Excitation Induced Tunable Emission in Ce3+/Eu3+ Codoped BiPO4 Nanophosphors

Singh, Sarabjot; Lakshminarayana, G.; Sharma, Manoj; Dao, Thang Duy; Chen, K.; Wada, Yoshiki; Takeda, T.; Nagao, T.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/493607

Journal of Spectroscopy

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results and Discussion Conclusions References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 493607 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/493607

Excitation Induced Tunable Emission in Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ Codoped BiPO₄ Nanophosphors

Sarabjot Singh,^1,2G. Lakshminarayana,^2,3Manoj Sharma,¹Thang Duy Dao,^2,3K. Chen,^2,3Yoshiki Wada,⁴T. Takeda,⁵and T. Nagao^2,3

Academic Editor: Damien Boyer

Received23 Nov 2014

Revised16 Feb 2015

Accepted23 Feb 2015

Published17 Mar 2015

Abstract

Ce³⁺, Eu³⁺ ions singly doped, and Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ codoped bismuth phosphate (BiPO₄) nanophosphors were synthesized by a simple precipitation method and their structural, morphological, and photoluminescence properties were investigated. The structural and morphological analysis confirms the pure hexagonal crystal structure of the synthesized nanophosphors. From the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra various absorption bands respective to functional groups such as PO4 and phonon vibrations including the bending modes of the PO₄ units are identified. The Ce³⁺ doped nanophosphors show spectrally broad luminescence in the blue (centred at 459 nm) wavelength region under the direct optical excitation of Ce³⁺ at 417 nm. For Eu³⁺ doped nanophosphors, five emission bands have been observed with 394 nm excitation wavelength. Among them, 595 nm has shown bright yellowish-orange emission. These results demonstrate that by appropriately tuning the excitation wavelength of these codoped nanophosphors the emission color in the visible region (blue and orange) can be flexibly controlled in a single sample without varying its chemical composition and size. The mechanism for this excitation energy dependent tunable emission is explained on the basis of nonenergy transfer (ET) occurring among Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ dopant ions.

1. Introduction

Recently, bismuth phosphate (BiPO₄) has received a great deal of research interest due to its potential applications in ion sensing [1], separating radioactive elements [2], catalysis [3, 4], and light emitting devices [5]. BiPO₄ is also useful for the improvement of electrical properties of the phosphate glasses, which are of technological interest as ionic, electronic, and fast ionic conductors [5, 6]. Recently for alleviating negative environment impact of toxic dyes and pollutants, BiPO₄ has shown better photocatalytic property in comparison to commercial Degussa P25 TiO₂ creating worldwide interest in the study of this material [6]. Various methods such as chemical vapor deposition [7], sonochemical method [8], and hydrothermal method [9] are reported to synthesize BiPO₄ but these methods show some drawbacks such as requiring relatively high temperatures, sharp thermal gradient, longer reaction times, and difficulty in controlling the final product structure. It is well known that bismuth phosphate (BiPO₄) exhibits three different crystal structures such as hexagonal phase (HP), low temperature monoclinic phase (LTMP), and high-temperature monoclinic phase (HTMP), respectively [10]. The hexagonal phase of hydrated BiPO₄·xH₂O can be synthesized at room temperature through a wet chemical method [11].

Recently, due to comparable ionic radius of Bi³⁺ (1.11 Å) with that of lanthanide ions, BiPO₄ has drawn considerable interest as a host matrix for doping lanthanide ions for their luminescent applications [12–14]. Both cerium and europium can be found in two oxidation states (Ce³⁺ and Ce⁴⁺, and Eu²⁺ and Eu³⁺) depending upon the preparation conditions [15]. Ce³⁺ absorption bands in the UV region originate from the transitions between the ²F_5/2 ground state and 5d energy levels. In 4+ oxidation state, cerium has no electron in the 4f level, so it shows no 4f–5d transition. The Ce⁴⁺ absorption is caused by the electron/charge transfer between the shell of the cerium ions and neighboring ions [16]. As a result, Ce⁴⁺ ions do not show any emission and excitation bands. Electron transitions between the energy levels of the Ce³⁺ ion can be studied by using photoluminescence excitation (PLE) and photoluminescence (PL) measurements. The spectrally broad Ce³⁺: luminescence band produces emission colors ranging from deep blue to red, depending on the type and composition of the host matrix [17–20]. Among the lanthanide ions, trivalent europium (Eu³⁺) is well known to give rise to the intense orange-red luminescence. Generally, the luminescent properties of phosphors are strongly dependent on the crystal structure of the host materials. Europium ions are known to be good spectroscopic probes in different host materials due to its multiplets structure with nondegenerate first excited and ground levels, ⁵D₀ and ⁷F₀, respectively. Also, the number of Stark components and intensity ratio of the transitions are useful in understanding the symmetry at the Eu³⁺ site [21]. The Eu³⁺ ion has the lowest excited level (⁵D₀) of the 4f⁶ configuration which is situated below the 4f⁵5d configuration that shows very sharp lines extending from visible to the near-infrared depending on the host matrix.

Due to the wide range of applications, the development of nanostructured lanthanide ions doped BiPO₄ and the investigation of their functional properties could be an important research topic. Generally in rare earth codoped nanophosphors energy transfer among rare earth ions is studied with the aim to enhance emission of activator ion by efficient energy transfer from other dopant ions acting as sensitizer. Recently different groups have shown excitation wavelength dependent tunable emission in various organic-inorganic hybrid quantum dots [22, 23], mixed lanthanide complexes [24], nanocolloids of ZnO [25], CdSe/ZnS quantum dots [26], graphene oxide [27], and lanthanide doped metal organic frameworks [28]. All these reports have shown that these different systems show tunable emission in visible color just by varying the excitation wavelength without changing its chemical composition or size. They have used these materials for multicolor bioimaging applications, white light emission, and different color display applications. In the present work, the Ce³⁺ and Eu³⁺ singly doped and Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ codoped BiPO₄ nanophosphors were synthesized by a facile precipitation method using oleic acid as a capping agent. Here we highlight the excitation wavelength dependent tunable emission behavior of codoped BiPO₄ nanophosphors. Possible mechanism for this tunable emission in single sample is explained by nonenergy transfer process in Ce³⁺ and Eu³⁺ dopants ions in host BiPO₄.

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of Lanthanide Ions Doped BiPO₄

For the preparation of Ce³⁺, Eu³⁺ singly doped and Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ codoped BiPO₄ nanophosphors, Bi(NO₃)₃·5H₂O (99.9%), Eu(CH₃CO₂)₃·4H₂O (99.9%), and CeN₃O₉·6H₂O (99.9%) were used as starting materials. All chemicals were of reagent grade and used as received without further purification. Firstly, prerequisite amount of Bi(NO₃)₃·5H₂O was dissolved in concentrated HCl in a beaker and excess of acid was evaporated out repeatedly by adding water. To this solution the required amount of lanthanide salts was added along with 20 mL oleic acid and it was transferred into a two-necked round bottom flask. The synthesis of well dispersed BiPO₄ nanocrystals in oleic acid (OA) and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (BEHP) media by a high-temperature hydrolysis reaction has also been reported by other researchers [29]. Here in our synthesis, we used oleic acid as both solvent and surfactant. An aqueous solution (3 mL) of ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (ADP, 0.3 g) was added while stirring as a phosphate source. The solution was maintained for two hours at 100°C while continuously stirring. The solid precipitate and liquid contents were separated by centrifugation. Finally, the precipitate obtained was washed with methanol and acetone repeatedly several times to remove unreacted species and dried under ambient conditions. The synthesized five samples in this work in their nominal compositions are 99.0 mol% BiPO₄ : 1.0 mol% Eu³⁺, 95.0 mol% BiPO₄ : 5.0 mol% Ce³⁺, 97.0 mol% BiPO₄ : 0.5 Eu³⁺/2.5 Ce³⁺ (mol%), 94.0 mol% BiPO₄ : 1.0 Eu³⁺/5.0 Ce³⁺ (mol%), and 94.0 mol% BiPO₄ : 5.0 Eu³⁺/1.0 Ce³⁺ (mol%), respectively.

2.2. Characterization

The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) profiles were obtained on a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer (model Rint 2000) with Cu-K_α (λ = 1.542 Å) radiation using an applied voltage of 40 kV and 40 mA anode current, calibrated with Si at a rate of 2 deg/min. The surface morphology of the prepared bismuth phosphate samples was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S-4800 HITACHI Company) at 1 nm resolution and an acceleration voltage of 5 kV, together with the X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS; equipped on SU8000 HITACHI SEM) for chemical analysis. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM/HRTEM) measurements (bright field low magnification and lattice imaging) were performed using 200 keV (model JEM-2100F JEOL company) TEM microscope. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the phosphors were measured in the transmission mode over the 100–1400 cm⁻¹ range by a Thermo Nicolet NEXUS-670 FTIR machine using solid substrate beam splitter and DTGS polyethylene detector with a spectral resolution of ~4 cm⁻¹. The room temperature photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectra and photoluminescence (PL) spectra were measured by using JASCO Fluorescence Spectrometer FP8500 system, having a 150 W Xe lamp as the excitation source. Around 10 mg sample powder was mixed with two drops of methanol, made into a slurry and spread over a glass plate, and dried under ambient conditions prior to luminescence measurements. The excitation and detection geometry was fixed, and samples were mounted reproducibly to allow for quantitative comparison of the relative fluorescence intensity between different phosphor samples. All emission spectra were corrected for the detector response and all excitation spectra for the lamp profile. All the PLE and PL measurements were carried out with a resolution of 5 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

The phase and purity of the samples were examined by X-ray power diffraction (XRD) measurement and Figure 1(a) presents the XRD profiles 1.0 mol% Eu³⁺, 5.0 mol% Ce³⁺, and 1.0 Eu³⁺/5.0 Ce³⁺ (mol%) doped BiPO₄ nanophosphors. For comparison purpose we have also given the XRD profile of pure hexagonal phase BiPO₄ (JCPDS 45-1370) [4]. From these profiles one can see that all of the samples prepared were in good agreement with the standard data of the pure hexagonal phase BiPO₄ [4]. No impurity peaks were observed in these XRD patterns, indicating high purity of the synthesized samples. The intense and sharp diffraction peaks suggested that the as-synthesized products were well crystallized. It is well known that in hexagonal phase of BiPO₄, Bi³⁺ ions are surrounded by eight nearest neighbor oxygen atoms forming square antiprism geometry around Bi³⁺ [30]. To check whether the lanthanide ions (Eu³⁺ or Ce³⁺) are successfully incorporated into the host lattice by substituting the Bi³⁺ ions or if they occupy the interstitial or surface sites of the BiPO₄ host, we have selected the high intensity peak (2 0 0) of pure BiPO₄ hexagonal phase from Figure 1(a) and compared it with doped nanophosphors. A careful comparison of the (2 0 0) diffraction peaks in the range of 2θ = 29.1°–29.9° (Figure 1(b)) showed that the peak position of Eu³⁺ doped sample is shifted slightly towards a higher 2θ value. This can be attributed to the smaller ionic radius of Eu³⁺ (1.066 Å) as compared to Bi³⁺ (1.11 Å) and therefore associated with lattice contraction. But in the case of Ce³⁺ doped sample, the (2 0 0) peak is slightly shifted to a lower 2θ value and this can be ascribed to the higher ionic radius of Ce³⁺ (1.143 Å) compared to Bi³⁺ (1.11 Å) and thus related to the lattice expansion. For the Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ codoped sample, one can see the effect of Eu³⁺ on the Ce³⁺ ion as the (2 0 0) peak very slightly shifts to higher 2θ with apparent sharpness. This confirms the incorporation of either Ce³⁺ or Eu³⁺ ions into the lattice of BiPO₄. The morphology of the Eu³⁺ doped BiPO₄ nanophosphor was analyzed by scanning electron microscopic technique and Figure 2(a) depicts the typical SEM image of the Eu³⁺ doped BiPO₄ sample which shows that the product is composed of well-dispersed hexagonal structures. The length of these smooth surfaced hexagonal structures ranges from 200 to 400 nm and most of them are above 200 nm with diameter approximately ranging from 50 to 200 nm. The measured EDAX profiles of all the synthesized samples are presented in Figures 2(b) to 2(f). The measurements confirm the presence of the main constituents Bi, P, O, Eu, and Ce in the respective lanthanide doped nanophosphors. No compositional variation was found upon probing different locations within each sample, indicating that the observed elements are homogeneously distributed in the crystalline matrices. Table 1 summarizes the elemental compositional data derived from Figures 2(b) to 2(f). The morphology and size of the Eu³⁺ doped sample were further examined by transmission electron microscopy (Figure 3(a)). It shows the production of uniform BiPO₄ hexagonal nanostructure with diameter around 200 nm. Further the TEM measurements show that the doping with different lanthanide ions actually did not change the morphology of the nanostructures if they were synthesized in a similar way. Elemental mapping of Bi, P, O, and Eu of the nanostructure (Figure 3(a)) was carried out by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and from Figure 3(e) it is clearly seen that Eu is doped into BiPO₄ with uniform and smooth morphology. The electron diffraction (ED) pattern (scale bar is 5 nm) of a selected nanostructure (Figure 3(f)) revealed a regular and bright spots array, indicating that the nanostructures are crystals with a preferential growth orientation along the (110) crystalline plane. These results show that the samples are high-quality crystals.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

FTIR spectroscopy allows identification of the different functional groups of the synthesized material’s molecular structure and has been employed extensively for this purpose [31, 32]. Figure 4 shows well-resolved FTIR spectra of all the prepared nanophosphors in the 100–1400 cm⁻¹ range. All the spectra show similar features regarding the respective absorption bands. For 5.0 mol% Ce³⁺ doped sample the very intense band centered at 1057 cm⁻¹ is due to the stretching vibration of the PO₄ group. Several small intensity bands can also be seen in this region for other samples as the PO₄ group is situated in symmetry. For the hexagonal BiPO₄, the groups are under C₂ symmetry [33, 34] and corresponding and modes of vibration are very close that they might overlap with each other significantly to give a peak around 1057 cm⁻¹ (see Figure 4). The identified sharp bands at 596 and 536 cm⁻¹ could be assigned to the vibrations δ(O–P–O) and (PO₄), respectively [35, 36]. Two bands are observed at 475 and 377 cm⁻¹ and are considered to have originated from the bending modes of the PO₄ units. The band observed at 170 cm⁻¹ for all the samples could be assigned to an OBiO symmetric bending mode [8]. Generally the phosphate group related modes could show either blue or red shift based on the crystal symmetry of the host and electronic charge balancing ion [13]. No band at 1250 cm⁻¹ ((C–O)) is observed that can be related to oleic acid and H₂O adhered on the particle surface indicating during the drying process all the H₂O and OA are removed from the samples.

It is well known that Ce³⁺ with a 4f¹ electron configuration has a ground state and the 4f electrons can be photoexcited to 5d levels. The 5d levels are further split into various energy levels, depending on the crystal field strength of the host material [37]. The energy levels splitting patterns are determined by the chemical environment and the symmetry of the host matrix around the Ce³⁺ ions. Figure 5(a) presents the photoluminescence excitation (PLE) and photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the 5.0 mol% Ce³⁺ doped BiPO₄ nanophosphor. Direct excitation of Ce³⁺ occurs via the parity allowed absorptions, which are observed as a broad band centered at 417 nm in the PLE spectrum (Figure 5(a)). The excited Ce³⁺ ion then nonradiatively relaxes to the lowest-energy crystal-field level of the 5d state from where it decays radiatively to the ²F_7/2 and ²F_5/2 4f multiplets of Ce³⁺ [38]. The respective PL spectrum of Ce³⁺ doped nanophosphor has shown a relatively sharp and asymmetric blue emission band extending from 450 to 470 nm and peaking at around 459 nm and which could be assigned to the transition. The energy difference ~2194 cm⁻¹ between 417 nm and 459 nm can be well matched with the energy difference between the two spin orbit split components ²F_5/2 and ²F_7/2 of Ce³⁺. Generally, in noncrystalline materials one can observe broad emission band for cerium ion (Ce³⁺) extending from blue to green wavelength region or even covering entire visible wavelength region in some other noncrystalline or crystalline host materials. In [14], very broad emission from hexagonal BiPO₄ doped with cerium ion has been reported. In our case, the sharpness of the cerium emission band could be due to the incorporation of Ce³⁺ ion into Bi³⁺ crystal site in BiPO₄ as confirmed by the XRD. In Figure 5(b) the relevant Ce³⁺ ion energy level diagram is presented and the excitation and relaxation processes are shown schematically. Figure 6(a) depicts the PLE and PL spectra of 1.0 mol% Eu³⁺ doped BiPO₄ nanophosphor. From the excitation spectrum six excitation bands are identified which can be assigned to the electronic transitions of at 362 nm, at 381 nm, at 394 nm, at 415 nm, at 464 nm, and at 525 nm, including a charge transfer band (Eu–O charge transfer process) at 318 nm [39]. Only the prominent excitation peak at 394 nm has been selected for the measurement of room temperature emission spectrum of Eu³⁺ doped nanophosphor and clearly validates the fingerprint transition lines between the and multiplets of the Eu³⁺ ion (Figure 6(a)). The main emission line from the europium occurred in the yellowish-orange region at 595 nm, corresponding to the parity allowed magnetic dipole induced transition. Also, several other emission lines are observed from the Eu³⁺ luminescence spectrum which can be ascribed to the following transitions: 580 nm, the strictly forbidden ; 615 nm, and 622 nm, electric dipole allowed transition, 653 nm, a weak mixed character ; 688 nm, and 714 nm, the electric dipole allowed [21]. The intensity of an emission line is proportional to the radiative decay of the transition. It is well known that the probability of the transition is very sensitive to the changes in the chemical surroundings of the Eu³⁺ ions in the host matrix and its intensity is significantly affected by the degree in the center of symmetry in the environments around Eu³⁺ ions. The number of transitions between the nondegenerate ⁵D₀ and ⁷F₀ multiplets is usually used to estimate the number of Eu³⁺ sites in a crystalline lattice. In our study, the luminescence lines that are assigned to transition and transition of Eu³⁺ show the doublet-structure, and the lower symmetry sites induce the emission line splitting into doublet. When the Eu³⁺ ion is excited to ⁵L₆ level under 394 nm wavelength, it nonradiatively relaxes to the main emitting level ⁵D₀. From the ⁵D₀ level the Eu³⁺ ions decay radiatively, since the large energy difference of the ⁷F₆ level presents possibility of multiphonon relaxation as shown in the energy level scheme (Figure 6(b)). Based on the Dexters theory of resonant energy transfer [40], in solids two luminescence centers within a certain distance will be in resonance with each other and could transfer the excitation energy from one center (donor) to another center (acceptor). The close proximity of the centers enables them to be connected by electrostatic interaction or by the quantum mechanical exchange interaction. Also, for effective energy transfer, the emission of the donors must be overlapped with the absorption of the acceptors [41]. To examine possible energy transfer process between Ce³⁺ and Eu³⁺ or vice versa, in Figure 7(a) we present the comparison of Ce³⁺ emission and Eu³⁺ excitation spectra in BiPO₄ nanostructures. From this figure, one can hardly see any overlap between these spectra. This means that the emission of Ce³⁺ does not effectively overlap with the excitation spectrum of Eu³⁺ in synthesized BiPO₄ nanophosphors. Therefore, there is no possibility for energy transfer from Ce³⁺ to Eu³⁺ or vice versa in our synthesized BiPO₄: Ce/Eu codoped nanostructures (following Figures 5 and 6 one can see no spectral overlap between the emission and excitation band of the energy donor (Eu³⁺) and the energy acceptor (Ce³⁺), resp., for ET to occur from ). Also, why Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ is not a good sensitizer/activator pair is clearly explained in [42] with some fundamental reasons apart from the possible lack of spectral overlap between them. Figures 7(b) and 7(c) present the PLE and PL spectra of Eu³⁺/Ce³⁺ codoped nanophosphors with their respective excitation wavelengths 394 nm and 417 nm. At 394 nm only Eu³⁺ ions could be excited to higher levels, and Ce³⁺ ions stay inactive under this excitation wavelength. Similarly, at 417 nm only Ce³⁺ ions are excited. However, recently some other researchers [43] have reported energy transfer between Ce³⁺ and Eu³⁺ ions in silicate phosphors synthesized through a wet-chemistry method. From Figures 7(b) and 7(c), the characteristic emission bands of Eu³⁺ and Ce³⁺ ions are identified under their respective excitation wavelengths. By monitoring the emission at 459 nm (Ce³⁺), the measured excitation spectrum did not show any excitation bands related to Eu³⁺ ion between 300 nm and 400 nm (Figure 7(c)). In the corresponding emission spectrum of Ce³⁺ between 500 nm and 750 nm no emission bands of Eu³⁺ are observed under 417 nm excitation wavelength except straight lines as shown in Figure 7(c) between 475 nm and 500 nm and this is obvious due to the absence of Eu³⁺ excitation bands under 459 nm monitored emission of Ce³⁺. To show clearly the blue emission band of Ce³⁺ in Figure 7(c), we have provided the emission wavelength range up to 500 nm. However in all the Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ codoped samples we have observed independent dual emissions 459 nm (blue) and 594 nm (yellowish-orange) by externally varying excitation wavelengths as 417 nm and 394 nm. The relative emission intensity increases with doping concentration increment up to 5.0 mol% for both Eu³⁺ and Ce³⁺ and no concentration quenching occurred up to 5.0 mol% for either ions. For studying energy transfer between Ce³⁺ to Eu³⁺ ions, we have also measured the life times of Ce³⁺ single doped and Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ codoped samples using 370 nm excitation source (graph not shown). Life times of both samples were obtained by using double exponentials. Two life times with similar values for both singly and codoped samples were obtained at around 6.5 ± 0.6 ns and 186 ± 3 ns. Similar life time values for singly and codoped samples suggest minimum or no energy transfer in codoped samples. Earlier some researchers [22–28] have reported excitation dependent tunable emission in different systems like chitosan capped ZnS : Mn quantum dots, lanthanide doped metal organic frameworks, mixed lanthanide complexes, CdSe/ZnS quantum dots, nanocolloids of ZnO, and graphene oxide. Some of them have reported this fluorescence behavior in violation of Kasha’s rule of excitation wavelength independence [44]. They have given possible mechanism for this fluorescence behavior along with its application in multicolor bioimaging and lightning. Our results show that with careful adjustment of excitation wavelength, the color of luminescence can be modulated from blue to orange in same sample without changing its chemical composition and size. As discussed above nontransfer of energy among Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ dopants generates this excitation induced tunable emission. Here this tunable emission is achieved from nontoxic inorganic host material which is chemically and thermally stable. Thus synthesized codoped BiPO₄ nanostructures could be highly suitable for their practical applications in multicolor bioimaging, optoelectronics, and display devices.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(c)

4. Conclusions

In summary, bismuth phosphate (BiPO₄) nanophosphors doped with Ce³⁺ and Eu³⁺ ions singly and Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ codoped were prepared and their structural (XRD and FTIR), morphological (SEM-EDAX and TEM), and luminescence (PLE/PL) properties were studied. The synthesized lanthanides doped nanophosphors show pure hexagonal phase from XRD, SEM, and TEM analysis and expected phonon vibrational features attributed to the single-crystalline bismuth phosphate are found from the FTIR spectra. The incorporation of lanthanide ions into BiPO₄ crystalline hexagonal structure is also evident from the studied XRD profiles. The Ce³⁺ doped nanophosphors show blue luminescence at 459 nm under excitation wavelength at 417 nm. For Eu³⁺ doped nanophosphors, five emission bands centered at 580 nm, 595 nm, (615 nm and 622 nm), 653 nm, and (688 nm, 700 nm) have been observed with 394 nm () excitation wavelength which can be assigned to () transitions. Among these emissions, transition shows bright yellowish-orange emission. No energy transfer was observed from either Ce³⁺ to Eu³⁺ or Eu³⁺ to Ce³⁺ in the Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ codoped BiPO₄ nanophosphors due to the absence of suitable common metastable excitation level for Ce³⁺ and Eu³⁺ ions at 417 nm or 394 nm to excite both ions simultaneously for a possible energy transfer (ET) between Ce³⁺ and Eu³⁺ ions. Also there is lack of considerable spectral overlap between Ce³⁺ emission spectrum and Eu³⁺ excitation spectrum for ET to take place and vice versa. Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ codoped BiPO₄ nanophosphors show excitation wavelength dependent tunable emission in blue (459 nm) and orange (594 nm) region by suitably varying excitation wavelength from 394 nm to 417 nm in single sample without varying chemical composition or size of nanomaterials.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

K. Iitaka, Y. Tani, and Y. Umezawa, “Orthophosphate ion-sensors based on a quartz-crystal microbalance coated with insoluble orthophosphate salts,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 338, no. 1-2, pp. 77–87, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Charyulu, K. V. Chetty, D. G. Phal et al., “Recovery of americium from nitric acid solutions containing calcium by different co-precipitation methods,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 251, no. 1, pp. 153–154, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T.-S. Chang, L. Guijia, C.-H. Shin, Y. K. Lee, and S.-S. Yun, “Catalytic behavior of BiPO₄ in the multicomponent bismuth phosphate system on the propylene ammoxidation,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 68, no. 3-4, pp. 229–234, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Li, Y. Ding, Y. Zhang, Z. Lu, H. Sun, and R. Chen, “Microwave synthesis of BiPO₄ nanostructures and their morphology-dependent photocatalytic performances,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 363, no. 2, pp. 497–503, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Elmoudane, M. Et-Tabirou, and M. Hafid, “Glass-forming region in the system Li₃PO₄–Pb₃(PO₄)₂–BiPO₄ (Li₂O–PbO-Bi₂O₃–P₂O₅) and its ionic conductivity,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 279–287, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Li, J. Xu, C. Guo, and Y. Zhang, “Removal of rhodamine B from aqueous solution by BIPO₄ hierarchical architecture,” Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 382–387, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-F. Lin, H.-W. Chang, S.-Y. Lu, and C. W. Liu, “Preparation, characterization, and electrophysical properties of nanostructured BiPO₄ and Bi₂Se₃ derived from a structurally characterized, single-source precursor Bi[Se₂P(OiPr)₂]₃,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 50, pp. 18538–18544, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Geng, W.-H. Hou, Y.-N. Lv, J.-J. Zhu, and H.-Y. Chen, “One-dimensional BiPO₄ nanorods and two-dimensional BiOCl lamellae: fast low-temperature sonochemical synthesis, characterization, and growth mechanism,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 23, pp. 8503–8509, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Guan, J. Sun, F. Tao, and Z. Xu, “A host crystal for the rare-earth ion dopants: synthesis of pure and ln-doped urchinlike BiPO₄ structure and its photoluminescence,” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 2694–2697, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhao, G. Li, J. Zheng, L. Li, H. Wang, and L. Yang, “Preparation and polymorph-sensitive luminescence properties of BiPO₄:Eu, Part I: room-temperature reaction followed by a heat treatment,” CrystEngComm, vol. 13, no. 20, pp. 6251–6257, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Arunkumar, C. Jayajothi, D. Jeyakumar, and N. Lakshminarasimhan, “Structure-property relations in hexagonal and monoclinic BiPO₄:Eu³⁺ nanoparticles synthesized by polyol-mediated method,” RSC Advances, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1477–1485, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Roming and C. Feldmann, “Synthesis and characterization of nanoscaled BiPO₄ and BiPO₄:Tb,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1412–1415, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. Naidu, B. Vishwanadh, V. Sudarsan, and R. K. Vatsa, “BiPO₄: a better host for doping lanthanide ions,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 3194–3203, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Han, G. Zhang, X. Qi et al., “Synthesis and luminescence properties of BiPO₄:Ce,Tb nanorods,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 152, pp. 37–39, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kucuk and A. G. Clare, “Optical properties of cerium and europium doped fluoroaluminate glasses,” Optical Materials, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 279–287, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Lakshminarayana, E. M. Weis, A. C. Lira, U. Caldiño, D. J. Williams, and M. P. Hehlen, “Cross Relaxation in rare-earth-doped oxyfluoride glasses,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 139, pp. 132–142, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Shen, Q. Yan, Y. Xu et al., “Luminescence behaviors of Ce³⁺ ions in chalcohalide glasses,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 614–617, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Zuo, A. X. Lu, L. G. Zhu, and W. Y. Long, “Luminescence of Ce³⁺ or Tb³⁺,” in Advanced Materials Research, pp. 468–471, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
Y.-C. Wu, Y.-C. Chen, D.-Y. Wang, C.-S. Lee, C.-C. Sun, and T.-M. Chen, “α-(Y,Gd)FS:Ce³⁺: a novel red-emitting fluorosulfide phosphor for solid-state lighting,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 39, pp. 15163–15166, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. H. C. Andrade, S. M. Lima, M. L. Baesso et al., “Tunable light emission and similarities with garnet structure of Ce-doped LSCAS glass for white-light devices,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 510, no. 1, pp. 54–59, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. N. Soares, C. Nico, M. Peres et al., “Structural and optical properties of europium doped zirconia single crystals fibers grown by laser floating zone,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 109, no. 1, Article ID 013516, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sharma, T. Jain, S. Singh, and O. P. Pandey, “Tunable emission in surface passivated Mn-ZnS nanophosphors and its application for Glucose sensing,” AIP Advances, vol. 2, Article ID 012183, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sharma, S. Singh, and O. P. Pandey, “Excitation induced tunable emission in biocompatible chitosan capped ZnS nanophosphors,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 107, no. 10, Article ID 104319, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Ramya, S. Varughese, and M. L. P. Reddy, “Tunable white-light emission from mixed lanthanide (Eu³⁺, Gd³⁺, Tb³⁺) coordination polymers derived from 4-(dipyridin-2-yl)aminobenzoate,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 43, no. 28, p. 10940, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Irimpan, B. Krishnan, V. P. N. Nampoori, and P. Radhakrishnan, “Linear and nonlinear optical characteristics of ZnO-SiO₂ nanocomposites,” Applied Optics, vol. 47, no. 24, pp. 4345–4351, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hoy, P. J. Morrison, L. K. Steinberg, W. E. Buhro, and R. A. Loomis, “Excitation energy dependence of the photoluminescence quantum yields of core and core/shell quantum dots,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 2053–2060, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pramanik, Z. Fan, S. R. Chavva, S. S. Sinha, and P. C. Ray, “Highly efficient and excitation tunable two-photon luminescence platform for targeted multi-color MDRB imaging using graphene oxide,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, article 6090, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zhang, P. Yan, H. Li, X. Zou, G. Hou, and G. Li, “Towards full-color-tunable emission of two component Eu(III)-doped Gd(III) coordination frameworks by the variation of excitation light,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 43, no. 33, pp. 12574–12581, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Pan and Y. Zhu, “Size-controlled synthesis of BiPO₄ nanocrystals for enhanced photocatalytic performance,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4235–4241, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. L. Mooney-Slater, “Polymorphic forms of bismuth phosphate,” Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, vol. 117, no. 5-6, pp. 371–385, 1962.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. G. Motke, S. P. Yawale, and S. S. Yawale, “Infrared spectra of zinc doped lead borate glasses,” Bulletin of Materials Science, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 75–78, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gritco, M. Moldovan, R. Grecu, and V. Simon, “Thermal and infrared analyses of aluminosilicate glass systems for dental implants,” Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2845–2847, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Assaoudi and A. Ennaciri, “Vibrational spectra and structure of rare earth orthophosphates, weinschenkite type,” Spectrochimica Acta, Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 895–902, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Assaaoudi, A. Ennaciri, and A. Rulmont, “Vibrational spectra of hydrated rare earth orthophosphates,” Vibrational Spectroscopy, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Nakamoto, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, Part A: Theory and Applications in Inorganic Chemistry, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 5th edition, 1997.
B. Romero, S. Bruque, M. A. G. Aranda, and J. E. Iglesias, “Syntheses, crystal structures, and characterization of bismuth phosphates,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1869–1874, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-H. Lu, H.-C. Hong, and R. Jagannathan, “Sol-gel synthesis and photoluminescent properties of cerium-ion doped yttrium aluminium garnet powders,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 2525–2530, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Blasse and A. Bril, “Investigation of some Ce³⁺-activated phosphors,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 5139–5145, 1967.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Lakshminarayana and S. Buddhudu, “Spectral analysis of Eu³⁺ and Tb³⁺:B₂O₃-ZnO-PbO glasses,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 102, no. 2-3, pp. 181–186, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Dexter, “A theory of sensitized luminescence in solids,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 836–850, 1953.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Lakshminarayana and L. Wondraczek, “Photoluminescence and energy transfer in Tb³⁺/Mn²⁺ co-doped ZnAl₂O₄ glass ceramics,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 184, no. 8, pp. 1931–1938, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. M. Yen, H. Yamamoto, and S. Shionoya, Phosphor Handbook, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Oxford, UK, 2nd edition, 2006.
O. M. Ntwaeaborwa, H. C. Swart, R. E. Kroon, P. H. Holloway, and J. R. Botha, “Photoluminescence and energy transfer in Tb³⁺/Mn²⁺ co-doped ZnAl₂O₄ glass ceramics,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 38, pp. 458–461, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
J. B. Birks, Photophysics of Aromatic Molecules, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1970.

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Sarabjot Singh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2211

Downloads

1136

Citations

Journal of Spectroscopy

Excitation Induced Tunable Emission in Ce3+/Eu3+ Codoped BiPO4 Nanophosphors

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of Lanthanide Ions Doped BiPO4

2.2. Characterization

3. Results and Discussion

4. Conclusions

Conflict of Interests

References

Copyright

Excitation Induced Tunable Emission in Ce³⁺/Eu³⁺ Codoped BiPO₄ Nanophosphors

2.1. Synthesis of Lanthanide Ions Doped BiPO₄