About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 487943, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/487943
Research Article

Fabrication of Ultrafine Carbon Fibers Possessing a Nanoporous Structure from Electrospun Polyvinyl Alcohol Fibers Containing Silica Nanoparticles

Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Materials Engineering Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, 1-3 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan

Received 25 February 2014; Revised 2 May 2014; Accepted 3 May 2014; Published 16 June 2014

Academic Editor: Ruigang Liu

Copyright © 2014 Koichi Sawada et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Ultrafine carbon fibers with a nanoporous structure were fabricated by the template method using silica nanoparticles (NPs) embedded in fibers of approximate diameter 500 nm, electrospun from an aqueous solution of polyvinyl alcohol, , silica NPs, and N,N-dimethylformamide. Black, conductive fibers were obtained by heat treatment in air and a chemical vapor deposition reaction under methanol vapor for more than 5 h. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) demonstrated that the fabricated fibers after silica removal had a porous structure originating from 15 nm diameter silica NPs. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis combined with TEM confirmed the removal of silica from the fibers by NaOH treatment at 80°C. Total surface area and total pore volume of the fibers after silica removal, determined by nitrogen adsorption measurement, were 318 m2/g and 1.67 cm3/g, respectively. The sheet resistivities of the fabricated fibers were 35.1–477 Ω/□, which were relatively high, compared with that reported for polyacrylonitrile-based fibers carbonized at 800°C. D and G bands detected in the Raman spectrum of the NaOH-treated fibers showed that the prepared carbon fibers were more crystalline than natural carbonaceous materials.

1. Introduction

Carbon materials have attractive properties, such as surface hydrophobicity, chemical inertness, large surface area to volume ratios, and thermal stability. These properties enable their use in various applications, including catalysts [1], energy devices [2], sensors [3], and water and air cleaning elements [4, 5]. Recently, ultrafine carbon fibers fabricated from electrospun fibers have attracted great interest because they can be obtained as nonwoven fabrics consisting of continuous fibers with diameters ranging from several hundred nm to sub μm and such fabrics show high porosity and interconnectivity [6]. Ultrafine carbon fibers have been fabricated by carbonization of electrospun fibers made from carbon precursors such as polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and pitch [6].

Much effort has been given to control the structure, texture, and conductivity of fibers to expand the availability of the materials [6]. Amongst the properties of fibrous materials, the pore structure plays a key role in applications. However, the conventional electrospinning process only generates solid ultrafine fibers, without pores. Therefore, posttreatment methods have been developed to create desirable pores in the carbon fibers [7, 8]. For this purpose, two processes have been reported. One is the treatment of carbon fibers with steam or carbon dioxide at 700–1000°C, a so-called “activation” process [8]. The other is to induce phase separation using a hard or soft template. Kim et al. fabricated porous PAN-based carbon fibers by phase separation. Porous carbon fibers were prepared via electrospinning of PAN and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), followed by carbonization with decomposition of PMMA [9]. In a recent report, Liu et al. fabricated porous carbon fibers by phase separation via electrospinning of PAN and CaCO3 nanoparticles (NPs) and subsequent carbonization, followed by acid treatment to remove the CaCO3 template. The carbon fibers possessed a nanoporous structure, resulting in a high surface area and pore volume. These characteristics were reported to play a key role in a catalytic application and to be potentially useful in other applications [10].

In the current study, the fabrication of carbon fibers with a controlled nanoporous structure is proposed by combining a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reaction and phase separation using electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) fibers containing 15 nm silica NPs as pore templates. Figure 1 illustrates the stepwise procedure proposed in this study to prepare nanoporous carbon fibers, which includes the treatments of electrospun fibers with heat and CVD and removal of silica NPs. The fibers are electrospun from a solution composed of PVA, CoCl2, silica NPs, and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as a cosolvent that facilitates electrospinning. Cobalt is known to catalyze carbon deposition during the CVD reaction [11]. In the present study, a cobalt compound was added to the electrospinning solution to facilitate carbon deposition inside the fibers, for maintaining the continuous nanofibrous structure after removal of the silica NPs. Heat treatment produces a fiber preparation containing cobalt and silica NPs. Subsequent removal of the silica NPs by NaOH endows the resultant carbon fibers with a nanoporous structure.

487943.fig.001
Figure 1: Schematic drawing of the stepwise procedure for fabrication of nanoporous carbon fibers by combined electrospinning, CVD reaction, and phase separation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

PVA (MW: 146,000–186,000 Da) was purchased from Polysciences, Inc. (Warrington, PA, USA) and CoCl2·6H2O, DMF, and methanol were products from Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Colloidal silica (trade name: Snowtex), a sol of 30 wt% silica NPs with an average diameter of 15 nm, was provided by Nissan Chemical Industries Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).

2.2. Electrospinning of PVA/CoCl2/Silica NP Mixture Solution

An aqueous solution of 15 wt% PVA was prepared by autoclaving a suspension of PVA powder in distilled water at 120°C for 20 min. An aqueous solution of 1 wt% CoCl2·6H2O (3.9 g) was added dropwise to the colloidal silica sol (8.4 g) under vigorous stirring using a magnetic stirrer. This solution was mixed with the PVA solution (8.5 g) and DMF (1.7 g) and then electrospun at a tip-to-collector distance of 15 cm, with a solution flow rate of 2.0 mL/min and applied voltage of 20 kV.

2.3. Formation of Nanoporous Structure by Template Method

The electrospun fibers were calcined at 500°C under air flow for 5 h after elevating the temperature at 5°C/min. Subsequently, the resultant fibers were subjected to CVD reaction in a quartz tube furnace (60 cm in length). Methanol vapor was delivered by bubbling nitrogen gas through a glass trap containing pure methanol at 200 cm3/min and ambient temperature. The methanol/nitrogen gas mixture was then introduced into the furnace and the CVD reaction was performed at 600°C for the prescribed period. Finally, the silica NPs were removed to form a nanoporous structure in the carbon fibers by soaking the fibers in a 10 wt% NaOH aqueous solution for 24 h at 80°C. After treatment, the fibers were rinsed with a large amount of distilled water and lyophilized.

2.4. Morphological Characterization by TEM-EDX

Morphologies and element mapping of the electrospun fibers were characterized with a transmission electron microscope-energy dispersive X-ray (TEM-EDX) instrument (H-800EDX, Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan) operated at 200 kV. The fibers were dispersed in water by sonication and deposited on a TEM copper grid.

2.5. Pore Structural Characterization

The pore structure of the fibers was investigated by measuring the nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms at −196°C with an automatic volumetric sorption analyzer (Autosorb-1, Quantachrome Co., Boynton Beach, FA, USA). The total surface area ( ) and pore volume ( ) were calculated by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method and the Brunauer-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method, respectively.

2.6. Sheet Resistivity Measurement

Sheet resistivity of the fibers was evaluated by a four-point probe resistivity measurement with a resistivity meter (RT-70V/RG-5, Napson Co., Chiba, Japan). The fibrous mats were cut and shaped into rectangles that were 1 cm square on each side, with an average thickness of 35 μm, and placed on a glass substrate.

2.7. Raman Spectroscopy Measurement

Raman spectroscopy was carried out to evaluate the quality and crystallinity of carbon fibers using a confocal Raman microscope (LabRAM HR-800, Horiba, Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) at a wavelength of 532 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electrospinning and TEM-EDX Characterization

Ultrafine PVA fibers of about 500 nm in diameter containing CoCl2 and silica NPs were obtained by electrospinning. The white color of fibers as spun (Figure 2(a)) apparently became light blue after calcination in air at 500°C for 5 h (Figure 2(b)). From the TEM observations of fibers as spun and after calcination, it was found that the electron transparency inside the fibers increased somewhat after calcination and the presence of silica particles became more distinct (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). This result indicates that the calcination treatment yielded fibers predominantly containing silica NPs (Figure 2(b)). As seen in Figures 2(b) and 2(c), no significant structural difference was observed by TEM between the fibers before and after the CVD reaction. However, a color change from white to black after the CVD reaction was obvious, which indicates the deposition of carbon in/on the fibers (Figure 2(c)). A black mat was obtained even after silica removal with NaOH treatment for 24 h. Electron transparency of the fibers was significantly increased after the NaOH treatment (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). This result indicates that after the NaOH treatment, the fibers had a nanoporous structure originating from the silica NPs.

fig2
Figure 2: Photographs and TEM images of the PVA/ /silica NP fibers as spun (a), after heat treatment at 500°C for 5 h in air (b), after CVD reaction at 600°C for 24 h (c), and after NaOH treatment at 80°C for 24 h (d).

