Copyright © 2013 Rita A. Gangwani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

1. Priority Eye Disease, http://www.who.int/blindness/causes/priority/en/index7.html, 2011.
2. A. Iwase, Y. Suzuki, M. Araie et al., “The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 1641–1648, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
3. C. S. Kim, G. J. Seong, N. H. Lee, and K. C. Song, “Prevalence of primary open-angle Glaucoma in central South Korea: the Namil study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 1024–1030, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
4. M. A. Kass, “Normal-pressure glaucoma,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 242–244, 1998. View at Scopus
5. S. M. Drance, V. P. Sweeney, R. W. Morgan, and F. Feldman, “Studies of factors involved in the production of low tension glaucoma,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 457–465, 1973. View at Scopus
6. I. Goldberg, F. C. Hollows, M. A. Kass, and B. Becker, “Systemic factors in patients with low-tension glaucoma,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 1981. View at Scopus
7. S. S. Hayreh, M. B. Zimmerman, P. Podhajsky, and W. L. M. Alward, “Nocturnal arterial hypotension and its role in optic nerve head and ocular ischemic disorders,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 603–624, 1994. View at Scopus
8. S. Drance, D. R. Anderson, and M. Schulze, “Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 699–708, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
9. Z. He, A. J. Vingrys, J. A. Armitage, et al., “The role of blood pressure in glaucoma,” Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 133–149, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
10. M. T. Nicolela, B. E. Walman, A. R. Buckley, and S. M. Drance, “Ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma: a comparative study of their retrobulbar blood flow velocity,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 308–310, 1996. View at Scopus
11. V. P. Costa, E. S. Arcieri, and A. Harris, “Blood pressure and glaucoma,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 1276–1282, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
12. E. Hodapp, R. K. Parrish II, and D. R. Anderson, Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma, The CV Mosby Co., St Louis, Mo, USA, 1993.
13. S. Wang, L. Xu, J. B. Jonas et al., “Major eye diseases and risk factors associated with systemic hypertension in an adult Chinese population. The Beijing eye study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 12, pp. 2373–2380, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
14. P. Mitchell, A. J. Lee, E. Rochtchina, and J. J. Wang, “Open-angle glaucoma and systemic hypertension: the blue mountains eye study,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 319–326, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
15. M. Yanagi, R. Kawasaki, J. J. Wang, T. Y. Wong, J. Crowston, and Y. Kiuchi, “Vascular risk factors in glaucoma: a review,” Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 252–258, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
16. O. S. Punjabi, R. L. Stamper, A. G. Bostrom, and S. C. Lin, “Does treated systemic hypertension affect progression of optic nerve damage in glaucoma suspects?” Current Eye Research, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
17. J. M. Tielsch, J. Katz, A. Sommer, H. A. Quigley, and J. C. Javitt, “Hypertension, perfusion pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma: a population-based assessment,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 216–221, 1995. View at Scopus
18. M. C. Leske, S. Y. Wu, A. Hennis, R. Honkanen, and B. Nemesure, “Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma. The Barbados eye studies,” Ophthalmology, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
19. C. A. A. Hulsman, J. R. Vingerling, A. Hofman, J. C. M. Witteman, and P. T. V. M. De Jong, “Blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and open-angle glaucoma: the Rotterdam Study,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 805–812, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
20. H. A. Quigley, S. K. West, J. Rodriguez, B. Munoz, R. Klein, and R. Snyder, “The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic subjects: proyecto VER,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 12, pp. 1819–1826, 2001. View at Scopus
21. M. T. Nicolela, B. E. Walman, A. R. Buckley, and S. M. Drance, “Ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma: a comparative study of their retrobulbar blood flow velocity,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 308–310, 1996. View at Scopus
22. M. He, P. J. Foster, J. Ge et al., “Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan District, Guangzhou,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 2782–2788, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
23. C. A. Johnson and S. J. Samuels, “Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 413–425, 1997. View at Scopus
24. K. E. Cello, J. M. Nelson-Quigg, and C. A. Johnson, “Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 314–322, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
25. P. H. Artes, D. M. Hutchison, M. T. Nicoela, et al., “Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2451–2457, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
26. J. Katz, A. Sommer, and K. Witt, “Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing,” Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 70–75, 1991. View at Scopus
27. A. Heijl, G. Lindgren, and J. Olsson, “The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 1989. View at Scopus
28. G. Marra and J. Flammer, “The learning and fatigue effect in automated perimetry,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 229, no. 6, pp. 501–504, 1991. View at Scopus
29. C. Hudson, J. M. Wild, and E. C. O'Neill, “Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 268–280, 1994. View at Scopus
30. A. Heijl and B. Bengtsson, “The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 19–22, 1996. View at Scopus
31. J. Lamparter, A. Schulze, A. C. Schuff, M. Berres, N. Pfeiffer, and E. M. Hoffmann, “Learning curve and fatigue effect of flicker defined form perimetry,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 151, no. 6, pp. 1057–1064, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus