About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 642897, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/642897
Research Article

Preparation of -Graphene Nanocomposites and Their Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities

J. F. Dai,1,2 T. Xian,1,2 L. J. Di,2 and H. Yang1,2

1State Key Laboratory of Gansu Advanced Non-Ferrous Metal Materials, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
2School of Science, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China

Received 23 September 2013; Accepted 27 October 2013

Academic Editor: Jian Lin

Copyright © 2013 J. F. Dai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

BiFeO3 nanoparticles were prepared via a polyacrylamide gel route. BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposites were fabricated by mixing BiFeO3 nanoparticles and graphene into absolute ethanol solution followed by thermal drying. The TEM observation demonstrates that the BiFeO3 nanoparticles are well anchored onto graphene sheets. The photocatalytic activities of the as-prepared samples were evaluated by the degradation of methyl orange (MO) under simulated sunlight irradiation. Compared to bare BiFeO3 nanoparticles, BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposites exhibit enhanced photocatalytic activity. The outstanding photocatalytic performance is mainly ascribed to the efficient transfer of photogenerated electrons from BiFeO3 to graphene, thus leading to an increased availability of h+ for the photocatalytic reaction. In addition, hydroxyl (·OH) radicals were detected by the photoluminescence technique using terephthalic acid as a probe molecule and are found to be produced on the irradiated BiFeO3 and BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposites; in particular, an enhanced yield is observed for the latter.

1. Introduction

Semiconductor-based photocatalysts have attracted considerable attention over the past decades due to their potential applications in solar energy conversion and environmental purification [1, 2]. Among them, TiO2 has proven to be a powerful photocatalyst for the degradation of numerous organic compounds [35]. However, it can only respond to UV light owing to its wide bandgap (~3.2 eV). To efficiently make use of solar energy that consists largely of visible light, it is essential to explore visible-light-driven photocatalysts.

BiFeO3, exhibiting simultaneous ferroelectric and antiferromagnetic properties at room temperature, has been extensively studied as one of the most important multiferroic materials [6, 7]. Besides its multiferroic property, recent investigations have revealed that BiFeO3 also exhibits visible-light responsive photocatalytic activity for the degradation of organic pollutants [813]. Generally, the overall photocatalytic activity of a photocatalyst depends on numerous factors. Among them, the effective separation of photogenerated electron-hole (e-h+) pairs is very important in improving the photocatalytic activity. Graphene, being a two-dimensional (2D) sheet of sp2-hybridized carbon atoms, possesses excellent properties including high electrical conductivity, electron mobility, thermal conductivity, mechanical strength, chemical stability, and so forth [1416]. On account of its outstanding properties, graphene has been frequently used as an ideal support to integrate with a large number of functional nanomaterials to form unique nanocomposites with improved performances in the fields of photocatalysts [1723], microsupercapacitors [24], field-emission emitters [25], and fuel cells [26]. Particularly, the combination of graphene with photocatalysts is demonstrated to be an efficient way to promote the separation of photogenerated e-h+ pairs and then enhance their photocatalytic activities [1723]. In these graphene-photocatalyst composites, photogenerated electrons can be readily captured by graphene which acts as electron acceptor; thus, more photogenerated holes are increasingly available for the photocatalytic reactions. Therefore, many efforts have been devoted to incorporating graphene into BiFeO3-based composite materials.

Up to now, the BiFeO3-graphene composites are often prepared by hydrothermal method and sol-gel route. In the former method, the BiFeO3 precursors were introduced into the dispersed aqueous of graphene or graphene oxide, followed by hydrothermal reaction, to yield BiFeO3-graphene composites [23, 27]. For the latter route, the sol containing precursors and graphene oxide was dried, and then the resultant was thermally treated at N2 atmosphere, leading to the formation of BiFeO3-graphene hybrids [22]. However, it should be noted that the aforementioned processes are based on hydrothermal condition or high temperature thermal treatment procedure, which may damage the graphene lattice [28]. In this paper, we demonstrate that BiFeO3 nanoparticles can be assembled onto graphene sheets by mixing BiFeO3 nanoparticles and graphene into absolute ethanol solution followed by thermal drying. The photocatalytic activities of prepared samples were evaluated by the degradation of methylene orange (MO) under simulated sunlight irradiation. The production of OH radicals on the irradiated BiFeO3-graphene photocatalyst was examined by the photoluminescence (PL) technique using terephthalic acid (TPA) as a probe molecule.

2. Experimental

The graphene used in this research was purchased from Nanjing XFNano Materials Tech Co. Ltd. BiFeO3 nanoparticles were synthesized via a polyacrylamide gel route as described in the literature [29]. To assemble BiFeO3 nanoparticles on graphene, number of BiFeO3 nanoparticles and graphene were dispersed into absolute ethanol solution and ultrasonically treated for 10 min. The obtained mixture was dried at 60°C for 10 h in a thermostat drier, during which ethanol was vaporized, leaving behind BiFeO3 nanoparticles well anchored on graphene nanosheets. By changing the graphene content, several BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposite samples with graphene weight fractions of 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, and 9% were prepared.

The photocatalytic activity of the BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposites was evaluated by the degradation of MO under simulated sunlight irradiation from a 200 W xenon lamp (incident light power: ~5 mW cm−2) at room temperature. The initial dye concentration was 10 mg L−1 with a catalyst loading of 2.5 g L−1. Before illumination, the mixed solution was mildly stirred for 1 h in the dark in order to reach the adsorption-desorption equilibrium of MO on the catalyst. The concentration of MO after photocatalytic degradation was determined by measuring the absorbance of the solution at a fixed wavelength of 464 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. Before the absorbance measurements, the reaction solution was centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 r min−1 to remove the catalyst.

Terephthalic acid (TPA) was used as a probe molecule to examine OH radicals formed on the irradiated BiFeO3-graphene photocatalyst. It is expected that TPA reacts with OH to generate a highly fluorescent compound, 2-hydroxyterephthalic acid (TAOH). By measuring the PL intensity of TAOH that is pronounced around 429 nm, the information about OH can be obtained. TPA was dissolved in  mol L−1 NaOH aqueous solution to make a  mol L−1 TPA solution, and then to the solution was added 2.5 g L−1 photocatalyst. The mixed solution, after several minutes of ultrasound treatment in the dark, was illuminated under the 200 W xenon lamp. The reacted solution was centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 r min−1 to separate the catalyst particles and was then used for the PL measurements at a fluorescence spectrophotometer with the excitation wavelength of 315 nm.

The morphology of the sample was observed using a field-emission transmission electron microscope (TEM). A fluorescence spectrophotometer was used to measure the photoluminescence (PL) emission spectra of the samples.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1(a) presents the TEM image of pure graphene, indicating that graphene has typical two-dimensional sheet structure with crumpled feature. Figure 1(b) shows the TEM image of BiFeO3-graphene(5%) nanocomposite. It can be seen that BiFeO3 nanoparticles are assembled onto the graphene sheet. The BiFeO3 nanoparticles mainly exhibit sphere-like shape and have an average particle size centered around 110 nm.

fig1
Figure 1: TEM images of graphene and BiFeO3-graphene(5%) nanocomposite.

Figure 2 shows the photocatalytic degradation of MO over BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposites as a function of irradiation time (). The degradation percentage is defined as , where and are the MO concentrations before and after irradiation, respectively. The blank experiment result is also shown in Figure 2, from which one can see that the MO is hardly degraded under simulated sunlight irradiation without photocatalysts, and its degradation percentage is less than 5% after 6 h of exposure. After 6 h irradiation in the presence of BiFeO3 nanoparticles and graphene, about 37% and 16% of MO are observed to be degraded, respectively. When BiFeO3 nanoparticles assembled on graphene, all samples of BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposites exhibit higher photocatalytic activity than bare BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Moreover, the photocatalytic activity of nanocomposites increases gradually with the increase in graphene content from 1% to 5%. Further increase in graphene content leads to the decrease of photocatalytic activity.

642897.fig.002
Figure 2: Photocatalytic degradation of MO as a function of irradiation time over bare BiFeO3 nanoparticles and graphene and BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposites with graphene weight fractions of 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, and 9%.

Figure 3 shows the PL spectra of the TPA solution after reacting 6 h over the simulated sunlight irradiated BiFeO3 and BiFeO3-graphene(5%) photocatalysts. The blank experiment result indicates that no PL signal is observed at 429 nm after irradiation without catalyst. With BiFeO3 as photocatalyst, the PL signal centered around 429 nm is detected, revealing that OH radicals are generated on the irradiated BiFeO3. When BiFeO3-graphene(5%) nanocomposite is used as the photocatalyst, the PL signal intensity is slightly increased, which suggests that the yield of OH radicals is enhanced on the irradiated nanocomposite.

642897.fig.003
Figure 3: PL spectra of the TPA solution after reacting 6 h over the irradiated BiFeO3 nanoparticles and BiFeO3-graphene (5%) nanocomposite.

Figure 4 schematically shows the photocatalytic mechanism of BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposite toward the degradation of MO. Under the simulated sunlight irradiation, the valence band (VB) electrons of BiFeO3 are promoted to the conduction band (CB), inducing the production of e-h+ pairs. The photogenerated electrons and holes then participate in a series of redox reactions to form a number of active species. However, the redox reaction processes are strongly related to the CB and VB edge potentials of BiFeO3. The VB potential of the BiFeO3 can be calculated using the following relation [30]: where is the absolute electronegativity of the semiconductor, is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale (~4.5 eV), and is the bandgap energy of the semiconductor (for the as-prepared BiFeO3, is 2.06 eV [31]). The value of for BiFeO3 is obtained, by the arithmetic mean of the electron affinity and the first ionization of the constituent atoms reported in the literatures [32, 33], to be 5.93 eV. Thus, the CB and VB potentials of BiFeO3 are calculated to be 0.4 and 2.46 V versus normal hydrogen electrode (NHE), respectively. It can be seen that the VB potential of sample is more positive than the redox potential of OH/OH (1.89 V/NHE), indicating that the photogenerated holes have strong oxidative ability and they can oxide OH into OH. However, the CB potential of sample is not negative enough to reduce O2 to (−0.13 V/NHE) via e. As a result, it is reasonable to infer that OH radicals derived by the reaction of the photogenerated h+ with OH are the main active species responsible for the degradation of MO over simulated sunlight irradiated BiFeO3. Therefore, the effective separation of e-h+ pairs and increased availability of h+ are the key points to improve the photocatalytic activity of the BiFeO3. When BiFeO3 nanoparticles assembled on grapheme, that is, an excellent electron acceptor and conductor, the photogenerated electrons readily transfer from the BiFeO3 conduction band to graphene, which could suppress the recombination of photoexcited e-h+ pairs, thus leading to the increase in the number of holes which participate in the photocatalytic reaction. The results shown in Figure 3 confirm the enhanced yield of OH radicals on the irradiated BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposite. As a result, with the introduction of an amount of graphene, the resulted BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposites exhibit an improved photocatalytic activity compared to bare BiFeO3 nanoparticles. However, when the graphene content is further increased above its optimum value, the photocatalytic efficiency begins to exhibit a decreasing trend. This is ascribed to the following reasons: (i) the excessive graphene may shield the light and decrease the number of photon absorption on BiFeO3 particles; (ii) the amount of available surface active sites tends to be reduced due to an increasing coverage of graphene onto the surface of BiFeO3 particles.

642897.fig.004
Figure 4: Schematic illustration of the photocatalytic mechanism of BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposite toward the degradation of MO.

4. Conclusions

BiFeO3 nanoparticles were prepared via a polyacrylamide gel method. BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposites were fabricated by mixing BiFeO3 nanoparticles and graphene into ethanol followed by thermal drying at 60°C. It is found that the BiFeO3 nanoparticles are well anchored onto graphene sheet. The photocatalytic experiments indicate that the BiFeO3-graphene nanocomposites exhibit higher photocatalytic activity for the degradation of MO under simulated sunlight irradiation than bare BiFeO3 nanoparticles, which is attributed to the fact that the photogenerated electrons are captured by graphene, leading to an increased availability of h+ for the photocatalytic reaction.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 50962009 and 51262018) and the Hongliu Outstanding Talents Foundation of Lanzhou University of Technology (Grant no. J201205).

References

  1. A. Mills, R. H. Davies, and D. Worsley, “Water purification by semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 417–425, 1993. View at Scopus
  2. M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at Scopus
  3. J. H. Carey, J. Lawrence, and H. M. Tosine, “Photodechlorination of PCB's in the presence of titanium dioxide in aqueous suspensions,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 697–701, 1976. View at Scopus
  4. S. Mozia, P. Brozek, J. Przepiorski, B. Tryba, and A. W. Morawki, “Immobilized TiO2 for phenol degradation in a pilot-scale photocatalytic reactor,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, Article ID 949764, p. 10, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. Y. Han, H.-S. Kim, and H. Kim, “Relationship between synthesis conditions and photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline TiO2,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, Article ID 427453, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Wang, J. B. Neaton, H. Zheng et al., “Epitaxial BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5613, pp. 1719–1722, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Catalan and J. F. Scott, “Physics and applications of bismuth ferrite,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 2463–2485, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Gao, X. Chen, K. Yin et al., “Visible-light photocatalytic properties of weak magnetic BiFeO3 nanoparticles,” Advanced Materials, vol. 19, no. 19, pp. 2889–2892, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Guo, L. Fang, W. Dong, F. Zheng, and M. Shen, “Magnetically separable BiFeO3 nanoparticles with a γ-Fe2O3 parasitic phase: controlled fabrication and enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 46, pp. 18645–18652, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Li, Y.-H. Lin, B.-P. Zhang, Y. Wang, and C.-W. Nan, “Controlled fabrication of BiFeO3 uniform microcrystals and their magnetic and photocatalytic behaviors,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 7, pp. 2903–2908, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Wei, C. Zhang, and Z. Xu, “Low-temperature hydrothermal synthesis of BiFeO3 microcrystals and their visible-light photocatalytic activity,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 3513–3517, 2012.
  12. Y. Huo, Y. Jin, and Y. Zhang, “Citric acid assisted solvothermal synthesis of BiFeO3 microspheres with high visible-light photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 331, no. 1-2, pp. 15–20, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Reitz, C. Suchomski, C. Weidmann, and T. Brezesinski, “Block copolymer-templated BiFeO3 nanoarchitectures composed of phase-pure crystallites intermingled with a continuous mesoporosity: effective visible-light photocatalysts?” Nano Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 414–424, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. I. Bolotin, K. J. Sikes, Z. Jiang et al., “Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene,” Solid State Communications, vol. 146, no. 9-10, pp. 351–355, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. A. Balandin, S. Ghosh, W. Bao et al., “Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 902–907, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. W. Frank, D. M. Tanenbaum, A. M. Van Der Zande, and P. L. McEuen, “Mechanical properties of suspended graphene sheets,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2558–2561, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X. Liu, L. Pan, Q. Zhao et al., “UV-assisted photocatalytic synthesis of ZnO-reduced graphene oxide composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity in reduction of Cr(VI),” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 183, pp. 238–243, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Fan, X. Zhao, J. Yang, et al., “ZnO-graphene composite for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye,” Cataylsis Communication, vol. 29, pp. 29–34, 2012.
  19. S. Liu, J. Tian, L. Wang, Y. Luo, and X. Sun, “One-pot synthesis of CuO nanoflower-decorated reduced graphene oxide and its application to photocatalytic degradation of dyes,” Catalysis Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 339–344, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Song, W. Gao, X. Wang, et al., “Microwave-assisted synthesis of BiOBr/graphene nanocomposites and their enhanced photocatalytic activity,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 41, no. 34, pp. 10472–10476, 2012.
  21. G. Chen, M. Sun, Q. Wei, Y. Zhang, B. Zhu, and B. Du, “Ag3PO4/graphene-oxide composite with remarkably enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity toward dyes in water,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 244-245, pp. 86–93, 2013.
  22. J. An, L. Zhu, N. Wang, et al., “Photo-fenton like degradation of tetrabromobisphenol A with graphene BiFeO3 composite as a catalyst,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 219, pp. 225–237, 2013.
  23. Z. Li, Y. Shen, C. Yang, et al., “Significant enhancement in the visible light photocatalytic properties of BiFeO3-graphene nanohybrids,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, pp. 823–829, 2013.
  24. J. Lin, C. Zhang, Z. Yan, et al., “3-dimensional graphene carbon nanotube carpet-based microsupercapacitors with high electrochemical performance,” Nano Letters, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 72–78, 2013.
  25. Z. Yan, L. Ma, Y. Zhu, et al., “Three-dimensional metal-graphene-nanotube multifunctional hybrid materials,” ACS Nano, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 58–64, 2013.
  26. Y. Liang, Y. Li, H. Wang et al., “Co3O4 nanocrystals on graphene as a synergistic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction,” Nature Materials, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 780–786, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Li, J. Shen, N. Li, and M. Ye, “Hydrothermal preparation, characterization and enhanced properties of reduced graphene-BiFeO3 nanocomposite,” Materials Letters, vol. 91, pp. 42–44, 2013.
  28. V. Singh, D. Joung, L. Zhai, S. Das, S. I. Khondaker, and S. Seal, “Graphene based materials: past, present and future,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1178–1271, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. Xian, H. Yang, X. Shen, J. L. Jiang, Z. Q. Wei, and W. J. Feng, “Preparation of high-quality BiFeO3 nanopowders via a polyacrylamide gel route,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 480, no. 2, pp. 889–892, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. R. Morrison, Electrochemistry at Semiconductor and Oxidized Metal Electrode, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  31. T. Xian, H. Yang, J. Dai, Z. Wei, J. Ma, and W. Feng, “Preparation and photocatalytic performance of nano-bismuth ferrite with tunable size,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 618–623, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. Hotop and W. C. Lineberger, “Binding energies in atomic negative ions,” Journal of Physical and Chemial Reference Data, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 539–576, 1975.
  33. T. Andersen, H. K. Haugen, and H. Hotop, “Binding energies in atomic negative ions: III,” Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1511–1533, 1999. View at Scopus