About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 610642, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/610642
Research Article

Preparation of Mg2FeH6 Nanoparticles for Hydrogen Storage Properties

1Department of Physics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
2COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
3National Centre for Physics, Shahdara Valley Road, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

Received 23 May 2013; Revised 6 August 2013; Accepted 19 August 2013

Academic Editor: Alan K. T. Lau

Copyright © 2013 N. A. Niaz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Magnesium (Mg) and iron (Fe) nanoparticles are prepared by thermal decomposition of bipyridyl complexes of metals. These prepared Mg-Fe (2 : 1) nanoparticles are hydrogenated under 4 MPa hydrogen pressure and 673 K for 48 hours to achieve Mg2FeH6. Their structural analysis was assessed by applying manifold techniques. The hydrogen storage properties of prepared compound were measured by Sieverts type apparatus. The desorption kinetics were measured by high pressure thermal desorption spectrometer (HP-TDS). More than 5 wt% hydrogen released was obtained by the Mg2FeH6 within 5 min, and during rehydrogenation very effective hydrogen absorption rate was observed by the compound.

1. Introduction

The demand for an efficient and clean alternative fuel has increased in the recent years due to energy crisis and growing environmental concerns [1]. The use of hydrogen as an alternate fuel is a forward step to give up noninvasive and nontoxic emission, which is spoiling our surroundings [2]. The increasing relevance of hydrogen economy has generated interest in finding a safe way to transport hydrogen. Magnesium (Mg) is considered as attractive material for hydrogen storage economy due to light weight, low cost, and high storage capacity (7.6 wt%) [3, 4]. But slow kinetics and high temperature limit its practical use. Many efforts have been made to improve its absorption rate by reducing size or by adding transition metals [5, 6], creating defects by ball milling [710], synthesizing composite of metal hydrides [11, 12], and adding catalyst [1318]. Mg-based 3d transition metal hydrides have attracted much interest for the future hydrogen economy, due to their great abundance, high reversible storage capacity, and better kinetics [1921]. Mg2FeH6 is considered as attractive/gorgeous materials in particular due to its high gravimetric capacity 5.4 wt% and superior volumetric density 150 kg H2 m−3. However, Mg and Fe do not form stable binary compound; therefore synthesis of Mg2FeH6 is very difficult [22, 23].

First report for the preparation of Mg2FeH6 compound was published by Didishein et al. [24], by sintering process of Mg and Fe powder under high hydrogen pressure. By applying high hydrogen pressure (12 MPa), elevated temperature (793 K) and after several days, the yield of complex hydride was only 50 wt. (%). To improve the yield (%), a processing rout that is, mechanical alloying of precursory materials before sintering was employed [25]. Another approach for the synthesis of Mg2FeH6 compound was also performed by reactive milling (RM) under high hydrogen pressure [26]. This mechanically activated method can reduce the particle size to nanolevel and enhance the hydrogen sorption kinetics of the hydrides. However, the obtained compound still contained unreacted MgH2 and Fe. Alternatively, Raman et al. [23] milled the 2Mg + Fe mixture under 1 MPa hydrogen pressure. Moreover, the compounds often oxidized and got polluted by sintering, mechanical alloying, and reactive milling methods.

Progress regarding the yield has been made by using optimized sintering or RMA conditions, and more recently, by hydriding combustion synthesis [27] or sintering of metal nanoparticles produced by a hydrogen plasma metal reaction [28]. However, one drawback of the processing methods (with yields over 90%) is the long processing time involved, which is usually 10 h. Additionally, the Fe is usually retained in the synthesized material; for this reason, a purification process is necessary.

In this work, Mg and Fe pure nanoparticles are prepared by the thermal decomposition of bipyridyl complex of Mg and Fe. This is an alternate approach for the preparation of pure Mg and Fe nanoparticles. (2 : 1) Mg-Fe nanoparticles were transferred into reactor to form Mg2FeH6 under 4 MPa hydrogen pressure. Hydrogen storage behavior of the Mg2FeH6 compound having yield more than 90% was also investigated.

2. Experimental

The reagents and chemicals used are magnesium chloride (Sigma Aldrich), iron chloride (Sigma Aldrich), 2,2′ bipyridine (Fluka), 1-propanol, and diethyl ether. Scheme 1 is give brief illustration for the preparation of pure metal nanoparticles.

610642.sch.001
Scheme 1
2.1. Preparation of [Mg(Bipy)3]Cl2

2.56 gm (15 mml) solution of 2,2′ bipyridine and 4.75 g (50 mml) solution of magnesium chloride were prepared in 1-propanol. Both solutions were mixed through dropping funnel in a conical flask with constant stirring at a temperature of 323–333 K. Bipyridyl complex of magnesium did not precipitate by adding the bipyridine solution to the magnesium chloride solution, but the color of the mixture changed from transparent to orange. The solution was concentrated to two-third of the original through rotary evaporator and then kept for crystallization. Crystallization occurred very slowly and took six days for completion. The crystals of the bipyridyl complex were separated through filtration, washed with diethyl ether, and dried under IR lamp.

Melting point, IR, NMR, and TGA results of the compound are given below.

442 K, IR (KBr, cm−1): (C–Harom) 3050, 2927; (C–Narom) 1600; (C–Carom) 1501, 1453, 900–600; (Mg–N) 415. HNMR (DMSO, ppm): 8.687 (dd, 2H, bipyH2,2′); 8.384 (dd, 2H, bipyH5,5′); 7.95 (ddd, 2H, bipyH4,4′); 7.458 (ddd, 2H, bipyH3,3′). TGA: 460–580 K (80.32% weight loss), 606–722 K (18.22% residual mass).

2.2. Preparation of Fe[(Bipy)2]Cl2

2.97 g (15 mmol) tetrahydrated ferrous chloride (FeCl2-4H2O) and 7.05 g (45 mmol) 2,2′-bipyridine dissolved in solvent (2-propanal) separately. Both solutions were mixed with HPLC pump in flask with constant stirring at room temperature, keeping flow rate very slow (0.02 ml/sec) to get the homogenous mixture. Yellow precipitates were abstained, which were washed with tetrahydroformide to remove the impurities. The complex was crystallized from methanol solution in open air.

Melting point, IR, HNMR, and TGA results of the compound are given below.

432 K, IR (KBr, cm−1): (C–Harom) 3059, 2905; (C–Narom) 1593; (C–Carom) 1502, 1442, 900–600; (Fe–N) 413. 1HNMR (DMSO, ppm): 7.798 (s, 6H, bipy); 7.301 (s, 6H, bipy); 8.441 (s, 6H, bipy) 8.224 (s, 6H, bipy)TGA: 469–510 Kn (28.12% weight loss) 606–718 K, (38.41% weight loss), residual mass 25.13%.

Keeping in view all these observations, following pathway has been proposed for thermal degradation of to metal. Bipyridine was removed from the metal complex in two or three steps. This shows coordination on metal centre paving the way for H-elimination exclusion form pyridine ring followed by the reduction, elimination, and finally formation of metal nanoparticles.

2.3. Preparation of Mg-Fe Hydride Nanoparticles

1.5 gm of as-prepared pure (2Mg : Fe) nanoparticles was minced in gloves box to get the homogeneous mixture. This mixture was then transferred into sample tube of the chamber. First the chamber was flushed with argon to remove the oxygen contents and evacuated up to 10-3 Pa. In the second step the chamber was heated at 673 K with the heating rate of 5 K/min under 4 MPa hydrogen pressure. After 24–26 hours Mg was converted into MgH2, but no reaction with Fe nanoparticles occurred. After prolonging hydrogenation for 48–50 hours MgH2 reacted with Fe and converted into Mg2FeH6. The structural properties of the compound were analyzed by PANanlytical X’Pert Pro powder X-rays diffractometer (XRD). The details of apparatus are given in our previous report [18].

Morphology and particle size of compound were determined by Amray-1910FE field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). Thermal desorption spectra were measured by Setaram Labsys apparatus under an argon flow in an Al2O3 crucible in the range of 300–673 K at heating rates 2, 5, 10, and 15 K/min. Additionally, hydrogen absorption and desorption behavior was studied by using Sieverts type apparatus. The results show that very promising hydrogen storage behavior was observed by the Mg2FeH6 nanoparticles.

3. Results and Discussions

XRD patterns of the Mg-Fe compound are shown in Figure 1. The pattern in Figure 1(a) belongs to pure Mg (PDF-04-0770) and pure Fe (PDF-34-0529) nanoparticles. Figure 1(b) shows the mixed pattern of MgH2 (PDF-12-0697) and Fe after 24-hour hydrogenation. Figure 1(c) confirms the pure phase of Mg-Fe hydride (PDF-38-0843) where Figure 1(d) represents again the pure elemental phase of Mg and Fe nanoparticles after dehydrogenation.

610642.fig.001
Figure 1: XRD patterns of Mg-Fe compound; (a) mixture of Mg and Fe, (b) after 24-hour hydrogenation, (c) after 48-hour hydrogenation, and (d) after dehydrogenation under initial 200 Pa hydrogen pressure.

The XRD results also show that, after hydrogenation sharpness of the Mg-Fe hydride peaks increased, with the insertion of hydrogen atom, the surface lattice volume of the compound is increased. This expansion and contraction causes cracks in the particles, resulting in the decrease of particle size [33].

Figure 2 shows the morphology and particle size of Mg-Fe compound after hydrogen absorption and desorption. Figure 2(a) shows the mixed phase of Mg and Fe nanoparticles. It also shows that particles are homogenously dispersed, but the mixture has different particle sizes. The larger particles are surrounded by the smaller particles. Broadness of the peak of Fe from XRD pattern illustrates that smaller particles are of iron, where larger particles belong to magnesium.

fig2
Figure 2: SEM images of Mg-Fe system: (a) mixture of Mg and Fe nanoparticles, (b) after 24 hr hydrogenation, (c) after 48 hr hydrogenation, and (d) after dehydrogenation.

Figure 2(b) again shows the mixed phase of MgH2 and Fe after 24-hour hydrogenation under 4 MPa pressure at 673 K. SEM results also show some aggregation effect due to higher temperature. After 48 hours of hydrogenation, the compound completely converted into Mg-Fe hydrides as conformed from Figure 1(c). Figure 2(c) shows that the compound is elongated. This elongation might be due to the distortion of lattice after the insertion of hydrogen atom [34].

Figure 2(d) shows the SEM micrograph of regenerated Mg and Fe nanoparticles after dehydrogenation under 200 Pa hydrogen atmosphere. Significant decrease in particle size was observed after dehydrogenation, due to the elimination of hydrogen from the compound. Hydrogen desorption results are illustrated in Figure 3 at different temperatures under initial 200 Pa hydrogen pressure, which indicates that up to 5 wt% hydrogen desorption occurs within 3–5 min. Results also show that the rate of desorption is effectively increased by increasing the temperature. At 573 K, more than 5 wt% hydrogen was released by the system and 4.4 wt% and 3.5 wt% hydrogen desorption occurred within 5–10 min at temperatures of 523 and 473 K, respectively.

610642.fig.003
Figure 3: Hydrogen desorption properties of Mg2FeH6 nanoparticles at different temperatures under initial 200 Pa hydrogen pressure.

More than 5 wt% release of hydrogen also justifies the purity of Mg2FeH6 nanoparticles.

The hydrogen absorption of 2Mg : Fe compound at different temperatures, under 4 MPa hydrogen, is presented in Figure 4. Within 30–45 sec, 4.5% hydrogen was absorbed by the system at 573 K. This high absorption rate is due to the catalytic effect of Fe nanoparticles. The absorption rate becomes slow due to the reaction of MgH2 with H2 and Fe, resulting in the formation of Mg2FeH6. Very promising hydrogen absorption 3.7 wt% and 4 wt% was also observed by the compound at 473 K and 523 K, respectively. This high absorption rate is also due to the decrease in particle size after dehydrogenation and optimal morphology, which provide the shorter diffusion distance for hydrogen atoms during the solid-solid and gas-solid reactions compared with microsize compound to diffuse into the surface lattice [35].

610642.fig.004
Figure 4: Hydrogen absorption properties of Mg-Fe hydride nanoparticles at different temperatures.

Figure 5 represents the thermal desorption spectrum of Mg2FeH6 compound with the different heating rates of 2 K/min, 5 K/min, 10 K/min, and 15 K/min. Desorption peaks at 648 K, 630 K, 625 K, and 610 K corresponds to heating rates of 15 K/min, 10 K/min, 5 K/min, and 2 K/min. The desorption activation energy of the compound can be estimated by using Kissinger equation [36]: where is the peak desorption temperature, is the heating rate, is activation energy, and is the gas constant.

fig5
Figure 5: (a) Thermal desorption spectrum of Mg-Fe hydride nanoparticles with different heating rates. (b) Represents the Kissinger plot for activation energy.

The activation energy of pure Mg-Fe hydrides (Mg2FeH6) nanoparticles compound calculated from Kissinger plot as shown in the inset of Figure 5 is  kJ/mol. These results are closely matched to the  kJ/mol and  kJ/mol demonstrated by Gennari et al. and Zhang et al. [8, 29], respectively, whereas their synthesis procedure is quite different as compared to this report. In this process, some contents of Fe remained unreacted, which played as catalyst, due to the lower activation energy which they have reported.

The pressure-composition-temperature (P-C-T) curves shown in Figure 6 were obtained during the first hydrogen desorption/absorption cycle without any activation process at 473, 523, and 573 K. Only one plateau is observed during dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation of compound. Hydrogen desorption contents are 3.8 wt% at 473 K, 4.3 wt% at 523 K, and 4.95 wt% at 573 K. Whereas during rehydrogenation 4.7 wt% at 573 K, 4.13 wt% at 523 K, and 3.4 wt% at 473 K were absorbed by the compound. Desorption and absorption plateau pressure of hydrogen is given in Table 1. The hydrogen storage capacity and the equilibrium pressure in both absorption and desorption processes decrease as the temperature falls. This fact is due to the metal atom diffusion mechanism involved in absorption process, which is enhanced by rise in temperature [22]. Both P-C-T curves of absorption and desorption can reach more than 4 wt% hydrogen content, which suggests the excellent reversibility.

tab1
Table 1: Pressure-composition-isotherm (PCI) characteristics of Mg-Fe hydride nanoparticles at different temperatures.
fig6
Figure 6: (a) Pressure-composition-temperature curves of hydrogen desorption and absorption of the samples at 473, 523, and 573 K, (b) van’t Hoff plot of Mg2FeH6 compound constructed from desorption isotherms at 473, 523, and 573 K.

The thermodynamic information for Mg2FeH6 hydriding/dehydriding was determined by plotting the logarithmic dissociation pressures against the reciprocal temperature (van’t Hoff plot) as shown in Figure 6. The entropy () and enthalpy () values per mole of hydrogen of Mg2FeH6 compound were calculated by the data given in Table 1. Comparison of thermodynamic properties of this work with previous reports is given in Table 2.

tab2
Table 2: Entropy and enthalpy values for formation and decomposition of Mg2FeH6 compound calculated from van’t Hoff plot.

4. Conclusions

In this work, pure Mg2FeH6 with the yield more than 90% was successfully prepared after the hydrogenation of (2 : 1) Mg-Fe nanoparticles under 4 MPa hydrogen pressure. The synthesized compound has grain size about 60–70 nm. More than 5 wt% hydrogen released was observed within 5 min under 200 Pa hydrogen pressure at 573 K.

Results show that hydrogen absorption was achieved in two parts. In first step, within 1 min more than 4 wt% hydrogen absorption is attributed to the catalytic effect of Fe nanoparticles. In second step absorption rate is slow due to reaction of Fe with MgH2 to form Mg2FeH6. This effective dehydrogenation/hydrogenation rate is also due to effective decrease in activation energy which was calculated from Kissinger plot. High absorption and desorption behavior of Mg2FeH6 compound at nanoscale is a forward step for the hydrogen storage materials for mobile applications.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Islamabad, Pakistan, for the Indigenous 5000 PhD Fellowship program in the field of science and technology and IRSIP program.

References

  1. T. Massalski, H. Okamoto, P. Subramanian, and L. Kacprzak, Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, ASM, Materials Park, Ohio, USA, 2nd edition, 1990.
  2. F. Barbir, T. N. Veziroǧlu, and H. J. Plass Jr., “Environmental damage due to fossil fuels use,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 739–749, 1990. View at Scopus
  3. R. Zidan, D. K. Slattery, and J. Burns, “Study of chemically synthesized MgMgH2 for hydrogen storage,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 821–827, 1991. View at Scopus
  4. J. H. Kim, B. G. Kim, and Y. M. Kang, “Synthesis and enhanced hydrogen desorption kinetics of magnesium hydride using hydriding chemical vapor synthesis,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 529, pp. 102–107, 2012.
  5. G. Liang, J. Huot, S. Boily, A. van Neste, and R. Schulz, “Catalytic effect of transition metals on hydrogen sorption in nanocrystalline ball milled MgH2-Tm (Tm = Ti, V, Mn, Fe and Ni) systems,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 292, no. 1-2, pp. 247–252, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Y. Liang, “Synthesis and hydrogen storage properties of Mg-based alloys,” Journal of Alloys Compounds, vol. 370, no. 1-2, pp. 123–128, 2004.
  7. A. Zaluska, L. Zaluski, and J. O. Ström-Olsen, “Nanocrystalline magnesium for hydrogen storage,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 288, no. 1-2, pp. 217–225, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. C. Gennari, F. J. Castro, and G. Urretavizcaya, “Hydrogen desorption behavior from magnesium hydrides synthesized by reactive mechanical alloying,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 321, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Huot, M.-L. Tremblay, and R. Schulz, “Synthesis of nanocrystalline hydrogen storage materials,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 356-357, pp. 603–607, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J.-L. Bobet, S. Desmoulins-Krawiec, E. Grigorova, F. Cansell, and B. Chevalier, “Addition of nanosized Cr2O3 to magnesium for improvement of the hydrogen sorption properties,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 351, no. 1-2, pp. 217–221, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. R. Ovshinsky and M. A. Fetcenko, “Development of high catalytic activity disordered hydrogen-storage alloys for electrochemical application in nickel-metal hydride batterie,” Applied Physics A, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 239–244, 2001.
  12. J. Huot, J. F. Pelletier, L. B. Lurio, M. Sutton, and R. Schulz, “Investigation of dehydrogenation mechanism of MgH2-Nb nanocomposites,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 348, no. 1-2, pp. 319–324, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Charbonnier, P. de Rango, D. Fruchart et al., “Hydrogenation of transition element additives (Ti, V) during ball milling of magnesium hydride,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 383, no. 1-2, pp. 205–208, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. J. Vajo, F. Mertens, C. C. Ahn, R. C. Bowman Jr., and B. Fultz, “Altering hydrogen storage properties by hydride destabilization through alloy formation: LiH and MgH2 destabilized with Si,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 37, pp. 13977–13983, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Hanada, T. Ichikawa, and H. Fujii, “Catalytic effect of nanoparticle 3d-transition metals on hydrogen storage properties in magnesium hydride MgH2 prepared by mechanical milling,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 15, pp. 7188–7194, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Y. Song, D. R. Mumm, S. N. Kwon, S. H. Hong, and J. S. Bae, “Hydroazgen-storage properties of Mg-10 wt.% (Fe2O3, Ni, MnO) alloy prepared by reactive mechanical grinding,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 416, no. 1-2, pp. 239–244, 2006.
  17. G. Barkhordarian, T. Klassen, and R. Bormann, “Catalytic mechanism of transition-metal compounds on Mg hydrogen sorption reaction,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 22, pp. 11020–11024, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. A. Niaz, I. Ahmad, K. S. Waheed, and S. Tajammul Hussain, “Synthesis of nanostructured Mg-Ni alloy and its hydrogen storage properties,” Journal of Materials Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 401–406, 2012.
  19. M. Dornheim, S. Doppiu, G. Barkhordarian et al., “Hydrogen storage in magnesium-based hydrides and hydride composites,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 841–846, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Orimo and H. Fujii, “Materials science of Mg-Ni-based new hydrides,” Applied Physics A, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 167–186, 2001.
  21. B. Sakintuna, F. Lamari-Darkrim, and M. Hirscher, “Metal hydride materials for solid hydrogen storage: a review,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1121–1140, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Polanski, T. Plocinski, I. Kunce, and J. Bystrzycki, “Dynamic synthesis of ternary Mg2FeH6,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1257–1266, 2010.
  23. S. S. Sai Raman, D. J. Davison, J. L. Bobet, and O. N. Srivastava, “Investigations on the synthesis, structural and microstructural characterizations of Mg-based K2PtCl6 type (Mg2FeH6) hydrogen storage material prepared by mechanical alloying,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 333, no. 1-2, pp. 282–290, 2002.
  24. J.-J. Didishein, P. Zolliker, K. Yvon, P. Fisher, J. Shefer, and M. Gubelmann, “Dimagnesium iron(II) hydride, Mg2FeH6, containing octahedral FeH64- anions,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 1953–1957, 1984.
  25. J. Huot, H. Hayakawa, and E. Akiba, “Preparation of the hydrides Mg2FeH6 and Mg2CoH5 by mechanical alloying followed by sintering,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 248, no. 1-2, pp. 164–167, 1997. View at Scopus
  26. F. C. Gennari, F. J. Castro, and J. J. Andrade Gamboa, “Synthesis of Mg2FeH6 by reactive mechanical alloying: formation and decomposition properties,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 339, no. 1-2, pp. 261–267, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Q. Li, J. Liu, K. C. Chou, G. W. Lin, and K. D. Xu, “Synthesis and dehydrogenation behavior of Mg-Fe-H system prepared under an external magnetic field,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 466, no. 1-2, pp. 146–152, 2008.
  28. H. Shao, T. Liu, Y. Wang, H. Xu, and X. Li, “Preparation of Mg-based hydrogen storage materials from metal nanoparticles,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 465, no. 1-2, pp. 527–533, 2008.
  29. X. Zhang, R. Yang1, J. Qu et al., “The synthesis and hydrogen storage properties of pure nanostructured Mg2FeH6,” Nanotechnology, vol. 21, no. 9, Article ID 095706, 2010.
  30. J. A. Puszkie, P. A. Larochette, and F. C. Gennari, “Thermodynamic-kinetic characterization of the synthesized Mg2FeH6-MgH2 hydrides mixture,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 3555–3560, 2008.
  31. J. A. Puszkiel, P. A. Larochette, and F. C. Gennari, “Thermodynamic and kinetic studies of Mg-Fe-H after mechanical milling followed by sintering,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 463, no. 1-2, pp. 134–142, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. P. Selvam and K. Yvon, “Synthesis of Mg2FeH6, Mg2CoH5 and Mg2NiH4 by high-pressure sintering of the elements,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 615–617, 1991.
  33. H. Wagner and H. Homer, “Eastic interaction and the phase transition in coherent metal-hydrogen systems,” Advances in Physics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 587–637, 1974.
  34. R. W. P. Wagemans, J. H. Van Lenthe, P. E. De Jongh, A. J. Van Dillen, and K. P. De Jong, “Hydrogen storage in magnesium clusters: quantum chemical study,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 47, pp. 16675–16680, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Y. Li, Y. Cheng, Y. Yinghua, and R. Shen, “Supplement on applicability of the Kissinger equation in thermal analysis,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 605–608, 2010.
  36. H. E. Kissingerz, “Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1702–1706, 1957.