Research Article
TIMP-1 as well as Microvessel Invasion and High Nuclear Grade Is a Significant Determinant Factor for Extension of Tumor Diameter in Localized RCC
Table 1
Predictors of localized 237 RCC cases postoperative specific mortality.
| Categories | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | value | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | value |
| pT1a versus pT1b 94 versus 74 | 2.38 (1.02–5.55) | 0.046 | 1.35 (0.96–1.88) | 0.086 | pT1a versus pT2a 94 versus 43 | 1.40 (0.49–4.0) | 0.53 | 1.07 (0.93–1.42) | 0.74 | pT1a versus pT2b 94 versus 26 | 4.0 (1.51–1.020) | 0.005 | 1.09 (0.66–1.85) | 0.71 | Clear versus nonclear 190 versus 47 | 2.05 (1.00–4.019) | 0.048 | 1.12 (0.77–1.65) | 0.53 | Nuclear Grades 1 and 2 versus 3 and 4 190 versus 47 | 1.79 (1.76–6.84) | <0.001 | 1.50 (1.03–2.22) | 0.037 | MVI (−) versus (+) 154 versus 83 | 1.95 (0.92–2.94) | 0.025 | 1.04 (0.33–1.21) | 0.94 | MMP-2 weak versus strong 82 versus 155 | 3.69 (1.43–9.52) | 0.0069 | 1.26 (0.30–5.23) | 0.74 | MMP-9 weak versus strong 181 versus 56 | 4.29 (2.17–8.16) | <0.0001 | 2.88 (0.92–2.94) | 0.75 | TIMP-1 weak versus strong 42 versus 195 | 2.52 (0.77–8.26) | 0.12 | 1.014 (0.709–1.45) | 0.34 |
| TIMP-2 weak versus strong 201 versus 36 | 2.07 (0.99–4.31) | 0.052 | 1.12 (1.36–3.29) | 0.020 | MT-MMP-1 weak versus strong 194 versus 43 | 3.44 (1.73–6.84) | 0.005 | 1.84 (1.21–2.82) | 0.045 |
|
|