About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanotechnology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 209150, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/209150
Research Article

Selective Oxidation Using Flame Aerosol Synthesized Iron and Vanadium-Doped Nano-TiO2

1Environmental Health Laboratory, California Department of Public Health, 850 Marina Bay Parkway, EHLB/G365, Richmond, CA 94804, USA
2U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA

Received 20 December 2010; Accepted 13 April 2011

Academic Editor: Mallikarjuna Nadagouda

Copyright © 2011 Zhong-Min Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Selective photocatalytic oxidation of 1-phenyl ethanol to acetophenone using titanium dioxide (TiO2) raw and doped with Fe or V, prepared by flame aerosol deposition method, was investigated. The effects of metal doping on crystal phase and morphology of the synthesized nanostructured TiO2 were analyzed using XRD, TEM, Raman spectroscopy, and BET nitrogen adsorbed surface area measurement. The increase in the concentration of V and Fe reduced the crystalline structure and the anatase-to-rutile ratios of the synthesized TiO2. Synthesized TiO2 became fine amorphous powder as the Fe and V concentrations were increased to 3 and 5%, respectively. Doping V and Fe to TiO2 synthesized by the flame aerosol increased photocatalytic activity by 6 folds and 2.5 folds, respectively, compared to that of pure TiO2. It was found that an optimal doping concentration for Fe and V were 0.5% and 3%, respectively. The type and concentration of the metal dopants and the method used to add the dopant to the TiO2 are critical parameters for enhancing the activity of the resulting photocatalyst. The effects of solvents on the photocatalytic reaction were also investigated by using both water and acetonitrile as the reaction medium.

1. Introduction

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a photocatalyst that is used for various applications; such as wastewater and air treatments, virus disinfection and water splitting due to its low cost and its high activity and stability under irradiation. However, TiO2 has a large band gap energy (3.2 eV) that prohibits the use of visible light to activate it and requires UV light of wavelength ranging 320~400 nm to generate electron-hole pairs. Searching for semiconductors that absorbs large portion of solar spectrum reaching the earth has been intensified. Recently, there has been increasing interest in doping TiO2 with transition metal or nonmetal species, such as nitrogen and sulfur, to narrow or shift the band gap in order to activate the catalyst using visible light [16]. Doping metals in TiO2 matrix could increase the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 with irradiation both UV and visible light because of better conducting characteristics. Metal doping can also change the physical properties, such as lifetime of electron-hole pair and adsorption characteristics. Various transition metals have been used as doping materials [711], and many systems have been tested for potential commercial applications [1, 6] as well as improving photocatalyst activity of TiO2 in visible light range [1218].

However, the effects of metal doping on catalytic properties of the TiO2 are not conclusive. There are also no general guidelines to be followed in the selection of metal species or the methods of photocatalyst preparation that would result in improved activity. Although doping with transition metals at low concentrations has positive effects on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 [19, 20], some dopants have shown adverse effects [1, 21]. There is a progressive shift of the light absorption threshold toward the visible light range when increasing amounts of cations M+n (M: Cr, V, Fe, Co), but no improvement of the photoactivity of the system was observed [22]. Metal doping of TiO2 with Cr3+ and Mo5+ ions have shown to narrow the band gap of TiO2, change other physical properties such as the lifetime of electron-hole pairs and adsorption characteristics of the catalyst [23]. The presence of doping species either on the surface or in the lattice and the method how the metal species is deposited or combined with the TiO2 are critical to photocatalytic activity. Doping metal species in the matrix has been suggested to create a hole-trap or an electron-hole recombination center rather than an electron trap. Dvoranová et al. [24] suggested that transition metals should be coated mainly on the surface of the photocatalyst to form an electron trap and hence promote photocatalysis, although their results are inconclusive. The difference in results could be derived from differences in preparation methods, synthesis conditions, and position of doped species on the surface or in the crystal lattice structure of TiO2 [25]. Overload metal species on TiO2 promote either phase change [26] or recombination of the electron-holes by dramatically changing conductivity of materials [27], becoming detrimental to the photocatalytic activity. Therefore, optimal dopant concentration is usually reported for the best photocatalyst performance [2732].

Flame aerosol synthesis of nanoparticles have been used for large-scale manufacturing of ceramic powders such as pigmentary TiO2, fumed silica, and alumina [33]. Advances in this field has allowed the production of more complex products with high functionality including molecular doping of small quantities of materials in the preparation of ceramic materials [34]. The technology has been used to produce highly active nanostructured coatings with closely controlled morphology and composition [33, 35, 36]. Flame synthesis technology could be a more effective way to make versatile and low cost nanostructured materials, such as carbon nano-tubes [37]. This study aims to synthesize metal-doped nanostructured catalysts using the flame aerosol technology and test the effect of doping on photo-activities of the resulted nanostructured catalysts. In this study photocatalytic performance of Fe or V doped TiO2 synthesized using flame aerosol process in addition to further characteristics are presented. Iron was chosen because of its low toxicity and the wide availability of data as a doping material. Studies indicated that V is one of the promising doping materials [34, 38, 39], therefore it is a good choice as a doping material.

Selective catalytic oxidation of alcohols to carbonyls is one of the most important chemical transformations in chemical industry. Acetophenone is the simplest aromatic ketone with a melting point of 20°C and has low water solubility. It is an important intermediate in chemical and pharmaceutical industries. It is used for fragrance in soaps and perfumes, as a flavoring agent in food, and as a solvent for plastics and resins. In addition, it is used as a polymerization catalyst for the manufacture of olefins, as an intermediate for pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and other organic compounds as well as a drug to induce sleep.

Commercial acetophenone production involves Friedel-Crafts acylation of benzene with acetic anhydride or acetyl chloride. Friedel-Craft alkylation is commonly condensed using homogeneous acid catalysts such as aluminum chloride at more than stoichiometric amounts with acetyl chloride as the acylating agent. This process may create pollution problems related to the disposal of the catalyst and treatment of acidic effluent. It can be also obtained by air oxidation of ethyl benzene, as a by-product of cumene or from acrylonitrile.

Dehydrogenation of secondary alcohol is usually carried out using chromic acid or sulfuric acid with potassium dichromate. However, in the current work, a simple process was developed based on the utilization of heterogeneous catalysts to produce acetophenone by photocatalytic oxidation of 1-phenylethanol. The photooxidation process is cleaner than the conventional synthetic method since the reaction by-product is water, and the photocatalyst can be easily recycled back to the reaction system. The oxidation of 1-Phenylethanol was selected as a probe molecule for this study. There are studies that have shown that the preparation methods of meta-doped TiO2 can be critical in promoting the photoactivity [40].

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Preparation of Metal-Doped TiO2 using Flame Aerosol Methods

Schematic diagram of the flame aerosol synthesis system for preparing the pure and vanadium doped-TiO2 is shown in Figure 1(a). The system consists of a diffusion burner, an atomizer for generating aerosol from the titanium (IV) Isopropoxide (TTIP) (97% Aldrich Chemical) a precursor for TiO2, a water-cooled stainless steel plate for collecting the products. Mass flow controllers were used to adjust the flow rates of methane, oxygen, and air. The organic form of the vanadium, vanadium (V) oxy-tripropoxide (98%, Aldrich Chemical), was easily dissolved in TTIP in the atomizer at preset ratios. The mixture of precursors flowed to the flame through the center port of the diffusion burner. Methane and oxygen were fed through the second and outer ports, respectively. Schematic diagram of the flame aerosol reactor system for preparing iron-doped titanium dioxide is shown in Figure 1(b). A solution of Fe(NO3)3 was used as the iron source since it is more stable and less volatile than Fe carbonyl. Varying concentrations of the iron nitrate water solution were used to obtain desired amounts of Fe doping. Water was removed from the flow via diffusion dryer before aerosols reach the flame reactor to avoid quenching and allow better control of the flame temperature that may result in forming big clump in the transport tube. Earlier experiments indicated that in the case of Fe doping the stream bearing precursor material has to flow through the out port of the burner to generate higher anatase-to-rutile ratio in the TiO2. The TiO2 precursor and oxygen were introduced through the center port of the burner and methane flowed through the middle annular tube. The precursor oxidized in the flame and metal-doped TiO2 was deposited on a water-cooled stainless steel plate placed above the flame and controlled by an automatic rotating frame support. The flame temperatures were controlled by adjusting the gas flow rates and controlling the fuel-to-air ratios. The quench temperature profile was adjusted by controlling the rotating speed and the cooling water flow rate into the cooling plate. The quenching temperature affected the particle size and the morphology of the TiO2 particles. The position of the cooling plate above the flame determined the reaction time of the TiO2 precursor in the flame, which is a critical parameter to determine the primary particle size and the characteristics of the flame-synthesized TiO2. A large number of preliminary tests, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy measurements were conducted to determine suitable operation conditions that afforded for desired crystalline structure, form, particle size, and doping concentrations of TiO2. The typical experiment conditions for the flame aerosol synthesis process are shown in Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Typical flame synthesis condition for the metal doped TiO2.
fig1
Figure 1: Multiannular coflow diffusion burner for synthesizing nanostructured TiO2 with (a) vanadia doped, (b) Fe doped.
2.2. Characterization of the Synthesized Samples

X-ray diffraction pattern of powder samples of metal-doped TiO2 were characterized by XRD (Rigaku D-2000) for recording and for determining the crystal structure. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) (Philips, PW6060) was used to determine the surface morphology and particle size of the doped catalysts. The BET surface area was measured by AutoChem 2920 (Micromeritics, Atlanta, GA). Bulk doping concentrations of the metal species in the synthesized photocatalysts were determined by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) emission spectroscopy (Perkin Elmer Optima 3300 DV).

