Research Article

Evaluation of a Reduced Cost Active NDVI Sensor for Crop Nutrient Management

Table 3

Analysis of variance evaluating sensors and person operating sensors, Ciudad Obregon, Mexico, 2011.

PlotRow 1Row 2Row 3Row 4
NDVINDVINDVINDVI

Source of VariationdfMean square error

Operator10.000650.0001540.0175790.00001
Sensor40.00771**0.0175720.0126870.00261**
Person*Sensor40.000310.00113*0.00153**0.00051
Residual Error500.000410.0004340.0002550.00069

SED 0.0120.0120.0090.015
C.V.3.54.42.95.5
0.6170.7760.8540.267

TreatmentTreatment means

PS#20 Person 10.5960.5220.6010.503
PS#20 Person 20.6040.5180.5580.483
PS#32 Person 10.6170.4970.5970.486
PS#32 Person 20.6160.4950.5750.500
PS#37 Person 10.5530.4250.5670.454
PS#37 Person 20.5760.4610.4980.464
GS#96 Person 10.5570.4340.5250.471
GS#96 Person 20.5560.4180.4980.471
GS#97 Person 10.5680.4710.5390.480
GS#97 Person 20.5720.4730.5290.482
Contrast GS#96 = GS#97ns ** ** ns

*Is significant at the alpha = 0.05 level.
**Is significant at the alpha = 0.01 level.
PS: pocket sensor.
GS: GreenSeeker sensor.
ns: not significant.
SED: standard error of the difference between two equally replicated means.
C.V.: coefficient of variation.