Deformation Monitoring of Geomechanical  Model Test and Its Application in Overall Stability Analysis of a High Arch Dam

<div><svg height="14.8173pt" id="M105" style="vertical-align:-5.52897pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 33.3846 14.8173" width="33.3846pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M494 514C482 587 419 712 303 712C238 712 174 667 174 603C174 561 205 514 249 449C219 438 187 422 162 407C93 366 23 283 23 177C23 69 87 -12 190 -12C244 -12 288 5 328 33C406 87 444 170 444 249C444 329 404 391 331 475C265 550 222 605 222 627C222 647 238 657 267 657C355 657 421 585 484 499L494 514ZM359 234C359 143 319 30 219 30C172 30 114 75 114 178C114 275 163 343 195 378C212 397 241 415 269 425C305 382 359 313 359 234Z" id="g113-226"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="517" vert-adv-y="517"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.396,3.132)"><path d="M563 395C563 428 543 451 519 451C500 451 480 438 472 423C468 415 465 403 470 394C477 381 482 368 482 347C482 272 386 136 342 74H340C334 163 323 257 312 337C302 410 290 451 257 451C214 451 160 385 127 338L145 310C169 341 203 373 209 373C219 373 225 369 232 325C249 215 269 62 271 -15C220 -80 135 -165 18 -231L26 -257L142 -230C254 -105 279 -74 342 13C394 85 484 211 526 286C553 334 563 365 563 395Z" id="g50-122"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="587" vert-adv-y="587"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,11.53,0)"><path d="M548 311L516 323C497 274 452 240 400 240C372 240 342 260 316 278C277 305 235 330 188 330C116 330 66 268 40 199L72 187C91 236 136 270 188 270C216 270 246 250 272 232C311 205 353 180 400 180C472 180 522 242 548 311Z" id="g117-131"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="587" vert-adv-y="587"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,18.434,0)"><path d="M743 650H503L496 622L527 618C563 613 564 603 532 573C449 495 371 431 323 392C301 374 272 355 246 346L280 522C297 609 300 614 379 622L385 650H135L129 622C209 614 215 609 198 522L124 133C106 39 99 35 23 28L17 0H271L277 28C193 35 192 39 208 133L239 316C264 328 280 325 303 288C368 183 435 90 502 0H652L659 28C602 34 584 43 543 94C495 154 403 283 347 369L574 554C634 603 659 612 735 624L743 650Z" id="g113-76"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="755" vert-adv-y="755"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,28.286,3.132)"><path d="M414 144C384 79 371 75 317 75H135L276 221C367 316 408 376 408 465C408 570 327 635 237 635C179 635 131 609 100 575L42 494L67 471C94 510 138 565 205 565C277 565 321 517 321 435C321 348 258 270 195 195C146 137 88 81 33 26V0H411C423 44 433 88 446 135L414 144Z" id="g50-51"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="487" vert-adv-y="487"></glyph.data></g></svg> relation curves regarding the deformation down the river at an elevation of 1885 m in the left bank and the overloading coefficient. Note: 34#, 96#, 99#, 116#, and 118# denote the serial numbers of the measuring points, as shown in Figure <a href="../fig8/">8</a>.</div>

Journal of Sensors

fig10

Figure 10

Figure 10: Deformation Monitoring of Geomechanical  Model Test and Its Application in Overall Stability Analysis of a High Arch Dam 