About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 403042, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/403042
Review Article

Gender and Ocular Manifestations of Connective Tissue Diseases and Systemic Vasculitides

1Cole Eye Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, I-10, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
2Department of Rheumatology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A-50, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

Received 20 October 2013; Accepted 6 February 2014; Published 17 March 2014

Academic Editor: H. Nida Sen

Copyright © 2014 Maria M. Choudhary et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Ocular manifestations are present in many connective tissue diseases which are characterized by an immune system that is directed against self. In this paper, we review the ocular findings in various connective tissue diseases and systemic vasculitides and highlight gender differences in each disease. In rheumatoid arthritis, we find that dry eyes affect women nine times more than men. The other extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis affect women three times more commonly than men. Systemic lupus erythematosus can involve all ocular structures and women are nine times more affected than men. Systemic sclerosis is a rare disease but, again, it is more common in women with a female to male ratio of 8 : 1. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis also affect women more commonly than men but no gender differences have been found in the incidence or disease course in the systemic vasculitides associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody such as granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA, formerly known as Wegener’s granulomatosis). Finally, Behcet’s disease is more common in males, and male gender is a risk factor for Behcet’s disease. There is a slight female preponderance in sarcoidosis with female gender carrying a worse prognosis in the outcome of ocular disease.

1. Introduction

Many connective tissue diseases have abnormal immune system activity with inflammation in tissues as a result of an immune system that is directed against one’s own body tissues (autoimmunity). Ocular inflammation is seen as part of a number of systemic diseases with autoimmune processes heading the list. Inflammation can affect any part of the eye starting from the cornea anteriorly to the retina, uveal tract and sclera posteriorly. In some conditions, uveitis or scleritis is the heralding presentation and in others it determines the need for more aggressive immunosuppressive therapy. The incidence, severity, and disease course of uveitis and scleritis are variable with many factors contributing to the natural history of the disease, including gender, the underlying systemic disease, and the extent of the inflammatory process. The ocular immune process is mediated by T helper cells 1 (TH1). It can be TH1 predominant with proinflammatory cytokines or antibody mediated through TH2 cells. Females have a stronger autoimmune response compared to males with TH1 pathway being more vigorous than TH2 except in pregnancy when TH2 takes over [1]. Studies have shown that administration of sex hormones alters autoimmune processes; estrogen upregulates whereas androgens suppress it [2, 3]. The effect of estrogen however is dose dependent with lower levels being immune-stimulatory and higher levels immune-inhibitory. This has been proposed to be responsible for improvement of certain autoimmune pathologies such as rheumatoid arthritis during pregnancy. Similarly women have higher levels of prolactin and growth hormones compared to males. These pituitary hormones also enhance autoimmunity [1]. The effect of hormonal factor in inflammatory eye disease is complex and is not uniform among all diseases; male patients with Behçet’s syndrome have worse ocular prognosis than their female counterpart. Nonhormonal gender differences such as environmental exposures, drugs (more commonly used by one gender than the other), or infectious organisms can also play a role.

Autoimmune diseases affect the eye in different ways. We will summarize the ocular manifestations of the most encountered connective tissue diseases and vasculitides.

2. Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory arthritis associated with a variety of extra articular manifestations. It is three times more common in women than men. There is a genetic predisposition with more than 90% patients carrying the HLA-DR4 and HLA-DR1 genes [4]. Dry eye syndrome is the most common ophthalmic manifestation; women are 9 times more commonly affected than men. It presents as foreign body/gritty sensation, redness, burning, photophobia, or even fluctuating blurry vision. The severity of dry eye does not parallel underlying rheumatoid arthritis disease activity [5].

Dry eye can be either “aqueous deficient” or “evaporative” type. The aqueous deficient component is more commonly associated with autoimmune conditions. It results from immune mediated destruction of the exocrine glands resulting in decreased tear production by the lacrimal glands, also referred to as secondary Sjogren’s syndrome [6]. Gender plays a key role with 90% of the patients being females. Females with primary Sjogren’s syndrome (without any underlying autoimmune problem) have elevated levels of antinuclear antibody (ANA) and autoantibodies directed against Ro/SSA and La/SSB autoantigens. This is thought to be secondary to higher estrogen levels in women, which, being immune-stimulatory, result in accelerated humoral and cell mediated responses. On the other hand, the evaporative type of dry eye is secondary to tear film instability and higher rate of evaporation. This is thought to be due to relative androgen deficiency. Androgens play a role at various stages in lipid metabolism. Meibomian glands are target organs for androgens. Decreased levels of androgens therefore lead to altered lipid component of meibomian secretions. This alters tear film composition and leads to evaporative dry eye [7]. Women with primary and secondary Sjogren’s syndrome are also relatively androgen deficient [8]. Similarly, men on antiandrogen therapy (such as for prostate cancer) are more commonly affected than others. Therefore, female gender has been identified as a risk factor for the development of dry eye [9]. Whether female patients do worse than men on long term follow-up has yet to be studied.

Scleritis and episcleritis are the second most common ocular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis with RA being the most common autoimmune etiology associated with scleritis [10]. Scleritis can be chronic and associated with significant pain and morbidity. The patients complain of typical deep intolerable boring eye pain, redness, photophobia, and classic ocular tenderness [11, 12]. It usually indicates active systemic disease and sometimes can be the heralding sign. Depending on anatomical location scleritis is classified as anterior or posterior. The former is further subdivided into diffuse, sectoral, nodular, or necrotizing variants with diffuse anterior scleritis being the most prevalent [11]. Significant morbidity is associated with the necrotizing variant, more commonly seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis than other autoimmune diseases. Slit lamp examination shows a bluish hue in areas of scleral thinning (coming from underlying choroid). On the other hand scleromalacia perforans represents the other end of the spectrum characterized by a quiet eye on exam with significant thinning of the sclera and even rupture [13].

The conjunctiva and episcleral tissue can be similarly involved. Episcleritis usually presents with painless red eye and preserved vision. Some patients complain of minimal discomfort. On exam dilated vessels are seen superficial to the sclera that are relatively mobile and blanch with phenylephrine instillation [14]. No gender differences have been reported in the disease course of scleral and episcleral inflammation associated with rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis is the most common autoimmune disease to affect the cornea. Patients typically complain of pain, photophobia, excessive lacrimation, and blurred vision. The cornea does not have its own blood supply and is inaccessible to the inflammatory leukocytes directly. This relatively protects it from immune mediated damage except for the periphery that derives its blood supply from the surrounding episclera. This can cause perilimbal corneal involvement referred to as peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK). PUK is often also accompanied with surrounding scleritis. Activation of tissue collagenases results in digestion of corneal stroma with potential loss of the eye [15]. PUK and resultant corneal melt can be seen in a variety of systemic immune destructive processes and is not specific to RA.

Presence of PUK or necrotizing scleritis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis indicates severe systemic disease necessitating immunosuppressive therapy [16].

3. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder that causes immune complex mediated tissue damage affecting a variety of organ systems [17]. It results from interplay of genetic, environmental, and hormonal factors. Gender plays a key role with women being nine times more commonly affected than men. It most commonly affects Asians and African women in their reproductive years [18]. Significant hormonal alterations such as pregnancy and postpartum can cause worsening of disease activity because of increase in the levels of estrogen and progesterone both of which upregulate the TH2 mediated pathway resulting in increased antibody synthesis. Supplemental estrogen in the form of contraceptive pills or hormone replacement therapy has also been proposed to increase the risk of disease flares [19, 20]. Male androgens offer relative protection. Patients with SLE have lower levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and testosterone compared to age matched controls irrespective of the gender [21, 22]. Hypoandrogenism in men has therefore been proposed to increase the incidence and worsen severity of disease activity [23, 24]. The recently revised classification criteria of SLE referred to as the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria require the presence of at least four of the seventeen criteria for classification of the disease; these should include at least one clinical criterion and one immunologic criterion or biopsy-proven lupus nephritis [25].

Ocular pathology secondary to SLE includes a wide range from the adnexa to the retina and optic nerve. Similar to RA, dry eye syndrome is the most common presentation. SLE is the most common underlying autoimmune pathology in patients with secondary Sjogren’s syndrome [26]. It is more frequent in SLE than rheumatoid arthritis and affects more than half of the patients [27, 28]. As in RA, female gender is a risk factor for dry eye syndrome in SLE patients and this is attributed to both the presence of estrogen and lack of androgens. Clinical findings range from abnormal tear film and corneal epithelial changes such as punctate epithelial erosions to more severe forms such as corneal scarring and ulceration. Peripheral ulcerative keratitis as seen in rheumatoid arthritis is uncommon [29, 30].

Retina is the second most commonly involved structure with significant visual morbidity resulting from vascular thrombosis. It can affect as high as a third of all patients with SLE depending on the patient population [29]. The pathogenesis is thought to be an immune mediated endothelial damage and a hypercoagulable milieu leading to vasoocclusive retinopathy. Dilated fundus examination findings can range from cotton wool spots, microaneurysms, and exudates to severe nonperfusion changes such as neovascularization and vitreous hemorrhage [31]. Retinopathy parallels systemic disease activity and simultaneous central nervous system involvement is seen in a vast majority of patients. Significant vision loss as well as increased mortality has been reported in patients with severe retinal vasculitis [32, 33]. Therefore, the presence of retinopathy warrants aggressive systemic therapy even if no obvious signs of systemic disease are seen. Patients with anti-phospholipid antibody are thought to be at a higher risk for developing retinal vasculitis than those who do not carry this antibody [34]; of all the anti-phospholipid antibodies, lupus anticoagulant is associated with the highest risk of arterial and venous thrombosis and resultant vasculitis [35]. Male patients though less commonly affected by SLE have a higher incidence of anti-phospholipid antibodies than females and therefore a higher risk for thrombosis. Male gender has been proposed as a predictor for poor prognosis for extra ocular organ involvement [36]. It is thought that male patients have a higher incidence and more severe retinopathy than their female counterparts, although there have not been epidemiologic studies comparing the ocular manifestations between genders [37, 38].

Scleritis and episcleritis are also common in patients with SLE, but at a less frequent rate than in patients with RA. The pathogenesis is thought to be immune complex mediated tissue destruction of affected tissue [39, 40]. No apparent gender disparities have been reported in terms of incidence or severity of scleral involvement in this patient population. Scleritis can be chronic, relapsing, and sometimes associated with active systemic disease necessitating systemic immunosuppressive therapy [41].

Neuroophthalmic manifestations such as optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy, and chiasmopathy are seen in about 1% of patients with SLE [42]. Patients typically present with painless loss of vision, pupillary defects, and loss/impaired color vision. This can sometimes be the initial manifestation of the disease making the diagnosis difficult. Examination can show disc pallor or edema. This warrants long-term use of systemic immunosuppressive therapy [43, 44]. Given the small population size, no studies are available to comment on gender differences if they exist.

4. Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis is a rare connective tissue disorder that is characterized by abnormal fibroblast proliferation leading to deposition of extracellular matrix in the skin, blood vessels, and viscera. This results in stiffening of the connective tissue structures in the skin and body organs. Like other autoimmune diseases, it is characterized by interplay of inflammatory cytokines and antibodies [45]. It is more common in women with female to male ratio being 8 : 1 [46]. Most commonly reported ocular pathologies include eye lid stiffness that is seen in more than 50% of the cases and results from deposition of type I collagen in the dermis [47]. Keratoconjunctivitis sicca is the second most common problem seen in 50% of the affected patients [48]. Cases of conjunctivitis, episcleritis, anterior uveitis, and hypertensive retinopathy have also been reported [46, 4850].

5. Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis

As their names suggest polymyositis and dermatomyositis are a group of autoimmune diseases characterized by inflammation of the skeletal muscles; when there is dermatologic involvement, the condition is referred to as dermatomyositis. Genetic factors play an important role and a strong association has been identified with human leukocyte antigens HLA-B8 and DR3 and DR52 [51, 52]. Laboratory testing usually shows elevated creatinine kinase and aldolase levels along with other inflammatory markers [53]. The histopathologic features in dermatomyositis include deposition of immune complexes in a vascular distribution in more than three quarters of the cases. Vasculitis is more commonly seen in the pediatric population [54, 55].

Inflammatory myositis is relatively rare compared to other rheumatologic diseases with around 5 new cases per million being reported annually [56]. Women are more commonly affected than men. Around 15% of the cases are associated with an underlying malignancy [57].

Heliotrope rash or purplish discoloration of the eyelids is the most common ocular manifestation associated with dermatomyositis. Pediatric case reports exist about retinal vasculitis with dermatomyositis [5860]. Occasional cases of internuclear ophthalmoplegia have also been reported [61, 62]. No gender differences have been observed in the incidence or severity of ocular problems in this patient population.

6. Systemic Vasculitides

Classically, the vasculitic syndromes have been classified by the predominant sizes of the blood vessels most commonly involved [63].

Revisions in the commonly used terms for the various vasculitides have been proposed by the 2012 International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC) on nomenclature of vasculitides [64].

Notably, the 2012 Chapel Hill Consensus Conference adopted the term antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) for these three disorders: microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA instead of Wegener’s), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA instead of Churg-Strauss Syndrome).

ANCA associated vasculitides are a group of small to medium vessel inflammatory diseases that cause end organ damage from vessel thrombosis that results from inflammation of the vascular endothelial lining. Ophthalmic manifestations are protean and nonspecific and are secondary to vasculitis of the ophthalmic circulation. GPA patients have a higher likelihood of ocular or orbital involvement than EGPA patients [65, 66].

Conjunctivitis, episcleritis, and scleritis are the most common presentations. The patients typically present with painful red eye except in episcleritis where the condition might be painless and usually self-limiting. Conjunctivitis can sometimes present with granulomas that are often bilateral. Cicatrizing conjunctivitis resulting in symblepharon more commonly of the upper eyelid can be seen in uncontrolled disease [67, 68]. Scleritis associated with systemic vasculitis requires more aggressive treatment than idiopathic scleritis or from other etiologies [69].

Cornea can be affected in the form of exposure keratitis as a result of conjunctival scarring or more seriously as peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK). GPA is the second most common cause of PUK after rheumatoid arthritis [70] and has a similar presentation.

Vasoocclusive phenomenon of the retinal artery or veins is uncommon but has been described as case reports in both GPA and EGPA [7175]. Patients present with sudden, painless loss of vision. Retinal arterial involvement can be in the form of central retinal artery occlusion or a branch of it. Involvement of posterior ciliary circulation can cause ischemic optic neuritis.

Rarely patients with ANCA vasculitis can present with anterior, posterior, or panuveitis. Uveitis tends to occur in less than 10% of the cases [67, 76, 77] and is thought to be a result of spill-over of inflammation from adjacent scleritis (which can sometimes be the heralding manifestation) or keratitis [78]. No gender differences have been reported in the incidence or disease course of ocular manifestations seen with systemic vasculitides.

7. Behçet’s Disease

Behçet’s disease (BD) is a chronic multiorgan occlusive vasculitis that affects venules more than arteries but can affect vessels of any size [79, 80]. It is most prevalent in countries along the historic Silk Route with Far and Middle East having a higher prevalence than Europe [81, 82]. In some countries such as Turkey the prevalence is as high as 80–300 cases per 100,000 [82]. Hence, much of the current literature comes from studies done in Turkey, Iran, and Japan. It usually presents with recurrent oral and genital ulcers, cutaneous inflammation, and relapsing uveitis usually in the third decade of life with male predominance noted in most studies [8285]. International Study Group for Behçet’s Disease (ICBD) has included ocular involvement as part of the diagnostic criteria [86].

Uveitis is the most common ocular manifestation affecting more than 50–80% of patients with BD [87]. Bilateral panuveitis is the most frequent form irrespective of the patient age group [82, 83]. Behçet disease associated uveitis carries a poor visual prognosis with more than a quarter ending up legally blind [83, 88]. Male gender has been proposed as a risk factor for developing BD related uveitis [89, 90] and has also been found to be associated with worse outcomes in terms of disease course and response to therapy [91, 92]. This is thought to be secondary to a higher incidence of posterior segment involvement and retinal vasculitis in males compared to females. Other prognostic factors include duration of uveitis and age at onset.

Like all autoimmune conditions, genetics plays an important role in the disease pathogenesis. Human leukocyte antigens (HLA-) B51 and HLA-A26 have been identified as predisposing factors associated with BD related uveitis. HLA-A26 has also been proposed to be associated with worse visual outcomes by increasing the risk of posterior involvement [93, 94] whereas HLA-B51 is associated with earlier onset age of uveitis and male gender [95] in patients with posterior uveitis.

Hence male gender serves not only as a risk factor for developing uveitis in patients with Behçet’s disease but also as a marker of poor visual outcome once the uveitis develops.

8. Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is characterized by multisystem noncaseating granulomas that result from an exaggerated immune response to self or non-self-antigens [96]. No specific etiology has been identified. Genetics (HLA-B8 is the most common allele that has been associated with sarcoidosis) [97] and infectious agents (mycobacteria, human herpes virus 8) [98, 99] as well as environmental factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis. Inflammation can involve multiple organ systems with the most common ones being lymph nodes, lungs, eyes, and skin. Ocular sarcoidosis can be seen in up to 25–50% of the patients with systemic disease. This can be the unmasking feature leading to the diagnosis [100]. The incidence also varies with race. African-Americans are 10–20 times more commonly affected than Caucasians [101]. It affects both genders similarly with a slight female predominance [102]. A bimodal incidence has been reported with the first peak between the 2nd and 3rd decade and the second between the 5th and 6th decade of life [103, 104].

Bilateral granulomatous uveitis can sometimes be the only sarcoid related pathology. Bilateral ocular involvement is the most common ocular pattern occurring in 30–70% of the cases [105108]. Anterior uveitis is the most common type; however distribution of uveitis may vary with race. Some studies have reported posterior or panuveitis to be more common in Caucasians compared to African-Americans [109112]. The International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) has identified seven signs “suggestive” for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis. These include (1) mutton-fat/granulomatous keratic precipitates and/or iris nodules (Koeppe/Busacca), (2) trabecular meshwork nodules and/or tent-shaped peripheral anterior synechiae, (3) snowballs/string of pearls vitreous opacities, (4) multiple chorioretinal peripheral lesions (active and/or atrophic), (5) nodular and/or segmental periphlebitis (+/− candlewax drippings) and/or retinal macroaneurysm in an inflamed eye, (6) optic disc nodule(s)/granuloma(s) and/or solitary choroidal nodule, and (7) bilaterality [113].

About 10% of sarcoid associated uveitis cases can have significant visual dysfunction and even blindness [114]. Female gender, Caucasian race, late onset of systemic disease, and presence of multifocal choroiditis or panuveitis have been associated with a worse visual outcome [109, 115117]. White patients had more posterior segment involvement and white females had frequent occurrence of cystoid macular edema and therefore worse visual outcomes [117].

Keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) is the second most common ocular manifestation followed by adnexal granulomas. KCS or dry eye syndrome results not only from aqueous layer deficiency as a result of lacrimal gland inflammation leading to fibrosis but also from mucin and lipid layer deficiencies. The latter is in fact the main underlying pathology [118]. This is more common in women as mentioned earlier in the Rheumatoid Arthritis section. Clinically, significant lacrimal gland involvement resulting in enlargement of the lacrimal gland is an uncommon finding [112].

Adnexal granulomas most commonly affect the conjunctiva followed by eyelid. Rarely lacrimal gland and orbital granulomas are also seen [112]. According to IOWS diagnostic criteria, they can also be present in the trabecular meshwork (Berlin nodules) and cause an elevated intraocular pressure secondary to angle closure [113, 119]. Like elsewhere histopathology shows noncaseating granulomas and sometimes can help form the diagnosis.

Female gender acts as a prognostic factor related to worse visual outcomes in patients with ocular sarcoidosis.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. C. C. Whitacre, S. C. Reingold, P. A. O'Looney, et al., “Biomedicine: a gender gap in autoimmunity,” Science, vol. 283, no. 5406, pp. 1277–1278, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Talal, M. J. Dauphinee, A. Ahmed, and P. Christados, “Sex factors in immunity and autoimmnity,” Program in Immunology, pp. 1589–1600, 1983.
  3. S. A. Ahmed, W. J. Penhale, and N. Talal, “Sex hormones, immune responses, and autoimmune diseases: mechanisms of sex hormone action,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 531–551, 1985. View at Scopus
  4. E. M. McDermot and H. McDevitt, “The immunogenetics of rheumatic diseases,” Bulletin on the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 38, no. 1, 1988.
  5. M. Fujita, T. Igarashi, T. Kurai, M. Sakane, S. Yoshino, and H. Takahashi, “Correlation between dry eye and rheumatoid arthritis activity,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 808–813, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. Lemp and R. Mauquardt, Eds., The Dry Eye, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1992.
  7. D. A. Sullivan, B. D. Sullivan, J. E. Evans et al., “Androgen deficiency, meibomian gland dysfunction, and evaporative dry eye,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 966, pp. 211–222, 2002. View at Scopus
  8. D. A. Sullivan, A. Belanger, J. M. Cermak, et al., “Are women with Sjogren’s syndrome androgen deficient?” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 41, article S1453, 2000.
  9. B. Caffery, D. Richter, T. Simpson, D. Fonn, M. Doughty, and K. Gordon, “The prevalence of dry eye in contact lens wearers: part 2 of the Canadian Dry Eye Epidemiology Study (candees),” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 37, no. 3, article S72, 1996. View at Scopus
  10. E. K. Akpek, J. E. Thorne, F. A. Qazi, D. V. Do, and D. A. Jabs, “Evaluation of patients with scleritis for systemic disease,” Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 501–506, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. A. Jabs, A. Mudun, J. P. Dunn, and M. J. Marsh, “Episcleritis and scleritis: clinical features and treatment results,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 469–476, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. P. Riono, A. A. Hidayat, and N. A. Rao, “Scleritis: a clinicopathologic study of 55 cases,” Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 1328–1333, 1999. View at Scopus
  13. A. Mohsenin and J. J. Huang, “Ocular manifestations of systemic inflammatory diseases,” Connecticut Medicine, vol. 76, no. 9, pp. 533–544, 2012.
  14. G. P. Riley, R. L. Harrall, P. G. Watson, T. E. Cawston, and B. L. Hazleman, “Collagenase (MMP-1) and TIMP-1 in destructive corneal disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis,” Eye, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 703–718, 1995. View at Scopus
  15. C. S. Foster, S. L. Forstot, and L. A. Wilson, “Mortality rate in rheumatoid arthritis patients developing necrotizing scleritis or peripheral ulcerative keratitis: effects of systemic immunosuppression,” Ophthalmology, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 1253–1262, 1984. View at Scopus
  16. A. Rahman and D. A. Isenberg, “Systemic lupus erythematosus,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 9, pp. 929–939, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. P. D'Cruz, M. A. Khamashta, and G. R. Hughes, “Systemic lupus erythematosus,” The Lancet, vol. 369, no. 9561, pp. 587–596, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. H. Costenbader, D. Feskanich, M. J. Stampfer, and E. W. Karlson, “Reproductive and menopausal factors and risk of systemic lupus erythematosus in women,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1251–1262, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. S. Cooper, M. A. Dooley, E. L. Treadwell, E. W. St.Clair, and G. S. Gilkeson, “Hormonal and reproductive risk factors for development of systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a population-based, case-control study,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1830–1839, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. S. Cooper, M. A. Dooley, E. L. Treadwell, E. W. St.Clair, and G. S. Gilkeson, “Hormonal and reproductive risk factors for development of systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a population-based, case-control study,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1830–1839, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. G. Lahita, “The role of sex hormones in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 352–356, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. I. Stahl and J. L. Decker, “Androgenic status of males with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 665–668, 1978. View at Scopus
  23. C. C. Mok and C. S. Lau, “Profile of sex hormones in male patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Lupus, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 252–257, 2000. View at Scopus
  24. A. Rahman and D. A. Isenberg, “Systemic lupus erythematosus,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 9, pp. 929–939, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Petri, A. M. Orbai, G. S. Alarcón, et al., “Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 64, article 2677, 2012.
  26. T. Klenjberg and H. V. Moraes Jr., “Ophthalmological alterations in outpatients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, vol. 69, pp. 233–237, 2006.
  27. J. L. Jensen, H. O. Bergem, I.-M. Gilboe, G. Husby, and T. Axéll, “Oral and ocular sicca symptoms and findings are prevalent in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 317–322, 1999. View at Scopus
  28. J. B. Davies and P. K. Rao, “Ocular manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 512–518, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. O. Ushiyama, K. Ushiyama, S. Koarada et al., “Retinal disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 705–708, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. J. Stafford-Brady, M. B. Urowitz, D. D. Gladman, and M. Easterbrook, “Lupus retinopathy. Patterns, associations, and prognosis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1105–1110, 1988. View at Scopus
  31. D. A. Jabs, S. L. Fine, and M. C. Hochberg, “Severe retinal vaso-occlusive disease in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 558–563, 1986. View at Scopus
  32. A. Montehermoso, R. Cervera, J. Font et al., “Association of antiphospholipid antibodies with retinal vascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 326–332, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Galli, D. Luciani, G. Bertolini, and T. Barbui, “Lupus anticoagulants are stronger risk factors for thrombosis than anticardiolipin antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature,” Blood, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1827–1832, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Stefanidou, A. Benos, V. Galanopoulou et al., “Clinical expression and morbidity of systemic lupus erythematosus during a post-diagnostic 5-year follow-up: a male: female comparison,” Lupus, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1090–1094, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Stefanidou, A. Benos, V. Galanopoulou et al., “Clinical expression and morbidity of systemic lupus erythematosus during a post-diagnostic 5-year follow-up: a male: female comparison,” Lupus, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1090–1094, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. Yan, G. Jian-ping, D. Yi-jun, et al., “Gender differences are associated with the clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 125, no. 14, pp. 2477–2481, 2012.
  37. P. Frith, S. M. Burge, P. R. Millard, and F. Wojnarowska, “External ocular finidngs in lupus erythematosus: a clinical and immunopathological study,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 163–167, 1990. View at Scopus
  38. A. Heiligenhaus, J. E. Dutt, and C. Stephen Foster, “Histology and immunopathology of systemic lupus erythematosus affecting the conjunctiva,” Eye, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 425–432, 1996. View at Scopus
  39. C. E. Pavesio and F. M. Meier, “Systemic disorders associated with episcleritis and scleritis,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 471–478, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. R. Sivaraj, O. M. Durrani, A. K. Denniston, P. I. Murray, and C. Gordon, “Ocular manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Rheumatology, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1757–1762, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. Galindo-Rodríguez, J. A. Aviña-Zubieta, S. Pizarro et al., “Cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in optic neuritis due to systemic lupus erythematosus: an open trial,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. P. Frohman, B. J. Frieman, and L. Wolansky, “Reversible blindness resulting from optic chiasmitis secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 18–21, 2001. View at Scopus
  43. L. I. Sakkas, “New developments in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis,” Autoimmunity, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 113–116, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. B. D. A. F. Gomes, M. R. Santhiago, P. Magalhães, N. Kara Jr., M. N. L. de Azevedo, and H. V. Moraes Jr., “Ocular findings in patients with systemic sclerosis,” Clinics, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 379–385, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. Tailor, A. Gupta, A. Herrick, and J. Kwartz, “Ocular manifestations of scleroderma,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 292–304, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. F. Zulian, C. Vallongo, P. Woo et al., “Localized scleroderma in childhood is not just a skin disease,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2873–2881, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. R. David and M. Ivry, “Focal chorioretinitis and iridocyclitis associated with scleroderma,” Annals of Ophthalmology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 199–202, 1976. View at Scopus
  48. W. L. Jones and S. M. DeCanio Jr., “Hypertensive retinopathy and generalized scleroderma,” American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 1138–1141, 1981. View at Scopus
  49. N. I. Abdou, G. J. Kullman, G. S. Hoffman et al., “Wegener's granulomatosis: survey of 701 patients in North America. Changes in outcome in the 1990s,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 309–316, 2002. View at Scopus
  50. G. G. Hunder, W. P. Arend, D. A. Bloch et al., “The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of vasculitis. Introduction,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1065–1067, 1990. View at Scopus
  51. L. A. Love, R. L. Leff, D. D. Fraser et al., “A new approach to the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: myositis-specific autoantibodies define useful homogeneous patient groups,” Medicine, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 360–374, 1991. View at Scopus
  52. M. J. Garlepp, “Genetics of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 514–520, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. L. Wortmann, “Inflammatory diseases of muscle and other myopathies,” in Kelly's Textbook of Rheumatology, S. Ruddy, E. D. Harris, C. B. Sledge, et al., Eds., pp. 1273–1296, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 6th edition, 2001.
  54. J. N. Whitaker and W. K. Engel, “Vascular deposits of immunoglobulin and complement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 286, no. 7, pp. 333–338, 1972. View at Scopus
  55. W. E. Crowe, K. E. Bove, J. E. Levinson, and P. K. Hilton, “Clinical and pathogenetic implications of histopathology in childhood polydermatomyositis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 126–139, 1982. View at Scopus
  56. M. E. Cronin and P. H. Plotz, “Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies,” Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 655–665, 1990. View at Scopus
  57. J. P. Callen, J. F. Hyla, G. G. Bole Jr., and D. R. Kay, “The relationship of dermatomyositis and polymyositis to internal malignancy,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 295–298, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. S. Liebman and C. Cook, “Retinopathy with dermatomyositis,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 74, article 704, 1965.
  59. J. Zamora, K. Pariser, T. Hedges, et al., “Retinal vasculitis in polymyositis-dermatomyositis,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 30, article S106, 1987.
  60. P. Lenoble, P. Desprez, M. Fischbach, J. Flament, and J. Sahel, “Ocular lesion in dermatomyositis: about the case of a fifteen year old girl,” Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 312–316, 1995. View at Scopus
  61. J. O. Susac, R. Garcia-Mullin, and J. S. Glaser, “Ophthalmoplegia in dermatomyositis,” Neurology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 305–310, 1973. View at Scopus
  62. A. Ehongo, M. Cordonnier, C. Van Nechel et al., “Internuclear bilateral pseudo-ophthalmoplegia and dermatomyositis,” Bulletin de la Société Belge d'Ophtalmologie, vol. 263, pp. 43–51, 1996. View at Scopus
  63. J. C. Jennette, R. J. Falk, P. A. Bacon, et al., “2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 65, no. 1, article 1, 2013.
  64. R. A. Watts, D. M. Carruthers, and D. G. I. Scott, “Epidemiology of systemic vasculitis: changing incidence or definition?” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. C. L. Bullen, T. J. Liesegang, T. J. McDonald, and R. A. DeRemee, “Ocular complications of Wegener's granulomatosis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 279–290, 1983. View at Scopus
  66. G. S. Hoffman, G. S. Kerr, R. Y. Leavitt et al., “Wegener granulomatosis: an analysis of 158 patients,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 488–498, 1992. View at Scopus
  67. N. Pakrou, D. Selva, and I. Leibovitch, “Wegener's granulomatosis: ophthalmic manifestations and management,” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 284–292, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. M. R. Robinson, S. S. Lee, M. C. Sneller et al., “Tarsal-conjunctival disease associated with Wegener's granulomatosis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1770–1780, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. A. Garritty, “Ocular manifestations of small-vessel vasculitis,” Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, vol. 79, pp. 31–33, 2012.
  70. J. G. Ladas and B. J. Mondino, “Systemic disorders associated with peripheral corneal ulceration,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 468–471, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. H. Greenberger, “Central retinal artery closure. In Wegener's granulomatosis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 515–516, 1967. View at Scopus
  72. M. Wang, R. N. Khurana, and S. R. Sadda, “Central retinal vein occlusion in Wegener's granulomatosis without retinal vasculitis,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 1435–1436, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. T. Lida, R. F. Spaide, J. Kantor, et al., “Retinal and choroifal arterial occlusion in Wegener’s granulomatosis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 133, pp. 151–152, 2002.
  74. L. Rabinowitz Dagi and J. Currie, “Branch retinal artery occlusion in the Churg-Strauss syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 229–237, 1985. View at Scopus
  75. A. Partal, D. M. Moshfeghi, and D. Alcorn, “Churg-Strauss syndrome in a child: retina and optic nerve findings,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 971–972, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. C. L. Bullen, T. J. Liesegang, T. J. McDonald, and R. A. DeRemee, “Ocular complications of Wegener's granulomatosis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 279–290, 1983. View at Scopus
  77. B. F. Haynes, M. L. Fishman, A. S. Fauci, et al., “The ocular manifestations of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Fifteen years experience and review of the literature,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 44, pp. 789–799, 1957.
  78. J. E. Thorne and D. A. Jabs, “Ocular manifestations of vasculitis,” Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 761–779, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. V. Kontogiannis and R. J. Powell, “Behçet’s disease,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 76, pp. 629–637, 2000.
  80. P. McCluskey and P. R. J. Powell, “The eye in systemic inflammatory diseases,” The Lancet, vol. 364, no. 9451, pp. 2125–2133, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. A. Mahr, L. Belarbi, B. Wechsler et al., “Population-based prevalence study of Behçet's disease: differences by ethnic origin and low variation by age at immigration,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 3951–3959, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. M. Citirik, N. Berker, M. S. Songur, S. S. Ozkan, and O. Zilelioglu, “Ocular manifestations of late-onset Behçet disease,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. I. Tugal-Tutkun, S. Onal, R. Altan-Yaycioglu, H. Huseyin Altunbas, and M. Urgancioglu, “Uveitis in Behçet disease: an analysis of 880 patients,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 373–380, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. I. Tugal-Tutkun and M. Urgancioglu, “Childhood-onset uveitis in Behçet disease: a descriptive study of 36 cases,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 1114–1119, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. H. Saricaoglu, S. K. Karadogan, N. Bayazit, A. Yucel, K. Dilek, and S. Tunali, “Clinical features of late-onset Behçet's disease: report of nine cases,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1284–1287, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. International Study Group for Behcet's Disease, “Criteria for diagnosis of Behcet’s disease,” The Lancet, vol. 335, pp. 1078–1080, 1990.
  87. E. H. Kang, J. Y. Kim, F. Takeuchi, et al., “Associations between the HLA-A polymorphism and the clinical manifestations of Behcet’s disease,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 13, no. 2, article R49, 2011.
  88. N. Kitaichi, A. Miyazaki, D. Iwata, et al., “Ocular features of Behçet’s disease: an international collaborative study,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 91, pp. 1579–1582, 2007.
  89. F. Davatchi, F. Shahram, H. Chams et al., “The influence of gender on the severity and the outcome of ocular lesions in Behçet's disease,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 528, pp. 67–71, 2003. View at Scopus
  90. F. Davatchi, F. Shahram, H. Shams et al., “Gender influence on ocular manifestations and their outcome in Behcet's Disease. A long-term follow-up of up to 20 years,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 541–547, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. H. Yazici, Y. Tuzun, and A. B. Tanman, “Male patients with Behcet's syndrome have stronger pathergy reactions,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 137–141, 1985. View at Scopus
  92. S. Ohno, M. Ohguchi, S. Hirose, et al., “Close association of HLA-B51 with Behçet’s disease,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 100, pp. 1455–1458, 1982.
  93. C. Maldini, M. P. Lavalley, M. Cheminant, M. de menthon, and A. Mahr, “Relationships of HLA-B51 or B5 genotype with Behçet's disease clinical characteristics: systematic review and meta-analyses of observational studies,” Rheumatology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 887–900, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. T. Kaburaki, M. Takamoto, J. Numaga, et al., “Genetics association of HLA-A*2601 with ocular Behçet’s disease in Japanese patients,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 28, supplement 60, pp. S39–S44, 2010.
  95. E. H. Kang, J. W. Park, C. Park, et al., “Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting the visual outcome of ocular Behçet’s disease,” Human Immunology, vol. 74, pp. 1363–1367, 2013.
  96. A. Rothova, “Ocular involvement in sarcoidosis,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 110–116, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. L. E. Siltzbach, D. G. James, and E. Neville, “Course and prognosis of sarcoidosis around the world,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 847–852, 1974. View at Scopus
  98. F. A. K. El-Zaatari, D. Y. Graham, K. Samuelsson, and L. Engstrand, “Detection of Mycobacterium avium complex in cerebrospinal fluid of a sarcoid patient by specific polymerase chain reaction assays,” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 202–204, 1997. View at Scopus
  99. L. Di Alberti, A. Piattelli, L. Artese et al., “Human herpesvirus 8 variants in sarcoid tissues,” The Lancet, vol. 350, no. 9092, pp. 1655–1661, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. A. Heiligenhaus, D. Wefelmeyer, E. Wefelmeyer, M. Rösel, and M. Schrenk, “The eye as a common site for the early clinical manifestation of sarcoidosis,” Ophthalmic Research, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 9–12, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. J. M. Reich, “Course and prognosis of sarcoidosis in African-Americans versus Caucasians,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 17, no. 4, article 833, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. M. Papadia, C. P. Herbort, and M. Mochizuki, “Diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis,” Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 432–441, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. C. W. Fink and R. Cimaz, “Early onset sarcoidosis: not a benign disease,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 174–177, 1997. View at Scopus
  104. D. L. Hoover, J. A. Khan, and J. Giangiacomo, “Pediatric ocular sarcoidosis,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 215–228, 1986. View at Scopus
  105. R. P. Crick, C. Hoyle, and H. Smellie, “The eyes in sarcoidosis,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 102, pp. 297–301, 1986.
  106. D. J. Spalton and M. D. Sanders, “Fundus changes in histologically confirmed sarcoidosis,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 348–358, 1981. View at Scopus
  107. T. J. Wolfensberger and C. P. Herbort, “Indocyanine green angiographic features in ocular sarcoidosis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 285–289, 1999. View at Scopus
  108. U. R. Desai, K. A. Tawansy, B. C. Joondeph, and R. M. Schiffman, “Choroidal granulomas in systemic sarcoidosis,” Retina, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 2001. View at Scopus
  109. P. Stavrou, S. Linton, D. W. Young, and P. I. Murray, “Clinical diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis,” Eye, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 365–370, 1997. View at Scopus
  110. G. S. Kosmorsky, D. M. Meisler, T. W. Rice, M. A. Meziane, and C. Y. Lowder, “Chest computed tomography and mediastinoscopy in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis-associated uveitis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 132–134, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. A. Rothova, C. Alberts, E. Glasius, A. Kijlstra, H. J. Buitenhuis, and A. C. Breebaart, “Risk factors for ocular sarcoidosis,” Documenta Ophthalmologica, vol. 72, no. 3-4, pp. 287–296, 1989. View at Scopus
  112. M. Evans, O. Sharma, L. LaBree, R. E. Smith, and N. A. Rao, “Differences in clinical findings between Caucasians and African Americans with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 325–333, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. C. P. Herbort, N. A. Rao, and M. Mochizuki, “International criteria for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis: results of the first international workshop on ocular sarcoidosis (IWOS),” Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 160–169, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. J. E. Roulston, G. I. O'Malley, and J. G. Douglas, “Effects of prednisolone on angiotensin converting enzyme activity,” Thorax, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 356–360, 1984. View at Scopus
  115. A. Lobo, K. Barton, D. Minassian, R. M. Du Bois, and S. Lightman, “Visual loss in sarcoid-related uveitis,” Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 310–316, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. D. Khalatbari, S. Stinnett, R. M. McCallum, and G. J. Jaffe, “Demographic-related variations in posterior segment ocular sarcoidosis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 357–362, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. C. D. Obenauf, H. E. Shaw, C. F. Sydnor, and G. K. Klintworth, “Sarcoidosis and its ophthalmic manifestations,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 648–655, 1978. View at Scopus
  118. D. A. Jabs and C. J. Johns, “Ocular involvement in chronic sarcoidosis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 297–301, 1986. View at Scopus
  119. T. Hamanaka, A. Takei, T. Takemura, and M. Oritsu, “Pathological study of cases with secondary open-angle glaucoma due to sarcoidosis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus