Research Article

Hostility Modifies the Association between TV Viewing and Cardiometabolic Risk

Table 5

Cross-lagged associations from TV viewing to five cardiometabolic risk variables by levels of hostility.

Low hostilityWST 10HOMA 10aTRI 10aHDL 10SBP 10

TV viewing 5
B 0.0090.046*−0.079**0.075**0.119***
P value0.630.030.0050.002<0.001

Low hostilityWST 15HOMA 15aTRI 15 aHDL 15SBP 15

TV viewing 10
B 0.0250.055**−0.0510.0000.037
P value0.140.0090.080.990.10

Low hostilityWST 20HOMA 20aTRI 20aHDL 20SBP 20

TV viewing 15
B 0.0050.024−0.008−0.056**0.053*
P value0.750.250.780.0060.02

High hostilityWST 10HOMA 10aTRI 10aHDL 10SBP 10

TV viewing 5
B 0.0350.064**−0.020.065**0.177***
P value0.170.0010.480.001<0.001

High hostilityWST 15HOMA 15aTRI 15aHDL 15SBP 15

TV viewing 10
B −0.0320.002−0.064*−0.086***−0.006
P value0.090.950.03<0.0010.85

High hostilityWST 20HOMA 20aTRI 20aHDL 20SBP 20

TV viewing 15
B −0.0060.040.02−0.0340.160***
P value0.750.680.510.07<0.001

WST: waist circumference; HOMA: HOMA insulin resistance; TRI: triglycerides; HDL: HDL-cholesterol; SBP: systolic blood pressure. All cross-lagged panel models were adjusted for the same covariates as the clustered cardiometabolic risk model. Regression weights are standardized.
Variables were log-transformed (natural log).
; ; .