Review Article
Advances in Synthesis and Functional Modification of Nanohydroxyapatite
Table 1
Difference between natural bone and synthetic nanoapatite.
| | Morphology | Dimension | Calcium phosphate ratio | Crystallinity | Representative method |
| Natural bone | Needle | 5–10 nm | 1.50 | low | | Flaky | 20–50 nm | |
| Chemical synthesis | Needle | 130–170 nm | 1.640–1.643 | high | Hydrothermal | 15–25 nm | Coprecipitation |
| Organic polymer template synthesis | Needle | 70–90 nm | 1.35 | low | Polyamide | 10–20 nm | Polyacrylic acid | 2–5 nm | Polyethylene glycol | Spherical | 30–50 nm | Polyethyleneimine | 1–5 µm |
| Biological template synthesis | Flaky | 7–8 nm | 1.5–1.66 | low | Collagen | Fusiform | 30–40 nm | Chitosan | Flaky | 6 nm | Chondroitin sulfate | 12 nm |
|
|