Research Article

Design and Characterization of Electrospun Polyamide Nanofiber Media for Air Filtration Applications

Table 3

The overview of filter quality factors obtained by different authors for most penetrating particle size (300 nm).

StudyMaterialFiber diameter, nmQuality factor, Pa−1Comments

Wang et al., 2008 [13]N/A150 = 0.048
= 0.025
= 0.029
= 0.020
Quality factor (QF) for face velocity  cm/s was interpolated
Zhang et al., 2009 [23]PA 6110–150
70–100
60–90
15 wt% = 0.036
12 wt% = 0.020
10 wt% = 0.016
which was applied in filtration is not known, only pressure drop for  cm/s was interpolated.
Yun et al., 2010 [8]Polyacrylonitrile
(PAN)
390
420
420
BF = 0.235–0.356
CF = 0.094–0.206
NF = 0.051–0.174
BF stands for beaded nanofiber; CF: composite particle nanofiber; NF: nanofibers. The highest value of OF of BF is for 300 nm particles; the highest values of OF of CF and NF are for 20 nm particles.  cm/s
Zhang et al., 2010 [9]Polyacrylonitrile
(PAN)
200PAN5 = 0.037
PAN15 = 0.023
PAN5x3 = 0.063
PAN15x2 = 0.025
“x3” stands for 3 layers of PAN nanofiber and “x2” stands for 2 layers.  cm/s
Leung et al., 2010 [7]Polyethylene oxide (PEO)208N9S = 0.015
N8S = 0.016
N7S = 0.017
N6S= 0.019
N5S = 0.024
N1S = 0.045
QF for cm/s was interpolated;
N1S had the lowest filtration efficiency and pressure drop, while N9S had the highest filtration efficiency and pressure drop.
Hung and Leung, 2011 [22]PA 694
185
185
185
185
220
= 0.039
= 0.037
= 0.029
= 0.027
= 0.022
= 0.022
QF for  cm/s was interpolated