Next, the silica removal was confirmed by an EDX spectrometer equipped with TEM. Figures 3(a)3(f) show scanning transmission electron microscopic (STEM) images and the results of element mapping for Si and Co. As seen in Figures 3(a) and 3(b), it was found that after the CVD reaction, the fibers contained a large amount of silica NPs. From an appreciable decrease in the Si signals, the silica NPs were shown to have been substantially removed by the NaOH treatment (Figures 3(b) and 3(e)). As shown in Figures 3(c) and 3(f), conversely, the signals for Co were too weak to detect its location or any difference after the NaOH treatment.

fig3
Figure 3: STEM images (a and d) and element mapping by EDX spectroscopy of Si (b and e) and Co (c and f) in the fibers before and after NaOH treatment at 80°C for 24 h, respectively.
3.2. Pore Structural Characterization

The pore structures of the carbon fibers were determined by the nitrogen adsorption/desorption method. The isotherm observed for the fibers after the NaOH treatment had a type-H1 hysteresis loop (Figure 4(a)) [12], which was not observed for the fibers before the treatment, while the capillary condensation occurred at high relative pressures ( = 0.85–0.97). Additionally, from the corresponding pore size distributions of the fibers calculated by the BJH method, it was shown that the NaOH treatment increased mainly the quantity of mesopores (2–50 nm) and partially the quantity of macropores (>50 nm) in the fibers (Figure 4(b)). Table 1 summarizes the BET surface area and pore volume distributions of the fibers after the CVD and NaOH treatment. The BET surface area of the fibers increased approximately 4 times after the NaOH treatment. Notably, the mesopore volume, in particular, greatly increased from 0.26 to 1.33 cm3/g through the NaOH treatment. These results indicate that the 15 nm silica NPs loaded into the fibers acted as templates for pores in the resultant fibers. The total pore volume also increased from 0.37 to 1.67 cm3/g, which is comparable with that of carbon aerogels [13, 14] and larger than that of carbon nanotubes synthesized by acetylene decomposition on cobalt-supported silica [14]. The highly porous fibrous structure may be useful in applications as catalyst supports and water cleaning, such as oil spill cleanup [10].

tab1
Table 1: Surface area and pore volume distributions of the fibers.
fig4
Figure 4: Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms (a) and pore size distributions (b) for the fibers after CVD reaction at 600°C for 24 h and after NaOH treatment at 80°C for 24 h. STP: standard temperature and pressure (1 atm, 0°C).
3.3. Effect of CVD Reaction Time on Sheet Resistivity

The sheet resistivity of the fibers was measured to evaluate the amount of carbon deposition, as influenced by CVD reaction time. As shown in Figure 5, for 15 min reaction, the fibers displayed high resistivity, acting as insulators. By prolonging the reaction time from 15 min to 1 h, the obtained fibers became conductive, with a sheet resistivity of 477 ± 66.4 Ω/□, and further reaction for 5 h lowered the resistivity to 56.3 ± 1.47 Ω/□. Finally, the sheet resistivity of the fibers, after 24 h CVD, was 35.1 ± 4.82 Ω/□, which was similar to that of the fibers after 5 h CVD reaction. Considered together with the TEM image of the fibers that had undergone the CVD reaction (Figure 2(c)), these results indicate that 5 h CVD reaction was sufficient to accumulate carbon deposits in/on the fibers under the conditions examined in the current study. Although these values of sheet resistivity are higher than those of carbonized PAN-based carbon fibers reported in the literature [6], it is difficult to compare sheet resistivity because of differences in material properties such as pore size and porosity. As the preparation process was not fully optimized in the current study, there is a possibility that sheet resistivity can be decreased by tailoring the electrospun fibers and CVD conditions.

487943.fig.005
Figure 5: Effect of CVD reaction time on sheet resistivity of the fibers after CVD reaction at 600°C and NaOH treatment at 80°C for 24 h.
3.4. Raman Spectroscopic Analysis

Raman spectroscopy is a powerful tool used to evaluate the quality and degree of crystallinity of vapor-grown carbon materials [12]. Figure 6 shows the Raman spectrum of fibers fabricated by the CVD reaction for 24 h and subsequent NaOH treatment. The pair of bands at 1358 and 1581 cm−1, designating the D and G bands, respectively, are the most diagnostically relevant features. The D/G intensity, which strongly depends on the structure of the carbon, was 1.02 for the prepared fibers. This result indicates that the carbon deposits in/on the fabricated fibers possessed a low degree of crystallinity, although they had a more crystalline nature than charcoal and coke [12].

487943.fig.006
Figure 6: Raman spectrum of the fibers after CVD reaction at 600°C for 24 h.

4. Conclusions

Ultrafine carbon fibers with a nanoporous structure were fabricated by a template method using silica NP-containing fibers, electrospun from a PVA-based aqueous solution. Black, conductive fibers were obtained by the CVD reaction under methanol vapor for a minimum of 5 h. TEM observation demonstrated that, after silica removal, the fabricated fibers had a structure originating from the silica NPs. The nitrogen adsorption/desorption method showed that the carbon fibers mainly contained mesopores (2–50 nm) and macropores (>50 nm). The total surface area and total pore volume of the fibers after silica removal were 318 m2/g and 1.67 cm3/g, respectively. EDX analysis equipped with TEM confirmed the removal of silica from the fibers by the NaOH treatment at 80°C. The sheet resistivity of the fabricated fibers was relatively high compared with that reported for PAN-based fibers carbonized at 800°C. Raman spectroscopy showed that the prepared carbon fibers were more crystalline than natural carbonaceous materials.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their appreciation to Professor H. Yasuda and Dr. T. Sakata, Research Center for Ultra-High Voltage Electron Microscopy, Osaka University, for kind assistance in TEM experiments. The authors also express their appreciation to Dr. N. Nishiyama and Drs. H. Umakoshi and K. Suga, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, for giving the facilities for nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm measurements and Raman spectroscopy analysis, respectively. This study was in part supported by the Kansai Research Foundation for Technology Promotion, Japan. One of the authors (Koichi Sawada) is grateful for financial support from a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (no. 25.1614).

References

  1. F. Rodríguez-Reinoso, “The role of carbon materials in heterogeneous catalysis,” Carbon, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 159–175, 1998. View at Scopus
  2. G. S. Chai, S. B. Yoon, J.-S. Yu, J.-H. Choi, and Y.-E. Sung, “Ordered porous carbons with tunable pore sizes as catalyst supports in direct methanol fuel cell,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 22, pp. 7074–7079, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Sotiropoulou, V. Gavalas, V. Vamvakaki, and N. A. Chaniotakis, “Novel carbon materials in biosensor systems,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 18, no. 2-3, pp. 211–215, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Lu, Y.-L. Chung, and K.-F. Chang, “Adsorption of trihalomethanes from water with carbon nanotubes,” Water Research, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1183–1189, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. H. Ao and S. C. Lee, “Indoor air purification by photocatalyst TiO2 immobilized on an activated carbon filter installed in an air cleaner,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 103–109, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Inagaki, Y. Yang, and F. Kang, “Carbon nanofibers prepared via electrospinning,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 19, pp. 2547–2566, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Yang, A. Centrone, L. Chen, F. Simeon, T. Alan Hatton, and G. C. Rutledge, “Highly porous electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-based carbon fiber,” Carbon, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 3395–3403, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. N. Bui, B. H. Kim, K. S. Yang, M. E. D. Cruz, and J. P. Ferraris, “Activated carbon fibers from electrospinning of polyacrylonitrile/pitch blends,” Carbon, vol. 47, pp. 2528–2555, 2009.
  9. C. Kim, Y. I. Jeong, B. T. N. Ngoc et al., “Synthesis and characterization of porous carbon nanofibers with hollow cores through the thermal treatment of electrospun copolymeric nanofiber webs,” Small, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 91–95, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Liu, C. Y. Cao, F. F. Wei et al., “Fabrication of macroporous/mesoporous carbon nanofiber using CaCO3 nanoparticles as dual purpose template and its application as catalyst support,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 117, pp. 21426–21432, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. Z. P. Huang, D. Z. Wang, J. G. Wen, M. Sennett, H. Gibson, and Z. F. Ren, “Effect of nickel, iron and cobalt on growth of aligned carbon nanotubes,” Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 387–391, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Zhao, J. Feng, Q. Huo et al., “Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5350, pp. 548–552, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Hanzawa, H. Hatori, N. Yoshizawa, and Y. Yamada, “Structural changes in carbon aerogels with high temperature treatment,” Carbon, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 575–581, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Frackowiak and F. Béguin, “Carbon materials for the electrochemical storage of energy in capacitors,” Carbon, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 937–950, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus