About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 783163, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/783163
Review Article

Lymphatics and Lymphangiogenesis in the Eye

1Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
2Functional and Molecular Imaging Center and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Womenʼs Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Received 15 August 2011; Revised 20 November 2011; Accepted 21 November 2011

Academic Editor: Claus Cursiefen

Copyright © 2012 Shintaro Nakao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Lymphatic is a prerequisite for the maintenance of tissue fluid balance and immunity in the body. A body of evidence also shows that lymphangiogenesis plays important roles in the pathogenesis of diseases such as tumor metastasis and inflammation. The eye was thought to lack lymphatic vessels except for the conjunctiva; however, advances in the field, including the identification of lymphatic endothelial markers (e.g., LYVE-1 or podoplanin) and lymphangiogenic factors (e.g., VEGF-C), have revealed the exsitence and possible roles of lymphatics and lymphangiogenesis in the eye. Recent studies have shown that corneal limbus, ciliary body, lacrimal gland, orbital meninges, and extraocular muscles contain lymphatic vessels and that the choroid might have a lymphatic-like system. There is no known lymphatic outflow from the eye. However, several lymphatic channels including uveolymphatic pathway might serve the ocular fluid homeostasis. Furthermore, lymphangiogenesis plays important roles in pathological conditions in the eye including corneal transplant rejection and ocular tumor progression. Yet, the role of lymphangiogenesis in most eye diseases, especially inflammatory disease or edema, remains unknown. A better understanding of lymphatic and lymphangiogenesis in the eye will open new therapeutic opportunities to prevent vision loss in ocular diseases.

1. Introduction

The lymphatic system in human was first described by Gasper Aselli in 1627 in a paper “De Lacteibus sive Lacteis Venis,” Quarto Vasorum Mesarai corum Genere novo invento. Now, it is well known that the lymphatics remove interstitial fluid and macromolecules, including proteins, and transport them to lymph nodes before entering the blood circulation. From the lymphatic capillaries, the lymph is transported via precollectors to collecting lymphatic vessels and is returned through the lymphaticovenous junctions between the thoracic or lymphatic duct and the subclavian veins to the blood circulation [1]. Another role of the lymphatics is to carry immune cells to the lymph nodes and to control the immunity in health and disease.

Although the presence of lymphatics was long known through histology [2], systematic lymphatic research started later than blood vessels because of lack of specific markers. Recent identification of lymphatic endothelial markers facilitated lymphatic research [3, 4]. Furthermore, finding of lymphangiogenic factors reveals various mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis in health and disease. For instance, lymphangiogenesis plays critical roles in various disorders, including cancer metastasis and inflammation [5, 6].

In the past two decades, lymphatics and lymphangiogenesis in the eye and the phenotypes in the various ocular diseases have been investigated. Histological studies show the location and existence of lymphatics in the eye [7]. These studies have revealed that lymphatics contribute to the ocular homeostasis and that ocular lymphangiogenesis may play important roles in eye disorders. This paper reviews current knowledge on lymphatics and lymphangiogenesis in the eye and discusses the possibility of lymphatic-targeting therapy.

2. VEGF/VEGFR System in Lymphangiogenesis

VEGF family is important for vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis [8]. The mammalian VEGF family presently contains five members: VEGF-A, placenta growth factor (PlGF), VEGF-B, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D. VEGF-A has important roles in mammalian vascular development and in diseases involving abnormal growth of blood vessels. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated the significance of VEGF-A in ocular neovascularization (e.g., diabetic retinopathy and aged-macular degeneration) with use of VEGF-A neutralizing antibodies [9]. VEGF-C and VEGF-D are main lymphangiogenic factors in both physiological and pathological conditions. The VEGF receptor family contains three members: VEGFR-1 (Flt-1), VEGFR-2 (KDR/Flk-1), and VEGFR-3 (Flt-4). VEGF-A binds and activates two tyrosine kinase receptors: VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 [8]. VEGF-A does not show any appreciable binding affinity to VEGFR-3. VEGFR-3 is a ligand for VEGF-C and VEGF-D. Mature form of VEGF-C and human VEGF-D are known to bind and activate VEGFR-2 [10, 11]. Various studies clarify the involvement of VEGF-C and -D/VEGFR-3 system in cancer lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis [12, 13]. Furthermore VEGF-C and -D/VEGFR-3 signaling is involved in inflammatory diseases and organ transplantation [6, 14, 15].

3. The Other Lymphangiogenesis-Related Factors

Lymphangiogenic factors include not only VEGF family but also the other growth factors and cytokines such as insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), and interleukins (ILs). These growth factors and cytokines have been well known to be angiogenic. Some of these factors can cause lymphangiogenesis directly and some can induce lymphangiogenesis via VEGF family indirectly. These findings are shown with assays in cornea.

4. Corneal Avascularity and Its Alymphatic Characteristics

The normal cornea, but not the conjunctiva, is devoid of lymphatic vessels as well as blood vessels (Figure 1). The alymphatic mechanism was unknown until recently a study showed that a soluble VEGFR-2 form is secreted by corneal epithelial cells selectively suppressing the physiologic growth of lymphatics [16]. This finding is the first identification of a specific lymphangiogenesis inhibitor.

783163.fig.001
Figure 1: Distribution of lymphatics in the eye. Immunological staining with lymphatic specific markers as well as histological examinations has revealed the distribution of lymphatic vessels in the eye. Conjunctiva is well known to possess lymphatics. Cornea limbus, ciliary body, lacrimal gland, orbital meninges and extraocular muscle also contain lymphatic vessels, and choroid might have lymphatic-like system. Cornea, retina, and optic nerve do not show lymphatics. Intraocular lymphatic can be observed only in the ciliary body. (A), (B), and (C) show the details of corneal limbal area, angulus iridocornealis, and optic nerve, respectively. Red indicates lymphatic vessels.

5. Corneal Lymphangiogenesis Assay

Because of its avascularity, the cornea is widely used to investigate lymphangiogenesis. One of the most reliable methods to examine lymphangiogenesis is corneal inflammation model by suture or alkali burn (NaOH solution) [17, 18] (Figure 2). Another authentic method is cornea micropocket assay, which has been used for estimation of angiogenesis since the 1970s [19, 20] (Figure 2). In both models, lymphangiogenesis occurs from preexisting limbal lymphatics. The cornea micropocket model has revealed that most angiogenic factors also induce lymphangiogenesis (Table 1). This might indicate that the mechanism of lymphangiogenesis is partially similar with angiogenesis. IGF-1 and IGF-2, which significantly stimulates proliferation and migration of lymphatic endothelial cells, can induce corneal lymphangiogenesis. IGF-1-induced lymphangiogenesis is not mediated by VEGFR-3 signaling [21]. A potent angiogenic factor, VEGF-A, is also shown to be a lymphangiogenic factor in mouse cornea [22]. In VEGF-A-induced lymphangiogenesis, there are both mechanisms: VEGFR-3-dependent and VEGFR-3-independent. VEGF-A can induce the proliferation of lymphatic endothelial cells directly, which is not mediated by VEGFR-3 [23]. This lymphangiogenesis is also mediated by macrophage-derived VEGF-C with the inflammatory suture model [24]. The balance between direct and indirect effect in VEGF-A-induced lymphangiogenesis may depend on the situations. VEGF-C, a potent lymphangiogenic factor, was confirmed to induce corneal lymphangiogenesis [25]. VEGF-C156S, which is a specific ligand for VEGFR-3, also causes lymphangiogenesis as well as angiogenesis in the cornea [26]. This VEGFR-3-mediated lymphangiogenesis could be induced by direct effect for lymphatic endothelium as well as macrophage recruitment. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) causes corneal lymphangiogenesis via direct stimulation of lymphatic endothelium [27]. HGF also causes corneal lymphangiogenesis that can be blocked by VEGFR-3 inhibition partially [28]. FGF-2, which is a well-known potent angiogenic factor, could cause lymphangiogenesis with corneal micropocket assay [29]. The FGF-2-induced lymphangiogenesis was blocked by VEGFR-3 inhibition [29]. These investigations suggest that each GF (growth factor) has different dependency on VEGFR-3 signaling in lymphangiogenesis. Some GFs cause proliferation or migration of lymphatic endothelial cells directly, whereas some GFs upregulate VEGF-C/-D to activate VEGFR-3 in lymphangiogenesis. Interestingly, the corneal micropocket assay reveals that low dose of FGF-2 causes selective lymphangiogenesis [30]. This observation provides the evidence that lymphatic growth is possible without angiogenesis. However, the detailed mechanism of FGF-2-mediated lymphangiogenesis has been enigmatic. A recent examination using mouse cornea introduced physiological expression of lymphatics without the presence of blood vessels, which is an indication that angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis might occur independently [25]. In the study, FGF-2-deficient mice show significantly less preexisting lymphatic sprouts without having an effect on angiogenesis in the cornea compared to their wild-type counterparts [25]. Consequently, this suggests that lymph- and angiogenesis might occur independently.

tab1
Table 1: Growth factors and cytokines in corneal lymphangiogenesis assay. Various growth factors or cytokines induce lymphangiogenesis as well as angiogenesis with or without VEGFR-3 activation.
fig2
Figure 2: Mouse cornea lymphangiogenesis model. No lymphatic vessels exist in the normal mammalian cornea. Implantation of growth factor or cytokine into a surgically created micropocket in the mouse cornea stroma (a) or corneal injury by suture (b) induces lymphangiogenic response. Corneal lymphangiogenesis as well as angiogenesis can be examined 6 or 7 days after pellet implantation or suture, respectively (a) and (b). Double staining of corneal flat mounts for lymphangiogenic (LYVE-1, red) endothelium and angiogenic (CD31, green) with immunohistochemistry (c).

6. Genetic Heterogeneity of Lymphangiogenesis

Recently two different groups have reported on genetic heterogeneity of corneal lymphangiogenesis in different mouse strains with the corneal suture model and the corneal micropocket model independently [25, 34] (Figure 3). This suggests that heterogeneity of corneal lymphatics shows different inflammatory reactions in patients. In the comparative analysis of lymphatics with various strains, nu/nu mice, which have a greatly reduced number of T cells, showed similar lymphatic development and GF-induced lymphangiogenesis with the other strains, suggesting that T cells might be unnecessary for lymphatic development as well as GF-induced lymphangiogenesis in the cornea [25] (Figure 3). Inflammation model by suture has also revealed various insights of lymphangiogenesis. After corneal inflammation, pathologic corneal lymphangiogenesis can regress earlier than angiogenic vessels [17].

783163.fig.003
Figure 3: Strain-dependent limbal lymphatics. Genetic background significantly affects corneal preexisting limbal lymphatics. The area of preexisting lymphatics in C57BL/6 mice is significantly larger than that in Balb/c mice. nu/nu mice show the intermediate phenotype. Preexisting limbal lymphatics may be heterogenic in patients, causing differences in corneal transplant rejection or keratitis. nu/nu mice develop normal lymphatics, suggesting that T cells may not be important for lymphatic development.

7. The Interplay between Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis

As described above, lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis occur in concert [6]. However, how blood and lymphatic vessels regulate each other has been unknown. Recently, it was reported that angiogenic vessels delay lymphangiogenesis using corneal micropocket assay [31]. In response to VEGF-A, corneal lymphatics grow with a delay compared to blood vessels. Higher concentrations of VEGF-A are needed for lymphangiogenesis than for angiogenesis. The poised temporal and spatial association of angio- and lymphangiogenesis indicates interdependencies between blood and lymphatic vessels. Proteolytically processed VEGF-C binds to and activates VEGFR-2. Upregulated VEGFR-2 in angiogenic tips could trap VEGF-C, and the trapped VEGF-C could not reach lymphangiogenesis due to the distance apart from the lymphatic vessels [31]. This VEGF-C/VEGFR-2 interaction might regulate the relation between angio- and lymphangiogenesis. Delayed lymphangiogenesis might allow immune cells additional time at the inflammatory sites because immune cells originate from angiogenic vessels and drained through lymphangiogenic vessels [35].

8. Macrophages in Lymphangiogenesis

Macrophages have been well investigated for their role in neovascularization in various ocular diseases including ker atitis [36, 37], retinal angiogenesis [38, 39], and choroidal neovascularization [40, 41]. Macrophages contribute to corneal lymphangiogenesis in two different ways. Maruyama et al. showed that CD11b(+) macrophages infiltrate the inflammatory cornea and transdifferentiate into lymphatic endothelium that contributes to lymphangiogenesis [42]. Another role of macrophages is to provide lymphangiogenic factors. During corneal inflammation, infiltrating macrophage activates the NF-κB signaling and secretes the downstream cytokines (e.g., VEGF-A, -C, and -D) to induce corneal lymphangiogenesis [32]. NF-κB inhibition could block corneal lymphangiogenesis as well as the angiogenesis. A recent paper showed a mechanism for macrophages to infiltrate into the sites of corneal lymphangiogenesis. Vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) is an endothelial glycoprotein that regulates leukocyte transmigration [43, 44]. VAP-1 inhibition blocks inflammatory corneal lymphangiogenesis by reducing macrophage infiltration [33]. Macrophage polarization (M1 classical versus M2 alternatively activated macrophages) was recently discovered to regulate various inflammatory diseases [45]. The number of M2 marker(+) macrophages in inflammatory corneas of VAP-1-inhibitor-treated mice was significantly lower than in vehicle-treated mice [33]. Thus, M2 macrophages might play an important role in corneal lymphangiogenesis. However, further investigation will be necessary to discern the role of macrophage polarization in lymphangiogenesis. VAP-1 may become a therapeutic target for various lymphangiogenesis-related ocular diseases. Furthermore, a recent report showed that the antiangiogenic factor Thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) is also an endogenous antilymphangiogenic factor [46]. TSP-1 can suppress macrophage-derived VEGF-C and VEGF-D by ligating CD36 on the cells. As a result, TSP-1 can become a therapeutic molecule for corneal lymphangiogenesis.

9. Lymphangiogenesis in Corneal Disorders

Human cornea lacks lymphatic vessels during the development [47]. Vascularization in cornea disturbs visual acuity, whereas corneal lymphangiogenesis cannot. However, lymphangiogenesis in the cornea can modulate corneal immunity or inflammation. Increasing studies on lymphatic and lymphangiogenesis, have shown that lymphatic vessels play an important role for various corneal disorders (Table 2). Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infection in the cornea is a leading cause of blindness. Corneal HSV-1 infection induces lymphangiogenesis, and the corneal lymphatics persist past the resolution of infection (Table 2). HSV-1-elicited lymphangiogenesis was reported to be strictly dependent on VEGF-A/VEGFR-2 signaling but not on VEGFR-3 ligands [48]. A recent study also showed that dry eye, a low-grade corneal inflammatory disorder, induces lymphangiogenesis by the upregulation of VEGFs and VEGFRs and CD11b(+) macrophage recruitment. Interestingly, corneal lymphangiogenesis in dry eye does not accompany angiogenesis (Table 2). However, the mechanism is not fully appreciated, and further investigation must include the estimation that lymphangiogenesis can be a therapeutic target for dry eye disease [49].

tab2
Table 2: Lymphatic-associated ocular diseases. The list shows several diseases of the eye that are related to lymphatics or lymphangiogenesis. Further investigation might provide evidence of the contribution of lymphatics or lymphangiogenesis in the other eye diseases.

10. The Role of Lymphangiogenesis in Corneal Graft Rejection

The critical role of lymph nodes in corneal alloimmunization and graft rejection has been well investigated [54]. VEGFR-3 blockade suppressed corneal antigen-presenting cell trafficking to the lymph node and delayed the rejection of corneal transplanted graft rejection [55]. Lymphatic vessels, but not angiogenic vessels, could be important for immune rejection after corneal transplantation [50] (Table 2). Lymphatics and lymphangiogenesis-related factor would be a therapeutic target for corneal graft rejection (Figure 4).

783163.fig.004
Figure 4: Lymphangiogenesis as a possible therapeutic target for the eye diseases. Corneal transplant, glaucoma, and intraocular tumors were suggested to be related to lymphatics or lymphangiogenesis in the pathogenesis. If choroid has lymphatic function, lymphatics or lymphangiogenesis may be important for the pathology of uveitis, choroidal neovascularization, or macular edema because of the vital role of lymphatics in inflammation or tissue edema. Red: lymphatic vessels. Green: blood vessels.

11. Conjunctival Lymphatics in Glaucoma Surgery

Conjunctiva is the most lymphatic-developed tissue in the eye. A surgeon incidentally fills anesthetic solution into the lymphatics of a patient’s conjunctiva during an operation. The doctor routinely visualizes conjunctival lymphatic vessels with a dye to decide where to make scleral filter to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma patients. Interestingly, he suggests that a healthy lymphatic system in the conjunctiva may decide the outcome of lowering IOP surgery and alerts that mitomycin or cauterization can cause damage to the lymphatic structures [56].

12. Lymphangiogenesis in Conjunctivitis

Various studies with LYVE-1 or podoplanin antibody confirmed that lymphatic vessels exist in conjunctiva in various species. Corneal lymphangiogenesis is sprouted from limbal lymphatics that connect to conjunctival lymphatic [57]. The removal of conjunctiva could not affect GF-induced corneal lymphangiogenesis, suggesting that the conjunctiva, including its LYVE-1(+) lymphatics and cells, may not be necessary for corneal lymphangiogenesis [25]. However, lymphatics might play an important role to heal conjunctivitis or conjunctival chemosis, or probably corneal edema. Furthermore, a group reported that injected tracers in the anterior chamber or the vitreous utilize conjunctival lymphatics to reach the lymph nodes [58, 59]. These data alert that intraocular drug injection affects the immunity.

13. The Possibility of Lymphatic-Targeting Therapy in Retinal Disorders

Retina is part of the central nervous system (CNS) that is vascularized and has been thought not to have lymphatics as well as other parts of the CNS like the brain [60]. In addition to severe vision loss, macular edema is commonly associated with many retinal diseases including diabetic macular edema and retinal vein occlusion [61]. It is believed to be caused by hyperpermeability of the retinal vessels and/or decreased efflux of fluid across the retinal pigment epithelium, which can be induced by outer/inner blood retinal barrier dysfunction. In the past decade, there were advances in therapy for macular edema. Administration of steroid or VEGF neutralizing antibodies or vitrectomy can reduce macular edema significantly in patients [62]. However, these treatments may cause adverse effects including an increased incidence of IOP elevation or tractional retinal detachment [63, 64]. These pharmacological mechanisms to reduce macular edema must be caused by the blockade of leakage from retinal vessels [6567]. However, the mechanism to absorb leaked interstitial fluid in macular edema is unclear. A recent paper suggested that drainage from the vitreous might exist via conjunctival lymphatics [59]. Furthermore, as described below, choroid might have lymphatic-like system. It has been reported that the dysfunction of lymphatic vessels causes lymphedema or tissue edema in various diseases and that lymphatic normalization or newly lymphatic vessels reduce tissue edema in the skin [68]. Further investigations of the lymphatic role of the posterior eye segment may reveal novel ways to manage macular edema (Figure 4).

Recently podoplanin is shown to be expressed in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) [69]. Podoplanin depletion with siRNA reduces cell aggregation, proliferation, and the tight junction. RPE regulates outer blood-retinal barrier, which is broken down in various retinal diseases. Further research is required to reveal how podoplanin in RPE contributes to the pathogenesis of retinal disorders.

14. Choroidal Lymphatics: A Controversial Point

The choroid, which forms the uvea with the ciliary body and the iris, is one of the most highly vascularized tissue in the body. The choroid provides oxygen and nourishment to the outer layers of the retina. Before the discoveries of lymphatic specific markers, various histological examinations of animal choroid have shown the existence of lymphatic vessels in the choroid (Figure 1). In 1997, a paper on the avian eye proposed that the lacunae of the choroid represented a system with short lymphatic vessels that reached the choriocapillaris [70]. The authors proposed that the system might drain intraocular fluids directly into the eye venous system. In 1998, W. krebs ad I. P. krebs showed evidence of choroidal lymphatic vessels in the monkey by using electron microscopy [71]. In this paper, their observation with lymphatic specific features, including the lack of a continuous external basement lamina and the presence of anchoring filaments, supported their conclusion. Another study examined whether lymphatic vessels existed in monkey choroid [72]. This electron microscopic study observed the lymphatic sinus-like structures in the outer choroid. The lymphatic sinus-like structures were lined with fibroblast-like cells with large intercellular gaps and contained amorphous material, which was probably tissue fluid. Furthermore, this study indicated that the cells lining the lymphatic sinus-like structures put out valve-like cytoplasmic processes into the lumen. However, this study also pointed out that the ultrastructure in the outer choroid differed from typical lymphatics in the point of the discontinuous cell lining with large gaps.

Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronic acid receptor (LYVE-1) is widely accepted as the most reliable lymphatic marker that is also expressed by a subpopulation of macrophages [4, 42]. A recent paper on human choroid checked for lymphatic vessels with immunohistochemistry of LYVE-1 and podoplanin. LYVE-1(+) podoplanin(+) lymphatic vessel could not be observed and all LYVE-1(+) cells were expressed macrophage markers in human choroid [73]. These findings can support observation that the choroid contains some LYVE-1(+) macrophages and no lymphatics [74]. In corneal inflammation, LYVE-1(+) macrophages transdifferentiate and contribute to lymphangiogenesis [42]. However, the role of LYVE-1(+) macrophages has not been examined. It is unknown whether LYVE-1(+) macrophages are vital for choroidal homeostasis or how these cells conduct themselves in the pathological condition. Because the outer choroid is recognized as an unconventional route of aqueous humor outflow, choroid may have lymphatic-like system despite the lack of authentic lymphatic vessels in human.

15. Lymphatic-Targeting Therapy in Choroidal/Uveal Disorders

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV), which involves abnormal growth of blood vessels in the back of the eyes, is a hallmark of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A paper reported that both VEGF-C and VEGF-D were markedly expressed in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in a surgically removed subretinal vascular membrane of AMD patients [75]. Because VEGF-C and VEGF-D show angiogenic potential, they may contribute to CNV formation. Further investigation is necessary to estimate the contribution to AMD pathogenesis (Figure 4).

Uveitis in humans is an inflammatory and immune disease in the eye that causes severe vision loss [76]. The eye is thought to have no lymphatic drainage, and the uvea may act as an accessory lymph node during the immune response. However, the role of lymphatic system in uveitis is unclear (Figure 4). Because lymphatic system contributes to the pathogenesis of immune diseases, lymphatic-targeting drug may provide agents for uveitis treatment.

16. Ocular Tumor-Associated Lymphangiogenesis

Lymphangiogenesis is observed in many types of solid tumors [77]. Human cancers express various lymphangiogenic factors including VEGF-C. Furthermore, many clinical studies showed positive correlation between VEGF-C, lymphatic invasion, lymph node metastasis, and poor patient survival. What about ocular tumors? A paper by Heindl et al. analyzed the correlation of tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis and malignancy in conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) [52] (Table 2, Figure 4). They observed that the development of conjunctival SCC from premalignant stage was accompanied by conjunctival lymphangiogenesis. The study also noticed that the lymphangiogenesis in tumor was associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in patients with SCC. Another study evaluated whether lymphangiogenesis could contribute to the prognosis of ciliary body melanoma with extraocular extension [53]. Intraocular lymphatic vessels were found in 60% of the melanoma with extraocular extension and the lymphangiogenesis is associated with an increased mortality risk. However, uveal melanoma does not include lymphangiogenesis despite expressions of VEGF-C and its receptor VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 [78]. The tumor location, tumor type, or tumor malignancy can be a contributing factor to this variation. The contribution of VEGF-C to tumor progression remains unclear. Lymphangiogenesis in some ocular tumors may play an important role for the tumor progression. In the future, it will be possible that antilymphangiogenic treatment will lower metastasis rate of ocular tumor and mortality.

17. Ocular Drainage System

A recent paper shows that various lymphatic markers are expressed in the human anterior segment [79]. Podoplanin is widely accepted as a reliable lymphatic marker, because of its continuous expression in lymphatic endothelium [80]. The immunohistochemical examination for podoplanin and other lymphatic markers reveals that the anterior eye segment does not have lymphatic vessels. Interestingly podoplanin can be expressed on almost all cells of the trabecular meshwork, endothelial cells of Schlemm’s canal, and cells of anterior ciliary muscle tips despite the lack of lymphatics. This suggests that the aqueous humor outflow tissues have similar characteristics of lymphatic vessels (e.g., immune cell way to lymph node). Intracameral injected fluorescent antigens can be observed in the ipsilateral lymph node of the head and neck within 24 hours, suggesting that the antigen in the anterior chamber reaches the lymphoid organ [58]. This route to travel to the lymph node must be via conjunctival lymphatic and blood circulation. Furthermore, an alternative pathway via trabecular meshwork may exist. Lymphatic-related molecular or cellular targeting strategies will offer novel approaches in the treatment of inflammatory or immunological disorders in anterior ocular segments. Aqueous humor drainage from the eye is known to travel via two pathways: conventional pathway (trabecular meshwork) and alternative pathway (uveoscleral outflow) (Figure 4). Impaired aqueous humor drainage elevates intraocular pressure and results in glaucoma. A lymphatic outflow from the eye has been considered to be absent [81]. Interestingly, a third pathway was recently reported, “uveolymphatic pathway” [51] (Figure 4, Table 2). Immunogold stain as well as immunohistochemistry with podoplanin or LYVE-1 antibody showed lymphatic vessels in the human ciliary body (Figure 1). Furthermore, intracamerally injected tracer could be detected in several lymph nodes (e.g., cervical lymph node). The uveolymphatic pathway may be a novel therapeutic target for glaucoma patients.

In 1989, McGetrick et al. searched for lymphatic drainage from monkey orbit. They injected colloid solution, or India ink, into the retrobulbar space and examined if they could reach the lymphatic vessels or the lymph node. However, no lymphatic vessels could be identified in the orbit and these tracers left the posterior orbit. This paper concluded that the posterior pathway did not lead to the lymphatic vessels or the lymph node [82]. From these observations, the human orbit has been thought to lack lymphatic vessels in a long time [83]. However, in 1993, a paper using an enzymatic method in monkey demonstrated the presence of lymphatic vessels in the orbital arachnoid, lacrimal gland, extraocular muscle, and connective tissue at the orbital apex [84] (Figure 1). In 1999, an electron microscopic study with India ink showed that human optic nerve meninges have lymphatic vessels [85]. These studies suggested new evidence that cerebrospinal fluid drained into lymphatics within the meninges of the intraorbital part of the optic nerve. However, it is unclear how lymphatics within the meninges can affect ocular disorders including glaucoma, optic neuritis, or optic neuropathy.

18. Conclusion

Increasing evidence shows that lymphangiogenesis, as well as angiogenesis, has a key role in ocular physiology and pathology (Table 2). Recently antiangiogenic therapy (e.g., bevacizumab) is widely used for various ocular diseases. However, various ocular disorders including edema or inflammation still remain as a cause of visual loss. Better understanding of lymphatics and lymphangiogenesis in the eye will provide a basis for the development of novel therapeutic strategies for incurable ocular diseases (Figure 4).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an overseas Research Fellowship Award from Bausch & Lomb, a Fellowship Award from the Japan Eye Bank Association and Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society, and Young Investigator Fellowship (to S. Nakao).

References

  1. C. Norrmén, T. Tammela, T. V. Petrova, and K. Alitalo, “Biological basis of therapeutic lymphangiogenesis,” Circulation, vol. 123, no. 12, pp. 1335–1351, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  2. F. Sabin, “On the origin of the lymphatic system from the veins and the development of the lymphatic hearts and thoracic duct in the pig,” American Journal of Anatomy, vol. 1, pp. 367–391, 1902.
  3. S. Breiteneder-Geleff, A. Soleiman, H. Kowalski et al., “Angiosarcomas express mixed endothelial phenotypes of blood and lymphatic capillaries: podoplanin as a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 385–394, 1999. View at Scopus
  4. S. Banerji, J. Ni, S. X. Wang et al., “LYVE-1, a new homologue of the CD44 glycoprotein, is a lymph-specific receptor for hyaluronan,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 789–801, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Skobe, T. Hawighorst, D. G. Jackson et al., “Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer metastasis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 192–198, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. P. Baluk, T. Tammela, E. Ator et al., “Pathogenesis of persistent lymphatic vessel hyperplasia in chronic airway inflammation,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 247–257, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. E. Gausas, R. S. Gonnering, B. N. Lemke, R. K. Dortzbach, and D. D. Sherman, “Identification of human orbital lymphatics,” Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 252–259, 1999.
  8. M. Shibuya and L. Claesson-Welsh, “Signal transduction by VEGF receptors in regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 312, no. 5, pp. 549–560, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. S. Wolf, “Current status of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in Europe,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 433–439, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. V. Joukov, T. Sorsa, V. Kumar et al., “Proteolytic processing regulates receptor specificity and activity of VEGF-C,” EMBO Journal, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 3898–3911, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. S. A. Stacker, K. Stenvers, C. Caesar et al., “Biosynthesis of vascular endothelial growth factor-D involves proteolytic processing which generates non-covalent homodimers,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 45, pp. 32127–32136, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. He, I. Rajantie, K. Pajusola et al., “Vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor 3-mediated activation of lymphatic endothelium is crucial for tumor cell entry and spread via lymphatic vessels,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 4739–4746, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. K. Shimizu, H. Kubo, K. Yamaguchi et al., “Suppression of VEGFR-3 signaling inhibits lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer,” Cancer Science, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 328–333, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Kajiya and M. Detmar, “An important role of lymphatic vessels in the control of UVB-induced edema formation and inflammation,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 919–921, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. D. Kerjaschki, N. Huttary, I. Raab et al., “Lymphatic endothelial progenitor cells contribute to de novo lymphangiogenesis in human renal transplants,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 230–234, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. R. J. Albuquerque, T. Hayashi, W. G. Cho et al., “Alternatively spliced vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 is an essential endogenous inhibitor of lymphatic vessel growth,” Nature Medicine, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1023–1030, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  17. C. Cursiefen, K. Maruyama, D. G. Jackson, J. W. Streilein, and F. E. Kruse, “Time course of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis after brief corneal inflammation,” Cornea, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 443–447, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  18. S. Ling, H. Lin, L. Liang et al., “Development of new lymphatic vessels in alkali-burned corneas,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 315–322, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. M. A. Gimbrone Jr., R. S. Cotran, S. B. Leapman, and J. Folkman, “Tumor growth and neovascularization: an experimental model using the rabbit cornea,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 413–427, 1974. View at Scopus
  20. Y. Cao, S. Lim, H. Ji et al., “Mouse corneal lymphangiogenesis model,” Nature Protocols, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 817–826, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  21. M. Björndahl, R. Cao, L. J. Nissen et al., “Insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2 induce lymphangiogenesis in vivo,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 43, pp. 15593–15598, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  22. M. A. Björndahl, R. Cao, J. B. Burton et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor-a promotes peritumoral lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 20, pp. 9261–9268, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. F. Bock, J. Onderka, T. Dietrich et al., “Bevacizumab as a potent inhibitor of inflammatory corneal angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 2545–2552, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. C. Cursiefen, L. Chen, L. P. Borges et al., “VEGF-A stimulates lymphangiogenesis and hemangiogenesis in inflammatory neovascularization via macrophage recruitment,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1040–1050, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Nakao, K. Maruyama, S. Zandi et al., “Lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis: concurrence and/or dependence? Studies in inbred mouse strains,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 504–513, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  26. E. S. Chung, S. K. Chauhan, Y. Jin et al., “Contribution of macrophages to angiogenesis induced by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3-specific ligands,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 175, no. 5, pp. 1984–1992, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  27. R. Cao, M. A. Björndahl, P. Religa et al., “PDGF-BB induces intratumoral lymphangiogenesis and promotes lymphatic metastasis,” Cancer Cell, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 333–345, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. R. Cao, M. A. Björndahl, M. I. Gallego et al., “Hepatocyte growth factor is a lymphangiogenic factor with an indirect mechanism of action,” Blood, vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 3531–3536, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. H. Kubo, R. Cao, E. Bräkenhielm, T. Mäkinen, Y. Cao, and K. Alitalo, “Blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 signaling inhibits fibroblast growth factor-2-induced lymphangiogenesis in mouse cornea,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 13, pp. 8868–8873, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  30. L. K. Chang, G. Garcia-Cardeña, F. Farnebo et al., “Dose-dependent response of FGF-2 for lymphangiogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 32, pp. 11658–11663, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  31. S. Nakao, S. Zandi, Y. Hata et al., “Blood vessel endothelial vegfr-2 delays lymphangiogenesis: an endogenous trapping mechanism links lymph- and angiogenesis,” Blood, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 1081–1090, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  32. K. Watari, S. Nakao, A. Fotovati et al., “Role of macrophages in inflammatory lymphangiogenesis: enhanced production of vascular endothelial growth factor C and D through NF-κB activation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 377, no. 3, pp. 826–831, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  33. S. Nakao, K. Noda, S. Zandi, et al., “VAP-1-mediated M2 macrophage infiltration underlies IL-1beta- but not VEGF-A-induced lymph- and angiogenesis,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 178, pp. 1913–1921, 2011.
  34. B. Regenfuß, J. Onderka, F. Bock, D. Hos, K. Maruyama, and C. Cursiefen, “Genetic heterogeneity of lymphangiogenesis in different mouse strains,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 501–510, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  35. S. Nakao, S. Zandi, S. Faez, R. I. Kohno, and A. Hafezi-Moghadam, “Discontinuous LYVE-1 expression in corneal limbal lymphatics: dual function as microvalves and immunological hot spots,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 808–817, 2012.
  36. S. Nakao, T. Kuwano, C. Tsutsumi-Miyahara et al., “Infiltration of COX-2-expressing macrophages is a prerequisite for IL-1β-induced neovascularization and tumor growth,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 2979–2991, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. S. Nakao, Y. Hata, M. Miura et al., “Dexamethasone inhibits interleukin-1β-induced corneal neovascularization: role of nuclear factor-κB-activated stromal cells in inflammatory angiogenesis,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 1058–1065, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. S. Yoshida, A. Yoshida, T. Ishibashi, S. G. Elner, and V. M. Elner, “Role of MCP-1 and MIP-1α in retinal neovascularization during postischemic inflammation in a mouse model of retinal neovascularization,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 137–144, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Ishida, T. Usui, K. Yamashiro et al., “VEGF164-mediated inflammation is required for pathological, but not physiological, ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 483–489, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  40. C. Tsutsumi, K. H. Sonoda, K. Egashira et al., “The critical role of ocular-infiltrating macrophages in the development of choroidal neovascularization,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. E. Sakurai, A. Anand, B. K. Ambati, N. van Rooijen, and J. Ambati, “Macrophage depletion inhibits experimental choroidal neovascularization,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 3578–3585, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. Maruyama, M. Ii, C. Cursiefen et al., “Inflammation-induced lymphangiogenesis in the cornea arises from CD11b-positive macrophages,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 2363–2372, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  43. S. Jalkanen and M. Salmi, “VAP-1 and CD73, endothelial cell surface enzymes in leukocyte extravasation,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 18–26, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  44. K. Noda, S. Nakao, S. Zandi, V. Engelstädter, Y. Mashima, and A. Hafezi-Moghadam, “Vascular adhesion protein-1 regulates leukocyte transmigration rate in the retina during diabetes,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 774–781, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  45. A. Sica, P. Allavena, and A. Mantovani, “Cancer related inflammation: the macrophage connection,” Cancer Letters, vol. 267, no. 2, pp. 204–215, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  46. C. Cursiefen, K. Maruyama, F. Bock et al., “Thrombospondin 1 inhibits inflammatory lymphangiogenesis by CD36 ligation on monocytes,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 208, no. 5, pp. 1083–1092, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  47. C. Cursiefen, C. Rummelt, A. Jünemann et al., “Absence of blood and lymphatic vessels in the developing human cornea,” Cornea, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 722–726, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  48. T. R. Wuest and D. J. Carr, “VEGF-A expression by HSV-1-infected cells drives corneal lymphangiogenesis,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 101–115, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  49. S. Goyal, S. K. Chauhan, J. El Annan, N. Nallasamy, Q. Zhang, and R. Dana, “Evidence of corneal lymphangiogenesis in dry eye disease: a potential link to adaptive immunity?” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 128, no. 7, pp. 819–824, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  50. T. Dietrich, F. Bock, D. Yuen et al., “Cutting edge: lymphatic vessels, not blood vessels, primarily mediate immune rejections after transplantation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 535–539, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  51. Y. H. Yucel, M. G. Johnston, T. Ly et al., “Identification of lymphatics in the ciliary body of the human eye: a novel "uveolymphatic" outflow pathway,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 810–819, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  52. L. M. Heindl, C. Hofmann-Rummelt, W. Adler et al., “Tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis in the development of conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 649–658, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  53. L. M. Heindl, T. N. Hofmann, W. Adler et al., “Intraocular tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis a novel prognostic factor for ciliary body melanomas with extraocular extension?” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 334–342, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  54. S. Yamagami and M. R. Dana, “The critical role of lymph nodes in corneal alloimmunization and graft rejection,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1293–1298, 2001. View at Scopus
  55. L. Chen, P. Hamrah, C. Cursiefen et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 mediates induction of corneal alloimmunity,” Nature Medicine, vol. 10, pp. 813–815, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  56. D. Singh, “Conjunctival lymphatic system,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 632–633, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. H. B. Collin, “Endothelial cell lined lymphatics in the vascularized rabbit cornea,” Investigative Ophthalmology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 337–354, 1966. View at Scopus
  58. S. Camelo, J. Kezic, A. Shanley, P. Rigby, and P. G. McMenamin, “Antigen from the anterior chamber of the eye travels in a soluble form to secondary lymphoid organs via lymphatic and vascular routes,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1039–1046, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  59. S. Camelo, L. Lajavardi, A. Bochot et al., “Drainage of fluorescent liposomes from the vitreous to cervical lymph nodes via conjunctival lymphatics,” Ophthalmic Research, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 145–150, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  60. T. Karpanen and K. Alitalo, “Molecular biology and pathology of lymphangiogenesis,” Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, vol. 3, pp. 367–397, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  61. R. Klein, B. E. K. Klein, and S. E. Moss, “The wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema,” Ophthalmology, vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 1464–1474, 1984. View at Scopus
  62. A. Gandorfer, E. M. Messmer, M. W. Ulbig, and A. Kampik, “Resolution of diabetic macular edema after surgical removal of the posterior hyaloid and the inner limiting membrane,” Retina, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 126–133, 2000. View at Scopus
  63. J. F. Arevalo, M. Maia, H. W. Flynn Jr. et al., “Tractional retinal detachment following intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in patients with severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 213–216, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  64. J. B. Jonas, I. Kreissig, A. Sofker, and R. F. Degenring, “Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone for diffuse diabetic macular edema,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 57–61, 2003. View at Scopus
  65. C. A. Wilson, B. A. Berkowitz, Y. Sato, N. Ando, J. T. Handa, and E. De Juan, “Treatment with intravitreal steroid reduces blood-retinal barrier breakdown due to retinal photocoagulation,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 110, no. 8, pp. 1155–1159, 1992. View at Scopus
  66. Q. D. Nguyen, S. Tatlipinar, S. M. Shah et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor is a critical stimulus for diabetic macular edema,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 961–e4, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  67. T. Sakamoto, M. Miyazaki, T. Hisatomi et al., “Triamcinolone-assisted pars plana vitrectomy improves the surgical procedures and decreases the postoperative blood-ocular barrier breakdown,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 240, no. 6, pp. 423–429, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  68. Y. S. Yoon, T. Murayama, E. Gravereaux et al., “VEGF-C gene therapy augments postnatal lymphangiogenesis and ameliorates secondary lymphedema,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 717–725, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. S. Grimaldo, M. Garcia, H. Zhang, and L. Chen, “Specific role of lymphatic marker podoplanin in retinal pigment epithelial cells,” Lymphology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 128–134, 2010. View at Scopus
  70. M. E. De Stefano and E. Mugnaini, “Fine structure of the choroidal coat of the avian eye: lymphatic vessels,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1241–1260, 1997. View at Scopus
  71. W. Krebs and I. P. Krebs, “Ultrastructural evidence for lymphatic capillaries in the primate choroid,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 11, pp. 1615–1616, 1988. View at Scopus
  72. A. Sugita and T. Inokuchi, “Lymphatic sinus-like structures in choroid,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 436–442, 1992. View at Scopus
  73. F. Schroedl, A. Brehmer, W. L. Neuhuber, F. E. Kruse, C. A. May, and C. Cursiefen, “The normal human choroid is endowed with a significant number of lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronate receptor 1 (LYVE-1)—positive macrophages,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 5222–5229, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  74. H. Xu, M. Chen, D. M. Reid, and J. V. Forrester, “LYVE-1-positive macrophages are present in normal murine eyes,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 2162–2171, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  75. Y. Ikeda, Y. Yonemitsu, M. Onimaru et al., “The regulation of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF-A, -C, and -D) expression in the retinal pigment epithelium,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1031–1040, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  76. J. W. Streilein, “Ocular immune privilege: the eye takes a dim but practical view of immunity and inflammation,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 179–185, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. S. A. Stacker, M. E. Baldwin, and M. G. Achen, “The role of tumor lymphangiogenesis in metastatic spread,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 922–934, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  78. R. Clarijs, L. Schalkwijk, D. J. Ruiter, and R. M. de Waal, “Lack of lymphangiogenesis despite coexpression of VEGF-C and its receptor Flt-4 in uveal melanoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1422–1428, 2001.
  79. K. Birke, E. Lütjen-Drecoll, D. Kerjaschki, and M. T. Birke, “Expression of podoplanin and other lymphatic markers in the human anterior eye segment,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 344–354, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  80. S. Breiteneder-Geleff, K. Matsui, A. Soleiman et al., “Podoplanin, novel 43-kd membrane protein of glomerular epithelial cells, is down-regulated in puromycin nephrosis,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 1141–1152, 1997. View at Scopus
  81. A. Bill, “Blood circulation and fluid dynamics in the eye,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 383–417, 1975. View at Scopus
  82. J. J. McGetrick, D. G. Wilson, R. K. Dortzbach, P. L. Kaufman, and B. N. Lemke, “A search for lymphatic drainage of the monkey orbit,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 255–260, 1989. View at Scopus
  83. A. J. Dickinson and R. E. Gausas, “Orbital lymphatics: do they exist?” Eye, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1145–1148, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  84. D. D. Sherman, R. S. Gonnering, I. H. Wallow et al., “Identification of orbital lymphatics: enzyme histochemical light microscopic and electron microscopic studies,” Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 153–169, 1993.
  85. H. E. Killer, H. R. Laeng, and P. Groscurth, “Lymphatic capillaries in the meninges of the human optic nerve,” Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 222–228, 1999. View at Scopus