Research Article

Delay Discounting and the Income-Food Insecurity-Obesity Paradox in Mothers

Table 1

Participant characteristics.

VariablesMean ± SD or N (%)

Food insecurity score1.05 ± 2.03
 Low food security65/313 (21%)
 Very low food security40/313 (12.9%)
BMI28.00 ± 7.16
 Overweight (BMI ≥25)181/313 (57.8%)
 % Obese (BMI ≥30)89/310 (28.4%)
Income111,057 ± 77434
 Percent over poverty adjusted for household size459.3 ± 320.4
 Low income (<200% of poverty line)53 (16.9%)
 Middle income (200–399% of poverty)107 (34.2%)
 High income (greater than 400% of poverty)153 (48.9%)
Percent on government assistance46/313 (14.7%)
Education (years)16.32 ± 2.48
Age32.54 ± 7.14
Race
 American Indian0 (0.0%)
 Asian2 (0.01%)
 Black9 (2.9%)
 Native Hawaiian/PI0 (0.0%)
 White289 (92.3%)
 Multiracial5 (0.16%)
 Refused8 (0.26)%
Marital status
 Single18 (5.8%)
 Married242 (77.3%)
 Living as married19 (6.0%)
 Divorced32 (10.2%)
 Widowed2 (0.01%)
Number of children1.93 ± 0.89
House size3.87 ± 1.04
Perceived Stress Scale16.37 ± 7.29
Delay discounting (ordinal area under the curve)0.84 ± 0.14