About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Skin Cancer
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 180980, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/180980
Research Article

Grey-Blue Regression in Melanoma In Situ—Evaluation on 111 Cases

Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Received 15 November 2010; Accepted 26 January 2011

Academic Editor: Daniela Massi

Copyright © 2011 S. Bassoli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

As fibrosis and melanosis are often seen in malignant melanoma, the presence of dermoscopic signs of regression may represent a clue for the diagnosis of malignancy. Our aim was to assess the frequency and extent of 11 dermoscopic features of regression evaluating dermoscopic images of 111 melanomas in situ (MIS). Regression structures (grey-blue areas, white areas, peppering, and/or blue-whitish veil) were present in 80.1% of the lesions. Approximately 80% of the lesions showed regression of dermoscopic structures and light brown areas. Most lesions showed the presence of grey-blue areas (74.7%), whereas peppering was observable in 30.6% of MIS. Areas of fibrosis were mainly observable as structureless areas with a pinkish hue (50.4%). Based on our data, the reticular pattern of blue regression and light brown areas can be considered a significant discriminator and a reliable predictor of MIS.

1. Introduction

Regression structures are employed for detection of malignant melanoma (MM) by dermoscopy and are defined by the presence of white and grey-blue areas in the dermoscopic lesion image [13]. White areas have been described as areas whiter than the surrounding skin (white scar-like areas), whereas grey-blue areas appear as homogeneous or nonhomogeneous areas (blue pepper-like granules or globules) with a bluish color [35]. White and blue colours in a melanocytic lesion may be simultaneously or separately present, suggesting a different therapeutic approach; moreover, their distribution and their location in the centre or at the periphery of the lesion may represent an aid to distinguish between different subtypes of melanocytic lesions [3]. Histopathologically, blue regression may correspond to an abundance of melanin pigment, within either melanophages or pigmented melanocytes in the dermis [6], whereas in the presence of the classic blue-whitish veil, histopathology shows an acanthotic epidermis with compact orthokeratosis and focal hypergranulosis above sheets of heavily pigmented melanocytes or melanophages in the dermis [68]. Lesions with regression often carry great histopathological controversy. However, the presence of dermoscopic signs of regression may represent a clue for the diagnosis of malignant lesions. In our previous paper, comparing the regression features observed in 85 MIS, 85 invasive MMs, and 85 nevi with equivocal dermoscopic aspects, the presence of a blue-whitish veil was more frequently seen in invasive MMs, while grey-blue areas with a reticular pattern represented a significant descriptor for MIS [9]. The aim of the present study is to expand the study population with respect to our previous publication, evaluating the dermoscopic features of 111 lesions for the presence of 11 parameters of regression.

2. Material and Methods

The study population included 111 consecutive lesions, excised at the Department of Dermatology of the University of Modena in the years 2003–2009, where we assessed the presence or absence of 11 parameters of regression (Table 1). The dermoscopic images were evaluated by 3 experienced dermatologists. Final judgment on each descriptor derived from a consensus of at least 2 of 3 observers.

tab1
Table 1: Eleven variables of regression and their definitions.

Dermoscopic descriptors. Regression was considered present when grey-blue areas, peppering, blue-whitish veil, and/or white areas were present. Grey-blue areas were further described as being globular, reticular, or structureless (Figure 1). “Globular grey-grey-blue areas” were represented by aggregated grey-blue globules, whereas the term “reticular grey-grey-blue areas” defined a coarse blue-grey net, with thick grey-blue lines and large holes, corresponding to white or pink regression areas (Figure 2). Although often present in lesions with a network, reticular grey-blue pigmentation does not correspond to the pigment network, which has smaller meshes and thinner lines. Pink lesion areas, as areas of the lesion lighter than the surrounding skin with a pinkish shade, were also observed. For blue and white areas, both their presence and their extent were assessed. Unlike in our previous paper, the presence of the blue-whitish veil was only considered when the lesion was clinically palpable. Moreover, we also considered the presence of regression of dermoscopic structures and light brown areas defined as light brown structureless irregular areas especially located at the periphery of the lesions [10] “Regression of dermoscopic structures” was visible when, within a structured area, there was a fading of net, globules, or pigmentation giving rise to light brown structureless areas.

fig1
Figure 1: Reticular grey-grey-blue areas. (a) In situ melanoma with reticular grey-blue pigmentation in the centre of the lesion (30-fold magnification). (b) Detail of a 50-fold magnified in situ melanoma, where reticular grey-grey-blue areas are well detectable.
fig2
Figure 2: Association of different dermoscopic aspects of regression. (a) In situ melanoma showing white and pink areas as well as blue structureless areas (original magnification ×20). (b) Dermoscopic image of an in situ melanoma showing blue structureless and globular areas associated with peppering (original magnification ×20).

3. Statistics

Absolute and relative frequencies of the observations were obtained for each regression parameter. Absolute and relative frequencies of lesions showing only one or a combination of the evaluated dermoscopic features were calculated on the number of lesions presenting regression.

4. Results

The study included a total of 111 melanocytic lesions diagnosed as MIS according to conventional histopathological criteria. These were located on the trunk and limbs of 110 patients (50 female and 60 male, mean ± SD age 56.4 ± 15.7 years).

Table 2 shows the results of the assessment of regression parameters in 111 MIS. Regression structures (i.e., grey-blue areas, white areas, peppering, and/or blue-whitish veil) were present in 80.1% of the lesions. Approximately 80% of the lesions showed regression of dermoscopic structures and light brown areas. Most MIS showed the presence of grey-blue areas (74.7%), whereas peppering was observable in 30.6% of MIS. Areas of fibrosis seldom appeared as white areas (10.8%) but were rather observable as structureless areas with a pinkish hue (50.4%). In our series of MIS, the blue-whitish veil was noticed in only 1.8% of the cases (Figures 1 and 2).

tab2
Table 2: Frequency (%) of regression descriptors in melanoma in situ (MIS).

Table 3 shows data regarding pattern and extent of grey-grey-blue areas. The reticular pattern was the most frequently observed along with the structureless pattern. Grey-grey-blue areas involved 10–50% of the lesion area in more than half of the cases.

tab3
Table 3: Frequency (%) of pattern and extent of grey-blue areas in MIS.

Table 4 shows the number of regression parameters in the study population. One regression parameter was present in 64% of MIS. The presence of two regression descriptors was found in 25.8% of MIS, whereas 3 regression parameters or more were observed in 10.1% of cases in our population.

tab4
Table 4: Number of regression parameters in lesions with regression (%).

When subdividing our cases according to the diameter of the lesion, we observed a higher percentage of lesions showing regression, in particular grey-grey-blue areas and white/pink structures, in MIS with a diameter >1 cm (Table 5).

tab5
Table 5: Frequency (%) of patterns of regression features according to lesion diameter.

5. Discussion

Blue-white structures, corresponding to histological regression phenomena, are one of the most interesting dermoscopic features commonly seen in melanomas and represent a clue for the diagnosis [3, 1116]. Blue-white structures in dermoscopy include white areas, scar-like or associated with a reddish shade, grey-grey-blue areas, or a combination of both. Histologically, white areas correspond to fibrosis, whereas grey-grey-blue areas correspond to melanophages in the dermis [17, 18]. Dermoscopically, grey-blue areas and the blue-whitish veil are difficult to distinguish, and this causes a low reproducibility in the identification of these features [1216, 1923]. Therefore, they are generally considered together and described by the unifying definition of blue structures [24].

In our previously published paper, comparing the dermoscopic features of regression in equivocal lesions, MIS, and invasive MMs, we found that regression is not only more frequent and extensive in invasive MMs with respect to in situ lesions, but it also has a different morphological expression [9].

In the present study, features of regression were re-evaluated on 111 lesions histologically diagnosed as MIS, assessing the extent, the morphology, and the correlation of regression features, also according to the diameter of the lesion. The results substantially confirm the data we obtained in the previous study: regression structures were present in 80% of cases and were mainly represented by grey-blue areas with a reticular pattern and structureless light brown pigmentation. Grey-blue areas can represent the only expression of regression features, or, less frequently, they can be associated to peppering. Unlike in our previous study, the presence of the blue-whitish veil was only considered when the lesion was clinically palpable; therefore, only few lesions with this feature were identified by our evaluation.

We also observed that regression features, as expressed by the presence of grey-blue areas and white/pink structures are more frequently observable in large lesions indicating that the regression process evolves with the radial growth of the MM.

In MIS, grey-grey-blue areas are presumably due to a deep melanophagic infiltration. Light brown areas may represent the start of the regression phenomenon, followed by a disarrangement later expressed by reticular blue structures. In lesion zones of MIS corresponding to light brown areas, the disappearance of the rete ridges and the scarcity of intraepidermal melanin may explain the lack of an evident pigment network and the light brown diffuse pigmentation [10].

In conclusion, our study provides data about frequency, morphology, extent, and distribution of regression in a large population of MIS of different size. Confirming the findings of our previous paper, we can state that the identification of the reticular pattern of blue regression is a significant discriminator and a reliable predictor of MIS, extremely useful for the diagnosis of early melanoma.

References

  1. M. A. Pizzichetta, R. Talamini, I. Stanganelli et al., “Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: clinical and dermoscopic features,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 1117–1124, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. G. Argenziano, G. Fabbrocini, P. Carli, V. De Giorgi, E. Sammarco, and M. Delfino, “Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions: comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 134, no. 12, pp. 1563–1570, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. Zalaudek, G. Argenziano, G. Ferrara et al., “Clinically equivocal melanocytic skin lesions with features of regression: a dermoscopic-pathological study,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 64–71, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Argenziano, H. P. Soyer, S. Chimenti et al., “Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the internet,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 679–693, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. G. Argenziano, H. P. Soyer, V. De Giorgi, et al., Interactive Atlas of Dermoscopy, Edra Medical Publishing and New Media, Milan, Italy, 2000.
  6. D. Massi, V. De Giorgi, P. Carli, and M. Santucci, “Diagnostic significance of the blue hue in dermoscopy of melanocytic lesions: a dermoscopic-pathologic study,” American Journal of Dermatopathology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 463–469, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Yadav, K. A. Vossaert, A. W. Kopf, M. Silverman, and C. Grin-Jorgensen, “Histopathologic correlates of structures seen on dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy),” American Journal of Dermatopathology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 297–305, 1993. View at Scopus
  8. H. P. Soyer, R. O. Kenet, I. H. Wolf, B. J. Kenet, and L. Cerroni, “Clinicopathological correlation of pigmented skin lesions using dermoscopy,” European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2000. View at Scopus
  9. S. Seidenari, C. Ferrari, S. Borsari et al., “Reticular grey-blue areas of regression as a dermoscopic marker of melanoma in situ,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 302–309, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. G. Annessi, R. Bono, F. Sampogna, T. Faraggiana, and D. Abeni, “Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of three dermoscopic algorithmic methods in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic lesions. The importance of light brown structureless areas in differentiating atypical melanocytic nevi from thin melanomas,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 759–767, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. V. De Giorgi, D. Massi, C. Salvini, S. Sestini, and P. Carli, “Features of regression in dermoscopic diagnosis: a confounding factor? Two clinical, dermoscopic-pathologic case studies,” Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 282–286, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Pellacani, S. Bassoli, C. Longo, A. M. Cesinaro, and S. Seidenari, “Diving into the blue: in vivo microscopic characterization of the dermoscopic blue hue,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 96–104, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. S. Seidenari, G. Pellacani, and C. Grana, “Colors in atypical nevi: a computer description reproducing clinical assessment,” Skin Research and Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 36–41, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. P. Carli, G. Ghigliotti, M. Gnone et al., “Baseline factors influencing decisions on digital follow-up of melanocytic lesions in daily practice: an Italian multicenter survey,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 256–262, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. G. Argenziano, I. Zalaudek, G. Ferrara et al., “Dermoscopy features of melanoma incognito: indications for biopsy,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 508–513, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. H. P. Soyer, J. Smolle, G. Leitinger, E. Rieger, and H. Keri, “Diagnostic reliability of dermoscopic criteria for detecting malignant melanoma,” Dermatology, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 1995. View at Scopus
  17. D. Massi, V. De Giorgi, and H. P. Soyer, “Histopathologic correlates of dermoscopic criteria,” Dermatologic Clinics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 259–268, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Blessing and K. M. McLaren, “Histologic regression in primary cutaneous melanoma: recognition, prevalence and significance,” Histopathology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 315–322, 1992. View at Scopus
  19. H. P. Soyer, G. Argenziano, S. Chimenti, et al., Dermoscopy of Pigmented Skin Lesions. An Atlas Based on the Consensus Net Meeting on Dermoscopy 2000, Edra Medical Publishing and New Media, Milan, Italy, 2001.
  20. H. Pehamberger, M. Binder, A. Steiner, and K. Wolff, “In vivo epiluminescence microscopy: improvement of early diagnosis of melanoma,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. S356–S362, 1993. View at Scopus
  21. G. Argenziano and H. P. Soyer, “Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions—a valuable tool for early diagnosis of melanoma,” Lancet Oncology, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 443–449, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. P. Soyer, G. Argenziano, S. Chimenti, and V. Ruocco, “Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions,” European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 270–276, 2001. View at Scopus
  23. H. P. Soyer, G. Argenziano, I. Zalaudek et al., “Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: a new screening method for early detection of melanoma,” Dermatology, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. V. De Giorgi, D. Massi, E. Trez, C. Salvini, E. Quercioli, and P. Carli, “Blue hue in the dermoscopy setting: homogeneous blue pigmentation, gray-blue area, and/or whitish blue veil?” Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 965–967, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus