Research Article

The Effect of Neonatal Leptin Antagonism in Male Rat Offspring Is Dependent upon the Interaction between Prior Maternal Nutritional Status and Post-Weaning Diet

Table 1

Adult (P110) body weight, total fat (%), body length, bone density, and mineral content in CON or MHF offspring treated with either saline (S) or pegylated leptin antagonist (LA) as neonates and fed either a chow or hf diet after weaning. Data are means ± SEM, 𝑛 = 8 –16 per group.

GroupFinal body weight (g)Total body Fat (%)Lean mass (%)Fat : lean ratioNose-anus (mm)Nose-tail (mm)BMD (g/cm2)BMC (g)

CON-S-chow590 ± 1031.0 ± 2.3 67.2 ± 2.2 0.47 ± 0.05277 ± 2478 ± 20.174 ± 0.00114.8 ± 0.4
CON-S-hf723 ± 1946.6 ± 2.6 52.0 ± 2.5 0.91± 0.09279 ± 2484 ± 40.183 ± 0.00317.6 ± 0.6
CON-LA-chow595 ± 1729.1 ± 1.1 69.3 ± 0.9 0.43 ± 0.02277 ± 3479 ± 40.171 ± 0.00214.5 ± 0.2
CON-LA-hf650 ± 2137.9 ± 3.1 60.0 ± 3.8 0.72 ± 0.09278 ± 2489 ± 30.174 ± 0.00315.8 ± 0.6
MHF-S-chow621 ± 1138.9 ± 2.1 59.6 ± 2.1 0.65 ± 0.06277 ± 2477 ± 30.176 ± 0.00215.7 ± 0.3
MHF-S-hf729 ± 1851.0 ± 1.6 47.8 ± 1.5 1.06 ± 0.07280 ± 2480 ± 30.187 ± 0.00318.7 ± 0.4
MHF-LA-chow624 ± 1334.9 ± 1.5 63.5 ± 1.5 0.54 ± 0.03283 ± 1490 ± 20.171 ± 0.00114.8 ± 0.3
MHF-LA-hf710 ± 1844.1 ± 3.0 50.8 ± 1.9 0.94 ± 0.08287 ± 2493 ± 40.179 ± 0.00217.5 ± 0.4

Main effects
Maternal diet (MD) 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 5 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 5 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 NSNS 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 5
LA treatment (LA)NS 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 5 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 5 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 5
PW-diet 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 NS 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 1

Interactions
MD × LANSNSNSNS 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 NSNS
LA × PW-diet 𝑃 = 0 . 0 5 NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
MD × PW dietNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNS
MD × PW diet × LANSNSNSNSNSNSNSNS