Research Article

Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adolescents: Association with Socioeconomic Status and Exposure to Supermarkets and Fast Food Outlets

Table 2

Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for infrequent fruit consumption, separate analyses for students in low, middle, and high family social classes.

Low family social class, 𝑛 = 1 1 4 1 OR (95% CI)Middle family social class, 𝑛 = 2 4 7 8 OR (95% CI)High family social class, 𝑛 = 1 3 8 4 OR (95% CI)

Sexa
 Boys versus girls1.80 (1.42–2.30)***1.82 (1.54–2.14)***1.60 (1.21–1.98)***

Gradea
 7th versus 5th 1.32 (1.00–1.74)*1.20 (0.99–1.46) 1.07 (0.83–1.38)
 9th versus 5th 1.88 (1.38–2.57)***1.16 (0.95–1.43)1.50 (1.13–1.99)**

Supermarket exposurea
 low versus high1.17 (0.89–1.54)1.17 (0.97–1.40)1.08 (0.80–1.45)

Fast food outlet exposurea
 high versus low1.32 (0.98–1.76)1.18 (0.97–1.43)1.23 (0.89–1.69)

Interaction supermarket* fast food exposureb
 (i) high, low 1.0 1.0 1.0
 (ii) low, high 1.60 (1.02–2.45)*1.40 (1.03–1.90)*1.45 (0.89–2.38)
 (iii) low, low 1.10 (0.78–1.54) 1.11 (0.88–1.40) 0.91 (0.64–1.29)
 (iv) high, high1.17 (0.75–1.84)1.09 (0.81–1.47)0.94 (0.61–1.46)

a Odds ratios mutually adjusted for sex, grade, and supermarket and fast food outlet exposure.
bAdjusted for sex and grade.
Significant levels at *0.05, **0.01, ***0.001.