Journal of Nanomaterials / 2014 / Article / Tab 3 / Research Article
Design and Characterization of Electrospun Polyamide Nanofiber Media for Air Filtration Applications Table 3 The overview of filter quality factors obtained by different authors for most penetrating particle size (300 nm).
Study Material Fiber diameter, nm Quality factor, Pa−1 Comments Wang et al., 2008 [13 ] N/A 150
= 0.048
= 0.025
= 0.029
= 0.020Quality factor (QF) for face velocity
cm/s was interpolated Zhang et al., 2009 [23 ] PA 6 110–150 70–100 60–90 15 wt% = 0.036 12 wt% = 0.020 10 wt% = 0.016
which was applied in filtration is not known, only pressure drop for
cm/s was interpolated.Yun et al., 2010 [8 ] Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) 390 420 420 BF = 0.235–0.356 CF = 0.094–0.206 NF = 0.051–0.174 BF stands for beaded nanofiber; CF: composite particle nanofiber; NF: nanofibers. The highest value of OF of BF is for 300 nm particles; the highest values of OF of CF and NF are for 20 nm particles.
cm/s Zhang et al., 2010 [9 ] Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) 200 PAN5 = 0.037 PAN15 = 0.023 PAN5x3 = 0.063 PAN15x2 = 0.025 “x3” stands for 3 layers of PAN nanofiber and “x2” stands for 2 layers.
cm/s Leung et al., 2010 [7 ] Polyethylene oxide (PEO) 208 N9S = 0.015 N8S = 0.016 N7S = 0.017 N6S= 0.019 N5S = 0.024 N1S = 0.045 QF for
cm/s was interpolated; N1S had the lowest filtration efficiency and pressure drop, while N9S had the highest filtration efficiency and pressure drop.
Hung and Leung, 2011 [22 ] PA 6 94 185 185 185 185 220
= 0.039
= 0.037
= 0.029
= 0.027
= 0.022
= 0.022QF for
cm/s was interpolated