About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanotechnology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 361347, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/361347
Research Article

Structure and Optical Properties of Doped SiO2 Mesoporous Glasses

1Departamento de Nanotecnología, Centro de Física Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada, UNAM Campus Juriquilla, 76230, QRO, Mexico
2Programa de Posgrado en Ciencia de Materiales del Departamento de Investigación en Polímeros y Materiales, Universidad de Sonora, 83000, SON, Mexico
3División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, UNAM, 04510, D.F., Mexico
4Departamento de Ingeniería Molecular de Materiales, Centro de Física Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada, UNAM Campus Juriquilla, 76230, QRO, Mexico

Received 31 March 2011; Accepted 19 May 2011

Academic Editor: Hongmei Luo

Copyright © 2011 G. Hernández-Padrón et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Monolithic mesoporous silica glasses were synthesized. The presence of Cu2+ and Fe3+ cations during the synthesis of sol-gel precursors leads to different morphologies and pore sizes. The materials are characterized via IR and Raman scattering spectra to detect surface groups and -Si-O-Si- rings (i.e., 3–6 Si atoms) and morphology is examined through electron microscopy. N2 sorption isotherms reveal details of the mesoporous structure of the materials, which are endowed with significantly large surface areas and pore volumes. Vapor percolation occurs in these samples because of a void arrangement consisting of pore bulges delimited by narrower necks. The optical characterization shows the luminescence spectrum and thermoluminescent behavior subjected to successive exposures of beta particles.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, a number of novel materials have been investigated, from organometallics, catalysis [1], semiconductors [2], carbonaceous materials [3], to optical fibers, and so forth, aiming to develop a new generation of nanotechnology-based mesosystems [4]. The development of nanostructured materials represents special significance for optical applications. Among the materials widely investigated due to their optical properties, silica ion-doped have been proved to be competitive candidates [5]. In addition, they represent very attractive materials for selective separation and adsorption of chemical for sensing [6].

The modification of its surface to design silica materials provides a wide range of special applications. Their proper development allows studying the structural behavior at molecular level and their interactions. The sol-gel process [79] has acquired much interest in recent years for providing inorganic materials in which it is possible to control particle size and shape, as well as the final arrangement of the colloidal particles, in order to obtain interesting materials with improved properties. In this work, we show the nanostructure differences between of several materials synthesized by two alternative routes that employ sol-gel process.

FT-IR and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectroscopies have been employed as auxiliary techniques for the study of structure at the molecular level of the optical glasses based on silica [10]. Raman scattering and IR were used to determine the interaction and the structural and molecular modifications induced by the doping element and the heat treatment. IR spectroscopy was used to determine the incorporation Cu2+ in the silica network.

The structural properties, particle size distribution, porous size, and surface area depend strongly of the condensation and hydrolysis rate of the gelation; therefore, the heat and/or use of doping metal must be tightly controlled to obtain an ordered structural arrangement.

The thermoluminescence phenomena occurred when a phosphor material is heated previously exposed to ionizing and nonionizing radiation. This is considered as an effective technique to understanding of the creation of defects generates a glow curve which is a graphical representation of light emission as a function of temperature and is related with trapping levels in the band gap, the main goal of analyzing trapping levels is to obtain several kinetic parameters [11]. The glow curves obtained for each material are different, and each glow peak is ascribed to the recombination centres and is related to the traps [12]. The luminescence properties of several silicate as gemstone exhibit good response thermoluminescent (TL), and a number of methods to synthesize TL materials have been reported based on traditional approaches to modify the band structure of the materials as well as the characteristic of their electron traps, thus controlling to some extent the corresponding TL response [13, 14].

In this work, a series of SiO2 xerogels, some of them doped with Cu2+ and Fe3+ ions, are synthesized by the sol-gel procedure. Porous glasses are created by precursor gels after thermal treatment at 500°C. The surface and pore morphology characteristics depicted by porous glasses are studied by surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), TEM, and N2 sorption analyses. Some optical properties were measured as the behavior of the glow curve through the technique of thermally stimulated luminescence and luminescence spectrum response.

2. Experimental

Mixtures of tetraethylorthorsilicate (TEOS) (98% Aldrich), triple distilled water and ethanol produced SiO2 gels. Doping cations came from either Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O (Aldrich 99 wt.%) or Fe(NO3)2·9H2O (Baker 99 wt.%). Each sol synthesis was performed in a Nalgene flask at room temperature by dissolving the appropriate amount of TEOS in ethanol under a gentle stirring. Separately, suitable quantities of Cu2+ or Fe3+ nitrates were dissolved in water. The Cu2+ or Fe3+ solution was then poured inside the flask containing the TEOS mixture. The reaction system was subjected to stirring during 20 min; afterward 0.25 cm3 of concentrated HCl mixed with 0.25 cm3 of concentrated HF were added drop by drop while continuing the stirring for further 30 min. The resulting SiO2 sol was then poured into a Nalgene cylinder where gelation rapidly occurred. Each gel was dried at 110°C for 48 h and the resulting xerogel calcined at 500°C during 24 h then obtaining SiO2 cylindrical monoliths.

Molar TEOS: H2O: ethanol ratios of: 1 : 4 : 6 (MG1), 1 : 1 : 4 (MG2) and 1 : 3 : 6 (MG3) were chosen to produce an assortment of transparent monolithic glass materials. For all samples, the amounts of Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O or Fe(NO3)2·9H2O employed for the synthesis of cation-doped xerogels corresponded to 10−3 and 6 × 10−4 mol per one mol of TEOS, respectively. Figure 1, shows the samples MG1-Cu, MG2-Cu, MG3-Cu, and MG1-undoped at 110°C, respectively. On the other hand, Figure 2 shows the samples MG1, MG1-Fe, and MG1-Cu at 500°C.

361347.fig.001
Figure 1: MG1-Cu, MG2-Cu, MG3-Cu, and MG1-undoped at 110°C.
361347.fig.002
Figure 2: MG2-Fe and MG2-Cu at 500°C.

FT-IR silica glass spectra were measured on a Bruker Vector 33 spectrometer by means of the Diffuse Reflectance technique. Glasses were also analyzed by Raman scattering spectroscopy by mounting the cylindrical glass specimens transversally in the sampling compartment of a Senterra Bruker Raman scattering instrument with at laser 785 nm. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of powdery glass samples was performed in a JEOL JEM-1010 instrument.

N2 sorption isotherms at 76 K of powdery samples were measured in a Quantachrome Autosorb 1 instrument. The N2 and He gases were UHP grade (Praxair, 99.99%). All samples were outgassed at 200°C overnight prior to the sorption run.

TL measurements and beta irradiation were performed in a Risø TL/OSL model TL/OSL-DA-15 unit equipped with a 90Sr beta source 3.33 Gy min−1 dose rate. The TL signal was integrated from room temperature up to 650 K under N2 atmosphere using a heating rate of 1°C s−1. The luminescence spectra were obtained prior to the UV excitation by using a Perkin Elmer spectrofluorometer model LS50-B at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FT-IR and Dispersive Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering

Figure 3 shows IR spectra of cation-undoped MG1, MG2-Cu, and MG2-Fe silica samples treated at 500°C. These spectra present a sharp peak at 3746 cm−1 due to the fundamental OH stretching vibration of the surface silanol groups (Si-OH). The wide band appearing between 3600 cm−1 and 3500 cm−1 corresponds to OH vibrations of Si-OH groups existing on the surface or hydrogen-bonded to molecular water. The peak at 1370 cm−1 has been interpreted as a signal proceeding from a highly disordered structure [15]. Signals characteristic of silica glass are found at 1085 cm−1 and 800 cm−1 and correspond to symmetric and asymmetric Si-O stretching modes while the band displayed at 450 cm−1 is due to the Si-O-Si bending model [15, 16].

361347.fig.003
Figure 3: FT-IR spectra of MG1, MG2 -Cu doped, and MG2-Fe doped.

In the case of FT-IR spectra of Cu-doped silica glasses (Figure 3), the vibration modes of the Cu-O groups [17, 18] should appear at 420, 425 and 528 cm−1; however, these peaks are hidden by the wide band centered at 450 cm−1 and which is assigned to Si-O-Si groups. The vibrations modes of Fe-O groups should appear at 636 and 560 cm−1 [19]. For Cu-doped MG1 and Fe-doped MG2 samples, the absence of the 1370 cm−1 band is indicative that these samples possess a more ordered structure than the cation-undoped specimens. Finally, three-member Si-O rings are detected at 3746 cm−1.

Observing the Cu-O and Fe-O groups for the doped monolithic glasses in Figure 4, it is possible to see the spectra at 700–400 cm−1 interval to observe the Cu-O and Fe-O groups of the MG3-Cu-doped and MG3-Fe-doped samples, respectively.

361347.fig.004
Figure 4: FT-IR spectra at 700–400 cm−1 interval, for MG3-Cu doped and MG3-Fe doped.

The Raman scattering spectra of MG3, MG3-Cu, and MG3-Fe calcined samples are shown in Figure 5. The Si-O-Si and SiO4 characteristic bands depicted at 980 cm−1 and 430 cm−1, respectively, are indicative of the existence of a 3D glass network. The two signals occurring at 485 and 610 cm−1 are called D1 and D2 defect bands; D1 is attributed to the emergence of 4-member Si-O rings, while D2 is interpreted as a symmetrical stretching vibration of O atoms constituting the Si-O three-member rings [20]. The Raman scattering spectrum of sample MG1-Cu depicts a band at 280 cm−1; this signal can be due to the crystalline lattice of Cu(NO3)2 [21]. In this case, is possible to observe the spectra at 700–80 cm−1 interval, as shown in Figure 6, the Cu-O and Fe-O groups for the MG3-Cu-doped and MG3-Fe-doped samples, respectively.

361347.fig.005
Figure 5: Raman scattering spectra of MG3, MG3-Cu, and MG3-Fe.
361347.fig.006
Figure 6: Raman scattering spectra at 80–700 cm−1 of MG3-Cu and MG3-Fe doped.
3.2. N2 Sorption

Table 1 shows the textural properties of nine SiO2 glasses: in this results, we can see that the porosity glasses is adequate for catalysis system, and these properties were obtained using a mixed of two different catalyst (HCl and HF) that obtained with only one catalyst. The biggest areas were obtained of the porous glasses with Cu-doped cation, and the best textural properties were obtained with the MG3 group. On the other hand, with the Fe-doped cation was decreased the pore sizes of the SiO2 glasses.

tab1
Table 1: Textural properties of porous glasses.

The N2 sorption isotherms and pore-size distributions (PSD) of three SiO2 glasses one Cu-doped (MG1-Cu) and two cation-undoped (MG1 and MG2), are shown in Figures 7, 8, and 9. Also, they display the PSD functions that have been calculated by the nonlocal functional density theory (NLDFT) procedure [22]. All isotherms correspond to IUPAC Type IV shapes while depicting IUPAC H2 hysteresis loops. An important characteristic of these isotherms is the existence of a plateau during the development of desorption boundary curve (DBC) of the hysteresis loop; on the other hand, the adsorption boundary curves (ABC) display a sloping behavior. Main textural parameters (i.e., surface area, pore volume, and mean pore size) of the glass specimens are presented in Table 1.

361347.fig.007
Figure 7: N2 sorption on (a) MG3-Cu.
361347.fig.008
Figure 8: N2 sorption on (a) MG1 undoped.
361347.fig.009
Figure 9: N2 sorption on (a) MG2 undoped.

An interesting characteristic of porous glasses consists of the appreciable overlap between the PSD functions obtained from the ABC and DBC isotherms. The DBC-PSD result depicts a mode value higher than the ABC-PSD outcome in all cases; this means that a pore-blocking phenomenon is taking place along the DBC.

Another interesting feature of all PSD distributions consists in pointing out that the DBC percolation peak protrudes above the ABC curve by about one third of its total area (compare the shaded peak area versus the crosshatched area in Figure 5); this means that an average connectivity (C) of about four corresponds to the cavities of porous glass. This is due to the fact that according to percolation theory [23], the shoulder of the DBC isotherm requires a fraction of open bonds in order to create a percolation vapor path into the inner pores of the glass substrate. Therefore, the pore structure of glasses prepared by the sol-gel method resembles a fractal 3D network of interconnected (deformed) tetrahedral [24].

