About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 635647, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/635647
Research Article

Fabrication of Metal Alloy-Deposited Flexible MWCNT Buckypaper for Thermoelectric Applications

1Department of Electrical Engineering, Tunghai University, 181 Taichung Harbor Road, Section 3, Taichung 40704, Taiwan
2Tunghai Green Energy Development and Management Institute, Tunghai University, 181 Taichung Harbor Road, Section 3, Taichung 40704, Taiwan
3Department of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise Information, Tunghai University, 181 Taichung Harbor Road, Section 3, Taichung 40704, Taiwan

Received 31 March 2013; Revised 10 September 2013; Accepted 27 September 2013

Academic Editor: Sulin Zhang

Copyright © 2013 Jih-Hsin Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We report the fabrication of a flexible network of multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) known as buckypaper (BP) for thermoelectric (TE) applications. A thermal evaporation method was used to deposit TE metal alloys onto the BP. The TE properties were improved primarily by increasing the Seebeck coefficient values (50 and 75 μV/K) and the electrical conductivity by approximately 10 000 S/m. High-temperature resistivity studies were performed to confirm the semiconductivity of buckypaper. Variations in resistivity were observed to be the result of the metal alloys coated on the BP surface. We also demonstrated that a substantial increase in the Seebeck coefficient values can be obtained by connecting 3 and 5 layers of metal-deposited BP in series, thereby enhancing the TE efficiency of MWCNT-based BP for application in thermoelectric devices.

1. Introduction

Recently, a considerable amount of effort has been devoted to developing thermoelectric (TE) devices that are capable of generating electricity from heat. TE devices that conserve heat energy should be cost-efficient and possess a high thermoelectric figure of merit [1]. Good TE materials must have a high Seebeck coefficient, which enhances thermoelectricity, low electrical resistivity, which minimizes Joule heating, and low thermal conductivity, which sustains a large temperature gradient [2]. The performance of a TE material is determined by its dimensionless figure of merit , where , , and are the Seebeck coefficient, electrical resistivity, and thermal conductivity of the materials, respectively.

Previous studies have focused on semimetallic nanomaterials such as Bi, Sb, Te, and Bi-Sb alloys because of their promising thermoelectric properties [35]. Bi2Te3-based alloys are known to be a state-of-the-art material currently available for TE applications [6]. Recently, Zhang et al. [7] reported that the Seebeck coefficient of Bi2Te3 can be improved by incorporating single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) into the matrix. Furthermore, highly doped SWCNTs can be used to tune Bi2Te3 from - to -type. Despite their excellent thermoelectric properties, these materials exhibit poor mechanical property, which complicates the fabrication process, and can cause reliability problems in their application, especially in miniature TE modules.

Recently, there has been considerable focus on macroscopic assemblies of various carbon nanotubes (CNTs) such as buckypaper (BP), fibers, pellets, and thin films because the characteristics of a single CNT can be used on a macroscopic scale to fabricate reliable, high-performance devices [8, 9]. BP is a macroscopic assembly of nanotubes that are formed through filtration after their dispersion in organic solvents. BP typically has a laminar structure with a random orientation of the bundles of tubes in the plane of the sheet [10]. High structural integrity in this MWCNT BP is thought to be derived primarily from their long lengths (up to micrometer scale), because the longer the tubes, the greater the mechanical robustness of the intermingled bundle. There has been a considerable level of interest in developing novel BP-based composite materials with improved mechanical properties and electrical conductivity for numerous potential applications. It has been established that SWCNTs exhibit considerably high electrical conductivity at room temperature because the charge carrier in the nanotubes exhibits substantial mobility [11]. CNTs exhibit excellent TE properties because of their nanoscale, low-dimensional, and porous structures [12]. Several studies have reported that the values of Seebeck coefficients for individual types of SWCNTs and MWCNTs are approximately 42 μV/K [13] and 82 μV/K [14], respectively, and for SWCNT and MWCNT films range from 20 to 25 μV/K [15, 16]. Zhan et al. [17] showed that the TE efficiency of SWCNTs could be improved by fabricating SWCNT/ceramic nanocomposites with metal oxides such as Al2O3 and nanocrystalline Y2O3-stabilized tetragonal ZrO2 polycrystals.

A review of the extant literature shows that few reports have focused on improving the thermoelectric properties of MWCNT-based BP and there is no report on the effect of the deposition of metal alloy nanoparticles on MWCNT BP. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the TE performance of MWCNT BP by depositing Bi, Te, and Sb alloys on the surface of BP and to measure the corresponding electrical resistivity and Seebeck coefficients. A thermal evaporation method was used because it guarantees high degree of homogeneity and uniform coverage. This report provides a simple and convenient method for fabricating high-quality and flexible MWCNT BP that exhibits promising electrical properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fabrication of MWCNT Buckypaper

The BP used in this study was fabricated using MWCNTs through vacuum filtration. The modified procedure used for fabricating the MWCNT BP was adopted from previous reports [18, 19]. The MWCNTs were dispersed in distilled water and stabilized using Triton-X-100, a nonionic surfactant. The aqueous suspension of MWCNTs was produced using ultrasonication (Misonic, 20 kHz, 63 W). Following the filtration and drying processes, the paper was peeled carefully and washed in an isopropyl alcohol bath to completely remove the surfactant, thereby producing a thin sheet (approx. 110 μm) of random network MWCNT BP (RBP). Compared with aligned membranes, the fabricated RBP exhibited a broader distribution of larger pores, which offers several advantages. For example, it can be rolled or bent without cracking, which is a unique mechanical property that is superior to that of the conventional inorganic TE materials applied in flexible energy conversion systems.

2.2. Deposition of Metal Alloys

A thermal evaporation technique was used to deposit the TE metal alloy on the RBP surface. The metal films (approx. 80 μm) were deposited onto the BP by Bi, Sb, and Te granules (99.99%) as a vapor source. The BP substrate was fixed on a ceramic holder and inserted into a deposition chamber that was subsequently evacuated under a relative pressure of 10-5 torr. The distance from source to the substrate was approximately 30 cm. The total deposition time varied from 1 to 2 min in a vacuum. The ratio of the metal source was 1 : 1 (0.06 g each). The samples after deposition of alloy of Bi + Te, Sb + Bi, Sb + Te, and Sb + Bi + Te onto the RBP, surface were referred as BiTe-RBP, SbBi-RBP, SbTe-RBP and SbBiTe-RBP, respectively.

2.3. Characterizations

The surface morphology and composition analyses of the BP were examined using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) JEOL JSM-7000F. The temperature-dependent electrical resistivity ( ) measurements of the BP samples were conducted using a standard programmable DC voltage/current detector four-point probe method in a temperature range from 300 to 550 K. Direct thermal conductivity of the pristine RBP at 300 K was measured using a hot disk analyzer TPS 2500. The Seebeck coefficient ( ) was determined by applying a temperature gradient along the sample and measuring the thermoelectric voltage. For all the samples, electrical resistivity ( ) and Seebeck coefficient ( ) were measured as a function of temperature, and was measured for 3 and 5 sheets of the metal-deposited BP samples which were connected in series.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological and Compositional Analysis

Figures 1(a)1(e) show the FESEM images of the RBP, BiTe-RBP, SbBi-RBP, SbTe-RBP, and SbBiTe-RBP, respectively. The microstructures of all samples illustrate the random entanglement, and the network structures of CNTs were formed. Figure 1(a) shows the porous structure of RBP, indicating the complete removal of surfactants between the tubes [20], whereas Figures 1(b)1(d) show an increase in the tube diameter of metal alloy/MWCNT composites. It reveals that the deposition of metal nanoparticles on the surface caused a densely packed network structure of CNTs in the buckypaper. Furthermore, the network structures of the MWCNT BP were unaltered by the deposition of the metal particles. The insets in Figures 1(a)1(e) are images of the pure and metal-deposited BP samples. Table 1 shows the elemental composition of the metal-deposited BP samples observed using EDX.

tab1
Table 1: EDX-weight percentage of the elements present in the BP samples.
fig1
Figure 1: FE-SEM images of buckypaper samples for (a) RBP, (b) BiTe-RBP, (c) SbBi-RBP, (d) SbTe-RBP, and (e) SbBiTe-RBP. Insets in (a)–(e) are the photo images of buckypaper samples, respectively.
3.2. Electrical Resistivity Studies

Figure 2 shows the high-temperature electrical resistivity ( ) plots for the pure and metal-deposited MWCNT-BP samples. The room temperature (RT) resistivity for all samples ranged from approximately 0.01 to 0.06 Ω-cm, which is comparatively low and decreases as the temperature increased, indicating that all the BP samples exhibited strong semiconducting behavior. The difference in the observed resistivity among the various metal alloy-deposited BP were attributed to the oxidation of nanotubes on the surface of buckypaper [17]. The increased slope indicated that the localization length decreased as the barriers between the intertube contacts increased and the oxidation is due to absorption of moisture on the surface of the BP during the measurement process [20]. These results show that the temperature dependence of the resistivity for all the samples was mostly dominated by the transportation of carriers between the tube junctions through hopping or tunneling, thereby resulting in semiconducting behavior [21, 22].

635647.fig.002
Figure 2: High-temperature-dependent electrical resistivity measurements for pure and metal alloy-deposited RBP samples.

Based on the observed semiconducting behavior, the variable-range hopping (VRH) model appears to be the predominant conduction mechanism [23]. It could be considered that the BP is a 3-dimensional network of dispersed bundle-bundle junctions that allow the carriers to move within a sheet. Therefore, the electrical conduction occurs either in the tube-tube, within the nanotube bundles or between neighbour bundles through their contacts. The resistivity is primarily dominated by the electric field gradient across the material because the electrons must hop between different bundles of CNTs [23]. The essential part is that the electrons hopped between conducting entities (NTs) were separated by the metallic particles which leads to a nonmetallic dependence of . The hopping conduction was probably the characteristic electric transport behavior between the nanotubes and bundles.

Compared with the pure samples, the metal-deposited RBP samples exhibited an increased resistivity value, indicating that the particles deposited onto the surface of the nanotubes might have caused a slight blockage at the intertube junctions and thereby forming a barrier for the hopping and tunneling of electrons. Kim et al. [24] also reported that the presence of metal content within the CNTs can affect the RT resistivity. Previous research indicated that the electrical conductivity of fully connected CNT networks can be limited by tube-tube contact resistance [25].

3.3. Seebeck Coefficient Measurement

Figure 3(a) shows the temperature-dependent Seebeck coefficient for a single sheet of metal-deposited MWCNT buckypaper. Figures 3(b) and 3(c) show the Seebeck coefficients for 3 and 5 sheets of metal-deposited BP connected in series, respectively. The Seebeck coefficient is related to the transport of energetic charged particles, whereas the electrical conductivity is related to the transport of all mobile charges [26]. In this study, the observed values were negative, indicating that the majority of carriers were electrons. For all samples, the strongly curved T-dependence of “ ”, which exhibited a nonlinear behavior, shows the semiconducting nature of the CNT networks, which also supports the resistivity results [27].

fig3
Figure 3: Seebeck coefficient for metal alloy-deposited RBP samples. (a) Single layer, (b) 3 sheets connected in series, and (c) 5 sheets connected in series.

Table 2 shows the maximum values obtained for the single layer as well as for the 3 and 5 sheets in series. The value for the single layer of pristine MWCNT BP was −13.49 μV/K (  W/mK at 300 K) is comparable [15, 23, 28], and in our, case it increases to approximately 22 (±1) μV/K after the deposition of TE metal alloys. The variation in the Seebeck coefficient originated from the change in the doping of metal alloys and its composition on MWCNTs and the amount of charges transferred to the BP. It was also stated that the Seebeck coefficient for CNT mats is independent of the CNT type, and high energetic charges are transported regardless of the junction types [28]. This unique relationship between the Seebeck coefficient and high electric conductivity implies that it is possible to balance the metal alloy films on the surface of BP to increase the carrier mobility and attain the maximum power factor . We also demonstrated that 3 and 5 layers of metal-deposited BP can be used to attain a high Seebeck coefficient of approximately 50 (±4) and 75 (±6) μV/K, respectively. This shows that an array of metal-deposited BP connected in series can achieve high “ ” and , thereby enhancing the thermoelectric efficiency.

tab2
Table 2: Measured Seebeck coefficient (− V/K) for metal alloy-deposited RBP samples.

We determined that increasing the thickness of the metal alloys on the BP surface weakens the quantum confinement effects and reduces the interaction between the metal particles and CNTs. This reduces the carrier density in the BP, which increases the resistivity of the sample. Furthermore, the intertube junctions in the BP are essential factors for improving the electrical transport and mechanical strength. This work demonstrates the fundamental challenges associated with employing the TE nanoparticles within BP to increase the surface properties as well as the inter-particle contacts, which was primarily considered in order to maximize the TE efficiency. We are further involved in controlling various parameters such as composition and thickness to achieve higher electrical and low thermal conductivity for processing the MWCNT-based BP as efficient thermoelectric (TE) material into a functional device.

4. Conclusion

In summary, the alloy of Bi, Sb, and Te nanoparticles was deposited on the surface of the buckypaper by employing a thermal evaporation method. The electrical measurements of the pure and metal alloy-deposited MWCNT buckypapers have been performed. The RT electrical resistivity was observed in the range from 0.01 to 0.06 Ω-cm, which also demonstrated the semiconductivity of the CNT networks. The observed values are comparable to those of BPs synthesized using various methods. An increase in the value was observed for the Seebeck coefficient to approximately 50 and 75 μV/K by connecting the metal alloy-deposited BP sheets in series. The results show the potential of these TE NPs to be further refined and maximized to increase the efficiency of BP-based thermoelectric materials. Further study on the inclusion of these TE particles in BP by controlling their size and composition to maximize the inter-tube contacts and improve surface properties through sample processing, to increase the electrical conductivity and enhance the thermoelectric efficiency, is part of our ongoing studies in this field.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Global Research and Education on Environment and Society (GREEnS) program, Tunghai University, Taiwan, and the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC101-2221-E-029-006 and NSC101-2221-E-029-010).

References

  1. W. Liu, X. Yan, G. Chen, and Z. Ren, “Recent advances in thermoelectric nanocomposites,” Nano Energy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42–56, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Chen, M. Y. Tang et al., “New directions for low-dimensional thermoelectric materials,” Advanced Materials, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1043–1053, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. L. Prieto, M. Martín-González, J. Keyani, R. Gronsky, T. Sands, and A. M. Stacy, “The electrodeposition of high-density, ordered arrays of Bi1−xSbx nanowires,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 125, no. 9, pp. 2388–2389, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Mott, N. T. Mai, N. T. B. Thuy et al., “Bismuth, antimony and tellurium alloy nanoparticles with controllable shape and composition for efficient thermoelectric devices,” Physica Status Solidi (A), vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. J. Goldsmid, Semiconductors and Semimetals, vol. 69, chapter 1, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  6. W. J. Xie, X. F. Tang, Y. G. Yan, Q. J. Zhang, and T. M. Tritt, “High thermoelectric performance BiSbTe alloy with unique low-dimensional structure,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105, no. 11, Article ID 113713, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Zhang, X. L. Wang, W. K. Yeoh, R. K. Zeng, and C. Zhang, “Electrical and thermoelectric properties of single-wall carbon nanotube doped Bi2Te3,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 101, no. 3, Article ID 031909, 4 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. Liu, J. Sun, and L. Gao, “Flexible single-walled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline composite films and their enhanced thermoelectric properties,” Nanoscale, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 3616–3619, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. W. Zhao, S. Fan, N. Xiao et al., “Flexible carbon nanotube papers with improved thermoelectric properties,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5364–5369, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Berhan, Y. B. Yi, A. M. Sastry, E. Munoz, M. Selvidge, and R. Baughman, “Mechanical properties of nanotube sheets: alterations in joint morphology and achievable moduli in manufacturable materials,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 4335–4345, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. Hiura, J. W. Bennett, H. F. Ghaemi, and T. Thio, “Electrical conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes,” Nature, vol. 382, no. 6586, pp. 54–56, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. Kunadian, R. Andrews, M. P. Mengüç, and D. Qian, “Thermoelectric power generation using doped MWCNTs,” Carbon, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 589–601, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. H. Yu, L. Shi, Z. Yao, D. Li, and A. Majumdar, “Thermal conductance and thermopower of an individual single-wall carbon nanotube,” Nano Letters, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1842–1846, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Kim, L. Shi, A. Majumdar, and P. L. McEuen, “Thermal transport measurements of individual multiwalled nanotubes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 21, Article ID 215502, 4 pages, 2001. View at Scopus
  15. C. Meng, C. Liu, and S. Fan, “A promising approach to enhanced thermoelectric properties using carbon nanotube networks,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 535–539, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. T. Byrne and Y. K. Guin'Ko, “Recent advances in research on carbon nanotube—polymer composites,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 1672–1688, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. D. Zhan, J. D. Kuntz, A. K. Mukherjee, P. Zhu, and K. Koumoto, “Thermoelectric properties of carbon nanotube/ceramic nanocomposites,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 77–82, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Z. Wang, Z. Liang, B. Wang, C. Zhang, and L. Kramer, “Processing and property investigation of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) buckypaper/epoxy resin matrix nanocomposites,” Composites A, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1225–1232, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. W. Chen, H. Y. Miao, M. Zhang, R. Liang, C. Zhang, and B. Wang, “Analysis of a laser post-process on a buckypaper field emitter for high and uniform electron emission,” Nanotechnology, vol. 20, no. 32, Article ID 325302, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. G. Park, J. Smithyman, C. Y. Lin et al., “Effects of surfactants and alignment on the physical properties of single-walled carbon nanotube buckypaper,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 106, no. 10, Article ID 104310, 6 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. B. Kaiser, G. Düsberg, and S. Roth, “Heterogeneous model for conduction in carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review B, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1418–1421, 1998. View at Scopus
  22. J. C. Charlier, “Defects in carbon nanotubes,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1063–1069, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. M. Díez-Pascual, J. Guan, B. Simard, and M. A. Gómez-Fatou, “Poly(phenylene sulphide) and poly(ether ether ketone) composites reinforced with single-walled carbon nanotube buckypaper: II—mechanical properties, electrical and thermal conductivity,” Composites A, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1007–1015, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. M. Kim, K. Kim, C. Y. Lee et al., “Electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding of multiwalled carbon nanotube composites containing Fe catalyst,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 589–591, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Buldum and J. P. Lu, “Contact resistance between carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review B, vol. 63, no. 16, Article ID 161403(R), 4 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. C. Yu, Y. S. Kim, D. Kim, and J. C. Grunlan, “Thermoelectric behavior of segregated-network polymer nanocomposites,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 4428–4432, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Hone, I. Ellwood, M. Muno et al., “Thermoelectric power of single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1042–1045, 1998. View at Scopus
  28. Y. J. Choi, Y. Kim, S. G. Park et al., “Effect of the carbon nanotube type on the thermoelectric properties of CNT/Nafion nanocomposites,” Organic Electronics, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2120–2125, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus