nanocomposites and neat PVA film.

The average UTS of the composites increased by 49.5, 95.6%, and 140.2% with 3%, 6%, and 9% CNC60 reinforced PVA, respectively. As expected, increasing the loading content produced an increase in the UTS of the nanocomposites.

Cellulose nanocrystals (CN) prepared from different resources, such as Kenaf fibers [37], cellulose microcrystals (CM) [38] and cotton linter [36] or cellulose nanofibers (CNF) prepared from flax, Kraft pulp, hemp, rutabaga [41] and microcrystalline cellulose [34], exhibited different reinforcements in the PVA matrix. The nanocomposites PVA/CNC60 prepared in this work showed higher tensile strength than PVA nanocomposites loaded with nanocrystals extracted from kenaf fiber (improvement of 46.2% with the addition of 9 wt% CN) [37]. In addition, the nanocomposites studied here were also more resistant to traction than the nanocomposites reported by Lee et al. [38], which reported 1 wt% CN from microcrystalline cellulose resulted in a significant increase in the tensile strength of films made using PVA as polymeric matrix (49.0% higher than pure PVA film), but when the load of CN was increased to 3% and 5% in the PVA matrix, the tensile strength gradually decreased [38]. In another interesting study, the authors were able to obtain 26% increase in TS when 12% wt of CN extracted from cotton linter were inserted into the PVA matrix [36]. The PVA/CNC60 nanocomposite films with loads of 6%, and 9% also had tensile strength well above those of PVA nanocomposites loaded with CN extracted from flax, hemp, or kraft pulp (10.1%, 47.8%, and 60.9% improvement in UTS, respectively, over adding 10 wt% of CN) [41]. The nanocomposites of this study also showed superior mechanical performance (tensile strength) than the best result of the work of Frone et al. [34], which obtained 90% increase in tensile strength with a load of 5% by weight of CN from microcrystalline cellulose dispersed in PVA matrix. However, even with 9% loading, the PVA/CNC60 film provided a reinforcement less than but comparable to that of a PVA nanocomposite loaded with CN from rutabaga (158.0% improvement in UTS with addition of 10 wt% of CN) [41].

These discrepancies in these results may be attributed to the different PVA employed in the composites preparations, as well as the experimental conditions employed in the preparation of them, which may influence the adhesion between the fillers and the polymer matrix, the uniform distribution of the fillers, the orientation of the fillers, and the degree of crystallinity of the matrix [35]. In addition these results also depend on the characteristics of filler, for example, aspect ratio, modulus of elasticity, specific surface area, type of interactions between themselves, and especially the possibility of forming a percolating network.

The CNC60 reinforced the PVA satisfactorily, given the large increases in UTS presented by the nanocomposites when compared to PVA film. The effect of improving the UTS of films developed in this study may be attributed to the phenomenon of mechanical percolation of cellulose nanocrystals and the formation of a continuous network of cellulose nanoparticles linked by hydrogen interactions, due to good dispersion of nanocrystals in the matrix, which would indicate a good interaction between the components of the nanocomposites.

The use of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from corncobs as a reinforcing agent in nanocomposites is an alternative which can expand the commercial applications of PVA films, for example, in the field of food packaging.

The analysis was conducted using the weighing method. Figure 3 graphically represents the change in mass lost (Δ) over time in samples of film made of neat PVA or the PVA/3%CNC60, PVA/6%CNC60, and PVA/9%CNC60 nanocomposites.

289641.fig.003
Figure 3: Δ graphical representation versus time for the neat PVA film and PVA/CNC60 nanocomposites with 3%, 6%, and 9% filler.

In Table 1 values for thickness, area , variation in mass lost with time , stream and for the films used at a constant temperature of °C and a pressure of vaporization (Δ) of 23.76 mmHg are shown.

tab1
Table 1: Values for thickness, area (), , stream () and water vapor permeability () for the films, tested in duplicate.

The values (mean ± standard deviation) of nanocomposites with different contents of CNC60 are shown graphically in Figure 2.

The growth and metabolism of microorganisms require the presence of water in available form. The most commonly employed measure to express the availability of water in food is water activity (aw). To reduce aw in food, one can increase the concentration of solutes in the aqueous phase of food, either by removing water or by adding solutes; one example is dehydration promoting the removal of water, as with curing or salting and syruping or sugaring, which means adding salt sugar as a solute, thus lowering the aw and preserving the food. A small reduction in aw is often sufficient to have effects in preserving a food; if this reduction is associated with other factors such as the addition of nitrite in some cured meats, or smoking and the use of packaging that does not allow or hinders the entry of water or moisture [42].

Given the necessity of reducing the aw in food packaged in polymeric films, it is very important to evaluate water transport through films produced for this type of application.

In Figure 2, the results obtained with the nanocomposites show a slight reduction in compared to the neat PVA film. It can be observed that the water permeability was progressively reduced with increasing content of CNC60; that a phyis, the water permeability of the nanocomposites becomes increasingly poorer with increasing charge on the polymeric matrix. According to Paralikar and his research group, the CN provide a physical barrier, creating a tortuous path for moisture that permeates the membrane [39]. The nanocomposite films with 3%, 6%, and 9% filler showed increasing improvement in reducing , by 6.92%, 20.02% and 28.81%, respectively. Even with the increased CNC60 content, the continued to reduce; this is at least one indication that the CNC60 were well dispersed and adherent in the polymeric PVA matrix [43].

The reduction of in the films of nanocomposite PVA/CNC60 can be explained by the physical barrier provided by CNC60 for the passage of water; that is, water must walk along the surface of CN, failing to pass therethrough. This is due to the high crystallinity and the strong interactions between the hydroxyls of cellulose chains of nanocrystals.

Garcia-S and colleagues produced biocomposite films from Carrageenan (a biopolymer extracted from red seaweed, M. stellatus) loaded with levels of 1%, 3%, and 5% by mass of CN extracted from highly purified α-cellulose microfibers (CNW) supplied by the company CreaFill Fibers Corp. (USA), which exhibited reductions in water permeability of 68%, 71%, and 58%, respectively, in comparison with the neat Carrageenan film. In summary, the best water barrier performance was found for the film with 3% CNW by mass. The author suggested that the highest concentration of CNW led to agglomerations of nanoparticles that no longer dispersed uniformly in the matrix, which was detrimental in terms of improving the barrier [43].

Paralikar and his collaborators have produced PVA membranes (Sigma-Aldrich Inc (St. Louis MO, USA)) loaded with 10%, 15%, and 20% by weight CN extracted from commercial cotton (CNXLs) supplied by the Whatman Company (Clifton, NJ, USA), which reduced water flow by approximately 65%, 62%, and 54%, respectively, in comparison with neat PVA membrane. The PVA/CNXLs membranes were thermally treated in a convection oven to optimize their crosslinking density, reducing the number of hydroxyls groups on the nanocomposite, and thus its hydrophilicity. The membranes with 10% CNXLs had a lower than those with 15 to 20% CNXLs, and this was contradictory to what was expected. However, for the authors, the agglomeration of CNXLs observed at the 20% level may provide channels or areas wherein the membrane allows a higher ; it is likely that the same phenomenon occurred in the membrane with a 15% load but at a lower intensity [39].

The CNC60 provided a reduction in through the membrane. The use of CNC as a reinforcing agent is an alternative that can expand the commercial applications of PVA films in the field of food packaging, because it maximizes the use of PVA films in environments that contain some moisture and also hinders the growth of bacteria.

3.2. Transparency and Optical Transmittance (Tr) of Nanocomposite Films

Figure 4 shows the physical aspect of the neat PVA film and of the PVA nanocomposite films produced with 9% by mass CNC60. As can be noted, macroscopically, the incorporation of CNC60 in PVA did not affect the transparency or homogeneity of the films; however, it could not be determined whether there was a uniform dispersion of the reinforcing material, since no specific technique was performed to determine this.

fig4
Figure 4: Photos of the films produced. (a) Neat PVA film; (b) nanocomposite film of PVA with 9% (by weight) CNC60.

In contrast, the pattern and the lyrics in the background can clearly be seen through the films, showing that they were sufficiently transparent.

Transparency is a useful criterion for the miscibility of the cellulose nanocrystals and the polymeric matrix [44]. The results of electronic spectroscopy in the ultraviolet-visible (UV-VIS) region (200 to 800 nm) of the neat PVA film and PVA/CNC60 nanocomposites with 3%, 6%, and 9% filler mass are shown in Figure 5. The thickness of the films produced ranged from 0.045 to 0.050 mm.

289641.fig.005
Figure 5: Optical transmittance (Tr) versus wavelength (200–800 nm) of PVA/CNC60 nanocomposite films with 3%, 6%, and 9% filler.

As can be seen in Figure 5, all films exhibited optical transmittances (Tr) very close and excellent in the spectrum of visible light (390–750 nm) even when the content of CNC60 was increased, indicating good miscibility and compatibility of the nanocomposites [8, 45]. It is known that beyond the refractive index, inherent to each material, the porosity of the film surface also causes light scattering; the excellent Tr of the films is at least one indication that they were minimally porous [8, 45].

The nanometric characteristics of CNC60, with their ultrathin diameter (4.15 nm) and average length of 210.8 nm, combined with a surface area of high hydrophilicity, substantially improved the intermolecular interactions through hydrogen bonding at interfaces of the CNC60, and PVA matrix; thus, there may have been good dispersal and compatibility of the nanoparticles in the polymeric matrix that, consequently, this implies, resulted in the great transparency of the nanocomposites [8, 45].

Nanocomposite PVA/CNC60 had Tr values in the visible region greater than those shown by other nanocomposites, such as nanocrystals of microcrystalline cellulose (NCCMC) embedded in a matrix of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with 2% load mass, which showed a Tr around 60% at 600 nm [46]; the Tr values of the PVA/CNC60 films were also higher than those of nanocomposites with 8.4% CN from carpet dispersed in PVA, which presented Tr values less than 90% at 600 nm [45]; they were also superior to nanocomposites of cellulose acetate butyrate with 10% NCCMC, which displayed Tr values of around 50 and 65% at wavelengths of 600 and 800 nm, respectively [47]. The Tr values of the nanocomposites of this study at 800 nm were not higher, but comparable to those of nanocomposites with 10% NCCMC embedded in a matrix of microcrystalline regenerated cellulose, which showed Tr of 99.89% at the same wavelength [44].

3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) of Nanocomposites

Thermogravimetric analyses were made for the neat PVA film and the PVA nanocomposite films produced with 9% by mass CNC60. The thermograms obtained are shown in Figure 6. TG curves of all the films reveal three regions of mass loss. The first region of mass loss is in the temperature range 30–150°C. This small loss is due to evaporation of adsorbed water (about 7%). The second step at about 220–390°C is due to structural degradation of the PVA, with a total mass loss of about 65%. The third stage of weight loss occurred at about 400°C, possibly due to cleavage of the PVA skeleton or decomposing carbonaceous matter, where the weight loss was above 73% and gradually increased to approximately 98% at 590°C [38]. The carbonized residues from the films were 1 to 2% by weight.

289641.fig.006
Figure 6: TG curves for films of neat PVA, PVA/3%CNC60, PVA/6%CNC60 and PVA/9%CNC60.

Knowing that in general the decomposition of PVA starts around 200°C and the thermoplastic processing temperatures also revolve around 200°C and sometimes even exceed this value, it is very important that the CN added to the PVA matrix do not adversely affect the thermal stability of the same order not to hinder the processing of the nanocomposites in an industrial process for example, [26, 27, 48].

The initial temperatures of degradation of pure PVA film and nanocomposites produced stood at about 225°C. Taking into account the initial temperature degradation, the addition of CNC60 in PVA does not improve the TS of the polymeric matrix; however the TS of nanocomposites has not changed significantly relative to the TS of PVA. In a similar work, but using cellulose nanofibers obtained from microcrystalline cellulose, a slight increase in the initial temperatures of degradation was obtained for PVA nanocomposites, in comparison to the neat PVA, showing an increase of the TS caused by the addition of the filler [34].

The results of thermal stability (TS) obtained in this work are very important because that way any adjustment or modification of the processing of nanocomposites produced by further processing of PVA is not necessary. Thus the CNC60 constitute an interesting model of filler to load PVA without changing their TS.

4. Conclusions

The CNC60 provided a significant improvement in the TS of the nanocomposites of 140.2% when only 9% of filler had been incorporated.

The reducing the water permeability () of up to 28.73% when loading 9% was used, in the films produced is at least an indication that the CNC60 were well dispersed and adherent on the polymeric PVA matrix. The reduction in permeability to water flow through nanocomposite films provided by corncob cellulose nanocrystals is a very important factor, because these nanofillers reinforce the PVA films and enhance their use in environments containing some moisture while still reducing water activity, which prevents or at least hampers the growth of bacteria. These factors make such films reasonable alternatives that can expand the applications of commercial PVA films in the field of food packaging.

The effect of improving the mechanical and barrier properties of films developed in this study suggest that the formation of a CN network occurs when the processing allows the formation of strong hydrogen bonds between the cellulose nanoparticles.

The nanocomposites produced were quite transparent, exhibiting optical transmittance (Tr) (400–800 nm) comparable to the pure PVA film.

The addition of CNC60 in the polymeric matrix of PVA kept the thermal stability of the nanocomposites virtually unchanged in relation to the thermal stability of PVA.

It can be concluded from these results that the CN obtained from corncobs have a great potential for use as reinforcing agents for producing nanocomposites. In this work, high-performance bionanocomposites for diverse applications were produced by adding cellulose nanocrystals from corncobs to poly(vinyl alcohol), compared to neat PVA films.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank CAPES/PROAP, CNPq, and FAPEMIG for financial support.

References

  1. W. P. Flauzino Neto, H. A. Silvério, J. G. Vieira et al., “Preparation and characterization of nanocomposites of carboxymethyl cellulose reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals,” Macromolecular Symposia, vol. 319, pp. 93–98, 2012.
  2. A. K. Mohanty, L. T. Drzal, and M. Misra, “Nano reinforcements of bio-based polymers—The Hope And The Reality,” Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 88, pp. 60–61, 2003.
  3. H. A. Silvério, W. P. Flauzino Neto, N. O. Dantas, and D. Pasquini, “Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from corncob for application as reinforcing agent in nanocomposites,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 44, pp. 427–436, 2013.
  4. Y. Habibi, L. A. Lucia, and O. J. Rojas, “Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 3479–3500, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. L. Peng, N. Dhar, H. L. Liu, and K. C. Tam, “Chemistry and applications of nanocrystalline cellulose and its derivatives: a nanotechnology perspective,” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1191–1206, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. M. C. Azeredo, L. H. C. Mattoso, D. Wood, T. G. Williams, R. J. Avena-Bustillos, and T. H. McHugh, “Nanocomposite edible films from mango puree reinforced with cellulose nanofibers,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. N31–N35, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. P. Flauzino Neto, H. A. Silvério, N. O. Dantas, and D. Pasquini, “Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from agro-industrial residue—soy hulls,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 42, pp. 480–488, 2013.
  8. R. J. Moon, A. Martini, J. Nairn, J. Simonsen, and J. Youngblood, “Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 3941–3994, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Beck-Candanedo, M. Roman, and D. G. Gray, “Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1048–1054, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. de Morais Teixeira, A. C. Corrêa, A. Manzoli, F. de Lima Leite, C. de Ribeiro Oliveira, and L. H. C. Mattoso, “Cellulose nanofibers from white and naturally colored cotton fibers,” Cellulose, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 595–606, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. A. Henrique, H. A. Silvério, W. P. Flauzino Neto, and D. Pasquini, “Valorization of an agro-industrial waste, mango seed, by extraction and characterization of its cellulose nanocrystals,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 121, pp. 202–209, 2013.
  12. E. D. M. Teixeira, T. J. Bondancia, K. B. R. Teodoro, A. C. Corrêa, J. M. Marconcini, and L. H. C. Mattoso, “Sugarcane bagasse whiskers: extraction and characterizations,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 63–66, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. M. L. Rosa, N. Rehman, M. I. G. De Miranda, S. M. B. Nachtigall, and C. I. D. Bica, “Chlorine-free extraction of cellulose from rice husk and whisker isolation,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 1131–1138, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. S. Purkait, D. Ray, S. Sengupta, T. Kar, A. Mohanty, and M. Misra, “Isolation of cellulose nanoparticles from sesame husk,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 871–876, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. O. van der Berg, J. R. Capadona, and C. Weder, “Preparation of homogeneous dispersions of tunicate cellulose whiskers in organic solvents,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1353–1357, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. B. Ziglio, J. R. M. V. Bezerra, I. G. Branco, R. Bastos, and M. Rigo, “Elaboração de pães com adição de farinha de sabugo de milho,” Revista Ciências Exatas E Naturais, vol. 9, pp. 115–128, 2007.
  17. B. Ramaraj, “Crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) and starch composite films. II. Physicomechanical, thermal properties and swelling studies,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 909–916, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Matsumura, N. Tomizawa, A. Toki, K. Nishikawa, and K. Toshima, “Novel Poly(vinyl alcohol)—degrading enzime and the degradation mechanism,” Macromolecules, vol. 32, pp. 7753–7761, 1999.
  19. M. S. Peresin, Y. Habibi, A. Vesterinen, O. J. Rojas, J. J. Pawlak, and J. V. Seppälä, “Effect of moisture on electrospun nanofiber composites of poly(vinyl alcohol) and cellulose nanocrystals,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 2471–2477, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. C. Isenberg and J. Y. Wong, “Building structure into engineered tissues,” Materials Today, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 54–60, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. I. B. Aranha and E. F. Lucas, “Poli (Álcool Vinílico) modificado com cadeias hidrocarbônicas: avaliação do balanço Hidrófilo/Lipófilo,” Polímeros, vol. 11, pp. 174–181, 2001.
  22. T. Okaya, A. Suzuki, and K. Kikuchi, “Importance of grafting in the emulsion polymerization of MMA using PVA as a protective colloid. Effect of initiators,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 153, no. 1–3, pp. 123–125, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. A. Finch, Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)—Developments, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1992.
  24. C. M. Hassan and N. A. Peppas, “Structure and applications of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels produced by conventional crosslinking or by freezing/thawing methods,” Advances in Polymer Science, vol. 153, pp. 37–65, 2000. View at Scopus
  25. M. Kobayashi, Y. Chang, and M. Oka, “A two year in vivo study of polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel (PVA-H) artificial meniscus,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 3243–3248, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. W. Gilman, D. L. Vanderhart, and T. Kashiwagi, Thermal Decomposition Chemistry of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol), chapter 11, American Chemical Society, 1995.
  27. K. Robert, K. Tubs, and T. Wu, “Thermal properties of polyvinyl alcohol,” in Polyninyl Alcohol—Properties and Applications, C. A. Finch, Ed., pp. 167–181, John Wliley & Sons, London, UK, 1st edition, 1973.
  28. D. Ragahavan, “Characterization of biodegradable plastics,” Polymer Plastics Technology Engineering, vol. 34, pp. 41–63, 1995.
  29. B. Wang and M. Sain, “Dispersion of soybean stock-based nanofiber in a plastic matrix,” Polymer International, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 538–546, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. Wang and M. Sain, “Isolation of nanofibers from soybean source and their reinforcing capability on synthetic polymers,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 11-12, pp. 2521–2527, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Zimmermann, E. Pöhler, and T. Geiger, “Cellulose fibrils for polymer reinforcement,” Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 754–761, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Leitner, B. Hinterstoisser, M. Wastyn, J. Keckes, and W. Gindl, “Sugar beet cellulose nanofibril-reinforced composites,” Cellulose, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 419–425, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Lu, T. Wang, and L. T. Drzal, “Preparation and properties of microfibrillated cellulose polyvinyl alcohol composite materials,” Composites A, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 738–746, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. N. Frone, D. M. Panaitescu, D. D. Spataru, C. Radovici, R. Trusca, and R. Somoghi, “Preparation and characterization of PVA composites with cellulose nanofibers obtained by ultrasonication,” BioResources, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 487–512, 2011. View at Scopus
  35. Q. Cheng, S. Wang, and T. G. Rials, “Poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose fibrils isolated by high intensity ultrasonication,” Composites A, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 218–224, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Roohani, Y. Habibi, N. M. Belgacem, G. Ebrahim, A. N. Karimi, and A. Dufresne, “Cellulose whiskers reinforced polyvinyl alcohol copolymers nanocomposites,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2489–2498, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Shi, S. Q. Shi, H. M. Barnes, and C. U. Pittman, “A chemical process for preparing cellulosic fibers hierarchically from kenaf bast fibers,” BioResources, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 879–890, 2011. View at Scopus
  38. S. Lee, D. J. Mohan, I. Kang, G. Doh, S. Lee, and S. O. Han, “Nanocellulose reinforced PVA composite films: effects of acid treatment and filler loading,” Fibers and Polymers, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 77–82, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. A. Paralikar, J. Simonsen, and J. Lombardi, “Poly(vinyl alcohol)/cellulose nanocrystal barrier membranes,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 320, no. 1-2, pp. 248–258, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. C. Morelli and A. Ruvolo Filho, “Nanocompósitos de polipropileno e argila organofílica: difração de raio X, espectroscopia de absorção na região do infravermelho e permeação ao vapor d’água,” Polímeros, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 121–125, 2010.
  41. A. Bhatnagar and M. Sain, “Processing of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced composites,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1259–1268, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. http://lucitojal.blogspot.com.br/2010/04/atividade-da-agua-em-alimentos.html, 2013.
  43. M. D. Sánchez-García, L. Hilliou, and J. M. Lagarón, “Morphology and water barrier properties of nanobiocomposites of κ/l-hybrid carrageenan and cellulose nanowhiskers,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 24, pp. 12847–12857, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H. Ma, B. Zhou, H. Li, Y. Li, and S. Ou, “Green composite films composed of nanocrystalline cellulose and a cellulose matrix regenerated from functionalized ionic liquid solution,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 383–389, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. Tang and H. Liu, “Cellulose nanofiber reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) composite film with high visible light transmittance,” Composites A, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1638–1643, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. H. Liu, D. Liu, F. Yao, and Q. Wu, “Fabrication and properties of transparent polymethylmethacrylate/cellulose nanocrystals composites,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 14, pp. 5685–5692, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. E. Ayuk, A. P. Mathew, and K. Oksman, “The effect of plasticizer and cellulose nanowhisker content on the dispersion and properties of cellulose acetate butyrate nanocomposites,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 2723–2730, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Roman and W. T. Winter, “Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1671–1677, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus