- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Journal of Spectroscopy
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 424185, 5 pages
Structural and Optical Properties of ZnWO4:Er3+ Crystals
1Center for Nano Science and Technology and Department of Physics, Hanoi National University of Education, 136 Xuan Thuy Road, Hanoi, Vietnam
2Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Dong Ngac, Tu Liem, Hanoi, Vietnam
3Centre for Surface Science and Catalysis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 23, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
4Department of Chemistry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
Received 20 May 2013; Accepted 3 July 2013
Academic Editor: Pilar Leret
Copyright © 2013 Nguyen Van Minh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Erbium ion- (Er3+-) doped ZnWO4 crystals were synthesized via a hydrothermal method with different erbium concentrations. The prepared materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Raman, UV-Vis, and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. For ZnWO4:Er3+ crystals, a pure phase of ZnWO4 was obtained without any evidence of impurity present. The SEM images show that the grain size and morphology of ZnWO4:Er3+ material depends on the Er3+-dopant concentration. The UV-Vis spectra of ZnWO4:Er3+ compounds exhibited an absorption band at about 323 nm (3.83 eV) stemming from the [WO4]2−. Other absorption bands centered at 367, 379, 408, 490, and 522 nm are related to Er3+-ion transitions. Room temperature PL spectra of the ZnWO4:Er3+ compounds exhibited visible emission at 515–540 and 545–565 nm corresponding to the 2H11/2−4I15/2 and 4S3/2−4I15/2 transitions of Er3+ ions, respectively.
Rare-earth compounds have been widely used as phosphors in high-performance luminescent devices [1–3]. For such applications, rare-earth compounds have been introduced into a variety of host materials, and a lot of research effort has been focused on the development of novel and more facile synthesis procedures and on the tuning of the photoluminescence properties of rare-earth centers. ZnWO4 is a very promising host material since it is nonhygroscopic and nontoxic, and it exhibits intrinsic photoluminescence properties. In the literature, various studies report on the doping of ZnWO4 with a variety of rare-earth ions such as Eu [4, 5], Y , and Ho . Doping other rare-earth element ions such as the Er3+ ion has barely been investigated from a synthesis and photoluminescence point of view. On the other hand, the spectroscopy of the Er3+ incorporated in a variety of other host materials has received much attention in the recent years, focusing especially on the development of green and infrared eye-safe laser .
Previously, Er3+-doped ZnWO4 has been prepared via the Czochralski method ; however, this method requires high calcination temperatures. Reports on the hydrothermal synthesis of this material were not found. Furthermore, control of crystal morphology and size as well as the effects of surface area, crystallinity, and dispersion on the luminescent properties of Er3+-doped ZnWO4 was not discussed in detail. In this work, we report on a facile hydrothermal synthesis procedure at low temperature (180°C) of Er3+-doped ZnWO4, and we discuss the effect of the composition on the structural and optical properties.
Erbium-doped zinc tungstate (ZnWO4) nanoparticles were prepared by the hydrothermal reaction of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, Na2WO4·2H2O, and Er(NO3)3·5H2O at 180°C for 6 hrs. The typical procedures for the preparation of these samples consist of adding 10 mL of an aqueous solution of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (1 mmol) to 20 mL of an aqueous solution containing Na2WO4·2H2O (1 mmol) and Er (NO3)3·5H2O under vigorous stirring. The volume of this solution was increased to 40 mL by adding distilled water, and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 7 by dropwise addition of a 30% aqueous ammonia solution. After that, the solution was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave of 100 mL capacity. The autoclave was heated to 180°C for 6 hrs without shaking or stirring, and it was then allowed to slowly cool to room temperature. From this autoclave, a white precipitate was collected and washed for four times with distilled water, after which the solid powder was retrieved. The solid powder was heated at 80°C and dried at this temperature under vacuum for 2.5 hrs before calcination at 700°C for 2 hrs.
Structural characterization was performed by means of X-ray diffraction using a D5005 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. The FE-SEM observations were carried out by using a S4800 (Hitachi) microscope. Raman measurements were taken in a backscattered geometry using the Jobin Yvon T 64000 triple spectrometer equipped with a cryogenic charge-coupled device (CCD) array detector, using the 514.5 nm line of an Ar-Ion laser. The absorption spectra were recorded by using the Jasco 670 UV-Vis spectrometer, and the room temperature luminescence spectra were recorded on a spectrofluorometer (PL, Fluorolog-3,) using 325 nm laser excitation.
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows the diffraction patterns of the pure ZnWO4 and ZnWO4:Er3+ with different erbium concentrations after the calcination. The pure zinc tungstate diffractogram is in good accordance with the standard JCPDS card (no. 73 0554; no. 89-0447) [9, 10]. The different Er3+-doped ZnWO4 exhibits almost the same XRD patterns as those of the undoped ZnWO4. An expanded view of the (111) peak of these different materials on the right shows that the diffraction peaks are slightly shifted to lower angles. This observation suggests that Er3+ is successfully substituting Zn2+ in the lattice and that Er3+ is homogeneously incorporated into the lattice. The minor lattice expansion resulting from the Er3+ incorporation is reasonable considering the relative ionic radius of Zn2+ (0.74 Å) and Er3+, (0.89 Å)  as shown in Figure 2. In pure ZnWO4 crystals, zinc ions occupy octahedral position () of the wolframite structure , and, when doped in ZnWO4, Er3+ should replace Zn2+ to be in Oh position .
Figure 3 shows the SEM images of pure ZnWO4 and Er3+-doped ZnWO4 materials prepared by the hydrothermal route at 180°C from the solution of pH 7 with various doping concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 mol%). It is clear that the morphologies and dimensions of the samples strongly depend on the doping concentration. SEM micrographs for the pure ZnWO4 crystals show an average length of about 50 nm (Figure 3(a)). However, when Er3+ ions were doped with concentration of 2 mol%, the resulting powder consists of nanorods with a diameter of about 20 nm and a length ranging from 100 nm to 250 nm (Figure 3(b)). With increasing Er-doping concentration, the size of the rods becomes more inhomogeneous, and the length of crystals decreased (Figures 3(c)–3(e)). When the erbium concentration was raised to 15 mol%, nanoparticles tend to aggregate into large pigment particles (Figure 3(f)).
ZnWO4 materials have a monoclinic wolframite structure with point group symmetry and P2/c space group. It has two formula units per unit cell. The W–O interatomic distance is substantially smaller than that of Zn–O; therefore, to a first-order approximation, the lattices can be separated into internal vibrations of the octahedra and the external vibrations in which an octahedron vibrates as a unit. Group theory analysis for wolframite-type ZnWO4 predicts 36 lattice modes, of which 18 even vibrations () are Raman active . The recorded Raman spectra of ZnWO4:Er3+ crystals with various erbium doping (0–15 mol%) are shown in Figure 4.
In fact, all expected lines of 907, 787, 709, 679, 547, 408, 343, 276, 193, and 162 cm−1 are observed in the Raman spectra shown in Figure 4. In particular, the presence of six internal vibration modes (stretching modes) of and (907, 787, 709, 679, 547, and 408 cm−1) should be noted as an important property of monoclinic wolframite ZnWO4; the vibration modes arise from the six internal stretching modes caused by each of the six W–O bonds in the WO6 octahedrons . Note that the highest-frequency line at 907 cm−1 corresponding to the mode has a linewidth of about 9 cm−1 for all samples.
When the particle size decreases to the nanometer scale, the effect on the vibrational properties of these materials might occur. A volume contraction occurs within the nanoparticles that are due to the size-induced radial pressure, which leads to increases in the force constants as a result of the decreases in the interatomic distances. In vibrational transitions, the wavenumber varies approximately in proportion to , where is the force constant. Consequently, the Raman bands shift towards a higher wavenumber due to the increasing force constants .
Figure 5 shows the diffuse reflectance spectra of the ZnWO4:Er3+ sample with Er concentrations of 4 mol%. Five distinct absorption peaks at wavelength 367, 379, 408, 490, and 522 nm in the absorption spectrum are attributed to transitions from ground state to excited states of Er3+ ions: 4I15/2 → 2 K15/2, 4I15/2 → 4G11/2, 4I15/2 → 2H9/2, 4I15/2 → 4F7/2, and 4I15/2 → 2H11/2, respectively . In addition, the absorption spectrum consists of a broad intense band at around 264 nm which is contributed by the [WO4]2− group.
ZnWO4 material is an indirect-gap semiconductor [17, 18]. For a crystalline semiconductor, the optical absorption near the band edge follows the following equation: , where , , , and are the absorption coefficient, the light frequency, band gap, and constant, respectively . For the ZnWO4, was determined to be 2. Using this equation to calculate, the band gap of the crystal Er3+-doped ZnWO4 (4 mol%) was roughly estimated to be 3.83 eV, while those of other ZnWO4:Er3+ compounds (2%–15%) were determined to be between 3.82 and 3.85 eV.
PL spectra of ZnWO4:Er3+ with Er3+ concentration of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 15 mol% under 325 nm excitation were shown in Figure 6. Three emission lines centered around wavelengths 537, 550, and 562 nm were observed in the PL spectra of the ZnWO4:Er3+ nanoparticles. The emissions at 515–540 and 543–565 nm correspond to the and transitions of Er3+ ions, respectively . The transition 4S3/2 → 4I15/2 at 550 nm is suitable for green laser . The absorption spectra in Figure 4 confirmed that this erbium emission can result only from the energy transfer from the UV-excited tungstate groups to the erbium ions.
A hydrothermal synthesis procedure for the generation of erbium-doped ZnWO4 materials has been developed. For ZnWO4:Er3+ crystals, a pure ZnWO4 phase was obtained without any evidence of impurities present; however, small distortions in the lattice parameters because of the difference in size between erbium and zinc could be observed. The -parameter changes from 0.5734 nm to 0.575 nm, while the - and -parameters do not almost change. The Raman peak of these materials shifts to lower frequency with increasing Er-dopant concentration which again supports the successful substitution of Zn2+ by Er3+ in ZnWO4 lattice. The SEM images clearly show that the grain size and morphology of ZnWO4:Er3+ material depends on concentration of the doped Er3+ ion. The absorption spectra of ZnWO4:Er3+ show a combination of the tungstate absorption in combination with the Er3+-ion transitions at 367, 379, 408, 490, and 522 nm. From these measurements, the band gap of Er3+-doped ZnWO4 was estimated to be about 3.83 eV. Room temperature PL spectra of the ZnWO4:Er3+ compounds exhibited emission in the visible ranges 515–540 and 545–565 nm stemming, respectively, from the and transitions of Er3+ ions.
Our work suggests that the idea of using ZnWO4 doped with Er3+ could be a plausible strategy to develop a green laser.
Conflict of Interests
We declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
This work was supported by the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) of Vietnam and the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) of Belgium (Code no. FWO.2011.23).
- S. Neeraj, N. Kijima, and A. K. Cheetham, “Novel red phosphors for solid-state lighting: the system NaM(WO4)2−x(MoO4)x:Eu3+ (M=Gd, Y, Bi),” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 387, no. 1–3, pp. 2–6, 2004.
- S. Ekambaram, K. C. Patil, and M. Maaza, “Synthesis of lamp phosphors: facile combustion approach,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 393, no. 1-2, pp. 81–92, 2005.
- X.-X. Wang, Y.-L. Xian, J.-X. Shi, Q. Su, and M.-L. Gong, “The potential red emitting Gd2-yEuy (WO4)3−x(MoO4)x phosphors for UV InGaN-based light-emitting diode,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 140, no. 1-2, pp. 69–72, 2007.
- F.-S. Wen, X. Zhao, H. Huo, J.-S. Chen, E. Shu-Lin, and J.-H. Zhang, “Hydrothermal synthesis and photoluminescent properties of ZnWO4 and Eu3+-doped ZnWO4,” Materials Letters, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 152–157, 2002.
- Q. Dai, H. Song, X. Bai et al., “Photoluminescence properties of ZnWO4:Eu3+ nanocrystals prepared by a hydrothermal method,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 21, pp. 7586–7592, 2007.
- H. Y. He, “Luminescence property of Y-doped ZnWO4 powders,” Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials—Rapid Communications, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 405–409, 2008.
- F. Yang, C. Tu, H. Wang et al., “Growth and spectroscopy of ZnWO4:Ho3+ crystal,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 455, no. 1-2, pp. 269–273, 2008.
- F. Yang, C. Tu, J. Li et al., “Growth and optical property of ZnWO4: Er3+ crystal,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 623–628, 2007.
- P. F. Schofield, K. S. Knight, and G. Cressey, “Neutron powder diffraction study of the scintillator material ZnWO4,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2873–2877, 1996.
- O. S. Filipenko, E. A. Pobedimskaya, and N. V. Belov, “Crystal structure of ZnWO4,” Kristallografiya, vol. 13, pp. 163–165, 1968.
- H. Wang, F. D. Medina, Y. D. Zhou, and Q. N. Zhang, “Temperature dependence of the polarized Raman spectra of ZnWO4 single crystals,” Physical Review B, vol. 45, no. 18, pp. 10356–10362, 1992.
- D. Errandonea, F. J. Manjón, N. Garro et al., “Combined Raman scattering and ab initio investigation of pressure-induced structural phase transitions in the scintillator ZnWO4,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 5, Article ID 054116, 12 pages, 2008.
- H.-W. Shim, I.-S. Cho, K. S. Hong, A.-H. Lim, and D.-W. Kim, “Wolframite-type ZnWO4 nanorods as new anodes for Li-ion batteries,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 32, pp. 16228–16233, 2011.
- H. C. Choi, Y. M. Jung, and S. B. Kim, “Size effects in the Raman spectra of TiO2 nanoparticles,” Vibrational Spectroscopy, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 2005.
- J. F. Suyver, A. Aebischer, D. Biner et al., “Novel materials doped with trivalent lanthanides and transition metal ions showing near-infrared to visible photon upconversion,” Optical Materials, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1111–1130, 2005.
- G. Kortum, Reflectance Spectroscopy, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1966.
- J. I. Pankove, Optical Process in Semiconductors, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1971.
- M. A. Butler, “Photoelectrolysis and physical properties of the semiconducting electrode WO2,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1914–1920, 1977.
- V. Buissette, A. Huignard, T. Gacoin, J.-P. Boilot, P. Aschehoug, and B. Viana, “Luminescence properties of YVO4:Ln (Ln = Nd, Yb, and Yb-Er) nanoparticles,” Surface Science, vol. 532–535, pp. 444–449, 2003.