- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Journal of Oncology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 264039, 10 pages
Dietary Restriction Promotes Vessel Maturation in a Mouse Astrocytoma
Biology Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 0246, USA
Received 19 May 2011; Revised 22 September 2011; Accepted 25 September 2011
Academic Editor: Kalpna Gupta
Copyright © 2012 Ivan Urits et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Mature vasculature contains an endothelial cell lining with a surrounding sheath of pericytes/vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Tumor vessels are immature and lack a pericyte sheath. Colocalization of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGF-Rβ) reduces pericyte ensheathment of tumor vessels. We found that a 30% dietary restriction (DR) enhanced vessel maturation in the mouse CT-2A astrocytoma. DR reduced microvessel density and VEGF expression in the astrocytoma, while increasing recruitment of pericytes, positive for alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). Moreover, DR reduced colocalization of VEGF-R2 and PDGF-Rβ, but did not reduce total PDGF-Rβ expression. These findings suggest that DR promoted vessel normalization by preventing VEGF-induced inhibition of the PDGF signaling axis in pericytes. DR appears to shift the tumor vasculature from a leaky immature state to a more mature state. We suggest that vessel normalization could improve delivery of therapeutic drugs to brain tumors.
Tumor vascularization, vital to neoplastic progression, provides nutrients and oxygen to the tumor [1–3]. Proliferation of vessel-forming endothelial cells is a limiting factor for tumor growth [4–7]. Accordingly, targeting tumor vessel proliferation decreases blood flow and nutrient availability, thus slowing tumor growth . Tumors induce the proliferative vascular response of host blood vessels by influencing the local balance of angiogenic regulators, a rate-limiting step termed the angiogenic switch [9, 10]. The uncontrolled production of angiogenic stimulators and the absence of inhibitors favor vessel growth [10–12].
Normal tissue vasculature contains an endothelial lining with a surrounding sheath of pericytes/vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) . In contrast to healthy vessels, tumor vessels are immature, often mal-shaped, irregular, and have a tortuous structure with a leaky endothelial cell lining [13, 14]. The process of blood vessel maturation involves ensheathment of neovascular sprouts by α-smooth-muscle-actin- (α-SMA-) positive pericytes . Pericytes contact endothelial cells and play an active role in endothelial cell function and blood flow regulation [15–17]. Mature vessels contain a variety of contractile proteins including α-SMA, which is often used as a pericyte marker [15, 18, 19].
The instability of tumor blood vessels is associated with the absence of a smooth muscle cell sheath . Abnormalities in tumor vessel shape and structure not only impair drug delivery, but also can facilitate metastatic spread [20, 21]. While it may seem that an increase in blood vessel quantity would provide sufficient oxygen to tumors, the abnormal vessels deliver less oxygen leading to a hypoxic tumor environment . This will further stimulate tumor growth and aberrant angiogenesis [22, 23]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) signaling drives angiogenesis and recruitment of perivascular cells to surround the newly formed blood vessels . VEGF stimulates endothelial cell migration, proliferation, survival, permeability, and lumen formation and has become a prime target of antiangiogenic therapy . Blockage of VEGF signaling induces vessel normalization and inhibition of new vessel growth (16). In addition to the pruning of immature blood vessels, inhibition of VEGF expression also increases pericyte cell coverage and vessel maturation [25, 26].
Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) coordinates pericyte coverage of vascular sprouts through PDGF-Rβ on vascular smooth muscle cells . Greenberg et al. showed that, in addition to stimulating endothelial cell proliferation, VEGF also inhibits neovascularization via its capacity to disrupt vascular smooth muscle cell function . Specifically, VEGF prevents pericyte coverage of nascent vascular sprouts leading to vessel destabilization. VEGF activation of VEGF-R2 suppresses PDGF-Rβ signaling in VSMCs through the assembly of a complex consisting of the two receptors. Inhibition of VEGF-R2 prevents the formation of this receptor complex and restores tissue angiogenesis. Moreover, genetic deletion of tumor cell VEGF also disrupts the receptor complex and consequently increases tumor vessel maturation. These findings are important as they reveal a dichotomous role for VEGF signaling as a promoter of endothelial cell function and as an inhibitor of VSMCs and vessel maturation [24, 26, 28, 29].
VEGF expression is greater in tumor cells than in normal cells [30–33]. Reduced VEGF expression reduces angiogenesis while increasing vessel maturation . Mukherjee et al. demonstrated that a 30% dietary restriction (DR) inhibits angiogenesis and reduces prostate tumor growth . We showed that DR in mice reduces microvessel density in experimental mouse and human brain tumors [35, 36]. Powolny et al. demonstrated that DR attenuates tumor growth and reduces vascular density. They also found that a 40% DR significantly reduced VEGF gene and protein expression in rat prostate tumors . These studies show that DR is a potentially viable nontoxic therapeutic approach for managing malignant brain tumor growth, for reducing tumor angiogenesis, and for increasing long-term survival in mice bearing orthotopically implanted tumors [35–38].
DR is produced by restricting the total caloric content administered to subjects. However, a distinction from starvation is that DR does not cause anorexia or malnutrition [34, 39–42]. It is important to note that the total reduction of calories, rather than the macronutritional content of the food, proves most important to producing the effects of reducing tumor growth and in limiting angiogenesis [34, 39]. Although prior studies showed that dietary restriction is antiangiogenic when initiated early in tumor development, no prior studies have identified the mechanisms by which dietary restriction is effective in correcting vasculature.
In this paper, we show that DR enhances vessel maturation and stabilization in the highly vascularized CT-2A mouse astrocytoma. In addition to reducing VEGF expression, we also found that DR decreased colocalization of VEGF-R2 with PDGF-Rβ. Our findings suggest that DR imparts its antiangiogenic and vessel maturating effects on the CT-2A tumor via the reduction of VEGF expression promoting VSMC ensheathment of vascular sprouts.
2. Materials and Methods
Mice of the C57BL/6J strain were obtained from the Jackson laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). The mice were propagated in the animal care facility of the Biology Department of Boston College, using animal husbandry conditions described previously . Male mice (8–10 weeks of age) were used for the studies and were provided with food either ad libitum (AL) or under restricted conditions (as described below). Water was provided ad libitum to all mice. The animal room was maintained at 22°C, and cotton nesting pads were provided for additional warmth. All animal experiments were carried out with ethical committee approval in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Care Committee.
2.2. Brain Tumor Model
The syngeneic CT-2A experimental mouse brain tumor was generated in our laboratory after implantation of 20-methylcholanthrene into the cerebral cortex of a C57BL/6 mouse according to the procedure of Zimmerman [45, 46]. Histologically, the CT-2A brain tumor is broadly classified as a poorly differentiated highly malignant anaplastic astrocytoma . The tumor grows orthotopically as a soft, noncohesive, and highly vascularised mass.
2.3. Intracerebral Tumor Implantation
The CT-2A tumor was implanted into the cerebral cortex of C57BL/6J mice using a trocar as we previously described [47, 48]. Briefly, mice were anaesthetized with pentobarbital (Vet Labs, Inc) intraperitoneally and their heads were shaved and swabbed with 70% ethyl alcohol under sterile conditions. Small CT-2A tumor pieces (1 mm3) from a C57BL/6J donor mouse were implanted into the right cerebral hemisphere of anaesthetized recipient mice as we recently described . All of the mice recovered from the surgical procedure and were returned to their cages when fully active. Initiation of tumors from intact tumor pieces is preferable to initiation from cultured cells since the pieces already contain an established microenvironment that facilitates tumor growth.
2.4. Dietary Restriction (DR)
The mice were separated prior to the beginning of the experiment and randomly assigned to either control group that was fed AL or to an experimental group that was fed a total dietary restriction (DR) of 30%. Each mouse was housed singly in a plastic shoe box cage with a filter top and was given a cotton nesting pad for warmth. DR was initiated 2 days following tumor implantation and was continued for 11 days following implantation. Total DR maintains a constant ratio of nutrients to energy; that is, the average daily food intake (grams) for the AL fed mice was determined every other day and the DR-fed mice were given 70% of that quantity on a daily basis. All mice received PROLAB chow (Agaway Inc.), which contains a balance of mouse nutritional ingredients and, according to the manufacturer’s specification, delivers 4.4 Kcal/g gross energy. Body weights of all mice were recorded every other day.
2.5. Tumor Growth and Histology
Intracerebral tumor growth was analyzed directly by measuring total tumor wet weight. Tumors were dissected from normal-appearing brain tissue, were frozen, and then were weighed. Tumor samples for histology were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (Sigma) and embedded in paraffin. They were sectioned at 5 μm, stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and examined by light microscopy.
2.6. Measurement of Plasma Glucose and Lipids
Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (Halocarbon Laboratories, River Edge, NJ, USA) and euthanized by exsanguination, involving collection of blood from the heart in heparinized tubes. The blood was centrifuged at 6,000 g for 10 min, the plasma was collected, and aliquots were stored at −80°C until analysis. Plasma glucose concentration was measured in a spectrophotometer using the Stanbio Enzymatic Glucose Procedure (Stanbio). High-performance thin-layer chromatography was used to evaluate plasma lipids according to our standard procedures .
2.7. Western Blot Analysis
Frozen CT-2A tumor and contralateral normal brain tissues were homogenized in lysis buffer, on ice. Lysates were transferred to Eppendorf tubes, mixed on a rocker for 1 h at 4°C, and then centrifuged for 20 min. Supernatants were collected, and protein concentrations were estimated using the Bio-Rad detergent-compatible protein assay. Approximately 25 μg of total protein from each tissue sample were denatured with SDS-PAGE sample buffer and resolved with SDS-PAGE on 4% to 12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen). Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride immobilon TM-P membrane (Millipore) overnight at 4°C and blocked in 5% nonfat powdered milk in TBS with tween 20 (pH 7.6) for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were probed with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C with gentle shaking. The blots were then incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature, and bands were visualized with chemiluminescence. Each membrane was stripped and reprobed for β-actin as an internal loading control, and the ratio of the indicated protein to β-actin was analyzed by scanning densitometry.
2.8. Antibodies and Reagents
Antibodies were obtained against α-SMA (Sigma), β-Actin (Cell Signaling), Factor VIII (Dako), PDGF-Rβ (Santa Cruz), VEGF-R2 (Santa Cruz), and VEGF (Santa Cruz).
2.9. Confocal Microscopy
For the immunohistochemical studies, the tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and washed. The tissue sections were then heat treated (95°C) in antigen unmasking solution (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 30 min. Tissue sections were blocked in goat serum (1 : 10 in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature, treated with primary antibody, followed by treatment with secondary antibody. Corresponding tissue sections without primary antibody served as negative controls. For confocal microscopy, digital images were obtained on a Leica DMI6000 inverted scope equipped with the Leica TCSSP5 confocal system, using HCX PL APO 409/1.25 NA oil and HCX PL APO 639/1.4 NA oil objective lenses. Leica confocal software was used to acquire images.
For α-SMA and Factor VIII immunoflourscent staining, sections were incubated with a cocktail of α-SMA and Factor VIII primary antibodies (1 : 100) in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature, followed by a cocktail of alexafluor 585 and 488, conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit, respectively, secondary antibody (1 : 200) for 45 min at room temperature.
For colocalization of VEGF-R2 and PDGF-Rβ, sections were incubated with a cocktail of VEGF-R2 and PDGF-R2 primary antibodies (1 : 100) in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C, followed by a cocktail of alexafluor 585 and 488, conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit, respectively, secondary antibody at 1 : 200 dilution for 45 min. All other conditions were as stated.
Tissue sections were processed similarly as for confocal microscopy. Sections were treated with VEGF, PDGF-Rβ, and Factor VIII primary antibodies overnight at 4°C followed by treatment with a biotinylated anti-rat secondary antibody at 1 : 100 dilution (Vector laboratories, Inc). The sections were then treated with avidin biotin complex followed by 3,3-diaminobenzidine as substrate for staining according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Vectastain Elite ABC kit, Vector laboratories, Inc.). The sections were counterstained with haematoxylin and mounted. Corresponding tissue sections without primary antibody served as negative controls. The Zeiss Axioplan 2 light microscope was used to capture bright-field images.
3.1. Dietary Restriction Reduces Body Weight, Blood Glucose, and Intracerebral Tumor Growth
The DR group exhibited an average body weight reduction of 22 ± 1% and an average tumor reduction of 76 ± 4%. Average tumor wet weight was significantly lower in the DR-fed mice (51 ± 7 mg) than in the AL-fed mice (209 ± 40 mg); , Student’s t-test. Blood glucose levels (mmol/L) in the AL and DR mice were 8.6 ± 0.6 and 4.4 ± 1.0, respectively (, determined by two-tailed t-test). The blood glucose levels were reduced in the DR mice as we previously showed [36, 50]. No significant differences were detected between the AL and DR mice for the distribution of major lipids including cholesteryl esters, cholesterol, triglycerides, or phosphatidylcholine (data not shown). Mouse activity level increased under dietary energy restriction. This is a well-documented phenomenon that occurs in all mice when placed under calorie restriction and is due to increased foraging . It is difficult to determine if increased physical activity causes psychological stress. It is well documented that general health and fitness improves significantly in mice when they are underfed with adequate nutrition [51, 52]. It is important to note that all tumors implanted grew in both the DR and AL groups, indicating that dietary restriction did not inhibit tumor take. This study confirms previous observations that DR inhibits CT-2A tumor growth .
3.2. Dietary Restriction Reduces Microvessel Density and Hemorrhaging in the CT-2A Astrocytoma
H&E staining was used to evaluate the influence of DR on hemorrhagic blood vessels in CT-2A (Figure 1(a)). Light pink staining indicates normal brain tissue. Bright pink staining found within the CT-2A tumor tissue indicates hemorrhagic vasculature. The number of hemorrhagic vessels was noticeably less in tumors of DR-fed mice than in tumors of AL-fed mice. Factor VIII immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the influence of DR on the density of vascular endothelial cells. The number of Factor-VIII-stained endothelial cells was noticeably less in sections of tumors from DR-fed mice than from AL-fed mice, indicating a reduction of microvessel density (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)).
3.3. Dietary Restriction Increases Maturation of Blood Vessels in the CT-2A Astrocytoma
Confocal microscopy was used to determine the influence of DR on localization of α-SMA and Factor VIII in blood vessels of CT-2A (Figure 2). α-SMA (red) was used as a marker for vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC)/perictye coverage of blood vessels, and Factor VIII (green) was used as a marker for endothelial cells. Localization of VSMCs (red) with the endothelial cell lining (green) was greater in tumor vessels of DR-fed mice than in tumor vessels of AL-fed mice. These findings suggest that DR enhances VSMC/perictye coverage of CT-2A tumor vessels.
3.4. Dietary Restriction Increases α-SMA Expression and Reduces Factor VIII Expression in the CT-2A Astrocytoma
Western blot analysis was done to examine the effects of DR on the relative expression of α-SMA and Factor VIII in tumor blood vessels. Factor VIII expression was significantly lower while α-SMA expression was significantly higher in the CT-2A tumor when grown in DR-fed mice than when grown in AL-fed mice (Figure 3). The ratio of α-SMA to Factor VIII was significantly greater in the tumors of the DR mice as compared to the AL mice (Figure 3). An increase of this ratio in DR mice as compared to the AL group indicates a reduction of endothelial cell proliferation and a simultaneous increase of pericyte/VSMC vessel coverage.
3.5. Dietary Restriction Reduces VEGF Expression in the CT-2A Astrocytoma
Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the influence of dietary restriction on local VEGF expression in CT-2A. The brown VEGF staining intensity and quantity was noticeably less in tumors of DR-fed mice than in tumors of AL-fed mice (Figure 4). These findings are consistent with previous findings in plasma indicating that DR reduces VEGF expression [35, 36].
3.6. Dietary Restriction Reduces PDGF-Rβ and VEGF-R2 Association in the CT-2A Astrocytoma
Confocal microscopy showed that the amount of yellow staining, indicative of colocalization of PDGF-Rβ (red) and VEGF-R2 (green), was less in DR-fed mice compared to tumors of AL-fed mice (Figure 5(a)). Western blot analysis showed that PDGF-Rβ expression was similar in tumors of DR-fed and AL-fed mice (Figure 5(b)).
We found for the first time that DR could enhance tumor blood vessel maturation in a malignant mouse astrocytoma. DR not only curtailed angiogenesis, but also increased vessel pericyte ensheathment in the highly vascularized CT-2A astrocytoma. DR reduced endothelial cell proliferation, as indicated by a reduction in staining for Factor VIII, a marker for endothelial cells. We also observed an increase of pericyte and vascular smooth muscle cell coverage of the endothelial cell lining in blood vessels, as indicated by an increase of α-SMA, a marker for VSMCs and VSMC-like pericytes. This was apparent from the increased ratio of α-SMA relative to Factor VIII. Our findings agree with the previously documented antiangiogenic effects of DR [34–36, 53]. Immunostaining of tumor sections with VEGF antibody showed an overall reduction of VEGF expression in DR-treated tumors. We suggest that the observed reduction in VEGF leads to the antiangiogenic and vessel maturating effects, via the VEGF-VEGF-R2 signaling axis.
The VEGF-VEGF-R2 signaling axis is a primary pathway in endothelial cell proliferation . Moreover, Greenberg et al. implicated VEGF in a dichotomous role. Apart from acting as a promoter of endothelial cell function, VEGF also acts as a negative regulator of VSMCs and consequently vessel maturation . We observed that DR reduced colocalization of VEGF-R2 and PDGF-Rβ in the CT-2A tumor. We also found that DR had no significant influence on PDGF-Rβ expression. These findings suggest that DR blocks the association of VEGF-R2 and PDGF-Rβ by reducing VEGF, thus preventing inhibition of the PDGF signaling axis due to colocolization of the two receptors . Further studies will be needed to evaluate these signaling pathways.
An immature and leaky vasculature is a hallmark of solid tumors [55–57]. The leakiness of the tumor vasculature leads to elevated interstitial fluid pressure within the tumor. Tong et al. demonstrated that increased hydrostatic pressure within tumors hinders drug penetration across tumor vessels . They also showed that penetration of large molecules into tumors is better through vessels with uniform pericyte coverage than through vessels with irregular pericyte coverage. We suggest that DR may improve drug delivery to the tumor via a similar mechanism. Denny et al. found that restriction of a ketogenic diet improved delivery of a small drug molecule into the mouse brain. They found that brain N-butyldeoxynojirmycin (NB-DNJ) content was 3.5-fold greater in the restricted ketogenic diet + NB-DNJ mice than in the NB-DNJ group alone suggesting that DR enhances delivery of the drug to the brain. This could allow for a lower dosing to achieve therapeutic effect . Further research on the effects of dietary restriction on the brain vasculature is necessary to elucidate the mechanism by which diet and DR enhance drug delivery to the brain.
It is well documented that prognosis is poor for most patients with malignant glioma . The targeting of angiogenesis has become an important strategy in current therapy [61, 62]. The goal of antiangiogenic therapy is to reduce microvessel density and to increase vessel stabilization [9, 60–62]. We suggest that DR normalizes tumor vasculature by decreasing VEGF expression in the tumor. Our findings show that mature smooth-muscle-cell-covered vessels are more prominent in brain tumors under DR than in brain tumors under AL feeding.
The results indicate that dietary restriction promotes vessel maturation in an experimental mouse astrocytoma. This preclinical study shows that DR may be an effective nontoxic antiangiogenic therapy in brain tumors. DR may also improve drug delivery to brain tumors and may therefore be used in conjunction with drug therapy.
|α-SMA:||Alpha smooth muscle actin|
|VSMC:||Vascular smooth muscle cell|
|VEGF:||Vascular endothelial growth factor|
|VEGF-R2:||Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2|
|PDGF-Rβ:||Platelet-derived growth factor receptor β.|
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
This work was supported in part by NIH grants (HD-39722, NS-1080 55195, and CA-102135), a grant from the American Institute of Cancer 1081 Research, and the Boston College Expense Fund. The authors thank the Harvard University Histopathology Core Facility and Dr. Roderick Bronson for the help of tissue processing. They also thank Dr. Joshua Rosenberg, the Director of the Boston College Biology Department Imaging facility.
- J. Folkman, “Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 285, no. 21, pp. 1182–1186, 1971.
- C. Rice and L. Eric Huang, “From antiangiogenesis to hypoxia: current research and future directions,” Cancer Management and Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2010.
- D. Ribatti, “The inefficacy of antiangiogenic therapies,” Journal of Angiogenesis Research, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 27, 2010.
- I. F. Tannock, “The relation between cell proliferation and the vascular system in a transplanted mouse mammary tumour,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 258–273, 1968.
- J. Folkman, “What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent?” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 4–6, 1990.
- D. J. Hicklin and L. M. Ellis, “Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1011–1027, 2005.
- K. J. Kim, B. Li, J. Winer et al., “Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis suppresses tumour growth in vivo,” Nature, vol. 362, no. 6423, pp. 841–844, 1993.
- R. K. Jain, “Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 987–989, 2001.
- A. L. Hayes, L. Y. Li, and M. E. Lippman, “Anti-vascular therapy: a new approach to cancer treatment,” Western Journal of Medicine, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 39–42, 2000.
- D. Hanahan and J. Folkman, “Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis,” Cell, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 353–364, 1996.
- G. Bergers and L. E. Benjamin, “Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 401–410, 2003.
- G. Neufeld, T. Cohen, S. Gengrinovitch, and Z. Poltorak, “Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors,” FASEB Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 9–22, 1999.
- R. K. Jain, “Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5706, pp. 58–62, 2005.
- K. De Bock, S. Cauwenberghs, and P. Carmeliet, “Vessel abnormalization: another hallmark of cancer? Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 2010.
- M. M. Verbeek, I. Otte-Holler, P. Wesseling, D. J. Ruiter, and R. M. W. De Waal, “Induction of α-smooth muscle actin expression in cultured human brain pericytes by transforming growth factor-β1,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 372–382, 1994.
- S. Morikawa, P. Baluk, T. Kaidoh, A. Haskell, R. K. Jain, and D. M. McDonald, “Abnormalities in pericytes on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 985–1000, 2002.
- K. K. Hirschi, “PDGF, TGF-β, and heterotypic cell-cell interactions mediate endothelial cell-induced recruitment of 10T1/2 cells and their differentiation to a smooth muscle fate,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 805–814, 1998.
- A. Antonelli-Orlidge, K. B. Saunders, S. R. Smith, and P. A. D'Amore, “An activated form of transforming growth factor β is produced by cocultures of endothelial cells and pericytes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 4544–4548, 1989.
- R. O. Schlingemann, F. J. R. Rietveld, R. M. W. De Waal, S. Ferrone, and D. J. Ruiter, “Expression of the high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen by pericytes during angiogenesis in tumors and in healing wounds,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 1393–1405, 1990.
- S. J. Lunt, N. Chaudary, and R. P. Hill, “The tumor microenvironment and metastatic disease,” Clinical and Experimental Metastasis, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 19–34, 2009.
- A. Rapisarda and G. Melillo, “Role of the hypoxic tumor microenvironment in the resistance to anti-angiogenic therapies,” Drug Resistance Updates, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 74–80, 2009.
- S. Pennacchietti, P. Michieli, M. Galluzzo, M. Mazzone, S. Giordano, and P. M. Comoglio, “Hypoxia promotes invasive growth by transcriptional activation of the met protooncogene,” Cancer Cell, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 347–361, 2003.
- L. Terraneo, P. Bianciardi, A. Caretti, R. Ronchi, and M. Samaja, “Chronic systemic hypoxia promotes LNCaP prostate cancer growth in vivo,” Prostate, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 1243–1254, 2010.
- J. I. Greenberg, D. J. Shields, S. G. Barillas et al., “A role for VEGF as a negative regulator of pericyte function and vessel maturation,” Nature, vol. 456, no. 7223, pp. 809–814, 2008.
- R. Abramovitch, H. Dafni, E. Smouha, L. E. Benjamin, and M. Neeman, “In vivo prediction of vascular susceptibility to vascular endothelial growth factor withdrawal: magnetic resonance imaging of C6 rat glioma in nude mice,” Cancer Research, vol. 59, no. 19, pp. 5012–5016, 1999.
- J. I. Greenberg and D. A. Cheresh, “VEGF as an inhibitor of tumor vessel maturation: implications for cancer therapy,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1347–1356, 2009.
- H. Gerhardt and H. Semb, “Pericytes: gatekeepers in tumour cell metastasis?” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 135–144, 2008.
- I. Helfrich and D. Schadendorf, “Blood vessel maturation, vascular phenotype and angiogenic potential in malignant melanoma: one step forward for overcoming anti-angiogenic drug resistance?” Molecular Oncology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 137–149, 2011.
- H. J. Thompson, Z. Zhu, and W. Jiang, “Dietary energy restriction in breast cancer prevention,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 133–142, 2003.
- S. Takano, Y. Yoshii, S. Kondo et al., “Concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor in the serum and tumor tissue of brain tumor patients,” Cancer Research, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2185–2190, 1996.
- D. Fukumura, R. Xavier, T. Sugiura et al., “Tumor induction of VEGF promoter activity in stromal cells,” Cell, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 715–725, 1998.
- A. K. Wong, M. Alfert, D. H. Castrillon et al., “Excessive tumor-elaborated VEGF and its neutralization define a lethal paraneoplastic syndrome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 13, pp. 7481–7486, 2001.
- D. Mukhopadhyay and K. Datta, “Multiple regulatory pathways of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor (VPF/VEGF) expression in tumors,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 123–130, 2004.
- P. Mukherjee, A. V. Sotnikov, H. J. Mangian, J. R. Zhou, W. J. Visek, and S. K. Clinton, “Energy intake and prostate tumor growth, angiogenesis, and vascular endothelial growth factor expression,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 512–523, 1999.
- P. Mukherjee, L. E. Abate, and T. N. Seyfried, “Antiangiogenic and proapoptotic effects of dietary restriction on experimental mouse and human brain tumors,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 5622–5629, 2004.
- P. Mukherjee, M. M. El-Abbadi, J. L. Kasperzyk, M. K. Ranes, and T. N. Seyfried, “Dietary restriction reduces angiogenesis and growth in an orthotopic mouse brain tumour model,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 1615–1621, 2002.
- A. A. Powolny, S. Wang, P. S. Carlton, D. R. Hoot, and S. K. Clinton, “Interrelationships between dietary restriction, the IGF-I axis, and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor by prostate adenocarcinoma in rats,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 458–465, 2008.
- J. Marsh, P. Mukherjee, and T. N. Seyfried, “Akt-dependent proapoptotic effects of dietary restriction on late-stage management of a phosphatase and tensin homologue/ tuberous sclerosis complex 2- deficient mouse astrocytoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 23, pp. 7751–7762, 2008.
- A. Tannenbaum, “Nutrition and cancer,” in Physiopathology of Cancer, F. Homburge, Ed., pp. 517–562, New York, NY, USA, 1959.
- A. Tannenbaum, “The genesis and growth of tumors . II . Effects of caloric restriction per se,” Cancer Research, vol. 2, pp. 460–467, 1942.
- R. Weindruch, R. L. Walford, S. Fligiel, and D. Guthrie, “The retardation of aging in mice by dietary restriction: longevity, cancer, immunity and lifetime energy intake,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 641–654, 1986.
- D. Kritchevsky, “Caloric restriction and experimental carcinogenesis,” Hybridoma and Hybridomics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 147–151, 2002.
- H. J. Flavin, A. Wieraszko, and T. N. Seyfried, “Enhanced aspartate release from hippocampal slices of epileptic (E1) mice,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1007–1011, 1991.
- P. Workman, A. Balmain, J. A. Hickman et al., “UKCCCR guidelines for the welfare of animals in experimental neoplasia,” Laboratory Animals, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 195–201, 1988.
- H. M. Zimmerman and H. Arnold, “Experimental brain tumors: II. Tumors produced with benzpyrene,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 939–955, 1943.
- T. N. Seyfried, M. El-Abbadi, and M. L. Roy, “Ganglioside distribution in murine neural tumors,” Molecular and Chemical Neuropathology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 147–167, 1992.
- T. N. Seyfried, R. K. Yu, M. Saito, and M. Albert, “Ganglioside composition of an experimental mouse brain tumor,” Cancer Research, vol. 47, no. 13, pp. 3538–3542, 1987.
- M. K. Ranes, M. El-Abbadi, M. G. Manfredi, P. Mukherjee, F. M. Platt, and T. N. Seyfried, “N-butyldeoxynojirimycin reduces growth and ganglioside content of experimental mouse brain tumours,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 1107–1114, 2001.
- L. B. Mahoney, C. A. Denny, and T. N. Seyfried, “Caloric restriction in C57BL/6J mice mimics therapeutic fasting in humans,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 5, article 13, 2006.
- W. Zhou, P. Mukherjee, M. A. Kiebish, W. T. Markis, J. G. Mantis, and T. N. Seyfried, “The calorically restricted ketogenic diet, an effective alternative therapy for malignant brain cancer,” Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 4, article 5, 2007.
- R. Weindruch and R. L. Walford, The Retardation of Agining and Disease by Dietary Restriction, Charles C Thomas, 1988.
- C. A. Denny, J. L. Kasperzyk, K. N. Gorham, R. T. Bronson, and T. N. Seyfried, “Influence of caloric restriction on motor behavior, longevity, and brain lipid composition in Sandhoff disease mice,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1028–1038, 2006.
- H. J. Thompson, J. N. McGinley, N. S. Spoelstra, W. Jiang, Z. Zhu, and P. Wolfe, “Effect of dietary energy restriction on vascular density during mammary carcinogenesis,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 16, pp. 5643–5650, 2004.
- P. Carmeliet, “Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 389–395, 2000.
- P. Carmeliet and R. K. Jain, “Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6801, pp. 249–257, 2000.
- P. Carmeliet, “VEGF as a key mediator of angiogenesis in cancer,” Oncology, vol. 69, supplement 3, no. 3, pp. 4–10, 2005.
- R. K. Jain, “Molecular regulation of vessel maturation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 685–693, 2003.
- R. T. Tong, Y. Boucher, S. V. Kozin, F. Winkler, D. J. Hicklin, and R. K. Jain, “Vascular normalization by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 blockade induces a pressure gradient across the vasculature and improves drug penetration in tumors,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 3731–3736, 2004.
- C. A. Denny, K. A. Heinecke, Y. P. Kim et al., “Restricted ketogenic diet enhances the therapeutic action of N-butyldeoxynojirimycin towards brain GM2 accumulation in adult Sandhoff disease mice,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 1525–1535, 2010.
- A. D. Norden, J. Drappatz, and P. Y. Wen, “Novel anti-angiogenic therapies for malignant gliomas,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1152–1160, 2008.
- N. Ferrara and R. S. Kerbel, “Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target,” Nature, vol. 438, no. 7070, pp. 967–974, 2005.
- S. S. Lakka and J. S. Rao, “Antiangiogenic therapy in brain tumors,” Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1457–1473, 2008.