The Optimum Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes for Epoxy Nanocomposites: Evolution of the Particle Size Distribution by Ultrasonic Treatment

<table>Mass fraction of CNTs relative to the total observed mass in suspensions, <svg height="14.75" id="M25" style="vertical-align:-3.25792pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 77.5 14.75" width="77.5" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,14.75)">
<g transform="translate(72,-60.2)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝑊</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-60.5,60.37)">
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="0" y="0">C</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="5.837584" y="0">N</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="12.156528" y="0">T</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-42.49,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">/</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="3.4758339" y="0">𝑊</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-27.57,60.37)">
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="0" y="0">O</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="6.318944" y="0">B</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="12.156528" y="0">S</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>, as a function of sonication time and horn amplitude: 10% (■), 20% (♦), 40% (●), 70% (▲), and bath sonicator (<svg height="7.4875002" id="M26" style="vertical-align:-0.0pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 8.3000002 7.4875002" width="8.3000002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,7.4875)">
<g transform="translate(72,-66.01)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,66.06)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">∗</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>). The straight lines are guides to the eye.</table>

Journal of Nanotechnology

fig8

Figure 8

Figure 8: The Optimum Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes for Epoxy Nanocomposites: Evolution of the Particle Size Distribution by Ultrasonic Treatment 