About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents 
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 762730, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/762730
Review Article

One-Dimensional Nanostructures as Photoanodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Jie Qu1 and Chao Lai2

1Center for Low-Dimensional Materials, Micro-Nano Devices and System and Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Solar Cell Materials and Technology, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
2School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China

Received 22 December 2012; Accepted 2 February 2013

Academic Editor: Xijin Xu

Copyright © 2013 Jie Qu and Chao Lai. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is star materials due to its remarkable optical and electronic properties, resulting in various applications, especially in the fields of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Photoanode is the most important part of the DSSCs, which help to adsorb dye molecules and transport the injected electrons. The size, structure, and morphology of TiO2 photoanode have been found to show significant influence on the photovoltaic performance of DSSCs. In this paper, we briefly summarize the synthesis and properties of one-dimensional (1D) TiO2 nanomaterials (bare 1D TiO2 nanomaterial and 1D hierarchical TiO2) and their photovoltaic performance in DSSCs.

1. Introduction

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is one of the most extensively studied oxides because of its remarkable optical and electronic properties. Due to its unique physical and chemical properties, TiO2 has been extensively used for various applications, such as dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), lithium ion batteries (LIBs), photocatalysis, water treatment, and gas sensors [1–21].

A typical DSSC consists of a dye-sensitized semiconductor electrode, redox electrolyte, and counter electrode [23, 24]. Once dye molecules absorb light, the excited dye injects electrons to the semiconductor. At the same time, the oxidized dye cation is reduced by the redox electrolyte, which competes with the recombination of injected electrons. Electrons are collected at the semiconductor electrode, pass through the external circuit, and then reenter the cell at the counter electrode to reduce the oxidized electrolyte [25]. A closed circuit is thereby established to continuously convert the solar light to electricity. Nanostructure-based DSSCs show advantages of low cost, high efficiency, and simple in preparation, which is promising as a renewable energy resource for sustainable development of the future [2, 23, 26, 27]. A breakthrough in DSSCs was achieved in 1991, O’Regan and Grätzel firstly introduced wide bandgap semiconductor nanocrystal (TiO2 nanoparticle) into DSSCs as the transporting medium of photo-induced electrons, and conversion efficiency was reached to 7% [2]. Recently the efficiency of DSSCs has been increased to 12.3% [28].

Dye-sensitized semiconductor electrode is usually the efficiency determining component of DSSCs due to the competition between electron separation and recombination accompanying with many electron transfer processes [5, 29, 30]. In brief, semiconductor oxides receive the injected electrons from the excited state of sensitizer dye, and the electrons could be competitively trapped by oxidized dye cation, anion in electrolyte, and surface state in TiO2 (e.g., oxygen vacancy) that is known as recombination, before they are transported to an external circuit. The described electron transfer processes in the semiconductor electrode affect essentially conversion efficiency of DSSCs, which depends on the nature and morphology of nanocrystalline semiconductor oxides [31–34].

Wide bandgap semiconductor nanoparticles were the first material used as an efficient photoanode. Due to the small size of the nanoparticles, it can provide a large surface area and a relatively high porosity [2], possible to adsorb enough dye for efficient light harvesting and a relative high conversion efficiency. However, TiO2 nanoparticles used in DSSCs are usually as a random network of crystallographically misaligned crystallites, and lattice mismatches at the grain boundaries could influence electron scattering and act as electron trap [31, 34, 35]. This could limit electron transport and reduce electron lifetime. Further improvement of DSSC-based nanoparticle is hindered by the previous drawbacks. One-dimensional TiO2 nanostructures [36–48] have a relatively small amount of grain boundaries and can act as single crystal, which is able to reduce the grain boundary effect and provide fast electron transport. It shows great potential in achieving high performance DSSCs. The recombination rate in TiO2 nanotubes has been found to be 10 times slower than that in nanoparticles [37]. However, it is more difficult for the liquid electrolyte to penetrate into one-dimensional titania than into nanoparticles network, because the one-dimensional titania has usually relatively low surface area, large size, and inefficient intact surface compared with nanoparticles. This usually leads to a large interface charge-transfer resistance for one-dimensional nanostructured materials-based photoanode.

To resolve the drawbacks of the nanoparticles and 1D nanostructures, 1D hierarchically structured materials were designed by combining nanoparticles and nanorods or nanowires. They have been used to take advantage of both the large surface area of nanoparticles and efficient charge transport of 1D nanostructures [50]. The interpenetration of electrolyte in the 1D hierarchical structure could be improved, and the interfacial area could be increased which might leads to more electron separation and fast transport [31, 34, 35, 51–57]. Compared with the nanoparticles and 1D nanostructures, the photovoltaic properties of 1D hierarchical structure are superior. This indicate a potential approach to overcome the limitations of nanoparticles and one-dimensional nanostructures as photoanode materials, though the increase of the grain boundary effect is inevitable in a hybrid structure matrix due to the formation of grain boundaries between nanoparticles and nanorods or nanowires.

In this paper, we review the recent developments in using of one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures as photoanodes for efficient DSSCs. Various randomly oriented and vertically aligned 1D nanostructures, and their composites with nanoparticles used in DSSCs are discussed, for which the order is randomly oriented 1D nanotubes and nanorods, vertically aligned 1D nanotubes and nanorods, randomly oriented 1D hierarchical TiO2 and vertically aligned 1D hierarchical TiO2.

2. Applications in DSSC Photoanode

The photoanode shows significant effects on the photocurrent and photovoltage of a DSSC. As a key material in photoanode, fast electron transfer kinetics of TiO2 are necessary to avoid photoelectron recombination, which usually depends strongly on the micromorphology and crystallographic structure of TiO2. Therefore, it is very important to synthesize controllably titania nanomaterials with specific structures and big surface area with optimized electron transfer kinetics.

2.1. Randomly Oriented 1D TiO2
2.1.1. Randomly Oriented 1D TiO2 Nanotube

To overcome the electron transport limit of nanoparticles, TiO2 nanotubes were the first reported 1D nanomaterial for use as a bifunctional photoanode material, which exhibiting both efficient generation of photon-generated electrons and good light-scattering property. Uchida et al. [58] have developed a facile one-step hydrothermal method to synthesize TiO2 nanotube [59]. The nanotube is 100 nm long with an outer diameter of 8 nm. The specific surface area can reach to 270 m2/g. DSSC with such nanotube showed a 2.9% conversion efficiency, which was not better than that of nanoparticles. The main reason for the previous result may due to the aggregate of the TiO2 nanotube, which could reduce electricity contact and increase impedance between TiO2 nanotube and conductive glass. And the nanotube wall here could also block the diffusion of the / .

To synthesize TiO2 nanotube with high dispersion and crystallization could improve the photoelectrochemical properties. Adachi et al. [60] and Ohsaki et al. [22] have reported such TiO2 nanotubes (TNTs) with large aspect ratio and large specific surface area. The conversion efficiency could reach to 6.4% (Figure 1). After treating with the TiCl4, the conversion efficiency could increase to 7.1%. Single crystal of TiO2 facilitates the fast transport of electron. And large aspect ratio of TiO2 nanotubes could help to reduce the grain boundary effect. The research also indicated that the increased electron density and electron lifetime in the photoanode could be beneficial for the improved photoelectrochemical properties.

762730.fig.001
Figure 1: (a) SEM images of mesoporous electrodes sintered at 500°C made of TNTs paste B. (b) Photocurrent-voltage curves obtained from the cells with TNTs electrodes at various Li+ concentrations [22].

Our group [16] also reported the protonated TiO2 nanotube prepared from one-step hydrothermal method with anatase TiO2 and 10 M NaOH solution as the starting materials [15, 61]. After being calcined at 400°C, single crystal of TiO2(B) nanotube was obtained (Figure 2). Although nanotubes have the advantage in morphology and surface area for enhancing photoelectrochemical performance, TiO2(B) nanotubes in this work showed relatively poor photovoltaic properties with the η value of only 1.05%. The poor performance here was mainly related to the serious recombination in numerous surface defects and a relatively open tunnel structure of TiO2(B) [15]. Higher temperature calcination would reduce the surface defects, but the tube morphology could not exist.

762730.fig.002
Figure 2: (a) TEM micrographs of titanate nanotubes calcined at 400°C. (b) Specific surface area of samples calcined at different temperatures. (c) I-V curves for titanate nanotubes calcined at different temperatures. Illumination intensity of 100 mW cm−2 with global AM 1.5 and an active area of 0.25 cm2 were applied [16].
2.1.2. Randomly Oriented 1D TiO2 Nanorod

One-dimensional TiO2 nanorods have a relatively small amount of grain boundaries and can act as single crystal, which is able to reduce the grain boundary effect and provide fast electron transport [51–53]. And the rod could keep the rod morphology with higher temperature calcination. Many researches were focused on TiO2 nanorods.

Jiu et al. [49, 62] have reported single crystalline anatase TiO2 nanorods synthesized by surfactant-assisted hydrothermal method. Short rods with the diameter 20–30 nm and length 100–150 nm have been obtained (Figure 3). The clear lattice strips indicated that the nanorods with high crystallinity and fewer defects have been obtained, which is beneficial for the transfer of electrons in the rods. A high light-to-electricity conversion yield of   7.06% was achieved by applying the TiO2 nanorods as thin film of dye-sensitized solar cells. The nanorod shows the same advantages as nanotubes: the fast electron transport, the reduced recombination, and the long lifetime.

762730.fig.003
Figure 3: (a) TEM image of nanorods prepared with F127. (b) HRTEM image of (a) [49].

We also fabricated such small size nanorods with a special method different from the tradition. The nanorods were obtained by calcination of protonated TiO2 nanotube at 600°C for 2 h [16]. It is much thicker and shorter with a diameter of 15–30 nm and a length of about 100 nm. The interference fringe spacing of the nanorods is about 0.35 nm, corresponding to the interplanar distance of the (101) plane in the anatase phase. And the conversion efficiency could reach to 7.71%. IMPS and IMVS were used to investigate further the electron transport and recombination processes, as shown in Table 1. Compared with nanotube calcined at 400°C, nanorods calcined at 600°C show a longer lifetime, which is over 10-fold longer than that for TiO2(B) nanotube and a shorter electron transport time only half of the TiO2(B) nanotube. This indicates that anatase nanorods with a good crystallinity are beneficial to a faster electron transport and a longer electron lifetime. In fact, it is considered that the good crystallinity and the cylindrical geometry could allow the nanorods to support radial electric fields, which could keep the electrons away from the nanorods surface, thereby reducing surface electron densities and recombination.

tab1
Table 1: Detailed IMPS/IMVS parameters of the DSSC with titanate nanotubes calcined at different temperatures [16].
2.2. Vertically Aligned 1D TiO2

Randomly oriented 1D TiO2 nanomaterial undoubtedly plays as the “electron speedways;” however, these nanotubes and nanorods are disordered and random. It has not realized the direct electron transport. So, it is significant to design and study the vertically aligned 1D TiO2 nanomaterials would be much more significative.

2.2.1. Vertically Aligned 1D TiO2 Nanotube

Vertically aligned TiO2 nanotubes provide a vertical pathway for electron transport along the tube and thus minimize electron loss during diffusion process, and the vertically ordered tubular structure will facilitate the filling of new sensitizer or electrolyte for a further increase in efficiency. As such, self-aligned TiO2 nanotube arrays have been widely studied for applications as photoanodes in DSSCs [65–74].

Mor et al. [38] have reported a highly ordered 360 nm long TiO2 nanotube arrays, made by anodization of thick-film titanium foil (Figure 4). Afer treating with TiCl4 and calcining at 450°C, a highly ordered photoanode was obtained. The DSSC exhibited a of 7.87 mA/cm2, a of 0.75 V, and an overall conversion efficiency of 2.9%. This result was no better than nanoparticles. A low surface area with a length of only 360 nm could be responsible for the result of insufficient dye-loading and low light-harvesting efficiency. However, highly ordered arrays showed a long lifetime and excellent electron transport path compared to nanoparticles. To resolve the problem of the low surface area, many efforts were done. Nanotubes with lengths up to 100 μm have been produced to increase the surface area for dye-loading [63, 75]. Shankar et al. [63] even obtained ultralong TiO2 nanotubes with length over 200 μm (Figure 5), which delivered significantly improved DSSC efficiency of 6.89%. However, synthesis of these ultralong nanotubes costs much time (more than 10 h) and electricity for anodization process, and the reported efficiencies of TiO2-nanotube-array-based DSSCs are still lower than DSSCs based on mesoporous TiO2 films due to the relative low internal surface area for dyeloading of nanotube arrays [44, 76, 77].

fig4
Figure 4: (a) Lateral view FESEM images of titanium nanotubes grown from a 500 nm thick Ti thin film (sputtered onto SnO2:F coated glass at 500°C) anodized using a 0.5% HF electrolyte concentration at a potential of 12 V. (b) Integration of transparent nanotube array architecture into dye solar cell structure [38].
fig5
Figure 5: Illustrative FESEM cross-sectional (a) and top images (b) of a nanotube-array sample grown at 60 V in an ethylene glycol electrolyte containing 0.25 wt% NH4F [63].
2.2.2. Vertically Aligned 1D TiO2 Nanorod

Different from 1D nanotube array, DSSCs based on 1D TiO2 nanorods array remain a challenge [43, 78–86], which is mainly owing to the low dye-loading ability resulting from the insufficient specific surface area. Liu and Aydil [44] reported a facile, hydrothermal method for the first time to grow oriented, single-crystalline rutile TiO2 nanorod films on transparent conductive fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates (Figure 6). The growth parameters, such as growth time, growth temperature, initial reactant concentration, acidity, and types additives, could effectively influence the diameter, length, and density of the nanorods. A small lattice mismatch between the FTO substrate and rutile TiO2 is key in driving the nucleation and growth of the rutile TiO2 nanorods on FTO. 4 μm long TiO2 nanorod films were obtained through the previous method. Afer treating with TiCl4, a light-to-electricity conversion efficiency of 3% was achieved.

762730.fig.006
Figure 6: FESEM images of oriented rutile TiO2 nanorod films grown from a two-step hydrothermal reaction; (a, b) and (c, d) with and without addition of saturated aqueous NaCl solution [44].

Many efforts have done to modify the oriented rutile TiO2 nanorod to improve the photoelectrochemistry properties. Lv et al. [87] have reported a densely aligned TiO2 nanorod arrays (NRAs) with high surface area. Theses densely aligned TiO2 NRAs with tunable thickness were grown directly on transparent conductive fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates by hydrothermal method. Dilute hydrochloric acid was used as chemical etching liquid to further increase the specific surface area of the TiO2 NRAs. TiO2 nanorods were splited into secondary nanorods with a reduced diameter during the etching treatment. And the inner surface area of the TiO2 NRAs was markedly enlarged. Finally, a conversion efficiency of 5.94% was achieved by using such NRAs. It is so far the best reported results for the 1D rutile TiO2 NRA films.

2.3. 1D Hierarchical TiO2 Nanomaterial

TiO2 nanoparticles used in DSSCs have its limitations, such as influencing the electron scattering and acting as an electron trap. 1D nanostructured TiO2 could reduce the grain boundary effect and provide fast electron transport. However, it is more difficult for the liquid electrolyte to penetrate into one-dimensional titania than into nanoparticles network. And the small surface area would block the improving of the photoelectrochemistry properties. In general, fast reaction kinetics (fast electron transport, long electron lifetime, and less recombination) together with large specific surface area are the essential properties of the superior photoanode materials with excellent photoelectrochemical properties.

2.3.1. Randomly Oriented 1D Hierarchical TiO2

To achieve highly efficient DSSCs, one-dimensional hierarchical composites were designed as show in Figure 7 [50], which combine the high electron transport from 1D nanostructures and large surface area to attach enough dyes from nanoparticles. A proposed electron transfer model is shown in the following; the injected electrons in the nanoparticles standing on nanorods are subject to transfer into the nanorods and then are rapidly transported to FTO substrate due to the single-crystal feature of the nanorods. The results indicate that one-dimensional hierarchical titania cannot only provide a matrix similar to the hybrid structure matrix but also avoid forming a large amount of grain boundaries with optimized fast reaction kinetics: low charge-transfer resistance, fast electron transport, and long electron lifetime. And the existed nanoparticles greatly improve the surface area of the nanorods. The conversion efficiency of one-dimensional hierarchical titania can reach to 4.46%, which is about 5 times higher than that of their corresponding nanorods.

762730.fig.007
Figure 7: (a) Schematic diagram of the dye-sensitized solar cell with the one-dimensional hierarchical titania as photoanode on FTO, showing the processes involved in current generation. (b, c) TEM images of the one-dimensional titania with hierarchical structures after calcination at 300°C (b) and 700°C (c). (d, e) The electron lifetime ( ) (d) and electron transport time ( ) (e) for DSSCs of titania with hierarchical structures, nanorods, and nanoparticles [50].
2.3.2. Vertically Aligned 1D hierarchical TiO2

Pan et al. [64] have reported vertically aligned 1D hierarchical TiO2. 10 nm size of TiO2 NPs were uniformly coated on the side walls of NTs through infiltration with TiCl4 solution and hydrothermal synthesis (Figure 8). Compared with the bare NT structure, dye-loading of mixed NT and NP structure was two times doubled. The larger surface area resulted in more recombination which slightly reduced the electron lifetime. However, the diffusion length was still longer than the tube length used. This means most electrons are collected.

762730.fig.008
Figure 8: (a) SEM images of one-cycle infiltration: inside view of the split NTs. (b) NT and NP mixed structure after two-cycle infiltration [64].

3. Summary

In this paper, we have summarized the using of 1D TiO2 nanostructures as electrode materials for DSSC photoanode.

Randomly oriented 1D TiO2 (nanotubes and nanorods) with cylindrical geometry could support radial electric fields that could keep the electrons away from the nanorods surface, thereby reducing surface electron densities and recombination. And large aspect ratio of TiO2 would help to reduce the grain boundary effect. The electron lifetime would also increase. All these advantages could be beneficial for the improved photoelectrochemical properties. However, randomly oriented 1D TiO2 nanomaterial are disordered and random. It has not realized the direct electron transport. Vertically aligned TiO2 nanotubes provide a vertical pathway for electron transport along the tube and thus minimize electron loss during diffusion process, and the vertically ordered tubular structure will facilitate the filling of new sensitizer and electrolyte for a further increase in efficiency. However, the small surface area made the photoelectrochemistry properties worse than the randomly oriented 1D TiO2 nanomaterial. In general, fast reaction kinetics (fast electron transport, long electron lifetime, and less recombination) together with large specific surface area are the essential properties of the superior photoanode materials with excellent photoelectrochemical properties. To achieve highly efficient DSSCs, 1D hierarchical TiO2 were designed. Both randomly oriented and vertically aligned 1D nanostructures have been used as the photoanode materials. Detailed study showed that this 1D hierarchical TiO2 could combine the high electron transport from 1D nanostructures and large surface area to attach enough dyes from nanoparticles. Furthermore, the bigger pores inside the hierarchically structured films are also beneficial for the permeation and diffusion of electrolyte in the photoanode, forming good ohmic contact. The results provide a potential approach to obtain highly effective solar conversion materials.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Chinese National Science Funds (no. 51202094); the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions; the Natural Science Foundation (no. 12KJB150010 and no. 12KJB430001) of Jiangsu Education Committee of China.

References

  1. A. Fujishima and K. Honda, “Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode,” Nature, vol. 238, no. 5358, pp. 37–38, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. O’Regan and M. Grätzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films,” Nature, vol. 353, pp. 737–740, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at Scopus
  4. R. Wang, K. Hashimoto, A. Fujishima et al., “Light-induced amphiphilic surfaces,” Nature, vol. 388, no. 6641, pp. 431–432, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Grätzel, “Photoelectrochemical cells,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6861, pp. 338–344, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. U. M. Khan, M. Al-Shahry, and W. B. Ingler, “Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5590, pp. 2243–2245, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. V. Kamat, “Meeting the clean energy demand: nanostructure architectures for solar energy conversion,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 2834–2860, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. Maciak and Z. Opilski, “Transition metal oxides covered Pd film for optical H2 gas detection,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 515, no. 23, pp. 8351–8355, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. G. Manera, J. Spadavecchia, D. Buso et al., “Optical gas sensing of TiO2 and TiO2/Au nanocomposite thin films,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 107–115, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Campus, P. Bonhôte, M. Grätzel, S. Heinen, and L. Walder, “Electrochromic devices based on surface-modified nanocrystalline TiO2 thin-film electrodes,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 56, no. 3-4, pp. 281–297, 1999. View at Scopus
  11. D. P. Partlow and T. W. O’Keeffe, “Thirty-seven layer optical filter from polymerized sol-gel solutions,” Applied Optics, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1526–1529, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. A. Brudnik, H. Czternastek, K. Zakrzewska, and M. Jachimowski, “Plasma-emission-controlled d.c. magnetron sputtering of TiO2-x thin films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 1991. View at Scopus
  13. L. Yang, S. S. Saavedra, N. R. Armstrong, and J. Hayes, “Fabrication and characterization of low-loss, sol-gel planar waveguides,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 1254–1263, 1994. View at Scopus
  14. L. Xiao-e, A. N. M. Green, S. A. Haque, A. Mills, and J. R. Durrant, “Light-driven oxygen scavenging by titania/polymer nanocomposite films,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 162, no. 2-3, pp. 253–259, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Zhang, G. R. Li, L. P. An, T. Y. Yan, X. P. Gao, and H. Y. Zhu, “Electrochemical lithium storage of titanate and titania nanotubes and nanorods,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 16, pp. 6143–6148, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Qu, Q. D. Wu, Y. R. Ren, Z. Su, C. Lai, and J. N. Ding, “Enhanced high-rate performance of double-walled TiO2-B nanotubes as anodes in lithium-ion batteries,” Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 2516–2518, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. P. G. Bruce, B. Scrosati, and J. M. Tarascon, “Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 47, no. 16, pp. 2930–2946, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. R. Armstrong, G. Armstrong, J. Canales, and P. G. Bruce, “TiO2-B nanowires,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 116, no. 17, pp. 2336–2338, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. G. Armstrong, A. R. Armstrong, J. Canales, and P. G. Bruce, “Nanotubes with the TiO2-B structure,” Chemical Communications, no. 19, pp. 2454–2456, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Lai, H. Z. Zhang, G. R. Li, and X. P. Gao, “Mesoporous polyaniline/TiO2 microspheres with core-shell structure as anode materials for lithium ion battery,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 196, no. 10, pp. 4735–4740, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Lai, G. R. Li, Y. Y. Dou, and X. P. Gao, “Mesoporous polyaniline or polypyrrole/anatase TiO2 nanocomposite as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 55, no. 15, pp. 4567–4572, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Ohsaki, N. Masaki, S. Yanagida et al., “Dye-sensitized TiO2 nanotube solar cells: fabrication and electronic characterization,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 7, no. 24, pp. 4157–4163, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Hagfeldt and M. Grätzel, “Molecular photovoltaics,” Accounts of Chemistry Research, vol. 3, pp. 269–277, 2000.
  24. J. Bisquert, D. Cahen, G. Hodes, S. Rühle, and A. Zaban, “Physical chemical principles of photovoltaic conversion with nanoparticulate, mesoporous dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 24, pp. 8106–8118, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Tachibana, J. E. Moser, M. Grätzel, D. R. Klug, and J. R. Durrant, “Subpicosecond interfacial charge separation in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline titanium dioxide films,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 100, no. 51, pp. 20056–20062, 1996. View at Scopus
  26. M. K. Nazeeruddin, A. Kay, I. Rodicio et al., “Conversion of light to electricity by cis-X2bis(2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-dicarboxylate)ruthenium(II) charge-transfer sensitizers (X = Cl-, Br-, I-, CN-, and SCN-) on nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 115, no. 14, pp. 6382–6390, 1993. View at Scopus
  27. A. Hagfeldt and M. Grätzel, “Light-induced redox reactions in nanocrystalline systems,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 49–68, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. A. Yella, H. W. Lee, H. N. Tsao et al., “Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency,” Science, vol. 334, no. 6056, pp. 629–634, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. S. A. Haque, E. Palomares, B. M. Cho et al., “Charge separation versus recombination in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline solar cells: the minimization of kinetic redundancy,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 10, pp. 3456–3462, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Pan, Y. Dong, C. Tian et al., “TiO2-B narrow nanobelt/TiO2 nanoparticle composite photoelectrode for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 54, no. 28, pp. 7350–7356, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Berger, T. Lana-Villarreal, D. Monllor-Satoca, and R. Gómez, “An electrochemical study on the nature of trap states in nanocrystalline rutile thin films,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 27, pp. 9936–9942, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. H. Chen, F. Z. Huang, Y. B. Cheng, and R. A. Caruso, “Mesoporous anatase TiO2 beads with high surface areas and controllable pore sizes: a superior candidate for high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 2206–2210, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. F. Qian, P. Liu, Y. Xiao et al., “TiO2-coated multilayered SnO2 hollow microspheres for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 36, pp. 3617–3667, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. J. Bierman and S. Jin, “Potential applications of hierarchical branching nanowires in solar energy conversion,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1050–1059, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Hu, S. Dai, J. Weng et al., “Microstructure design of nanoporous TiO2 photoelectrodes for dye-sensitized solar cell modules,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 358–362, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Law, L. E. Greene, J. C. Johnson, R. Saykally, and P. Yang, “Nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nature Materials, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 455–459, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. Zhu, N. R. Neale, A. Miedaner, and A. J. Frank, “Enhanced charge-collection efficiencies and light scattering in dye-sensitized solar cells using oriented TiO2 nanotubes arrays,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. K. Mor, K. Shankar, M. Paulose, O. K. Varghese, and C. A. Grimes, “Use of highly-ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 215–218, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Y. Song, D. K. Kim, K. J. Ihn, S. M. Jo, and D. Y. Kim, “Electrospun TiO2 electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nanotechnology, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1861–1865, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. W. Zhang, R. Zhu, L. Ke, X. Liu, B. Liu, and S. Ramakrishna, “Anatase mesoporous TiO2 nanofibers with high surface area for solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells,” Small, vol. 6, no. 19, pp. 2176–2182, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Q. L. Huang, G. Zhou, L. Fang, L. Hu, and Z. S. Wang, “TiO2 nanorod arrays grown from a mixed acid medium for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2145–2151, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Adachi, Y. Murata, J. Takao, J. Jiu, M. Sakamoto, and F. Wang, “Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells with a titania thin-film electrode composed of a network structure of single-crystal-like TiO2 nanowires made by the “oriented attachment” mechanism,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 45, pp. 14943–14949, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. X. Feng, K. Shankar, O. K. Varghese, M. Paulose, T. J. Latempa, and C. A. Grimes, “Vertically aligned single crystal TiO2 nanowire arrays grown directly on transparent conducting oxide coated glass: synthesis details and applications,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 3781–3786, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. B. Liu and E. S. Aydil, “Growth of oriented single-crystalline rutile TiO2 nanorods on transparent conducting substrates for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, no. 11, pp. 3985–3990, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Vomiero, V. Galstyan, A. Braga et al., “Flexible dye sensitized solar cells using TiO2 nanotubes,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 3408–3413, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. L. L. Li, Y. J. Chen, H. P. Wu, N. S. Wang, and E. W. G. Diau, “Detachment and transfer of ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays for front-illuminated dye-sensitized solar cells,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 3420–3425, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. L. D. Sun, S. Zhang, X. Wang, X. W. Sun, D. Y. Ong, and A. K. K. Kyaw, “A novel parallel configuration of dye-sensitized solar cells with double-sided anodic nanotube arrays,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2240–2248, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. R. Jennings, A. Ghicov, L. M. Peter, P. Schmuki, and A. B. Walker, “Dye-sensitized solar cells based on oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: transport, trapping, and transfer of electrons,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 40, pp. 13364–13372, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. Jiu, F. Wang, S. Isoda, and M. Adachi, “Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells based on single crystalline TiO2 nanorod film,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1506–1507, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Qu, G. R. Li, and X. P. Gao, “One-dimensional hierarchical titania for fast reaction kinetics of photoanode materials of dye-sensitized solar cells,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 2003–2009, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. E. Enache-Pommer, J. E. Boercker, and E. S. Aydil, “Electron transport and recombination in polycrystalline TiO2 nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, no. 12, Article ID 123116, 3 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Kläui, H. Ehrke, U. Rüdiger et al., “Direct observation of domain-wall pinning at nanoscale constrictions,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 87, no. 10, Article ID 102509, 3 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. S. H. Kang, S. H. Choi, M. S. Kang et al., “Nanorod-based dye-sensitized solar cells with improved charge collection efficiency,” Advanced Materials, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. B. Tan and Y. Wu, “Dye-sensitized solar cells based on anatase TiO2 nanoparticle/nanowire composites,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 32, pp. 15932–15938, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. J. Wu, G. R. Chen, C. C. Lu, W. T. Wu, and J. S. Chen, “Performance and electron transport properties of TiO2 nanocomposite dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nanotechnology, vol. 19, no. 10, Article ID 105702, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. D. Hernández-Alonso, F. Fresno, S. Suárez, and J. M. Coronado, “Development of alternative photocatalysts to TiO2: challenges and opportunities,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1231–1257, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. Gubbala, V. Chakrapani, V. Kumar, and M. K. Sunkara, “Band-edge engineered hybrid structures for dye-sensitized solar cells based on SnO2 nanowires,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 2411–2418, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. S. Uchida, R. Chiba, M. Tomiha, N. Masaki, and M. Shirai, “Application of titania nanotubes to a dye-sensitized solar cell,” Electrochemistry, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 418–420, 2002. View at Scopus
  59. T. Kasuga, M. Hiramatsu, A. Hoson, T. Sekino, and K. Niihara, “Formation of titanium oxide nanotube,” Langmuir, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 3160–3163, 1998. View at Scopus
  60. M. Adachi, Y. Murata, I. Okada, and S. Yoshikawa, “Formation of titania nanotubes and applications for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 150, no. 8, pp. G488–G493, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. Y. Lan, X. P. Gao, H. Y. Zhu et al., “Titanate nanotubes and nanorods prepared from rutile powder,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1310–1318, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. J. Jiu, S. Isoda, M. Adachi, and F. Wang, “Dye-sensitized solar cells based on a single-crystalline TiO2 nanorod film,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 2087–2092, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. K. Shankar, G. K. Mor, H. E. Prakasam et al., “Highly-ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays up to 220 μm in length: use in water photoelectrolysis and dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18, no. 6, Article ID 065707, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. X. Pan, C. H. Chen, K. Zhu, and Z. Y. Fan, “TiO2 nanotubes infiltrated with nanoparticles for dye sensitized solar cells,” Nanotechnology, vol. 22, Article ID 235402, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. O. K. Varghese, M. Paulose, and C. A. Grimes, “Long vertically aligned titania nanotubes on transparent conducting oxide for highly efficient solar cells,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 592–597, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. D. Ye, X. K. Xin, C. J. Lin, and Z. Q. Lin, “High efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells based on hierarchically structured nanotubes,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 3214–3220, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. M. Paulose, K. Shankar, O. K. Varghese, G. K. Mor, B. Hardin, and C. A. Grimes, “Backside illuminated dye-sensitized solar cells based on titania nanotube array electrodes,” Nanotechnology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1446–1448, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. J. M. Macák, H. Tsuchiya, A. Ghicov, and P. Schmuki, “Dye-sensitized anodic TiO2 nanotubes,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1133–1137, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. S. H. Kang, J. W. Lim, H. S. Kim, J. Y. Kim, Y. H. Chung, and Y. E. Sung, “Photo and electrochemical characteristics dependent on the phase ratio of nanocolumnar structured TiO2 films by RF magnetron sputtering technique,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 2777–2788, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. G. K. Mor, K. Shankar, M. Paulose, O. K. Varghese, and C. A. Grimes, “Enhanced photocleavage of water using titania nanotube arrays,” Nano Letters, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 191–195, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. Paulose, K. Shankar, S. Yoriya et al., “Anodic growth of highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays to 134 μm in length,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 33, pp. 16179–16184, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. J. H. Park, T. W. Lee, and M. G. Kang, “Growth, detachment and transfer of highly-ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays: use in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Chemical Communications, no. 25, pp. 2867–2869, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. S. P. Albu, A. Ghicov, J. M. Macak, R. Hahn, and P. Schmuki, “Self-organized, free-standing TiO2 nanotube membrane for flow-through photocatalytic applications,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1286–1289, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. J. Wang and Z. Q. Lin, “Freestanding TiO2 nanotube arrays with ultrahigh aspect ratio via electrochemical anodization,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1257–1261, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. M. Paulose, K. Shankar, S. Yoriya et al., “Anodic growth of highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays to 134 μm in length (Journal of Physical Chemistry B (2006) 110B),” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 112, no. 47, p. 15261, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. J. B. Baxter and E. S. Aydil, “Nanowire-based dye-sensitized solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, no. 5, Article ID 053114, 3 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. C. Xu, P. H. Shin, L. Cao, J. Wu, and D. Gao, “Ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays on transparent conductive oxide for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 143–148, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. Q. Huang, G. Zhou, L. Fang, L. Hu, and Z. S. Wang, “TiO2 nanorod arrays grown from a mixed acid medium for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2145–2151, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. T. Krishnamoorthy, V. Thavasi, G. M. Subodh, and S. Ramakrishna, “A first report on the fabrication of vertically aligned anatase TiO2 nanowires by electrospinning: preferred architecture for nanostructured solar cells,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 2807–2812, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. S. Fujihara, E. Hosono, K. Kakiuchi, and H. Imai, “Growth of submicrometer-scale rectangular parallelepiped rutile TiO2 films in aqueous TiCl3 solutions under hydrothermal conditions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 25, pp. 7790–7791, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. J. J. Wu and C. C. Yu, “Aligned TiO2 nanorods and nanowalls,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 11, pp. 3377–3379, 2004. View at Scopus
  82. Q. Zhou, X. F. Yang, S. Q. Zhang et al., “Rutile nanowire arrays: tunable surface densities, wettability and photochemistry,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 39, pp. 15806–15812, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. Y. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Xu, M. Li, and H. Shen, “Substrate-free, large-scale, free-standing and two-side oriented single crystal TiO2 nanorod array films with photocatalytic properties,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, no. 13, pp. 3790–3792, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. G. Wang, H. Wang, Y. Ling et al., “Hydrogen-treated TiO2 nanowire arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 3026–3033, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. X. Feng, J. Zhai, and L. Jiang, “The fabrication and switchable superhydrophobicity of TiO2 nanorod films,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 44, no. 32, pp. 5115–5118, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. E. Barea, X. Q. Xu, V. Gonzalez-Pedro, T. Ripolles-Sanchis, F. Fabregat-Santiago, and J. Bisquert, “Origin of efficiency enhancement in Nb2O5 coated titanium dioxide nanorod based dye sensitized solar cells,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 3414–3419, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. M. Q. Lv, D. J. Zheng, M. D. Ye et al., “Densely aligned rutile TiO2 nanorod arrays with high surface area for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, no. 19, pp. 5872–5879, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar