About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Pregnancy
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 374047, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/374047
Review Article

Preeclampsia, Hypoxia, Thrombosis, and Inflammation

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA

Received 24 August 2011; Accepted 4 November 2011

Academic Editor: Nikolaos Vrachnis

Copyright © 2012 Amir A. Shamshirsaz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Reductions in uteroplacental flow initiate a cascade of molecular effects leading to hypoxia, thrombosis, inflammation, and endothelial cell dysfunction resulting in untoward pregnancy outcomes. In this review, we detail these effects and their relationship to preeclampsia (PE) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).

1. Introduction

PE is universally defined as hypertension and significant proteinuria developed at or after 20 weeks of pregnancy in an otherwise normotensive woman [13]. PE is a multisystem disorder which complicates 3–14% of all pregnancies and about 5–8% of pregnancies in the United States [1]. The disease is mild in 75% of cases in the United States, and severe in 25% of cases [4]. Ten percent of PE occurs in pregnancies less than 34 weeks of gestation. The incidence of PE has risen in the USA in the last decades [5]. This finding might be related to an increased prevalence of predisposing disorders, such as maternal age, chronic hypertension, diabetes, prepregnancy obesity, and multiple births [57]. Overall, 10%–15% of direct maternal deaths are associated with PE in low- and middle-income countries and the proportion is similar in high-income countries [8, 9]. Furthermore, severe PE is a major cause of maternal morbidity (i.e., stroke and liver rupture) and negative long-term outcomes (i.e., cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus) as well as adverse perinatal effects, such as prematurity and intrauterine growth restriction [5, 10].

While much research has been devoted toward this topic, the cause of PE still remains elusive. Two different theories have emerged: (1) vascular-ischemic origin of PE and (2) impaired immune response [11]. A current hypothesis unifies these concepts where an altered immune response leads to disturbed placental function early in pregnancy with consequent syncytiotrophoblast ischemia and shedding of products that extensively damage endothelial integrity. This in turn results in an exponential production of multiple factors such as cytokines and growth factors leading to the clinical manifestations of PE [11]. How the immune response can activate the cascade process is still unknown but it is proposed to act in synergy with additional exacerbating factors such as predisposing maternal and ambient factors [12].

2. Angiogenic Factors and PE

Angiogenic factors and their receptors are important regulators of placental vascular development [13]. The most widely studied serum markers for PE, to date, are vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PlGF). Antagonists include soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1, also known as sVEGFR1), and soluble endoglin (sEng) [13].

sFlt-1 is a truncated splice variant of the membrane-bound Flt1; it consists of the extracellular binding domain without the intracellular signaling domain. Several studies demonstrated the association of increased sFlt-1 with PE [14, 15].

Evidence for the involvement of sFlt1 in the occurrence of PE was initially provided by an animal model in which gravid rats were infected with a recombinant adenovirus encoding sFlt1 and compared to animals infected with the empty control adenovirus. The animals infected with sFlt1 developed a syndrome highly reminiscent of human PE: hypertension and proteinuria due to a glomerular endotheliosis [14, 16].

Similarly, sEng is a truncated form of receptor for two subtypes of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) specifically, TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 which are highly expressed by vascular endothelial cells and syncytiotrophoblasts. Like sFlt1, soluble endoglin (sEng) is an antiangiogenic factor capable of inhibiting capillary tube formation in vitro [17]. Soluble Eng also increases vascular permeability; overexpression of both sFlt1 and sEng in rodents results in capillary permeability in the lungs, kidneys, and liver [18]. Overexpression of both sEng and sFlt1 in pregnant rats develops nephrotic-range proteinuria, severe hypertension, biochemical evidence of HELLP (“H” for hemolysis, “EL” for elevated liver enzymes, and “LP” for low platelet count), and intrauterine growth restriction of the pups [19, 20].

PlGF concentration during pregnancy increases during the first 30 weeks of gestation, and then decreases [13]. Longitudinal studies have shown that a relatively low PlGF concentration (which could be explained by a high sFlt1 concentration) is also a characteristic feature of PE. Decreased levels of urinary PlGF and PIGF : sFlt-1 ratio during mid-gestation have been proposed as a predictive model for development of clinical PE, and quantification of sFlt-1 levels has correlated directly with severity of disease and inversely with time to onset of proteinuria and hypertension [21].

The exact molecular basis for placental dysregulation of these factors remains unknown but hypoxia is likely an important regulator [22]. Other factors such as alterations in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, immune maladaption, excessive shedding of trophoblast debris, oxidative stress, and genetic factors likely contribute to the pathogenesis of the abnormal placentation [22]. To date the most successful treatment for PE is delivery.

3. Preeclapmpsia and Cathecol-O-methyltrasferase

Cathecol-O-methyltrasferase (COMT) catalyzes the O-methylation of various circulating hormones such as catecholamines and catecholestrogens [23, 24]. In the placenta, COMT metabolizes certain forms of circulating estradiols to the molecule 2-methyl estradiol (2-ME). This estradiol metabolite has several effects, one being the destabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor- (HIF-) 1α3 in the cytoplasm. HIFs are heterodimeric proteins that mediate the effects of hypoxia on gene expression by upregulating transcription of target genes including sFlt1 [25]. This role of COMT in maintaining oxygen balance suggests that COMT might somehow be involved in the pathogenesis of PE.

To better elucidate the role of COMT in PE, a genetic COMT knockout (COMT−/−) mouse model was recently developed. Interestingly, pregnant COMT−/− mice developed a PE-like phenotype characterized by proteinuria, increased blood pressure, and histopathological changes in the placenta and kidney. This phenotype was accompanied by lower plasma concentrations of 2-ME and higher placental protein levels of HIF-1a [26]. Restoration of 2-ME in COMT−/− mice decreased HIF-1a and ameliorated the preeclamptic phenotype [26]. Together, these results suggest that COMT and 2-ME deficiency might play a significant role in the development of PE.

The exact mechanism by which 2-ME prevents PE remains unknown. Although 2-ME was found to suppress HIF-1a and sFlt1, recent experiments suggest that there might be several other mechanisms through which 2-ME promotes vascular health [27].

Lastly, recent evidence suggests that 2-ME is necessary for cytotrophoblast invasion of the maternal decidua and therefore contributes to the prevention of PE by promoting normal placental vascular formation [28]. Further studies on this topic will be required to ascertain a more exact mechanism of action.

4. PE and Complement Factors

The complement system, composed of over 30 proteins that act in concert to protect the host against invading organisms, initiates inflammation and tissue injury [29] and normally has a protective role toward off-infection. Complement activation promotes chemotaxis of inflammatory cells and generates proteolytic fragments that enhance phagocytosis by neutrophils and monocytes. There is scant information about complement activation in normal and abnormal human pregnancy [30]. During normal gestation, serum levels of C3, C4, and total hemolytic complement (CH50) gradually increase 10%–50% [31]. Studies have shown significant elevations in levels of Bb, C3a, C4d, and soluble C5b-9 in preeclampsia, indicating excess activation of both the classical and alternative complement pathway [32]. Lynch et al. conducted a large prospective study in human pregnancy to investigate whether elevated levels of complement activation fragment Bb (reflecting alternative complement pathway activation) at a single point in early pregnancy (less than 20 weeks gestation) were predictive of preeclampsia later in pregnancy. Adjusted for other risk factors, women with higher levels of Bb in early pregnancy were almost four times more likely to develop preeclampsia later in pregnancy compared with women with levels less than the top decile in early pregnancy [33]. Products of complement pathway have been found in deciduas, chorionic villi, and as subendothelial deposits in vessel walls in normal and preeclampsia [34, 35]. A recent study reported that the presence in C5b-9 MAC on trophoblasts was associated with fibrin deposits at sites of villous injury in vivo in normal placentas, but especially in placentas from pregnancies complicated by IUGR or preeclampsia [36]. It has been demonstrated that in normal pregnancies, complement regulatory proteins that are highly expressed on trophoblast membranes prevent excessive complement activation (membrane cofactor protein [MCP (CD46)], decay accelerating factor [DAF (CD55)], and CD59)) as well as circulating complement regulatory proteins (complement factor H [CFH], C4b binding protein, and complement factor I [CFI]) [37, 38]. Defective regulation of the complement system allows for the excessive complement activation that leads to placental damage, abnormal placental development, generalized endothelial activation, and the release of antiangiogenic factors toxic to the fenestrated endothelium of glomeruli, the choroid plexus, and liver sinusoids—a sequence of events that culminates in clinical preeclampsia [39]. The link between complement activation and pathogenic events in preeclampsia identifies potential biomarkers to predict patients at risk for preeclampsia and new targets to prevent its complications.

5. PE and Coagulation Factors

As implied in the preceding section, insufficient and/or inadequate trophoblastic invasion of the maternal spiral arteries leads to reduced uteroplacental blood flow causing focal decidual hypoxia, and thus VEGF [4042]. This in turn results in activation of the decidual endothelial cells and the aberrant expression of tissue factor (TF) [40, 43]. In addition, under pathological conditions, other cells, such as macrophages present in the maternal fetal interface, can also generate TF. TF generates thrombin that further induces endothelial cell TF expression and inflammatory cytokines [40]. Both VEGF and TF induce aberrant angiogenesis and poor vessel maintenance reflected by endothelial cell fenestrations and induction of a prothrombotic surface and uteroplacental vascular insufficiency [44].

Under physiological conditions, TF is not expressed by endothelial cells. By contrast, endothelial TF expression is observed in pathologic conditions such as sepsis, atherosclerosis, and rapid but malformed vessel growth associated with malignancies and allograft rejection [4547]. Indeed, expression of TF by the endothelium is a pathological consequence of cross-talk between coagulation and inflammatory cytokines [45]. Expression of TF transforms endothelial cell membrane from an anticoagulant to a procoagulant surface and promotes intravascular thrombosis [48, 49]. Interestingly, the uteroplacental vasculature of pregnancies complicated by PE and IUGR display vascular features similar to those seen in allograft rejection [50]. A recent study by Di Paolo et al. demonstrated high expression of TF mRNA in the vascular endothelium of vessels in the decidua basalis of pregnancies complicated by PE and IUGR but not in normal pregnancies [51].

Tissue factor, the critical initiator of the coagulation cascade, is induced during pregnancy in the maternal decidua [52, 53] and is plentiful in the placenta and amniotic fluid [5457]. It has been well documented that patients with diseases leading to aberrantly increased circulating TF expression have a much higher rate of vascular thromboembolism (VTE) [5861]. Specifically, patients are at risk for cardiovascular diseases, sepsis, hematologic, and coagulation disorders such as disseminated intravascular coagulation [6267]. In these diseases, as well as in cancer and diabetes, plasma TF is related to increased blood thrombogenicity [67]. Interestingly, plasma levels of thrombomodulin activity, tissue factor activity, and procoagulant phospholipids were significantly elevated in women with PE versus normal pregnant and nonpregnant women [68]. Moreover, the circulating TF has been identified on circulating microparticles (MPs). These MPs are small vesicles released from injured or activated cells, primarily leukocytes and endothelial cells [58, 69]. TF-bearing MPs in pregnancy also arise from syncytiotrophoblasts [70] and excess syncytiotrophoblast microparticles have been found in the circulation of women with PE [71]. Unfortunately, VTE is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality during pregnancy [72]. A higher prevalence of risk factors for VTE has been found in women with PE and fetal loss [73].The principal factors that result in venous thrombosis consist of the classic triad of Virchow: venous stasis, vascular damage, and hypercoagulability, all of which occur during normal pregnancies [74]. A shift of the hemostatic balance in the direction of hypercoagulability during pregnancy is believed to be evolutionarily advantageous in reducing hemorrhage, however, this could also contribute to the increased risk of venous thromboembolic processes [75]. Studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that TF is normally expressed by decidual cells [76]. Indeed, immunohistochemical staining for TF has been observed in the decidualized endometrial stromal cells, but not in endothelial cells [7779]. In contrast, we noted that basal plate uteroplacental vessel segments from cases of low birth weight with villous evidence of maternal uteroplacental malperfusion had increased percent of strong positive endothelial immunostaining for TF [40].

6. Thrombin Activation of Endometrial Endothelial Cells

Vascular injury initiates clotting when plasma-derived factor VII binds to the extracellular domain of perivascular cell membrane-bound TF. The resulting TF/VIIa complex promotes hemostasis via a series of changes initiated by the extracellular cleavage of prothrombin to thrombin [76]. The aberrant expression of TF in vessels from deciduas with activated endothelium led us to study this phenomenon in further detail. We proposed that aberrantly expressed TF in decidual vessels would in turn result in thrombin production and further endothelial activation. In vitro experiments were carried out with cultured human endometrial endothelial cells (HEECs) [40]. Treatment with 2.5 U of thrombin demonstrated the induction of TF protein and mRNA expression [40]. Moreover, thrombin-induced inflammatory cytokine expression in HEECs. Specifically thrombin significantly upregulated mRNA expression for regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed, and secreted (RANTES) chemokine, growth-related oncogene (Gro)-β, Gro-γ, granulocyte chemotactic protein (GCP)-2, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and macrophage inflammatory protein 3α (MIP3α) [40]. This increase in proinflammatory chemokines are expected to result in endothelial dysfunction or inappropriate endothelial cell activation which are the most common clinical manifestations in PE, including enhanced endothelial-cell permeability and platelet aggregation [80]. Moreover, the overexpression of these chemokines is consistent with observations made in our laboratory [81, 82] as well as others [83, 84] indicating that the preeclamptic decidua contains an excess of macrophages [82].

7. Summary

To date, no accurate test exists for predicting PE. In recent years, it has become accepted that early-onset and late-onset PEs are associated with different biochemical, histological, and clinical features [85]. Moreover, markers such as sFLT, sEng, products of fetal and placental origin, markers of renal or endothelial damage, or markers of oxidative stress are secondary to the pathophysiological changes that precede the clinical onset of PE [85]. Nonetheless, a combination of markers may increase the detection accuracy earlier in the pregnancy and hopefully allow for more effective prophylactic strategies.

References

  1. E. J. Roccella, “Report of the national high blood pressure education program working group on high blood pressure in pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. S1–S22, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics, “ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 99, pp. 159–167, 2002.
  3. F. Milne, C. Redman, J. Walker et al., “The pre-eclampsia community guideline (PRECOG): how to screen for and detect onset of pre-eclampsia in the community,” British Medical Journal, vol. 330, no. 7491, pp. 576–580, 2005. View at Scopus
  4. B. M. Sibai, “Magnesium sulfate prophylaxis in preeclampsia: lessons learned from recent trials,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 190, no. 6, pp. 1520–1526, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. C. J. Berg, A. P. MacKay, C. Qin, and W. M. Callaghan, “Overview of maternal morbidity during hospitalization for labor and delivery in the united states: 1993–1997 and 2001–2005,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 1075–1081, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. C. L. Ogden, M. D. Carroll, L. R. Curtin, M. A. McDowell, C. J. Tabak, and K. M. Flegal, “Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 295, no. 13, pp. 1549–1555, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. J. M. Catov, R. B. Ness, K. E. Kip, and J. Olsen, “Risk of early or severe preeclampsia related to pre-existing conditions,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 412–419, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. L. Duley, “Pre-eclampsia and the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy,” British Medical Bulletin, vol. 67, pp. 161–176, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. K. S. Khan, D. Wojdyla, L. Say, A. M. Gülmezoglu, and P. F. Van Look, “WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review,” Lancet, vol. 367, no. 9516, pp. 1066–1074, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. J. A. Lykke, J. Langhoff-Roos, B. M. Sibai, E. F. Funai, E. W. Triche, and M. J. Paidas, “Hypertensive pregnancy disorders and subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the mother,” Hypertension, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 944–951, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Roberts and C. A. Hubel, “The two stage model of preeclampsia: variations on the theme,” Placenta, vol. 30, pp. S32–S37, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  12. E. A. P. Steegers, P. von Dadelszen, J. J. Duvekot, and R. Pijnenborg, “Pre-eclampsia,” The Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9741, pp. 631–644, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. J. Levine, C. Lam, C. Qian et al., “Soluble endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in preeclampsia,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 10, pp. 992–1005, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. P. Vuorela, S. Helske, C. Hornig, K. Alitalo, H. Weich, and E. Halmesmaki, “Amniotic fluid—soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 in preeclampsia,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 95, pp. 353–357, 2000.
  15. A. Rajakumar, H. M. Michael, P. A. Rajakumar et al., “Extra-placental expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, (Flt-1) and soluble Flt-1 (sFlt-1), by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in normotensive and preeclamptic pregnant women,” Placenta, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 563–573, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. S. E. Maynard, J. Y. Min, J. Merchan et al., “Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 649–658, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. P. Mutter and S. A. Karumanchi, “Molecular mechanisms of preeclampsia,” Microvascular Research, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  18. S. Baumwell and S. A. Karumanchi, “Pre-eclampsia: clinical manifestations and molecular mechanisms,” Nephron—Clinical Practice, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. c72–c81, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. S. Venkatesha, M. Toporsian, C. Lam et al., “Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 642–649, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  20. J. S. Gilbert, M. J. Ryan, B. B. Lamarca, M. Sedeek, S. R. Murphy, and J. P. Granger, “Pathophysiology of hypertension during preeclampsia: linking placental ischemia with endothelial dysfunction,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 294, no. 2, pp. H541–H550, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  21. S. A. Karumanchi and M. D. Lindheimer, “Preeclampsia pathogenesis: “Triple a rating”—-autoantibodies and antiAngiogenic factors,” Hypertension, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 991–992, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  22. A. Wang, S. Rana, and S. A. Karumanchi, “Preeclampsia: the role of angiogenic factors in its pathogenesis,” Physiology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 147–158, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. B. T. Zhu, “Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT)-mediated methylation metabolism of endogenous bioactive catechols and modulation by endobiotics and kenobiotics: importance in pathophysiology and pathogenesis,” Current Drug Metabolism, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 321–349, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. L. Mooberry, “Mechanism of action of 2-methoxyestradiol: new developments,” Drug Resistance Updates, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 355–361, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. J. Mabjeesh, D. Escuin, T. M. LaVallee et al., “2ME2 inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis by disrupting microtubules and dysregulating HIF,” Cancer Cell, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 363–375, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Kanasaki, K. Palmsten, H. Sugimoto et al., “Deficiency in catechol-O-methyltransferase and 2-methoxyoestradiol is associated with pre-eclampsia,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7198, pp. 1117–1121, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  27. F. Barchiesi, E. K. Jackson, D. G. Gillespie, L. C. Zacharia, J. Fingerle, and R. K. Dubey, “Methoxyestradiols mediate estradiol-induced antimitogenesis in human aortic SMCS,” Hypertension, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 874–879, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. B. Lee, A. P. Wong, K. Kanasaki et al., “Preeclampsia: 2-methoxyestradiol induces cytotrophoblast invasion and vascular development specifically under hypoxic conditions,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 710–720, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. V. M. Holers, “The spectrum of complement alternative pathway-mediated diseases,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 300–316, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  30. H. J. Imrie, T. P. McGonigle, D. T. Y. Liu, and D. R. E. Jones, “Reduction in erythrocyte complement receptor 1 (CR1, CD35) and decay accelerating factor (DAF, CD55) during normal pregnancy,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 221–227, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. B. Abramson and J. P. Buyon, “Activation of the complement pathway: comparison of normal pregnancy, preeclampsia, and systemic lupus erythematosus during pregnancy,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 28, no. 3-4, pp. 183–187, 1992. View at Scopus
  32. D. Sinha, M. Wells, and W. Page Faulk, “Immunological studies of human placentae: complement components in pre-eclamptic chorionic villi,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 175–184, 1984. View at Scopus
  33. A. M. Lynch, J. R. Murphy, T. Byers et al., “Alternative complement pathway activation fragment Bb in early pregnancy as a predictor of preeclampsia,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 198, no. 4, pp. 385.e1–385.e9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  34. F. Tedesco, O. Radillo, G. Candussi, A. Nazzaro, T. E. Mollnes, and D. Pecorari, “Immunohistochemical detection of terminal complement complex and S protein in normal and pre-eclamptic placentae,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 236–240, 1990. View at Scopus
  35. C. Labarrere and E. Mullen, “Fibrinoid and trophoblastic necrosis with massive chronic intervillositis: an extreme variant of villitis of unknown etiology,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology and Microbiology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 85–91, 1987.
  36. R. Rampersad, A. Barton, Y. Sadovsky, and D. M. Nelson, “The C5b-9 membrane attack complex of complement activation localizes to villous trophoblast injury in vivo and modulates human trophoblast function in vitro,” Placenta, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 855–861, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. G. Girardi, R. Bulla, J. E. Salmon, and F. Tedesco, “The complement system in the pathophysiology of pregnancy,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 43, no. 1-2, pp. 68–77, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. F. Tedesco, G. Narchi, O. Radillo, S. Meri, S. Ferrone, and C. Betterle, “Susceptibility of human trophoblast to killing by human complement and the role of the complement regulatory proteins,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 1562–1570, 1993. View at Scopus
  39. J. E. Salmon, C. Heuser, M. Triebwasser et al., “Mutations in complement regulatory proteins predispose to preeclampsia: a genetic analysis of the PROMISSE cohort,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e1001013, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  40. G. Krikun, S. T. J. Huang, F. Schatz, C. Salafia, C. Stocco, and C. J. Lockwood, “Thrombin activation of endometrial endothelial cells: a possible role in intrauterine growth restriction,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 245–253, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Hustin, J. M. Foidart, and R. Lambotte, “Maternal vascular lesions in pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation: light microscopy and immunofluorescence,” Placenta, vol. 4, pp. 489–498, 1983. View at Scopus
  42. A. T. Papageorghiou and N. Roberts, “Uterine artery Doppler screening for adverse pregnancy outcome,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 584–590, 2005. View at Scopus
  43. J. Procházková, R. Pilka, A. Měchurová, O. Šimetka, P. Brychtová, and M. Procházka, “Endotelial activation markers—possibilities of their detection and clinical signification in gynaecology and obstetric,” Ceska Gynekologie, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 279–281, 2009.
  44. B. L. Sheppard and J. Bonnar, “An ultrastructural study of utero-placental spiral arteries in hypertensive and normotensive pregnancy and fetal growth retardation,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 695–705, 1981. View at Scopus
  45. M. Levi, T. van der Poll, and H. ten Cate, “Tissue factor in infection and severe inflammation,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 32, pp. 33–39, 2006.
  46. V. Grau, O. Stehling, H. Garn, and B. Steiniger, “Accumulating monocytes in the vasculature of rat renal allografts: phenotype, cytokine, inducible no synthase, and tissue factor mRNA expression,” Transplantation, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2001. View at Scopus
  47. R. Tilley and N. Mackman, “Tissue factor in hemostasis and thrombosis,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 35, pp. 5–10, 2006.
  48. H. Fei, J. A. Berliner, F. Parhami, and T. A. Drake, “Regulation of endothelial cell tissue factor expression by minimally oxidized LDL and lipopolysaccharide,” Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1711–1717, 1993. View at Scopus
  49. H. Hölschermann, R. M. Bohle, H. Zeller et al., “In situ detection of tissue factor within the coronary intima in rat cardiac allograft vasculopathy,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 211–220, 1999. View at Scopus
  50. T. Stallmach, G. Hebisch, P. Orban, and X. Lü, “Aberrant positioning of trophoblast and lymphocytes in the feto-maternal interface with pre-eclampsia,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 434, no. 3, pp. 207–211, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. Di Paolo, P. Volpe, G. Grandaliano et al., “Increased placental expression of tissue factor is associated with abnormal uterine and umbilical Doppler waveforms in severe preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction,” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 650–657, 2003. View at Scopus
  52. C. J. Lockwood, G. Krikun, and F. Schatz, “The decidua regulates hemostasis in human endometrium,” Seminars in Reproductive Endocrinology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 1999.
  53. C. J. Lockwood, G. Krikun, C. Papp et al., “The role of progestationally regulated stromal cell tissue factor and type-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) in endometrial hemostasis and menstruation,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 734, pp. 57–79, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. Erlich, G. C. N. Parry, C. Fearns et al., “Tissue factor is required for uterine hemostasis and maintenance of the placental labyrinth during gestation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 14, pp. 8138–8143, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. C. A. Labarrere and W. P. Faulk, “Anchoring villi in human placental basal plate: lymphocytes, macrophages and coagulation,” Placenta, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 173–182, 1991. View at Scopus
  56. M. Uszynski, E. Ekanowska, W. Uszynski, and J. Kuczynski, “Tissue factor (TF) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) in amniotic fluid and blood plasma: implications for the mechanism of amniotic fluid embolism,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 163–166, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. C. J. Lockwood, R. Bach, A. Guha, X. Zhou, W. A. Miller, and Y. Nemerson, “Amniotic fluid contains tissue factor, a potent initiator of coagulation,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 165, no. 5 I, pp. 1335–1341, 1991. View at Scopus
  58. P. Poredos and M. K. Jezovnik, “The role of inflammation in venous thromboembolism and the link between arterial and venous thrombosis,” International Angiology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 306–311, 2007. View at Scopus
  59. M. E. Tesselaar and S. Osanto, “Risk of venous thromboembolism in lung cancer,” Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 362–367, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  60. C. R. Keenan, S. Murin, and R. H. White, “High risk for venous thromboembolism in diabetics with hyperosmolar state: comparison with other acute medical illnesses,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1185–1190, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  61. K. Uno, S. Homma, T. Satoh et al., “Tissue factor expression as a possible determinant of thromboembolism in ovarian cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 290–295, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  62. K. P. L. Yap and D. R. McCready, “Deep vein thrombosis and malignancy: a surgical oncologist's perspective,” Asian Journal of Surgery, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 249–254, 2004. View at Scopus
  63. A. Sambola, J. Osende, J. Hathcock et al., “Role of risk factors in the modulation of tissue factor activity and blood thrombogenicity,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 973–977, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. G. Hron, M. Kollars, H. Weber et al., “Tissue factor-positive microparticles: cellular origin and association with coagulation activation in patients with colorectal cancer,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 119–123, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. B. Osterud and E. Bjorklid, “The tissue factor pathway in disseminated intravascular coagulation,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 605–617, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  66. B. osterud and E. Bjorklid, “Sources of tissue factor,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 11–23, 2006.
  67. U. Rauch and Y. Nemerson, “Circulating tissue factor and thrombosis,” Current Opinion in Hematology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 273–277, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Rousseau, R. Favier, and P. Van Dreden, “Elevated circulating soluble thrombomodulin activity, tissue factor activity and circulating procoagulant phospholipids: new and useful markers for pre-eclampsia?” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 46–49, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  69. E. Biró, K. N. Sturk-Maquelin, G. M. Vogel et al., “Human cell-derived microparticles promote thrombus formation in vivo in a tissue factor-dependent manner,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 2561–2568, 2003. View at Scopus
  70. B. Brenner, “Haemostatic changes in pregnancy,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 114, no. 5-6, pp. 409–414, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  71. D. Goswamia, D. S. Tannetta, L. A. Magee et al., “Excess syncytiotrophoblast microparticle shedding is a feature of early-onset pre-eclampsia, but not normotensive intrauterine growth restriction,” Placenta, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 56–61, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  72. I. A. Greer, “Thrombosis in pregnancy: maternal and fetal issues,” Lancet, vol. 353, no. 9160, pp. 1258–1265, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. I. Pabinger, H. Grafenhofer, A. Kaider et al., “Preeclampsia and fetal loss in women with a history of venous thromboembolism,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 874–879, 2001. View at Scopus
  74. V. A. Holmes and J. M. Wallace, “Haemostasis in normal pregnancy: a balancing act?” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 428–432, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  75. M. Hellgren, “Hemostasis during normal pregnancy and puerperlum,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 125–130, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  76. C. J. Lockwood, W. Murk, U. A. Kayisli et al., “Progestin and thrombin regulate tissue factor expression in human term decidual cells,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 2164–2170, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  77. C. J. Lockwood, Y. Nemerson, G. Krikun et al., “Steroid-modulated stromal cell tissue factor expression: a model for the regulation of endometrial hemostasis and menstruation,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 1014–1019, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. C. J. Lockwood, Y. Nemerson, S. Guller et al., “Progestational regulation of human endometrial stromal cell tissue factor expression during decidualization,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 231–236, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. G. Krikun, C. J. Lockwood, and M. J. Paidas, “Tissue factor and the endometrium: from physiology to pathology,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 393–396, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  80. Y. Wang, Y. Gu, Y. Zhang, and D. F. Lewis, “Evidence of endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia: decreased endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression is associated with increased cell permeability in endothelial cells from preeclampsia,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 817–824, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  81. P. Matta, C. J. Lockwood, F. Schatz et al., “Thrombin regulates monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression in human first trimester and term decidual cells,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 268.e1–268.e8, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  82. C. J. Lockwood, S. J. Huang, G. Krikun et al., “Decidual hemostasis, inflammation, and angiogenesis in pre-eclampsia,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 158–164, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  83. V. M. Abrahams, Y. M. Kim, S. L. Straszewski, R. Romero, and G. Mor, “Macrophages and apoptotic cell clearance during pregnancy,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 275–282, 2004. View at Scopus
  84. F. Reister, H. G. Frank, J. C. P. Kingdom et al., “Macrophage-induced apoptosis limits endovascular trophoblast invasion in the uterine wall of preeclamptic women,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 1143–1152, 2001. View at Scopus
  85. E. Scazzocchio and F. Figueras, “Contemporary prediction of preeclampsia,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 65–71, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed