Comparison of Acid Red 114 Dye Adsorption by Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Impregnated Rice Husk Ash

<div>The variation of <svg height="9.39034pt" id="M63" style="vertical-align:-3.42943pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 10.794 9.39034" width="10.794pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M474 429L457 433C435 440 389 448 367 448C348 448 323 446 309 443C266 434 195 406 148 366C78 307 23 210 23 101C23 35 55 -12 92 -12C118 -12 146 1 196 35C247 70 311 130 346 173H348L281 -148C268 -211 256 -221 208 -229L191 -232L187 -257L433 -245L437 -219L411 -216C357 -210 350 -205 362 -140L427 207C447 315 461 381 474 429ZM387 387C379 337 363 262 355 236C318 180 201 57 142 57C126 57 112 81 112 128C112 205 150 321 220 376C244 395 280 403 312 403C345 403 370 396 387 387Z" id="g113-114"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="491" vert-adv-y="491"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.318,3.132)"><path d="M398 365C398 411 356 451 297 451C250 451 198 430 151 397C65 336 24 230 24 139C24 14 97 -12 148 -12C198 -12 284 7 373 104L355 130C306 84 246 53 198 53C132 53 111 109 111 163V189C209 211 398 261 398 365ZM317 351C317 308 273 262 117 225C134 338 189 383 221 399C230 404 249 407 263 407C295 407 317 389 317 351Z" id="g50-102"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="422" vert-adv-y="422"></glyph.data></g></svg> values depending on pH values of MNP and RHA-MNP.</div>

Journal of Nanomaterials

fig5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Comparison of Acid Red 114 Dye Adsorption by Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Impregnated Rice Husk Ash 

Journal of Nanomaterials

Comparison of Acid Red 114 Dye Adsorption by Fe3O4 and Fe3O4 Impregnated Rice Husk Ash

Figure 5

Comparison of Acid Red 114 Dye Adsorption by Fe₃O₄ and Fe₃O₄ Impregnated Rice Husk Ash