Seasonal Prevalence and Status of Anthelmintic Resistance of Goats’ Gastrointestinal Nematodes, Mirab Abaya, Southern Ethiopia

Negash, Behailu; Seyoum, Wasihun; Sheferaw, Desie

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9945998

Journal of Parasitology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 9945998 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9945998

Seasonal Prevalence and Status of Anthelmintic Resistance of Goats’ Gastrointestinal Nematodes, Mirab Abaya, Southern Ethiopia

Behailu Negash,¹Wasihun Seyoum,²and Desie Sheferaw³

Academic Editor: Lizandra Guidi Magalhães

Received13 Feb 2023

Revised14 Aug 2023

Accepted30 Aug 2023

Published25 Sept 2023

Abstract

Goats are an important source of livelihood especially for smallholder communities. But gastrointestinal nematodosis is the greatest threats of goat production. A repeated cross-sectional and field experimental study design was conducted from December 2020 to August 2021 in Mirab Abaya district, with the aim of seasonal prevalence gastrointestinal nematode infection and assessment of anthelmintic resistance. A systematic random sampling strategy was used to select the study goats. The overall prevalence of gastrointestinal nematode infections of goats in the study area was 57.9% (95% CI: 54.4-61.4), of which 48.7% (95% CI: 43.7-53.7) and 67.2% (95% CI: 62.3-71.7) accounted to dry and wet seasons, respectively. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that season, age, sex, and flock size were significantly () influenced the prevalence of gastrointestinal nematode infection of goats. The number of eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) was ranged from 100 to 2500. The overall mean egg per gram of faeces (EPG) was . The mean EPG of wet season () was higher than the dry season (). From faecal culture, 552 nematode larvae were recovered, and the most commonly identified nematode genera were Haemonchus (36.4%) that followed by Trichostrongylus (28.1%), Oesophagostomum (15.4%), Bunostomum (11.4), Teladorsagia (5.4%), and Strongyloides (3.0%) species. From the anthelmintic resistance test in the field, the percentage reduction and 95% confidence limit of albendazole were 96% (84.2-99.0) and 97.0% (84.6-99.4) in dry and wet seasons, respectively. Here, the lower limit of 95% CI was less than 90% both in dry and wet seasons; and hence, albendazole was suspected for resistance development by gastrointestinal nematode. From a pooled faecal culture that collected from albendazole-treated goats, Haemonchus species was recovered. Therefore, due attention shall be by animal health professionals in the area in the use of albendazole. Animal health extension work to create awareness of how anthelmintic is used is helpful in reducing the risk. Changing the type of anthelmintic drug after using for some period will minimize the risk of anthelmintic resistance development.

1. Introduction

Ethiopia is naturally endowed with diverse topography, wide range of climatic features, multitude agroecological zones, and environmental conditions, which makes the country suitable for different livestock production systems. Ethiopia has the largest livestock population in Africa and a home for huge number of small ruminants, which are estimated to be 42.90 million sheep and 52.50 million goats [1, 2]. Small ruminants, particularly goats, play a significant role in rural economies by providing meat, milk, skin, and wool and generate income. They also play traditional, social, and religious roles and become major sources of livelihood for resource poor smallholder farmers [1, 3].

In spite of huge population and importance of small ruminants, particularly goats, Ethiopia has benefited little from this enormous resource due to a combination of factors such as poor genetic potential, inadequate feed and nutrition, lack of effective veterinary services, traditional system of husbandry, lack of veterinary care, management constraints, and the presence of numerous animal diseases [1, 3, 4]. Among the diseases, gastrointestinal nematodes are the most important and widely spread in the tropical region [5].

Gastrointestinal nematode infections are one of the most important constraints to small ruminant production in sub-Saharan African countries in general and Ethiopia in particular due to the availability of a wide range of agroecological factors suitable for diversified host ranges and parasite species [3, 5, 6]. They are responsible to cause direct and indirect economic losses in small ruminant’s production system particularly in goats [7], through lowered fertility, susceptibility to other infections, involuntary culling, reduction in food intake and lower weight gains, decreased work capacity, lower milk production, carcass and organ condemnations, treatment costs, morbidities, and mortalities in heavily parasitized animals [7–9]. The death of the affected goat is mainly due to parasitic gastroenteritis [10].

Effective control and management of gastrointestinal nematode parasites in grazing livestock relies heavily on the strategic use of efficacious chemotherapy [8, 11, 12]. However, improper anthelmintic use such as underdosing and frequent (or continuous) use of a single anthelmintic causes widespread development of anthelmintic resistance by various gastrointestinal nematode population [12, 13]. Anthelmintic resistance (AR) is a condition in which a correct dosage of anthelmintic is not able to produce a consistent reduction of the number of eggs or worms excreted by the animal [11]. Several in vitro and in vivo tests have been developed to detect AR. The faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and controlled efficacy test (CET) are the most widely used in vivo methods commonly for detection of AR [11, 14]. In Ethiopia, anthelmintic drugs commonly used for management of small ruminant GI nematodes fall under three families, including macrocyclic lactones (ivermectin), imidazothiazole (tetramisole and levamisole), and benzimidazole (for example, albendazole) [5, 15].

Designing effective and sustainable gastrointestinal nematode parasite control strategies will require understanding of the prevalence, risk factors, and seasonal distribution of the disease [3]. Several previous epidemiological studies were done to estimate the prevalence and risk factors of gastrointestinal parasites in all small ruminant rearing regions in Ethiopia [3–5, 16]. In our study areas, where communal grazing system constitutes the main management system of small ruminants, gastrointestinal parasites are considered a major cause of economic losses [16]. Although such general perception exists, epidemiological studies of goats have not been carried out to demonstrate the prevalence of gastrointestinal nematode parasites and its associated risk factors. Additionally, information on seasonal patterns of worm population dynamics within the host animal and in relation to climate does not exist. Furthermore, parasite resistance of anthelmintic drug becomes a serious problem in different parts of Ethiopia [5, 15]. However, there is no any kind of information about anthelmintic resistance of gastrointestinal parasites of goat population in the study area. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the seasonal prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes in goats and to identify associated risk factors that influence the occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites and development of anthelmintic resistance in Mirab Abaya district, Southern Ethiopia. Furthermore, this study could complement the paucity of information and is also useful in devising control strategies for gastrointestinal parasite infection of goats in the study area.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was carried out from December 2020 to August 2021 in Mirab Abaya district of Gamo zone, Southern Ethiopia (Figure 1). The total land area of the district is 118,273 hectares, and its agroecology is classified as lowland (“Kolla”), midland (“Woyna-Dega”), and highland (“Dega”) with 37%, 22%, and 41%, respectively. The altitude of the area ranges from 1,100 to 3,000 m.a.s.l. The mean annual rainfall of the area was 673-934 mm, and temperature was 15-31°C. People in the area were engaged in mixed crop livestock farming. The total goats’ population of the district is estimated as 33,398 goats [17].

2.2. Study Population and Design

The study population was local breeds of goats that were kept under extensive management system. The study goats include all age groups that allowed for grazing, both sex groups and nondewormed in the past six months.

Repeated cross-sectional study design was employed to estimate the dry (December to mid-March) and wet (June to August) seasons’ gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) prevalence of goats. During the same seasons, field experimental study was conducted to investigate anthelmintic resistance development by mixed GIN of goats.

2.3. Sampling and Sample Size

The study district, Mirab Abaya, was purposively selected due to larger number of goats in the area. The district has twenty-four rural Kebeles; and from these Kebeles, four of them (i.e., Layotirga, Morede, Fura, and Fetele) were selected by simple random sampling technique (i.e., using lottery method) for the study.

Goat sample size for GIN prevalence estimation and assessment of the degree infection was determined by taking into account 50% expected prevalence in order to have a maximum sample size. The study considered 95% confidence level and 5% desired absolute precision for sample size computation. For sample size computation, the formula described by Thrusfield [18] was used. Accordingly, a total sample of 384 goats per season were required for the study. The total goat population in the four selected Kebeles was 4234 of which 15.6%, 15.7%, 21.8%, and 46.9% accounted to Layotirga, Morede, Fura, and Fetele, respectively. The study goats were allocated proportionally to these four Kebeles, and hence, from Layotirga, Morede, Fura, and Fetele, 120, 120, 168, and 360 goats were selected, respectively. Systematic random sampling method was used to select the study goats. The total number of goats in the selected Kebeles was divided to the computed sample size, and then, every 11^th goat was selected for the study.

Anthelmintics commonly used in Mirab Abaya area were albendazole, tetramisole, and ivermectin (Table 1).

2.4. Study Design and Methodology

2.4.1. Coproscopic Examination

A repeated cross study design, dry and wet seasons, was employed to estimate the prevalence of GIN and to assess the associated risk factors with occurrence of gastrointestinal nematodes in goats managed under extensive management system. Faecal samples were collected directly from the rectum of selected animals and placed in a screw capped universal bottle and then transported to Sodo Regional Veterinary Laboratory. The faecal samples were subjected to both qualitative and quantitative examinations. The McMaster egg counting technique was used to quantify the number of eggs per gram of faeces [14, 19] and then to determine the level of infections as described by Hansen and Perry [19].

2.4.2. Coproculture and Nematode Larva Identification

Pooled faecal samples from those goats positive for gastrointestinal nematode were cultured at room temperature to identify the nematode genera. Collected faeces were cultured in the Petri dish for 14 days, and the larvae recovered from faeces by using the modified Baermann technique [20, 21]. On day fourteen, the infective stage larvae () were recovered and examined under 10x and 40x microscopic magnifications, and the nematode genera were identified based on their morphological features [22].

2.4.3. Faecal Quantitative Examination and Assessment of Degree of Infection

Three grams of faecal samples was collected from those goats positive for gastrointestinal nematode infection and mixed very well with 42 ml flotation fluid (saturated salt solution, 1.28 specific gravity) by using pestle and mortar. The mixture was filtered by using tea strainer, and then, the test tubes were filled by the filtrate and, then after, allowed to stand for 20 minutes, and both chambers of McMaster slide were filled with the supernatant. All strongly type eggs observed in between the grid were counted, and the number of eggs per gram of faeces was determined (EPG) [19, 21–23]. Based on the count, the degree of infection was classified in to light (up to 800 EPG), moderate (800 to 1200 EPG), and heavy (>1200 EPG) as described by Hansen and Perry [19].

2.4.4. Field Experimental Study of Anthelmintic Resistance

Goats positive for gastrointestinal nematodes (during both dry and wet seasons) and with EPG greater than 150 were considered for the field experimental test of anthelmintic resistance. A total of 60 goats aged 6 to 18 months [24] per season were selected for the experiment. The selected goats were randomly allocated in to four treatment groups each containing 15 goats. The three commonly used anthelmintic in the study area were randomly assigned to the three groups, and one group used for control. So the first group was treated by albendazole bolus 300 gm (dose 7.5 mg/kg, administered per OS and trade name: ALBEN-LH 300), the second group by ivermectin injection 1% (dose 0.02 ml/kg, administered SC and trade name: H-IVER 1%), and the third group by tetramisole HCL 600 mg bolus (dose 15 mg/kg, administered per OS and trade name: DUXAM=QK 600MG).

At the beginning of the experiment, EPG of selected goats were determined and the goats were treated in the same day. On day 14 again, faecal samples were collected from these goats and examined for strongly type eggs. Finally, the development of resistance against each anthelmintic was determined as described by Coles et al. [24].

2.4.5. Faecal Sample Collection and Qualitative Examination

About 10 grams (could be used for both egg count and culture) of faecal sample was collected directly from the rectum by using arm length glove. Then, the samples were kept in universal sample bottle and labeled with all required information. The collected samples were transported to Sodo Regional Veterinary Laboratory with icebox. In the laboratory, the samples were kept at 4°C and processed within twenty-four hours of collection. The samples were examined by using flotation technique as described by Hansen and Perry [19], and the strongly type eggs were identified.

2.4.6. Faecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT)

On day zero and day 14 of the experimental goats, about three grams of faecal samples was collected from each treatment group of goats separately. The collected samples were labeled with all required information and transported to Sodo Regional Veterinary Laboratory. Then, the samples were examined for any nematode eggs, and the number of eggs per gram of faeces was determined by using McMaster egg counting technique. Finally, the cut point for existence of anthelmintic resistance was computed as described by Coles et al. [24].

2.5. Data Management and Analysis

Collected data were entered into Microsoft Excel spread sheet, edited, coded, and summarized by descriptive statistics. The prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes was computed by dividing the total number of goats positive for strongly type eggs by the total number of goats examined. EPG was log transformed to normalize the distribution, and for ease of egg count analysis. The association between the risk factors considered for this study and the infection of goats was analyzed by logistic regression analysis in two steps. First, univariable logistic regression was employed, and then, those independent variables with were subjected to multivariable logistic regression analysis. But before the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the collinearity of independent variables was checked by using the Kruskal gamma statistics, and those variables with gamma value ranged between -0.6 and +0.6 were considered for the multivariable logistic regression analysis. For all data analysis, Stata version 14.2 was employed. The cut point for existence of anthelmintic resistance was determined based on the pretreatment and posttreatment eggs per gram of faeces by using the formula described by Coles et al. [24].

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors

The overall prevalence of goats’ gastrointestinal nematodes, in dry and wet seasons, was 57.9% (95% CI: 54.4-61.4). And the seasonal prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes was 48.7% and 67.2%, in dry and wet seasons, respectively.

The univariable logistic and multivariable logistic regression analyses for gastrointestinal nematode infection of goats and the risk factors considered during this study are presented in Table 2. After checking for collinearity, all risk factors were found noncollinear, and hence, all risk factors with value < 0.25 (i.e., flock size, age, sex, agroecology, body condition score, faecal consistency, and season) were subjected to multivariable logistic regression analysis. The predictive ability of the model for gastrointestinal nematode infection of goats is 54.81%. Among the risk factors considered in the study, the multivariable logistic regression output revealed that flock size, age, sex, and season were significantly associated with gastrointestinal nematode infection of goats and left in final model.

In the final logistic model, the goodness-of-fit test for the prevalence of gastrointestinal nematode and risk factors was built by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test ( and ). Therefore, this inferred that the model fits the data was appropriate, and there was no difference between the empirical data and the model. Besides, the test had a capacity of classifying the diseased and nondiseased goats (i.e., sensitivity (85.8%) and specificity (70.9%)). Moreover, for predictive capacity of the model receiver operating curve (ROC) test (86.7%) was used and showed that the model had better predictive capacity.

3.2. Faecal Culture

From a pooled faecal culture, 552 infective larvae were recovered; and Haemonchus spp. (36.4%) were the most commonly identified nematode. Nematode genera circulating in Mirab Abaya are shown in Table 3.

3.3. Level of Infections

The range of faecal egg counts of infected goats was from 100 to 2500 EPG. The overall mean of faecal egg counts of infected goats was (95% CI: 420.0-502.3). Summarized mean EPG for each of the risk factors considered in the study are shown in Table 4.

The proportion of the level or intensity of gastrointestinal nematode infection of goats revealed that light infection (58.7%) was predominating in the study area (Table 5).

3.4. Field Anthelmintic Resistance Test Result

The mean pre- and posttreatment faecal egg counts and the percentage of faecal egg count reduction for each anthelmintic drugs tested are displayed in Table 6. The lower confidence limit for albendazole was less than 90%, both in dry and wet seasons, and hence, it was suspected for the development of resistance by the nematodes circulating in the study area. Posttreatment pooled faecal culture only Haemonchus spp. was identified from albendazole-treated goats. So, this can suggest suspicion of albendazole resistance development by Haemonchus species.

4. Discussion

From the total 768 goats studied for gastrointestinal nematode infection, about 445 goats (57.9%; 95% CI: 54.4-61.4) were found positive for strongly type eggs. Of this, 48.7% and 67.2% accounted to dry and wet seasons, respectively. This finding was very closer to the reports from various parts of Ethiopia [25]. A higher prevalence than the current study was reported from various parts of the country [16, 26–29] that could be due to differences in climatic and environmental factors and management factors [30]. The univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that flock size, age and sex of goats, and season were significantly () influencing the infection of goats by gastrointestinal nematodes. Significantly () higher prevalence was recorded in larger goat flock than the medium and small flock. What we observed during the study was agreed with reports of Zvinorova et al. [31] and Tariq et al. [32]. In general, increasing of goat flock increases grazing area contaminations that in turn influence the rate of small ruminants’ infection [33–35]. The prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes was significantly () higher in younger goats than the adult. This might be due to poor development of immunity against nematode infection and low resistance (or greater susceptibility) of the younger [33, 36, 37]. Wet season, June to August, is suitable period for egg production by the nematodes and contaminating the pasture. Due to suitable environmental condition, the eggs hatch and then develop to infective larval stage [32, 38, 39]. The prevalence of gastrointestinal nematode infection was significantly higher in female than male goats (). Similar finding is reported from various parts of the country and elsewhere [4, 36, 40–43]. This might be due to lose of immunity around parturition and during lactation time in female goats [23, 33, 38, 39]. So, it is good to note the stage of production, which might cause the difference in the susceptibility between male and female goats.

The result of coproculture revealed that Haemonchus spp., Trichostrongylus spp., Oesophagostomum spp., Bunostomum spp., Teladorsagia spp., and Strongyloides spp. were the gastrointestinal tract infecting nematode genera of goats. These nematode genera are commonly circulating in Gamo and Gofa zones and the surrounding areas [16, 28, 44, 45] and other parts of the country [4, 28, 46–51]. According to Bishop and Morris [52], these parasites, mainly Haemonchus spp., Trichostrongylus spp., and Teladorsagia spp., are the most common nematodes known to affect sheep and goats in sub-Saharan Africa.

From the 445 goats positive for gastrointestinal nematodes, mild, moderate, and severe infection recorded in 58.7%, 23.6%, and 17.7%, respectively. Under tropical condition, such degree of infection and in similar orders of proportions are commonly reported [4, 40, 41, 53, 54]. The management practice by the owners, especially, frequency of deworming, and level of grazing area contamination influence the intensity of infection [40]. Moreover, the higher proportion of light infection might be due to frequent goat infection and development of some immunity.

The dry period faecal egg count reduction for albendazole, tetramisole, and ivermectin was 96%, 97%, and 98%, respectively, whereas during wet season, it was 97%, 97.6%, and 99.6%, for albendazole, tetramisole, and ivermectin, respectively. The lower limit of the 95% confidence level for albendazole was less than 90% both in dry and wet seasons. So, according to Coles et al. [24], albendazole was suspected for resistance development; and from albendazole treated goats, the posttreatment pooled faecal culture Haemonchus spp. was recovered. This finding is consistent with the various reports from different areas of the country [50, 55–60]. Albendazole is the most commonly available, in the market as well as government veterinary clinics, and used drug in Ethiopia. Their irrational use of drug like albendazole might be contributing to the suspected resistance development. Long-term use of the same anthelmintic [61], underdosing [62, 63], and frequent treatment [64–66] are factors promoting anthelmintic resistance.

5. Conclusion and Recommendation

In the study area, the observed prevalence of goats’ gastrointestinal nematode infection was higher. Flock size, age, sex, and season influence the prevalence of gastrointestinal nematode infection. The overall mean EPG of infected goats was . It is higher in wet season () than the dry season (). This study revealed that light infection was the most commonly encountered type of infection in the area. The major nematode genera circulating in the study area were Haemonchus spp., Trichostrongylus spp., Teladorsagia spp., and Bunostomum spp. Albendazole was suspected for development of resistance by the gastrointestinal nematodes. Therefore, animal health extension work is highly important to aware the animal owners on how to use anthelmintic drugs. Strategic deworming is useful to prevent the parasite buildup on the grazing field. Treatment of all animals at the start of rainy season (i.e. treatment should be repeated on the third week) and around the end of rainy season is repeated on the third week. Moreover, treating female animals around parturition will reduce the grazing field contamination. Wider areas covering anthelmintic resistance surveys should be done, and then based on the result, it is better to use different types of anthelmintic by alternating. The final goal of all of the above will be to reduce risk of anthelmintic resistance development. Now, due attention shall be given by animal health professionals in the area in use of albendazole.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Disclosure

The work was done for MSc research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

S. Leta and F. Mesele, “Spatial analysis of cattle and shoat population in Ethiopia: growth trend, distribution and market access,” Springer Plus, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 310, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
CSA, Agricultural Sample Survey, Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, 2021.
A. Haile, H. Hassen, H. Gatew, T. Getachew, R. N. B. Lobo, and B. Rischkowsky, “Investigations into nematode parasites of goats in pastoral and crop livestock systems of Ethiopia,” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 643–650, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Sheferaw, A. Mohammed, and A. Degefu, “Distribution and prevalence of gastrointestinal tract nematodes of sheep at highland and midland areas, Ethiopia,” Journal of Parasitic Diseases, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 995–1001, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Asmare, D. Sheferaw, K. Aragaw et al., “Gastrointestinal nematode infection in small ruminants in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Acta Tropica, vol. 160, pp. 68–77, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Singh, M. S. Bal, L. D. Singla, and P. Kaur, “Detection of anthelmintic resistance in sheep and goat against fenbendazole by faecal egg count reduction test,” Journal of Parasitic Diseases, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 463–466, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Hoste, J. F. J. Torres-Acosta, and A. J. Aguilar-Caballero, “Nutrition–parasite interactions in goats: is immunoregulation involved in the control of gastrointestinal nematodes?” Parasite Immunology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 79–88, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Good, J. P. Hanrahan, D. T. Waa, T. Patten, A. Kinsella, and C. O. Lynch, “Anthelmintic-resistant nematodes in Irish commercial sheep flocks- the state of play,” Irish Veterinary Journal, vol. 65, no. 1, p. 21, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Constable, K. W. Hinchcliff, S. H. Done, and W. Grünberg, Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Pigs, and Goats, 11th Edition, Elsevier Ltd., 3251 Riverport Lane St. Louis, Missouri 63043, USA, 2017.
S. A. Zanzani, A. L. Gazzonis, A. Di Cerbo, M. Varady, and M. T. Manfredi, “Gastrointestinal nematodes of dairy goats, anthelmintic resistance and practices of parasite control in Northern Italy,” BMC Veterinary Research, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 114, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Taylor, R. K. Hunt, and L. K. Goodyear, “Anthelmintic resistance detection methods,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 183–194, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. A. Almeida, K. C. D. O. Garcia, P. R. Torgerson, and A. F. T. Amarante, “Multiple resistance to anthelmintics by Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep in Brazil,” Parasitology International, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 622–625, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Ratanapob, N. Thuamsuwan, and S. Thongyuan, “Anthelmintic resistance status of goat gastrointestinal nematodes in Sing Buri Province, Thailand,” Veterinary World, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Coles, F. Jackson, W. E. Pomroy et al., “The detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 136, no. 3-4, pp. 167–185, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Menkir, A. Assefa, A. Uggla, and J. Wallar, “Assessment of anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of sheep and goats owned by smallholder farmers in eastern Ethiopia,” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 38, pp. 215–222, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Mohammed, M. Taye, A. Asha, and D. Sheferaw, “Epizootological study of small ruminant gastrointestinal strongyles in Gamo-Gofa zone, Southern Ethiopia,” Journal of Parasitic Diseases, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 469–474, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
MAWLFDO, Report from Mirab Abaya District Livestock and Fishery Development Office, Gamo Zone, Suthern Ethiopia, Annual report, Unpublished, 2020.
M. Thrusfield, Veterinary Epidemiology, 4th Edition, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA, 2018.
J. Hansen and B. Perry, The Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Control of Helminth Parasites of Ruminants, ILRAD, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya, 1994.
M. A. Taylor, R. L. Coop, and R. R. Wall, Veterinary Parasitology, 3rdedn, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2007.
A. M. Zajak and G. A. Conboy, Veterinary Clinical Parasitology, 8th edition, Willey-Blackwell, A John Wiley and Sons Inc., Publication, 2121 State Avenue, Ames Iowa, 50014-8300, USA, 2012.
J. A. van Wyk, J. Cabaret, and L. M. Michael, “Morphological identification of nematode larvae of small ruminants and cattle simplified,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 277–306, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. L. Soulsby, Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals, 7th Edition, Baillere Tindall, London, 1982.
G. Coles, C. Bauer, F. Borgsteede et al., “World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 44, pp. 35–44, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Sheferaw, M. Guteta, K. Abduro, L. Chaka, E. Debela, and M. Abera, “Survey of gastrointestinal menatodes and anthelmintic resistance in sheep and goats in communal grazing pastoral area, Yabello District, Southern Ethiopia,” Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 35–47, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Wondimu, “Prevalence and seasonal dynamics of gastrointestinal nematode of goats in Haramaya, Ethiopia,” Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology, vol. 13, p. 8, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kabada, D. Tolera, and A. Abera, “Prevalence and the associated risk factors of gastrointestinal parasites of shoats in Tiyo District, Arsi zone, Oromia, South West Ethiopia,” International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–78, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tesfaye, “Prevalence, species composition, and associated risk factors of small ruminant gastrointestinal nematodes in south Omo zone, South-Western Ethiopia,” Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 597–605, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Aragaw and G. Gebreegziabher, “Small intestinal helminth parasites in slaughtered sheep and goats in Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia,” African Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 25–29, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. V. Arsenopoulos, G. C. Fthenakis, E. I. Katsarou, and E. Papadopoulos, “Haemonchosis: a challenging parasitic infection of sheep and goats,” Animals, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 363, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. I. Zvinorova, T. E. Halimani, F. C. Muchadeyi, O. Matika, V. Riggioe, and K. Dzama, “Prevalence and risk factors of gastrointestinal parasitic infections in goats in low-input low-output farming systems in Zimbabwe,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 143, pp. 75–83, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Tariq, M. Z. Chishti, and F. Ahmad, “Gastro-intestinal nematode infections in goats relative to season, host sex and age from the Kashmir valley, India,” Indian Journal of Helminthology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 93–97, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Sharma and A. Mandal, “Factors affecting gastrointestinal parasite infections in goats in semi-arid rural ecosystems in India,” Veterinary Science Development, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5–27, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Smith and D. M. Sherman, Goat Medicine, Second edition, Wiley-Blackwell, 2121 State Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50014-8300, USA, 2009.
L. F. Le Jambre, “Stocking rate effects on the worm burdens of angora goats and merino sheep,” Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 280–282, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ousman and A. Meribo, “Study on prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminant in Adami Tulu Jiddo Kombolcha District, east ShoaZone of Oromia, Ethiopia,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 72–81, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Ayaz, M. A. Raza, S. Murtaza, and S. Akhtar, “Epidemiological survey of helminths of goats in Southern Punjab, Pakistan,” Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 62–71, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
T. M. Craig, “Gastrointestinal nematodes, diagnosis and control,” Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 185–199, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Urquhart, J. Armour, J. L. Duncan, A. M. Dunn, and F. W. Jennings, Veterinary Parasitology, 2nd edition, Blackwell science, UK, 1996.
B. T. Paul, F. F. A. Jesse, E. L. T. Chung, A. Che’Amat, and M. A. M. Lila, “Risk factors and severity of gastrointestinal parasites in selected small ruminants from Malaysia,” Veterinary sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 208, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Emiru, Y. Amede, W. Tigre, T. Feyera, and B. Deressa, “Epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites of small ruminants in Gechi District, Southwest Ethiopia,” Advances in Biological Research, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 169–174, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dagnachew, A. Amamute, and W. Temesgen, “Epidemiology of gastrointestinal helminthiasis of small ruminants in selected sites of North Gondar zone, Northwest Ethiopia,” Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 57–68, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Amran, S. K. Yadav, F. Akter et al., “Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasitic infections in different existing goat breeds in different districts of Bangladesh,” The Journal of Advances in Parasitology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Asha and B. Chebo, “Epidemiological study on gastrointestinal tract helminthosis of small ruminants in Dawuro zone,” Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 63–82, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Asha and A. Wossene, “Gastrointestinal nematodosis of small ruminants in different agro-ecological zones in Southern Ethiopia,” Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 89–91, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Moje, A. Gurmesa, and G. Regassa, “Gastro-intestinal tract nematodes of small ruminants: prevalence and their identification in and around Alage, Southern Ethiopia,” Animal and Veterinary Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 65–72, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kumsa, E. Debela, and B. Megersa, “Comparative efficacy of albendazole, tetramisole and ivermectin against gastrointestinal nematodes in naturally infected goats in Ziway, Oromia Regional State (Southern Ethiopia),” Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 2905–2911, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kuma, R. Abebe, B. Mekbib, D. Sheferaw, and M. Abera, “Prevalence and intensity of gastrointestinal nematodes infection in sheep and goats in semi-intensively managed farm, South Ethiopia,” Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kumsa, T. Tadesse, S. Teshale, and B. Hussen, “Helminths of sheep and goats in Central Oromia (Ethiopia) during the dry season,” Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 1845–1849, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Terefe, U. Faji, and Y. H. Tolossa, “Field investigation of anthelmintic efficacy and risk factors for anthelmintic drug resistance in sheep at Bedelle District of Oromia region, Ethiopia,” Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 37–49, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Abebe, M. Gebreyohannes, S. Mekuria, F. Abunna, and A. Regassa, “Gastrointestinal nematode infections in small ruminants under the traditional husbandry system during the dry season in Southern Ethiopia,” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1111–1117, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Bishop and C. A. Morris, “Genetics of disease resistance in sheep and goats,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 48–59, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Wuthijaree, P. Tatsapong, and C. Lambertz, “The prevalence of intestinal parasite infections in goats from smallholder farms in Northern Thailand,” Helminthologia, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 64–73, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Tibebu, Y. Tamiru, and D. Abdeta, “Prevalence of major gastrointestinal nematode and degree of parasite infestation in sheep of Bako Agricultural Research Center community based breeding program project small holder farms at Horro District,” Dairy and Veterinary Science, vol. 8, no. 3, article 555740, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Tadesse, K. Asmare, J. Bekele, and G. Abebe, “Study on anthelmintic resistance nematodes at goat farm of Hawassa college agriculture Southern Ethiopia,” Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 49–57, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Sheferaw, D. Getachew, J. Bekele, and Y. Denbarga, “Assessment of anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants, Dale District, Sidama zone,” Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 257–261, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Sheferaw and A. Asha, “Efficacy of selected anthelmintic against gastrointestinal nematodes infections of sheep owned by smallholder farmers in Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia,” Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 31–38, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kumsa and G. Abebe, “Multiple anthelmintic resistance on a goat farm in Hawassa (Southern Ethiopia),” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 655–662, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kumsa and A. Nurfeta, “Comparative efficacy of albendazole, tertramisole and ivermectin against gastrointestinal nematodes in naturally infected sheep in Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia,” Revue de Méd Vét, vol. 159, no. 12, pp. 593–598, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Asmare, E. Gelaye, and G. Ayelet, “Anthelmintic resistance test in gastrointestinal of small ruminants in Southern Ethiopia,” Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa, vol. 53, pp. 89–95, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Leignel, A. Silvestre, J. F. Humbert, and J. Cabaret, “Alternation of anthelmintic treatments: a molecular evaluation for benzimidazole resistance in nematodes,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 172, no. 1-2, pp. 80–88, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. L. Hughes, A. F. Dowling, and A. P. L. Callinan, “Resistance to macrocyclic lactone anthelmintics and associated risk factors on sheep farms in the lower North Island of New Zealand,” New Zealand Veterinary Journal, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 177–183, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Rendell, T. E. Rentsch, J. M. Smith, D. S. Chandler, and A. P. L. Callinan, “Evidence that moxidectin is a greater risk factor than ivermectin in the development of resistance to macrocyclic lactones by Ostertagia spp in sheep in south eastern Australia,” New Zealand Veterinary Journal, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 313–317, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. F. V. Furtadol, A. C. P. de Paiva Bello, and E. M. L. Rabelo, “Benzimidazole resistance in helminths: from problem to diagnosis,” Acta Tropica, vol. 162, pp. 95–102, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Eddi, J. Caracostantogolo, M. Peña et al., “The prevalence of anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of sheep in Southern Latin America: Argentina,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 62, no. 3-4, pp. 189–197, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Kettle, A. Vlassoff, L. M. Judith, J. M. Ayling, and L. W. McMurtry, “A survey of nematode control measures used by sheep farmers and of anthelmintic resistance on their farms part 1. North Island and the Nelson region of South Island,” New Zealand Veterinary Journal, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 81–83, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Behailu Negash et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

382

Downloads

280

Citations