Clinical Study

Diagnostic Validity of Clinical Signs Associated with a Large Exophoria at Near

Table 2

Comparison of samples between both groups of patients.

TestNH-LVD group
( )
Average value ± SD
EXO-MHVD group
( )
Average value ± SD
-value

AC/A2.41/1 1.31  /D1.96 0.84  /D0.25
AA 10.97 1.71 D11.04 2.03 D0.83
MAF 12.86 3.34 cpm7.28 5.29 cpm<0.001*
BAF10.82 3.62 cpm4.45 4.14 cpm<0.001*
MEM 0.61 0.23 D0.34 0.37 D0.002*
NRA 2.30 0.32 D 2.07 0.43 D0.02*
PRA3.56 1.13 D4.23 1.54 D0.10
PFV blur19.68 6.11  16.70 6.46  0.09
PFV break25.64 7.05  22.85 8.42  0.10
PFV recovery13.61 6.35  13.73 7.24  0.90
NPC break2.93 2.02 cm 7.00 4.13 cm <0.001*
NPC recovery7.41 1.19 cm11.07 3.05 cm<0.001*
VF15.91 2.57 cpm10.35 6.16 cpm<0.001*
Stereopsis42.73 9.45#39.85 9.23#0.31

NH-LVD: normal heterophoria and low visual discomfort; EXO-MHVD: large exophoria at near and moderate or high visual discomfort; SD: standard deviation, AC/A: ratio AC/A, AA: accommodative amplitude, MAF: monocular accommodative facility, MEM: monocular estimated method, NRA: negative relative accommodation, PRA: positive relative accommodation, BAF: binocular accommodative facility, VF: vergence facility, PFV: positive fusional vergence, NPC: near point of convergence, : prismatic diopter, D: diopter, cpm: cycles per minute, (#): seconds of arch. ( P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between both groups).