2.3. Photocatalytic Reaction

Photocatalytic activities of neat, vanadium, or Fe-doped TiO2 were evaluated using oxidation of a probe molecule, 1-phenylethanol to acetophenone in two different solvents. All experiments employed the same light source. The reactions were performed in a 20 mL microbatch reactor equipped with Pen-Ray 5.5 Watts UV lamp (TM UVP, Inc. San Gabriel, CA). The irradiance at the reactor surface was 15 mW/cm2 as measured with a photometer (International Light Inc. model IL 1400A). The schematic diagram of the microreactor system is shown in Figure 2. Neat and doped TiO2 (0.05 g/L) were suspended in the microreactor that contained 20 mL reaction medium with substrate concentration at 20 ppm. Water or acetonitrile were used as the reaction medium to study the effect of solvents. The mixture was well stirred during the reaction process using a magnetic stirrer. The UV lamp was place at the center of the reactor, and oxygen was supplied for the oxidation. Since adsorbed oxygen served as a trap for the photogenerated conduction band electron in many heterogeneous photocatalytic reactions [41], solvents were saturated with O2 prior to the reaction study. The reactions were conducted at room temperature and at atmospheric pressure. Control studies were made to measure the photocatalytic activity of neat flame synthesized anatase phase TiO2 and commercially available TiO2 from Degussa (P25). Liquid samples were collected through the reactor sample port at selected time intervals, and the mixtures were analyzed using a Hewlett-Packard 6890 gas chromatograph with a low-bleed HP-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 mm) column and a split/splitless injector. A mass selective detector equipped with a quadrapole mass filter (Hewlett-Packard 5973) was used for detection of the samples. Quantification of the oxygenated products was obtained using a multipoint calibration curve for each product.

209150.fig.002
Figure 2: Schematic of the micro reactor system for photoxidation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Characteristics of Metal-Doped TiO2

The X-ray diffraction patterns for neat TiO2 samples and for Fe-doped TiO2 with different Fe concentrations are shown in Figure 3. The primary crystalline structure of the pure TiO2 was the anatase phase. As the doped Fe concentration increased, the anatase TiO2 phase fraction decreased, reaching almost amorphous structure and losing its catalytic activity as the Fe concentration exceeded 2% in atom ratio. Similar XRD patterns were observed when the vanadium concentrations of the doped TiO2 increased beyond 4 wt%. However, the concentrations of vanadium can reach as much high as 5% wt. before major changes in the crystal structure was detected. Other researchers have observed that niobium and vanadium stabilize the anatase crystalline form of TiO2 [27, 42]. No diffraction peaks originating from V2O5 crystallite were detected from the vanadium dispersed on the TiO2, which could be due to the presence of vanadyl groups (V4+) or polymeric vanadates (V5+). A previous study [26] has shown that the increase in the doped metal ion concentrations interferes in flame synthesis of TiO2 converting some of the anatase phase to rutile, and finally it became amorphous.

209150.fig.003
Figure 3: X-ray diffraction patterns of flame aerosol prepared iron deposited TiO2 at different doping concentrations.

The Raman spectrum for the neat and Fe-doped TiO2 are shown in Figure 4. A well-resolved Raman peak is seen at 153 cm–1, and three broader features are found in the high-frequency region located at around 415, 515, and 630 cm–1. In spite of their lower intensity and broader line width, all the Raman features observed in the spectra are close to those in the bulk anatase phase. The Raman spectra of the nanophase TiO2 after different amounts of Fe were doped is shown in Figure 4. One significant observation of these spectra is the reduced intensity of the lowest-frequency Eg mode with increased amounts of Fe and a shift in peak position of the 153 cm–1, indicating the decrease in the crystalline quality of the TiO2. Therefore, the result confirms XRD data that the neat TiO2 possesses higher degree of long-range order of anatase phase. However, with increase in Fe concentration the peak intensity attenuated gradually, and the weak overlapped broader peaks in the high-frequency region indicate that the short-range order is poor and optical phonons may decay as imperfect sites. Table 2 summarizes surface area changes for different doping concentrations of flame-synthesized Fe-doped TiO2. As the doped Fe concentrations increased, the particles gradually lost crystalline structure and the products surface area increased. The surface area of vanadium-doped TiO2 also increased with increase in the amount of doping, shown in Table 3. Comparison of TEM images of pure TiO2, and V- or Fe- doped TiO2 suggested that the doped metal ions to be present on the top layers of the TiO2 particles shown as Figure 5. Ranjit and Viswanathan [31] have reported that the solid solution of TiO2 with doping materials in the top few layers of the surface promote the photocatalytic activity of the catalyst. Shah et al. [43] confirmed that photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2 can be enhanced by homogeneous doping of Nd3+, Pd2+, and Pt4+, but Fe3+ doping resulted in little or no improvements. TEM images show that when the doping concentration is not relatively high, both of the Fe- and V-doped TiO2 have similar spherical shapes and uniform particle sizes ranging from 10 to 50 nm. As the doping concentration increases the TiO2 particle sizes become smaller, more agglomerated, and resulting in larger surface areas and change of crystallinity.

tab2
Table 2: BET surface area of codeposited Fe-doped TiO2 prepared with flame aerosol method.
tab3
Table 3: BET surface area of codeposited Vanadium-doped TiO2 prepared with flame aerosol synthesis.
209150.fig.004
Figure 4: Raman spectra of nanostructured TiO2 flame aerosol synthesized doped with increasing amounts of Fe.
209150.fig.005
Figure 5: X-Ray diffraction patterns of flame aerosol prepared vanadium-deposited TiO2 at different doping concentrations.
fig6
Figure 6: Transmission electron micrograph of the pure or doped TiO2 particles: (a) pure TiO2 particles using the TTIP Precursor; (b) 0.6 wt% Fe-doped TiO2 particles; (c) 2 wt% V-doped TiO2 particles; and (d) 2 wt% Fe-doped TiO2.
3.2. Photocatalytic Oxidation of Aromatic Alcohol

In this study, the photocatalytic conversion oxidation of 1-phenlyethanol to acetophenone was tested using undoped TiO2 prepared by flame aerosol method and from Degussa, Fe- and V-doped TiO2. Gas phase oxidation of 1-phenyl ethanol produced multiple products such as benzaldehyde, styrene, toluene, and acetophenone; however, in liquid phase acetophenone was the main product observed [44]. Therefore, the yield of acetophenone that is acetophenone produced/1-phenyl-ethanol consumed is more than 95%. The initial reaction of photocatalytic oxidation 1-phenylethanol takes place on the surface of TiO2, where the primary hole reaches the surface and interacts with the surface hydroxyl groups followed by an electron transfer to the hole to form species like OH· and   TiO· [45]. These species react via a mediated pathway. At high alcohol concentration, which is the case, there could also be a direct interaction of the surface hole with the hydroxyl group of the alcohol [46]. In addition, alcohols may undergo dehydration on the catalyst surface during photocatalytic oxidation reaction [47, 48].

The initial photooxidation step here may be the interaction of a surface hole with the hydroxyl group of the alcohol forming a metal-oxo species with the removal of a proton (Scheme 2) [45]. This proton removal step becomes easier with increased carbon chain branching as well as with increased carbon chain length, because of the increased availability of adjacent removable protons. The higher the number of adjacent hydrogen atoms present, the easier is the removal and the greater would be the conversion. It was observed that presence of a benzene ring enhanced the conversion. The linking of phenyl rings of 1-phenlethanol to the TiO2 surface via a -OH interaction, an inhibition effect may be produced, preventing phenyl group migration; the formation of phenyl ethanol hydroperoxide species, which may give acetophenone and water. This can be attributed to the electron-deficient nature of the benzene ring, which results in a reduced electron density at oxygen-hydrogen bond, thereby making the proton abstraction relatively easier. In gas phase processes, styrene has been formed from 1-phenylethanol due to the photocatalytic-induced dehydration of the alcohol [41].

209150.sch.001
Scheme 1
209150.sch.002
Scheme 2: Photocatalytic oxidation of 1-phenyl ethanol to acetophenone over TiO2 (□ = surface hole).

Photooxidation of cumene to acetophenone in acetonitrile has been reported [49], where IR and XPS analysis of cumene adsorption on TiO2 have shown that an interaction of the benzene ring with surface OH groups takes place without appreciable dehydration or dehydroxylation of the surface. Acetophenone and CO2 were the only reaction products detected, and the reaction proceeds with the intermediate of a hydroperoxide.

3.3. Influence of Doping Concentration

Photocatalytic oxidation of 1-phenlethnol over raw nano-phase TiO2 in aqueous medium (pH = 6.4) after 3 hours of run gave only 4% conversion. No significant difference in photoactivity was observed between the TiO2 prepared using flame aerosol method and the Degussa (P25). Reaction using both V and Fe-doped TiO2 gave higher conversions than the reaction with neat TiO2. Other studies have shown that metal-doped TiO2 have faster electron-hole recombination rate than the raw neat TiO2 including those doping on TiO2 surface by impregnation method [50]. The yield of acetophenone formed as a function of the amount of Fe- and V-doped on the TiO2 are shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. For both of Fe- and V-doped TiO2 there were doping concentrations that gave optimal yields of acetophenone at the reaction time of 3 hours (Figures 7 and 8). The optimal doping amount for Fe is about 0.6% wt, and 15% yield of acetophenone, whereas the optimal concentration for V-doped TiO2 of about 3 wt% gave 40% yield of acetophenone. Increasing or decreasing the metal-doping concentration lowered the catalyst activity. Vanadium doping greatly improved the photoactivity compared to those of pure or Fe-doped TiO2. Previous studies indicated that the formation of the photoactive complex by Fe3+ with organics play a key role in promoting photocatalytic reaction. Increasing Fe2+ of nano-TiO2 attenuate the photocatalytic activity [51].

209150.fig.007
Figure 7: Conversion for yield of ketone formation and conversion of Fe-doped TiO2 for the different doping concentrations.
209150.fig.008
Figure 8: Conversion rate for ketone formation and conversion of vanadium-doped TiO2 for the different doping concentrations.

One of the possible reasons for the optimal doping concentration is the competing effects between the recombination rate of the electron and hole pairs on the catalyst surface, and the hole capture rate by the substrate. At low metal concentrations, the metal ions do not affect the bulk electronic structure of the semiconductor and its electron-hole generation and separation capacity. As a result, the photoactivity slowly increases with doped metal concentration. At excess metal concentration, the metal ions may sharply increase the conductivity of the resulted materials and the recombination rate of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Further increase of the doping concentration did not favor enhanced activity. It has been previously observed that incorporating cations of valence higher than that of the parent cation, such as W6+, Ta5+, and Nb5+, into the crystal matrix of TiO2 resulted in enhanced rates of water cleavage while the opposite is observed upon doping with cations of lower valence, such as In3+, Zn2+, and Li+ [52]. The change in the photocatalytic activity is found to be dependent on the concentration and valence of the doping cations. Those results are explained in terms of alteration of the bulk electronic structure of the semiconductor, which influences its electron-hole generation and separation capacity under illumination.

Studies have also indicated problems concerning the stability of Fe-TiO2 photocatalysts [53]. One major cause of a decrease in activity was photocorrosion leading to loss of Fe from the doped material competing with the activation of oxygen With increased doping concentrations of both Fe and V, the crystal structure and the morphology of catalyst have changed, and the size of catalyst particles decreased. As particle size decreased, the total catalyst surface area increased and the photogenerated electron density on the surface of each particle increased. This could have enhanced the photocatalytic reaction. However, with increase in the density of the electron-hole pairs, the possibility of the recombination of the electrons and holes also increases, which could be one of the reason that there is an optimal particles size that allowed highest conversion for the photocatalytic reaction.

Doping of metal ions in TiO2 can alter its bulk electronic structure, which influences its electron-hole generation and separation capacity under light illumination. Compared to Fe-doped samples, higher concentrations of vanadium were doped to the TiO2 while maintaining the anatase crystal structure. On the other hand, V-doped photocatalyst has shown higher photocatalytic activity compared to Fe-doped and neat TiO2 samples. One of the possible reasons for the significant difference in the photocatalytic activity in the TiO2 doped with the two metals is that iron has larger electric conductivity than vanadium. Higher amounts of Fe allowed easier recombination of the electrons and holes which resulted in deleterious effects on the photoactivity of the doped TiO2. Vanadium has lower conductivity than iron therefore its concentration could be higher in the doped TiO2 and with little change in the catalytic materials’ conductivity. Higher valence of V5+ could also help the photoactivity of the resulted catalyst [52].

3.4. Solvent Effect

The reaction in acetonitrile gave higher conversions than in water. The effects of using either water or acetonitrile as solvents on photocatalytic oxidation of 1-phenylethanol studied are shown in Figures 7 and 8. For V-doped TiO2, the increase in conversion of 1-phenylethanol with dopant concentration was 5 to 6 times higher in acetonitrile compared to the reaction in aqueous medium. Acetonitrile afforded much higher conversions compared to that in an aqueous medium because of the higher solubility of 1-phenyethanol in acetonitrile limiting the availability of the reactants in water leading to the low reaction rate [54]. The lower activity of the photocatalyst in water could also be attributable to the hydrophobic nature of TiO2 limiting the adsorption of 1-phenyethanol. Water molecules cover most of the titanium dioxide slurry surface due to their polarity, and the available surface for 1-phenylethanol directly interacts with the catalyst becoming less and the diffusion resistance is increased for both of the reactant and products.

Selective adsorption of reactants on the TiO2 surface was found to account for differences in product selectivity [55]. Solvents such as chloroform strongly inhibit the photooxidation process due to the fact that it could compete with the hydrocarbon for oxidation and with O2 for reduction. Differences in reaction rates and chemo-selectivity of products was also observed when aqueous medium was compared to those of organic solvents [56]. Solvent effects have been attributed to the stabilization of cation radicals intermediates. A highly efficient photocatalytic process of linear olefins epoxidation by molecular oxygen, using TiO2 suspensions, has been reported [57]. The yield (epoxide produced/olefin consumed) increased with a decrease of chain length and in solvents with high donor number as follows: hexane < nitromethane < acetonitrile < butyronitrile. This effect may well be able to also be explained by a process that is mediated by the solvent hydroperoxides.

As the reaction time increased from three to six hours, the yield of oxidation product increased 25% using Fe-doped TiO2 and 40% for V-doped TiO2. The yield for the vanadium doped catalyst system has higher conversion rate than the iron-doped catalyst system for the longer reaction time. This confirms the experimental data, as vanadium-doped TiO2 has higher activity.

4. Conclusion

The effects of metal doping on flame synthesized nanostructured TiO2 have been studied in order to extend its response to illumination with visible light. A flame aerosol codeposition method was used for the preparation of V- and Fe-doped TiO2. Partial oxidation of 1-phenylethano- to acetophenone was used as a probe reaction to study photocatalytic activity. The type and concentration of dopant have strong influence in improving or inhibiting photocatalytic activity partial photooxidation. Although Fe- and V-doped TiO2 did not show enhanced response to visible light, there are improvements in photoactivity of doped catalyst. The photocatalytic activity of V and Fe-TiO2 materials depends markedly on the doping level. Relatively high amounts of iron (5 wt% in Fe3+) and vanadium (6 wt% in V5+) had adverse effect on the activity of TiO2 for 1-phenylethanol oxidation. However, positive effects are observed with a lower Fe3+ concentration (0.5 wt%) and V5+ concentrations (3 wt%), where the conversion of 1-phenylethanol increased by 2.5 and 6 folds, respectively, compared to undoped TiO2.

With the increase of the metal doping amount, the crystallinity of titanium dioxide decreased and the ratio of anatase-to-rutile in the product decreased. As the doping concentration increased, the resulting product from the flame process became amorphous fine powders, and the crystal patterns could not be detected by XRD, and Raman spectroscopy. These changes in physical properties of the TiO2 resulted in unique adsorption properties of organic substrates and allowed controlling the photocatalytic properties of the catalyst. Vanadium-doped TiO2 showed higher activity than that of iron-doped TiO2. An optimal doping concentration existed for both of the doping species in the applied photocatalytic reaction systems. The optimum doping concentration also depended on the type of solvent used for the photocatalytic reaction. The possible reasons for the optimal doping concentration have also been discussed. For the studied system, the one using acetonitrile as solvent has much higher conversions compared to the system using water as solvent.

References

  1. J. M. Herrmann, “Heterogeneous photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants,” Catalysis Today, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 115–129, 1999. View at Scopus
  2. M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at Scopus
  3. J. A. Navío, G. Colón, M. I. Litter, and G. N. Bianco, “Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic properties of iron-doped titania semiconductors prepared from TiO2 and iron (III) acetylacetonate,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 267–276, 1996. View at Scopus
  4. S. Sakthivel, M. Janczarek, and H. Kisch, “Visible light activity and photoelectrochemical properties of nitrogen-doped TiO2,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 50, pp. 19384–19387, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Suda, H. Kawasaki, T. Ueda, and T. Ohshima, “Preparation of nitrogen-doped titanium oxide thin film using a PLD method as parameters of target material and nitrogen concentration ratio in nitrogen/oxygen gas mixture,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 475, no. 1-2, pp. 337–341, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. C. Yu, W. Ho, J. Yu, H. Yip, K. W. Po, and J. Zhao, “Efficient visible-light-induced photocatalytic disinfection on sulfur-doped nanocrystalline titania,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1175–1179, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Fresno, C. Guillard, J. M. Coronado et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of a sulfonylurea herbicide over pure and tin-doped TiO2 photocatalysts,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. I. Halkides, D. I. Kondarides, and X. E. Verykios, “Catalytic reduction of NO by C3H6 over Rh/TiO2 catalysts effect of W-cation doping of TiO2 on morphological characteristics and catalytic performance,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 415–426, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. M. Karvinen, “The effects of trace element doping on the optical properties and photocatalytic activity of nanostructured titanium dioxide,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1035–1043, 2003. View at Scopus
  10. K. Palmisano, V. Augugliaro, A. Sclafani, and M. Schiavello, “Activity of chromium-ion-doped titania for the dinitrogen photoreduction to ammonia and for the phenol photodegradation,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 92, no. 23, pp. 6710–6713, 1988. View at Scopus
  11. T. Umebayashi, T. Yamaki, H. Itoh, and K. Asai, “Analysis of electronic structures of 3d transition metal-doped TiO2 based on band calculations,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1909–1920, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. I. Choi, J. H. Han, and D. Y. Kim, “Effect of titania and lithia doping on the boundary migration of alumina under an electric field,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 347–350, 2003. View at Scopus
  13. V. Guidi, M. C. Carotta, M. Ferroni, G. Martinelli, and M. Sacerdoti, “Effect of dopants on grain coalescence and oxygen mobility in nanostructured titania anatase and rutile,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 120–124, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Jeon and P. V. Braun, “Hydrothermal synthesis of Er-doped luminescent TiO2 nanoparticles,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1256–1263, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Jiang and L. Gao, “Enhancing the UV inducing hydrophilicity of TiO2 thin film by doping Fe ions,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 878–881, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Kumbhar and G. Chumanov, “Synthesis of iron(III)-doped titania nanoparticles and its application for photodegradation of sulforhodamine-B pollutant,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 7, no. 4-5, pp. 489–498, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Mozia, et al., “Decomposition of nonionic surfactant on a nitrogen-doped photocatalyst under visible-light irradiation,” Applied Catalysis B-Environmental, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 195–200, 2005.
  18. S. Yin, Y. Aita, M. Komatsu, J. Wang, Q. Tang, and T. Sato, “Synthesis of excellent visible-light responsive TiO2xNy photocatalyst by a homogeneous precipitation- solvothermal process,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 674–682, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Luo, T. Takata, Y. Lee, J. Zhao, K. Domen, and Y. Yan, “Photocatalytic activity enhancing for titanium dioxide by co-doping with bromine and chlorine,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 846–849, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Wittmer, “Apparent band shift of Cr3+-doped titania as observed by photoacoustic and impedance spectroscopy,” Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische Chemie-International Journal of Research in Physical Chemistry & Chemical Physics, vol. 214, pp. 709–720, 2000.
  21. Y. Ma, X. T. Zhang, ZI. S. Guan, YA. A. Cao, and J. N. Yao, “Effects of zinc(II) and iron(III) doping of titania films on their photoreactivity to decompose rhodamine B,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2928–2933, 2001. View at Scopus
  22. F. Gracia, J. P. Holgado, A. Caballero, and A. R. Gonzalez-Elipe, “Structural, optical, and photoelectrochemical properties of M+-TiO2 model thin film photocatalysts,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 45, pp. 17466–17476, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Wilke and H. D. Breuer, “The influence of transition metal doping on the physical and photocatalytic properties of titania,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 1999. View at Scopus
  24. D. Dvoranová, V. Brezová, M. Mazúr, and M. A. Malati, “Investigations of metal-doped titanium dioxide photocatalysts,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 91–105, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Piera, M. I. Tejedor-Tejedor, M. E. Zorn, and M. A. Anderson, “Relationship concerning the nature and concentration of Fe(III) species on the surface of TiO2 particles and photocatalytic activity of the catalyst,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 671–685, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Z. M. Wang, G. Yang, P. Biswas, W. Bresser, and P. Boolchand, “Processing of iron-doped titania powders in flame aerosol reactors,” Powder Technology, vol. 114, no. 1-3, pp. 197–204, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. J. Sene, W. A. Zeltner, and M. A. Anderson, “Fundamental photoelectrocatalytic and electrophoretic mobility studies of TiO2 and V-doped TiO2 thin-film electrode materials,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 1597–1603, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. Falaras, I. M. Arabatzis, T. Stergiopoulos, and M. C. Bernard, “Enhanced activity of silver modified thin-film TiO2 photocatalysts,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 123–130, 2003. View at Scopus
  29. C. Li, J. Wang, X. Wang, H. Chen, and W. Su, “Nonlinear electrical properties of Ta-doped titania capacitor-varistor ceramics,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 187–191, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. V. Nguyen, S. Kim, and O. B. Yang, “Water decomposition on TiO2-SiO2 and RuS2 /TiO2-SiO2 photocatalysts: the effect of electronic characteristics,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 5, pp. 59–62, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. T. Ranjit and B. Viswanathan, “Photocatalytic reduction of nitrite and nitrate ions over doped TiO2 catalysts,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 107, no. 1–3, pp. 215–220, 1997. View at Scopus
  32. Z. H. Yuan, J. H. Jia, and LI. D. Zhang, “Influence of co-doping of Zn(II) + Fe(III) on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 for phenol degradation,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 73, no. 2-3, pp. 323–326, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. E. Sahle-Demessie, M. Gonzalez, Z. M. Wang, and P. Biswas, “Synthesizing alcohols and ketones by photoinduced catalytic partial oxidation of hydrocarbons in TiO2 film reactors prepared by three different methods,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 3276–3284, 1999. View at Scopus
  34. M. Anpo, T. Kawamura, S. Kodama, K. Maruya, and T. Onishi, “Photocatalysis on Ti-Al binary metal oxides: enhancement of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 species,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 438–440, 1988. View at Scopus
  35. W. J. Stark and S. E. Pratsinis, “Aerosol flame reactors for manufacture of nanoparticles,” Powder Technology, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 103–108, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K. Wegner and S. E. Pratsinis, “Flame synthesis of nanoparticles,” Chimica Oggi, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 27–29, 2004. View at Scopus
  37. M. J. Height, J. B. Howard, J. W. Tester, and J. B. V. Sande, “Flame synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Carbon, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2295–2307, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W. Choi, A. Termin, and M. R. Hoffmann, “The role of metal ion dopants in quantum-sized TiO2—correlation between photoreactivity and charge carrier recombination dynamics,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 98, no. 51, pp. 13669–13679, 1994. View at Scopus
  39. S. Klosek and D. Raftery, “Visible light driven V-doped TiO2 photocatalyst and its photooxidation of ethanol,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 105, no. 14, pp. 2815–2819, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Shui, L. H. Yue, and Z. D. Xu, “Photocatalytic activity of iron doping TiO2 prepared by several methods,” Acta Physico—Chimica Sinica, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 282–285, 2001. View at Scopus
  41. M. A. Fox and M. T. Dulay, “Heterogeneous photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 341–357, 1993. View at Scopus
  42. H. Kikkawa, B. O'Regan, and M. A. Anderson, “Photoelectrochemical properties of Nb-doped TiO2 semiconductor ceramic membrane,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, vol. 309, no. 1-2, pp. 91–101, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. I. Shah, W. Li, C. P. Huang, O. Jung, and C. Ni, “Study of Nd, Pd, Pt, and Fe dopant effect on photoreactivity of TiO2 nanoparticles,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 6482–6486, 2002. View at Scopus
  44. U. R. Pillai and E. Sahle-Demessie, “Selective oxidation of alcohols in gas phase using light-activated titanium dioxide,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 211, no. 2, pp. 434–444, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. Minero, G. Mariella, V. Maurino, and E. Pelizzetti, “Photocatalytic transformation of organic compounds in the presence of inorganic anions. 1. Hydroxyl-mediated and direct electron-transfer reactions of phenol on a titanium dioxide -fluoride system,” Langmuir, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2632–2641, 2000. View at Scopus
  46. V. Brezová, M. Čeppan, E. Brandšteterová, M. Breza, and L. Lapčík, “Photocatalytic hydroxylation of benzoic acid in aqueous titanium dioxide suspension,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, A: Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 385–391, 1991. View at Scopus
  47. P. Calza, C. Minero, and E. Pelizzetti, “Photocatalytically assisted hydrolysis of chlorinated methanes under anaerobic conditions,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 2198–2203, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. N. Djeghri and S. J. Teichner, “Heterogeneous photocatalysis: the photooxidation of 2-methylbutane,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 99–106, 1980. View at Scopus
  49. R. Wittenberg, M. A. Pradera, and J. A. Navio, “Cumene photo-oxidation over powder TiO2 catalyst,” Langmuir, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2373–2379, 1997. View at Scopus
  50. A. Di Paola, E. García-López, S. Ikeda, G. Marc, B. Ohtani, and L. Palmisano, “Photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds in aqueous systems by transition metal doped polycrystalline TiO2,” Catalysis Today, vol. 75, no. 1–4, pp. 87–93, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Araña, O. González Díaz, M. Miranda Saracho, J. M. Doña Rodríguez, J. A. Herrera Melián, and J. Pérez Peña, “Maleic acid photocatalytic degradation using Fe-TiO2 catalysts. Dependence of the degradation mechanism on the Fe catalysts content,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 113–124, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. K. E. Karakitsou and X. E. Verykios, “Effects of altervalent cation doping of TiO2 on its performance as a photocatalyst for water cleavage,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1184–1189, 1993. View at Scopus
  53. M. I. Litter and J. A. Navío, “Photocatalytic properties of iron-doped titania semiconductors,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 171–181, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. G. J. Ten Brink, I. W. C. E. Arends, and R. A. Sheldon, “Green, catalytic oxidation of alcohols in water,” Science, vol. 287, no. 5458, pp. 1636–1639, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. C. B. Almquist and P. Biswas, “The photo-oxidation of cyclohexane on titanium dioxide: an investigation of competitive adsorption and its effects on product formation and selectivity,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 259–271, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. F. Soana, M. Sturini, L. Cermenati, and A. Albini, “Titanium dioxide photocatalyzed oxygenation of naphthalene and some of its derivatives,” Journal of the Chemical Society. Perkin Transactions 2, no. 4, pp. 699–704, 2000. View at Scopus
  57. T. Ohno, K. Nakabeya, and M. Matsumura, “Epoxidation of olefins on photoirradiated titanium dioxide powder using molecular oxygen as an oxidant,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 76–81, 1998. View at Scopus