TEM photographs (Figure 10) of porous glasses reveal the fractal nature of the precursory SiO2 gels: the morphologies of the vitreous solids are similar to structures created by diffusion-limiting processes for the samples the Cu-O and Fe-O groups for the MG3-Cu-doped and MG3-Fe-doped samples, respectively.

fig10
Figure 10: TEM micrographs of (a) MG3-Cu and (b) MG3-Fe.
3.3. Optical Measurement

The TL response induced by an irradiation dose of 400 Gy in SiO2 glasses with impurities: MG2-Fe, MG3-Cu, and MG3-Fe, is presented in Figure 9. Specimens display complex TL glow curve structure and support exposure to high doses [25]. Those Fe-doped show TL glow curve with two maxima, while MG3-Cu has only one TL peak around of 420 K. Silica glasses TL glow curves after successive exposures to beta particles are present in Figure 10. Each was obtained by irradiating the same monolith during a dose of 100 Gy. The reproducibility of the TL glow curves for MG2-Fe irradiated 5 times is ±2% better samples realized with other reagent concentration. Figures 1115 illustrate the TL glow curves of the irradiated samples, respectively, at different laboratory doses, in the interval of 100–800 Gy. As can be seen, the maxima of the curves for the Fe-doped samples appear in the same position regardless doses, which indicates that first-order processes are involved in the TL phenomenon [26]. On the other hand, the Cu-doped specimen not have the same conduct; however, all samples do not present saturation of the TL response for the used doses. Therefore, cation-doped directly influences in the creation of various traps and recombination centres of SiO2 nanostructures mesoporous glasses.

361347.fig.0011
Figure 11: TL glow curves of SiO2 glasses with different doping concentrations irradiated using a 400 Gy dose.
361347.fig.0012
Figure 12: Reproducibility of the TL glow of silica glasses after being expose 5 times to beta particles for 100 Gy dose each.
361347.fig.0013
Figure 13: TL glow curves of MG2-Fe at different doses in the interval 100–800 Gy.
361347.fig.0014
Figure 14: TL glow curves of MG3-Cu obtained by exposing to beta irradiation for different doses: 100–800 Gy.
361347.fig.0015
Figure 15: TL glow curves of MG3-Fe at different doses in the interval 100–800 Gy.

Figure 14 shows the luminescence spectrums comparison of MG2-Fe, MG3-Cu, and MG3-Fe taken at room temperature without annealing. Silica glasses MG3 excitation band is centered at 314 nm, and the emission is centered at 525 nm, while the MG2 monolith present excitation and emission band centered in 330 and 550, respectively (Figure 16). There are small shift in the spectra for each specimen type, but there are not important differences between the spectra for distinct doping. In both samples, the main emission occurs around the green.

361347.fig.0016
Figure 16: Excitation and emission spectra of MG2-Fe, MG3-Cu, and MG3-Fe taken at room temperature.

4. Conclusions

The sol-gel process assisted by supercritical drying is an efficient method to fabricate highly porous monolithic silica materials. A variety of porous glasses of outstanding surface areas and mesopore volumes can be synthesized by the sol-gel procedure. Thermal treatment of precursory gels produces mesoporous substrates free of micropores and of well-defined pore volumes. The effect of doping cations consists in decreasing the pore sizes of the resultant glasses.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank M. A. Lourdes Palma Tirado for technical support by TEM, M. en C. Alicia Del Real López for technical support by EDX analysis, M. en C. Carmen Peza Ledesma by help in textural properties measurement, and M. en C. Guillermo Vázquez Sánchez for the processing photographs.

