- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Journal of Oncology
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 816595, 7 pages
Involvement of Aberrant Glycosylation in Thyroid Cancer
1Department of Molecular Biochemistry and Clinical Investigation, Graduate School Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7 Yamada-oka Suita 565-0871, Japan
2Department of Surgery, Kuma Hospital, 8-2-35, Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0011, Japan
3Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita 565-0871, Japan
Received 12 August 2009; Accepted 6 May 2010
Academic Editor: Jennifer E. Rosen
Copyright © 2010 Eiji Miyoshi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Glycosylation is one of the most common posttranslational modification reactions and nearly half of all known proteins in eukaryotes are glycosylated. In fact, changes in oligosaccharides structures are associated with many physiological and pathological events, including cell growth, migration and differentiation, and tumor invasion. Therefore, functional glycomics, which is a comprehensive study of the structures and functions of glycans, is attracting the increasing attention of scientists in various fields of life science. In cases of thyroid cancer, the biological characters and prognosis are completely different in each type of histopathology, and their oligosaccharide structures as well as the expression of glycosyltransferases are also different. In this review, we summarized our previous papers on oligosaccharides and thyroid cancers and discussed a possible function of oligosaccharides in the carcinogenesis in thyroid cancer.
Oligosaccharides are mostly found on the cell surface and extracellular matrix (ECM), and also in various organelles such as the Golgi, ER, lysosome, cytosol, and nuclei. As compared to research on DNA, RNA, and proteins, study on glycans is rather difficult and the research in this field has been neglected for a long period, the same being true for glycomics as compared to proteomic research. In order to characterize the structures of glycans, glycobiology including glycomics is essential for understanding of the structures and functions of proteins. In the last couple of years, most of the glycosyltransferases (over 180 glycosyltransferase genes) have been identified, based on the genome sequence data and bioinformatics approach. Glycosylation reactions are catalyzed by the actions of glycosyltransferases; sugar chains are added to various complex carbohydrates. Modified oligosaccharides have the ability to interfere with carbohydrate-protein or protein/glycoprotein-glycoprotein interactions and, as a result, regulate many physiological and pathological events, including cell growth, migration and differentiation, and tumor metastasis. Cell surface carbohydrates contribute to a variety of interactions between a cell and its extracellular environment, since they are located on the outermost layer of the cell. Carbohydrates are the first molecules to be encountered and recognized by other cells, antibodies, invading viruses, and bacteria. Many secreted molecules such as hormones and toxins have also been reported to bind to carbohydrate receptors on the cell surface. Most receptors on the cell surface are N-glycosylated, including epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), integrins, and transforming growth factor receptor (TGF R). Increasing evidence indicates that sugar chains on glycoproteins are involved in the regulation of cell-cell communication, signal transduction, and protein folding and stability [2–5]. During the carcinogenesis in thyroid cancer, the biological characteristics of tumor cells dramatically changed with malignant transformation into undifferentiated thyroid cancer. In this period, the expression of glycosyltransferases as well as their target proteins would also be altered. The alteration of oligosaccharide structures on the cell surface could control cellular differentiation and biological characteristics. Also, aberrant expression of glyco-related genes could be a marker of thyroid cancer. In this review, we mainly focus on the importance of oligosaccharides in thyroid cancer, according to our previous reports.
2. Why Did We Start a Glycomics Project?
Glycobiology is one of the most difficult research areas in life science because oligosaccharides exhibit a variety of aspects and their functions often differ with the organ, species, or type of cancer. In terms of cancer, prominent changes in oligosaccharide structures on glycoproteins are dependent on sialylation, fucosylation, and branching formation. Both sialylation and fucosylation modify the charges on total oligosaccharide structures and thus controll receptor and adhesion molecules on the cell surface. Sialylation of IgG oligosaccharides can regulate allergic reactions and this minor IgG group suppresses autoimmuno reactions [6, 7]. Fucosylation is one of the most important oligosaccharide modifications, being linked to cancer and inflammation . Many reports have implied the involvement of branching formation of N-glycans and N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V) which is key enzymes producing the branching . Regarding many biological phenomena, Dr Taniguchi’s group have succeeded in the purification and characterization of glycosyltransferases, which are involved in the branching formation for N-glycans . Involving cDNAs or antibodies for these glycosyltransferases, many studies have revealed the relationship to carcinogenesis and/or tumor metastasis. Figure 1 shows three targets of glyco-related proteins in this review. Basically, the expression of Fut8 and GnT-V is relatively low and increases with malignant transformation. Expression of Fut8 increases in the early phase of carcinogenesis, but decreases at the stage of metastasis. In contrast, two-step increases in GnT-V expression are observed in certain kinds of cancer. Expression of glypican 3, which is a proteoglycan belonging to the glypican family, increases/decreases in an organ-specific manner.
3. Fut8 and Thyroid Cancer
Fucosylation is one of the most important modes of glycosylation in cancer. Fucosylation is regulated by several kinds of fucosyltransferases, the GDP-fucose synthetic pathway and GDP-fucose transporters. Before these complicated mechanisms of fucosylation were clarified, fucosylated target proteins were found and used as tumor markers. Increases in fucosylated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were reported by Drs Breborowicz et al.  and Dr Taketa et al. . They first found microheterogeneity of AFP in several liver conditions and then found increases in 1-6 fucosylation (core-fucosylation) of AFP on lectin affino-electrophoresis. AFP is a well-known tumor marker for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), but it is sometimes also increased in benign liver diseases such as chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis. In contrast, AFP with core-fucosylation is a very specific marker of HCCs [13, 14]. AFP with core-fucosylation was called AFP-L3, because it was detected in the L3 fraction on LCA (Lens culinaris agglutinin) lectin-electorophoresis. Core-fucosylation comprises the attachment of fucose to the innermost N-acetylglucosamine in N-glycans. 1-6 fucosyltransferase (Fut8) catalyzes this core-fucosylation reaction. Dr. Uozumi et al. succeeded in the purification and cDNA cloning of Fut8 from porcine brain . Studies on cancer and fucosylation have moved to the second stage since that time. Fut8 knockout mice show emphysema-like lesions in the lungs because core-fucose is important for the functions of reactions such as EGF-R and TGF-R [5, 16]. When we established a monoclonal antibody for Fut8, we performed the first immunohistochemical study on thyroid cancer . This is because there are various types of thyroid cancer and the prognosis differs for each pathological condition. As a result of immunohistochemical studies, involving 133 cases of thyroid cancer, the expression of Fut8 was found to be quite low in normal follicles. As shown in Figure 2, positive staining of Fut8 was observed in papillary carcinomas. This staining pattern could be called Golgi localization. The number of Fut8-positive cases of follicular carcinomas was relatively low. We concluded that expression of Fut8 might be a key factor for the progression of thyroid papillary carcinomas, but not of follicular carcinomas. High expression of Fut8 was observed in 33.3% of papillary carcinomas and the incidence was directly linked to tumor size and lymph node metastasis. In contrast, this phenomenon was less frequently observed in cases of follicular carcinomas and anaplastic (undifferentiated) carcinomas. Furthermore, decreases in Fut8 expression in papillary carcinomas might be linked to anaplastic transformation. These results seem to be similar to the results in the case of colon carcinogenesis that is, “fucosylation and defucosylation” . Further studies should determine the biological function of core-fucose in thyroid cancer.
4. GnT-V and Thyroid Cancer
N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V) is one of the most important glycosyltransferases in tumor metastasis . So far, more than 80 papers on GnT-V and tumor metastasis have appeared, with this number being quite high as compared to other glycosyltransferases. One mechanism underlying GnT-V and tumor progression is beta1-6 GlcNAc branching formation, a product of GnT-V, up-regulating cell surface growth factor receptors such as EGF-R . The other mechanism is suppressing of the degradation of glycoproteins, resulting in an increase in protease expression . Matriptase is a tumor-associated type II transmembrane serine protease that positively regulates carcinoma metastasis by activating the latent forms of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) . The overexpression of GnT-V in gastric carcinoma cells enhances the degradation of matriptase and accelerated the peritoneal dissemination of these cancer cells in athymic mice . Matriptase purified from GnT-V-transfected gastric cancer cells is resistant to trypsin and this resistance is dependent on the oligosaccharides linked to the 772 Asn residue of matriptase . These findings indicate that GnT-V modifies the oligosaccharide structure of matriptase, thus altering the function of proteases. According to the results of these in vitro studies on GnT-V and matriptase, we performed immunohistochemical studies, using 132 cases of thyroid cancers . While neither GnT-V nor matriptase was expressed in normal thyroid tissue, positive staining for matriptase and GnT-V was observed in 52/68 and 66/68 cases of papillary carcinomas, 3/23 and 10/23 cases of follicular carcinomas, 5/13 and 9/13 cases of follicular adenomas, and 11/28 and 6/28 cases of anaplastic carcinomas, respectively. Immunohistochemistry, as well as Western blotting, showed that the expression of matriptase paralleled the expression of GnT-V. However, the expression of matriptase mRNA was not correlated with its protein level, suggesting that the enhancement of matriptase expression could be caused by a posttranslational modification such as glycosylation through GnT-V-mediated glycosylation. In the case of papillary carcinomas, the levels of expression of both GnT-V and matriptase were significantly higher in tumors of 1 cm or less in size (microcarcinomas) and in cases without poorly differentiated lesions, and the two proteins were significantly correlated. In contrast, the prognosis of thyroid carcinomas after surgery was correlated with the expression of neither GnT-V nor matriptase, because the levels of their expression were quite low in anaplastic (undifferentiated) carcinomas. These results suggest that prolonged stabilization of matriptase is stabilized through GnT-V-mediated glycosylation in vivo, thus extending its halftime and permitting it to play a role in the early phases of papillary carcinomas, but not in the later phase of their progression. The staining pattern of GnT-V was different from that of Fut8 although GnT-V and Fut8 are glycosyltransferases located on the Golgi apparatus. GnT-V is cleaved by gamma secretase, resulting in its secretion into the serum or conditioned medium . The secreted type of GnT-V acts as an angiogenesis cofactor .
5. Glypican 3 and Thyroid Cancer
Glypican 3 (GPC3) is one of the heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) that are attached to the cell surface through a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor . While high expression of GPC3 is observed in fetal organs, it is scarcely detected in adult tissues. Interestingly, the serum levels of GPC3 measured by means of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were increased in patients with HCC at 40 53%. Since there was no correlation between the GPC3 and alpha-feto protein levels, 82% of HCC patients were positive for at least 1 of these 2 tumor-markers. GPC3 was also identified as a tumor marker for melanomas . GPC3 is involved in several kinds of cell signaling such as Wnt/Wingless, Hedgehog, TGF-β, and fibroblast growth factor, resulting in the stimulation of HCC growth . When we performed immunohistochemical analysis of GPC3 in thyroid cancer , GPC3 was scarcely expressed in normal thyroid glands, but was dramatically enhanced in certain types of cancers including 100% of follicular carcinomas (20/20 cases) and 70% of papillary carcinomas (48/69 cases). Expression of GPC3 in follicular carcinomas was significantly higher than that of follicular adenomas (P .0019). In contrast, no expression of GPC 3 was observed in 20 cases of anaplastic carcinomas. When expression of GPC3 was investigated in 69 cases of papillary carcinomas according to their clinical background, it was found to be expressed at an early stage. These data prompted us to perform experiments on transfection of GPC3 into thyroid cancer cell lines to determine the biological function of GPC3. When the GPC3 gene was transfected into a human thyroid cancer cell line, TAD2, cell growth was dramatically suppressed in the wild type of GPC3 transfectants, but not markedly suppressed in the GPC3 oligosaccharide mutants (Figure 3). This oligosaccharide of GPC3 is heparan sulfate and the mutants were established by point mutation of the amino acid sequences of GPC3 expression vectors. The cell morphology dramatically changed with the transfection of GPC3 with oligosaccharides but not GPC3 without oligosaccharides. In the case of HCCs, oligosaccharides of GPC3 were not linked to cell signaling or cell growth . Further studies are required to characterize GPC3-mediated cell signaling in thyroid cancer.
The differential diagnosis of follicular adenocarcinoma from follicular adenomas is the most important issue. In certain cases, even pathological examination is not perfect. Galectin 3 has been reported in one of the candidate pathological markers for a differential diagnosis . Recently, we established a quantitative ELISA assay for GPC3 and investigated its clinical usefulness for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer . Galectin 3 binds to polylactosamine structures on N-glycans and controls the function of cell surface receptors. The polylactosamine structures are synthesized through the reaction of GnT-V and the molecular mechanisms underlying GnT-V-related cell signaling would be due to galectin 3 . It is important to determine the biological function of galectin-3 in thyroid cancer. Basically, the thyroid is an endocrine organ that produces thyroid hormone. Many factors control the release of thyroid hormone via receptor-ligand mediated signaling (Figure 4). In this system, oligosaccharides seem to be deeply involved, and therefore control of thyroid function via oligosaccharides would be a promising research target. Many hormones including thyroid hormone could be regulated through glycosylation . In this review, we did not describe sialic acids in thyroid carcinoma. Sialic acids are a terminal oligosaccharide on N-/O-glycans and have a variety of biological functions . While the biological significance of sialic acids in thyroid cancer remains unknown, changes in cellular sialylation have been changed in malignant formation . Transgenic or knockout mice as to glycosyltransferases including sialyltransferases would be a powerful tool for determining the oligosaccharide function in thyroid carcinogenesis directly. Such mice should be mated with model mice for thyroid cancer, if any.
|EGF-R:||epithelial growth factor receptor|
|TGFβ R:||transforming growth factor β receptor|
The authors would like to thank Professor Jorge Filmus (Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto) for providing GPC3 and GPC3 mutant vectors. They also thank Kanako Yamanaka and Ayumi Akinaga for technical support.
- L. J. De Groot, The Thyroid and Its Diseases, Thyroid Disease Manager.
- A. Varki, “Biological roles of oligosaccharides: all of the theories are correct,” Glycobiology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–130, 1993.
- R. A. Dwek, “Glycobiology: “Towards understanding the function of sugars”,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 1995.
- E. Saxon and C. R. Bertozzi, “Chemical and biological strategies for engineering cell surface glycosylation,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 17, pp. 1–23, 2001.
- N. Taniguchi, E. Miyoshi, J. Gu, K. Honke, and A. Matsumoto, “Decoding sugar functions by identifying target glycoproteins,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 561–566, 2006.
- Y. Kaneko, F. Nimmerjahn, and J. V. Ravetch, “Anti-inflammatory activity of immunoglobulin G resulting from Fc sialylation,” Science, vol. 313, no. 5787, pp. 670–673, 2006.
- R. M. Anthony, F. Nimmerjahn, D. J. Ashline, V. N. Reinhold, J. C. Paulson, and J. V. Ravetch, “Recapitulation of IVIG anti-inflammatory activity with a recombinant IgG Fc,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5874, pp. 373–376, 2008.
- E. Miyoshi, K. Moriwaki, and T. Nakagawa, “Biological function of fucosylation in cancer biology,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 143, no. 6, pp. 725–729, 2008.
- J. W. Dennis, M. Granovsky, and C. E. Warren, “Glycoprotein glycosylation and cancer progression,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1473, no. 1, pp. 21–34, 1999.
- N. Taniguchi, E. Miyoshi, J. H. Ko, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Ihara, “Implication of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases III and V in cancer: gene regulation and signaling mechanism,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1455, no. 2-3, pp. 287–300, 1999.
- J. Breborowicz, A. Mackiewicz, and D. Breborowicz, “Microheterogeneity of α-fetoprotein in patient serum as demonstrated by lectin affino-electrophoresis,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 1981.
- K. Taketa, M. Izumi, and E. Ichikawa, “Distinct molecular species of human α-fetoprotein due to differential affinities to lectins,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 417, pp. 61–68, 1983.
- Y. Aoyagi, Y. Suzuki, and Y. Suzuki, “The usefulness of simultaneous determinations of glucosaminylation and fucosylation indices of alpha-fetoprotein in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic diseases of the liver,” Cancer, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 2390–2394, 1991.
- K. Taketa, Y. Endo, and Y. Endo, “A collaborative study for the evaluation of lectin-reactive α- fetoproteins in early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Research, vol. 53, no. 22, pp. 5419–5423, 1993.
- N. Uozumi, S. Yanagidani, and S. Yanagidani, “Purification and cDNA cloning of porcine brain GDP-L-Fuc:N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide α1→6 fucosyltransferase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 44, pp. 27810–27817, 1996.
- X. Wang, S. Inoue, and S. Inoue, “Dysregulation of TGF-β1 receptor activation leads to abnormal lung development and emphysema-like phenotype in core fucose-deficient mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 44, pp. 15791–15796, 2005.
- Y. Ito, A. Miyauchi, and A. Miyauchi, “Expression of α1, 6-fucosyltransferase (FUT8) in papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: its linkage to biological aggressiveness and anaplastic transformation,” Cancer Letters, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. 167–172, 2003.
- K. Moriwaki, K. Noda, and K. Noda, “Deficiency of GMD leads to escape from NK cell-mediated tumor surveillance through modulation of TRAIL signaling,” Gastroenterology, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 188–198, 2009.
- K. S. Lau, E. A. Partridge, A. Grigorian, C. I. Silvescu, V. N. Reinhold, M. Demetriou, and J. W. Dennis, “Complex N-glycan number and degree of branching cooperate to regulate cell proliferation and differentiation,” Cell, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 123–134, 2007.
- S. Ihara, E. Miyoshi, and E. Miyoshi, “Prometastatic effect of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V is due to modification and stabilization of active matriptase by adding β1-6 GlcNAc branching,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 19, pp. 16960–16967, 2002.
- C.-Y. Lin, J. Anders, M. Johnson, and R. B. Dickson, “Purification and characterization of a complex containing matriptase and a Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor from human milk,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 26, pp. 18237–18242, 1999.
- S. Ihara, E. Miyoshi, and E. Miyoshi, “Addition of β1-6 GlcNAc branching to the oligosaccharide attached to Asn 772 in the serine protease domain of matriptase plays a pivotal role in its stability and resistance against trypsin,” Glycobiology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 2004.
- Y. Ito, A. Akinaga, and A. Akinaga, “Co-expression of matriptase and N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V in thyroid cancer tissues; its possible role in prolonged stability in vivo by aberrant glycosylation,” Glycobiology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 368–374, 2006.
- S. Nakahara, T. Saito, and T. Saito, “A secreted type of β1, 6 N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V), a novel angiogenesis inducer, is regulated by γ-secretase,” FASEB Journal, vol. 20, no. 14, pp. 2451–2459, 2006.
- T. Saito, E. Miyoshi, K. Sasai, N. Nakano, H. Eguchi, K. Honke, and N. Taniguchi, “A secreted type of β1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V) induces tumor angiogenesis without mediation of glycosylation. A novel function of GnT-V distinct from the original glycosyltransferase activity,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 19, pp. 17002–17008, 2002.
- J. Filmus and S. B. Selleck, “Glypicans: proteoglycans with a surprise,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 497–501, 2001.
- M. Capurro, I. R. Wanless, M. Sherman, G. Deboer, W. Shi, E. Miyoshi, and J. Filmus, “Glypican-3: a novel serum and histochemical marker for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Gastroenterology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 89–97, 2003.
- M. I. Capurro, Y.-Y. Xiang, C. Lobe, and J. Filmus, “Glypican-3 promotes the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma by stimulating canonical Wnt signaling,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 14, pp. 6245–6254, 2005.
- K. Yamanaka, Y. Ito, and Y. Ito, “Immunohistochemical study of glypican 3 in thyroid cancer,” Oncology, vol. 73, no. 5-6, pp. 389–394, 2008.
- A. Bartolazzi, F. Orlandi, E. Saggiorato, et al., “Galectin-3-expression analysis in the surgical selection of follicular thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration cytology: a prospective multicentre study,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 543–549, 2008.
- H. Inohara, T. Segawa, and T. Segawa, “Cytoplasmic and serum galectin-3 in diagnosis of thyroid malignancies,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 376, no. 3, pp. 605–610, 2008.
- L. Medvedová and R. Farkaš, “Hormonal control of protein glycosylation: role of steroids and related lipophilic ligands,” Endocrine Regulations, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 65–79, 2004.
- A. Varki, “Sialic acids in human health and disease,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 351–360, 2008.
- P. Babál, P. Janega, A. Černá, I. Kholová, and E. Brabencová, “Neoplastic transformation of the thyroid gland is accompanied by changes in cellular sialylation,” Acta Histochemica, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 133–140, 2006.