Research Article
Delay Discounting and the Income-Food Insecurity-Obesity Paradox in Mothers
Table 1
Participant characteristics.
| Variables | Mean ± SD or N (%) |
| Food insecurity score | 1.05 ± 2.03 | Low food security | 65/313 (21%) | Very low food security | 40/313 (12.9%) | BMI | 28.00 ± 7.16 | Overweight (BMI ≥25) | 181/313 (57.8%) | % Obese (BMI ≥30) | 89/310 (28.4%) | Income | 111,057 ± 77434 | Percent over poverty adjusted for household size | 459.3 ± 320.4 | Low income (<200% of poverty line) | 53 (16.9%) | Middle income (200–399% of poverty) | 107 (34.2%) | High income (greater than 400% of poverty) | 153 (48.9%) | Percent on government assistance | 46/313 (14.7%) | Education (years) | 16.32 ± 2.48 | Age | 32.54 ± 7.14 | Race | | American Indian | 0 (0.0%) | Asian | 2 (0.01%) | Black | 9 (2.9%) | Native Hawaiian/PI | 0 (0.0%) | White | 289 (92.3%) | Multiracial | 5 (0.16%) | Refused | 8 (0.26)% | Marital status | | Single | 18 (5.8%) | Married | 242 (77.3%) | Living as married | 19 (6.0%) | Divorced | 32 (10.2%) | Widowed | 2 (0.01%) | Number of children | 1.93 ± 0.89 | House size | 3.87 ± 1.04 | Perceived Stress Scale | 16.37 ± 7.29 | Delay discounting (ordinal area under the curve) | 0.84 ± 0.14 |
|
|