References

  1. M. Esparza, M. L. Ojeda, A. Campero et al., “Development and sorption characterization of some model mesoporous and microporous silica adsorbents,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 228, no. 1-2, pp. 97–110, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Schlottig, M. Textor, U. Georgi, and G. Roewer, “Template synthesis of SiO2 nanostructures,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 599–601, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. A. Mahadik, M. S. Kavale, S. K. Mukherjee, and A. R. Venkateswara, “Transparent superhydrophobic silica coatings on glass by sol—gel method,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 257, no. 2, pp. 333–339, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. de Keizer, E. M. van der Ent, and L. K. Koopal, “Surface and volume charge densities of monodisperse porous silicas,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 142, no. 2-3, pp. 303–313, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Chunlei, J. Miao, Y. Liu, and Y. Wang, “Meso-macroporous monolithic CuO—CeO2/c-Al2O3 catalysts and their catalytic performance for preferential oxidation of CO,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 45, no. 20, pp. 5660–5668, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. D. Xiaobo Liu and H. Wencheng, “The structure and mechanism of porous silica films by sol—gel method using poly(ethylene glycol) and side-chain polyether modified polydimethylsiloxane with terminal Si—CH3 as templates,” Journal of Materials Science. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. C. Sanchez, L. Rozes, F. Ribot et al., ““Chimie douce”: a land of opportunities for the designed construction of functional inorganic and hybrid organic-inorganic nanomaterials,” Comptes Rendus Chimie, vol. 13, no. 1-2, pp. 3–39, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Mc Cormick, “Recent progress in the study of the kinetics of sol-gel SiO2 synthesis reactions,” in Sol-Gel Processing and Applications, Y. A. Attia, Ed., pp. 1–16, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  9. W. Stöber, A. Fink, and E. Bohn, “Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 1968. View at Scopus
  10. L. L. Hench and J. Livage, “The sol-gel process,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 34–72, 1990. View at Scopus
  11. V. Pagonis, G. Kitis, and C. Furetta, Numerical and Practical Exercises in Thermoluminiscence, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  12. C. Furetta, S. Guzmán, B. Ruiz, and E. Cruz-Zaragoza, “The initial rise method extended to multiple trapping levels in thermoluminescent materials,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 346–349, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. V. Correcher, J. M. Gomez-Ros, J. Garcia-Guinea, M. Lis, and L. Sanchez-Muñoz, “Calculation of the activation energy in a continuous trap distribution system of a charoite silicate using initial rise and TL glow curve fitting methods,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 43, no. 2–6, pp. 269–272, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Mendoza-Anaya, C. Angeles, P. Salas, R. Rodríguez, and V. M. Castaño, “Nanoparticle-enhanced thermoluminescence in silica gels,” Nanotechnology, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. L1–L4, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. J. C. Cheang, A. Oliver, J. Roiz et al., “Optical properties of Ir2+-implanted silica glass,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, vol. 175–177, pp. 490–494, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C.-K. Wu, “Stable silicate glasses containing up to 10 weight percent of water,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 381–398, 1980. View at Scopus
  17. J. R. Martínez, F. Ruiz, Y. V. Vorobiev, F. Pérez-Robles, and J. González-Hernández, “Infrared spectroscopy analysis of the local atomic structure in silica prepared by sol-gel,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 109, no. 17, pp. 7511–7514, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. Woignier, C. Fernandez-Lorenzo, J. L. Sauvajol, J. F. Schmit, J. Phalippou, and R. Sempere, “Raman study of structural defects in SiO2 aerogels,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 167–172, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Vilarigues and R. C. da Silva, “The effect of Mn, Fe and Cu ions on potash-glass corrosion,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 355, no. 31–33, pp. 1630–1637, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H.-Y. Zhu, R. Jiang, L. Xiao, and W. Li, “Preparation, characterization and adsorption application for removal of hazardous azo dye,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 179, no. 1–3, pp. 251–257, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  21. V. M. Miskowski, S. Franzen, A. P. Shreve et al., “Distortional isomers of a mixed-valence binuclear Cu complex,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 38, pp. 2546–2547, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. I. Ravikovitch and A. V. Neimark, “Characterization of micro- and mesoporosity in SBA-15 materials from adsorption data by the NLDFT method,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 105, no. 29, pp. 6817–6823, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. P. Iczkowski, “Electrical conductivity of partially saturated porous solids,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 572–576, 1970. View at Scopus
  24. G. Mason and D. W. Mellor, “Simulation of drainage and imbibition in a random packing of equal spheres,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 214–225, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Zgrablich, V. Mayagoitia, F. Rojas et al., “Molecular processes on heterogeneous solid surfaces,” Langmuir, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 129–138, 1996. View at Scopus
  26. J. Morales, R. Bernal, C. Cruz-Vazquez, E. G. Salcido-Romero, and V. M. Castaño, “Thermoluminescence of tequila-based nanodiamond,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 1–4, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus