Review Article

Folate Intake and Markers of Folate Status in Women of Reproductive Age, Pregnant and Lactating Women: A Meta-Analysis

Table 4

Forest plot of the effects of total folate supply (i.e., supplement plus dietary folate), with the supplement provided in form of folic acid and [ 6 S ]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate [5-MTHF] on serum or plasma folate in childbearing age, pregnant and lactating women.

Study or subgroupBetaSEWeightBeta
IV, Random, 95% CI
Beta
IV, Random, 95% CI

Folic acid470656.fig.002
 Brouwer et al., 1999_1 [26]0.357410490.0412669712.5%0.36 [0.28, 0.44]
 Ellison et al., 2004 [33]0.530501040.0933263211.1%0.53 [0.35, 0.71]
 Fohr et al., 2002 a [31]0.530236070.0440645812.5%0.53 [0.44, 0.62]
 Green et al., 2005 [32]1.009818770.0671707611.9%1.01 [0.88, 1.14]
 Houghton et al., 2006 f [36]0.578531130.0987882310.9%0.53 [0.38, 0.77]
 Lamers et al., 2006 c [18]0.73847530.0663708911.9%0.74 [0.61, 0.87]
 Lira et al., 1989 [34]0.370515540.0647641512.0%0.37 [0.24, 0.50]
 Mackey and Picciano, 1999 [20]0.132069210.1023482810.8%0.13 [−0.07, 0.33]
 Nogueira et al., 2003 [35]0.942913430.240373136.3%0.94 [0.47, 1.41]
Subtotal (95% CI)100.0%0.56 [0.40, 0.72]
Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0.05; Chi2 = 102.70, df = 8 ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 ); 𝐼 2 = 92%
Test for overall effect: 𝑍 = 6.68 ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 )
5-MTHF
 Fohr et al., 2002 b [31]1.659212210.0513093335.0%1.66 [1.56, 1.76]
 Houghton et al., 2006 g [36]0.748577690.1713037231.0%0.75 [0.41, 1.03]
 Lamers et al., 2006 e [18]1.068973130.090473134.0%1.07 [0.39, 1.25]
Subtotal (95% CI)100.0%1.18 [0.65, 1.71]
Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0.21; Chi2 = 50.98, df = 2 ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 ); 𝐼 2 = 96%
Test for overall effect: 𝑍 = 4.35 ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 1 )

*The Authors kindly requested us to cite both the publication in AJCN [18] and Lamers’ Ph.D. thesis for the raw data [37].
RCB: red blood cell.
aSignificant differences between the baseline and the end of the treatment.
FA: folic acid.
MTHF: methyltetrahydrofolate.