About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents 
Journal of Signal Transduction
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 483796, 11 pages
doi:10.1155/2012/483796
Review Article

Involvement of Src in the Adaptation of Cancer Cells under Microenvironmental Stresses

A. K. M. Mahbub Hasan,1,2 Takashi Ijiri,1 and Ken-ichi Sato1

1Laboratory of Cell Signaling and Development, Department of Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto 603-8555, Japan
2Laboratory of Gene Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh

Received 24 February 2012; Revised 16 May 2012; Accepted 4 June 2012

Academic Editor: Yasuo Fukami

Copyright © 2012 A. K. M. Mahbub Hasan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Protein-tyrosine phosphorylation, which is catalyzed by protein-tyrosine kinase (PTK), plays a pivotal role in a variety of cellular functions related to health and disease. The discovery of the viral oncogene Src (v-Src) and its cellular nontransforming counterpart (c-Src), as the first example of PTK, has opened a window to study the relationship between protein-tyrosine phosphorylation and the biology and medicine of cancer. In this paper, we focus on the roles played by Src and other PTKs in cancer cell-specific behavior, that is, evasion of apoptosis or cell death under stressful extracellular and/or intracellular microenvironments (i.e., hypoxia, anoikis, hypoglycemia, and serum deprivation).

1. Introduction

It is believed that the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates (ca. 460 B.C.–ca. 370 B.C.), the father of medicine, was the first to use the word “cancer” in this context. Although phenomena reflecting the formation of malignant tumor had already been described much earlier, Hippocrates was the first to use the Greek word “carcinos” (in English and Latin, “cancer”), based on the word for crab, which he thought resembled the cut surface of a malignant tumor [1]. Long after this incident, the biology and medicine of cancer reached the age of modern science in the mid 18th century with findings and reports that some cases of cancer may be associated with the patient’s lifestyle and/or job (e.g., nose, scrotum) [2, 3]. Currently, cancer is known as one of the most critical and fatal diseases in humans, especially in those living in areas with relatively high longevity. Thus, in general, cancer is recognized as having been relatively rare during the earlier average human lifetime. Nevertheless, overall, demands for understanding, preventing, and curing cancer are growing; therefore, the biology and medicine of cancer are of particular importance in science.

Why and how is cancer rare? Why and how does cancer arise and develop? Why and how is cancer fatal? Many fundamental questions arise from the study of cancer. Against this background, an extensive number of studies have been conducted in recent decades using many approaches including animal models, bioinformatics, and cellular and molecular biology techniques. In 2000, Hanahan and Weinberg, a pioneering scientist in the cancer biology field, proposed that the development of most cancer cells is the result of a manifestation of six essential alterations in cell physiology that collectively dictate malignant growth: self-sufficiency in growth signals, insensitivity to growth-inhibitory signals, evasion of programmed cell death or apoptosis, limitless replicative potential, sustained angiogenesis, and tissue invasion and metastasis [4]. These altered functions are based on the occurrence of critical mutations in one or more cancer-related genes (i.e., protooncogenes and/or tumor suppressor genes), as well as other cancer-promoting, nongenomic mechanisms involving epigenetically altered expression of certain genes and a number of environmental factors that could affect intracellular signaling events and/or metabolic systems. Under these circumstances, current trends in the biology of cancer deal extensively with the molecular details of how each type of human cancer cell arises, develops, and maintains its cancerous features as described previously, by which it shows aggressive and pathological behavior in the patients with such lesions.

A century ago, Rous discovered a virus named Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) that has cell-transforming activity [5, 6] and carries a viral Src (v-src) oncogene [7–10]. v-src gene originated from a cellular progenitor termed protooncogene cellular Src (c-src) or Src; they share a conserved sequence that just differs by several point mutations throughout the gene and deletion mutations in the C-terminal region [10–13]. c-src is one of the oldest protooncogenes, discovered in 1976 in the vertebrate genome [13]; this outstanding discovery led to the Nobel Prize for Medicine and Physiology being awarded to Bishop and Varmus in 1989. The protein product of this gene is nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinase (PTK), Src, which principally attaches to the inner plasma membrane and associates with many kinds of cellular proteins that include receptor tyrosine kinases, G-protein-coupled receptors, steroid receptors, and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) [14]. There are eleven identified Src family kinases (SFKs): Src, Fyn, Yes, Blk, Yrk, Fgr, Hck, Lck, Lyn, Frk (also known as Rak), and Srm. Src or SFK study has led to new insights into the role of tyrosine phosphorylation in cell physiology and functions (for review, see [15–19]). The diverse functions of Src involve the initiation of fertilization-mediated development and regulation of normal cell growth, survival, proliferation, differentiation, adhesion to matrix and a wide range of molecular signaling networks. Src protein is composed of four Src homology (SH) domains, a unique N-terminal domain, a linker region and negative-regulatory tyrosine residue (chicken Tyr527; human Tyr530)-containing C-terminal tail [17–22].

Among the four SH domains, SH1 is the kinase domain that contains the autophosphorylation site required for full activity (chicken Tyr416; human Tyr419), SH2 interacts with the negative-regulatory Tyr527 (chicken) or Tyr530 (human), SH3 promotes intramolecular contact with the kinase domain for inactivation, and SH4 contains the myristoylation site that is important for lipid bilayer membrane localization. The functions of the unique N-terminal domain are not well understood, but mutation in this region seems to reduce the transforming potential of v-Src [21]. The SH2 and SH3 domains and C-terminal tail are involved in the negative regulation of Src. A linker region is present between SH2 and SH1 domains and is involved in intramolecular binding with the SH3 domain. Phosphorylated C-terminal tyrosine residue can bind to the SH2 domain. These interactions along with the interaction between the kinase domain and the SH3 domain cause the Src molecule to adopt a closed conformation that makes it unavailable for its substrate [23]. Dephosphorylation at the C-terminal tyrosine residue by tyrosine phosphatase or the Src-interacting molecules that break the closed conformation without C-terminal tyrosine dephosphorylation converts the Src molecules into an open active state. Consistently, v-Src is constitutively active because it lacks the C-terminal negative-regulatory tyrosine residue.

Apoptosis is critical for maintaining the appropriate cell number in tissues and organs. Apoptosis is somehow escaped in transformed or cancer cells, leading to their immortality by a mechanism called anti-apoptosis. Src plays roles in several types of cancer cells, such as breast cancer [24] and an astrocytoma cell line [25], to provide them with an anti-apoptotic character, and even acts in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced endothelial cell anti-apoptosis [26]. Mutations of several other molecules, for example Raf, Ras, and STAT, also contribute to anti-apoptosis, abnormal proliferation, angiogenesis, and invasion of several types of cancer cells, such as in melanoma and gliomas [27–30]. How normal cells are transformed into cancer cells and progress to invasive cancers and then to metastatic mode and their relationships with Src are very interesting issues. Src has the potential to be altered in a fashion that allows it to play a role in cancer progression. When cells are transformed, they lose molecular controls and subcellular structures and ultimately alter their cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions and become motile and invasive; Src plays a central role in this process [4, 31, 32]. Increased Src kinase activity is associated with advanced-stage tumors that readily metastasize to distant organs [33–36]. The activation of Src in human cancers may occur through a variety of mechanisms that include domain interaction between molecules and/or structural remodeling in response to multiple activators or upstream kinases and tyrosine phosphatases. Overexpression of Csk, a negative regulator of Src, suppresses metastasis in mouse model experiments, demonstrating the importance of Src activity in metastasis [37]. The involvement of Src activity has been studied in several carcinomas, including colorectal, hepatocellular, pancreatic, gastric, esophageal, breast, ovarian, lung, and prostate carcinomas [38–42]. In some cases, for example, hepatocellular and colon carcinomas, very high Src activity and low expression of Csk were observed [43–45]. Recently, the oncoprotein Src has been focused on as a molecular target for cancer therapy. Several Src inhibitors that are highly specific and stable in vivo have been extensively studied, and attempts are now underway to utilize them in human cancer treatment because blocking of Src activation may inhibit several signaling pathways involved in tumor progression [46–50]. However, successful targeting of Src in a clinical setting remains a challenge, and Src inhibitors have only recently started to move through clinical development.

When a population of cancer cells arises, surrounded by normal cells and tissues, these cancer cells will suffer from various kinds of environmental stress, such as low oxygen pressure (i.e., hypoxia), lack of cell-cell contact (low confluence) and insufficient support by the extracellular matrix (possibly leading to anoikis), and shortage or complete lack of nutrients (e.g., hypoglycemia) and growth factors (e.g., low serum). These microenvironmental stresses could act as selective pressures or death-promoting (e.g., pro-apoptotic) signals for cancer cells, so that only those that successfully adapt to them can continue their malignant growth. Some cancer cells with relatively high malignant potential overcome this situation by triggering altered gene expression (e.g., upregulation of hypoxia-inducible genes) and signal transduction for angiogenesis (e.g., expression of vascular endothelial growth factor) [51, 52]. In this paper, we discuss how these cancer-specific adaptations to microenvironmental stresses are managed with a focus on the roles of Src and other PTKs and how this knowledge could contribute to future progress in this research field.

2. Hypoxia

Tumor blood microvessels arising from neovascularization are structurally and physiologically different from normal blood vessels. Tumor blood vessels are highly irregular (displaced and compressed), tortuous, have arteriovenous shunts and blind ends, are leaky, lack smooth muscle or enervation, and have incomplete endothelial linings and basement membranes that often result in sluggish, highly abnormal blood flow [53–55]. Because of unrestrained growth, tumor cells are forced away from vessels beyond the effective diffusion distance of oxygen in respiring tissue and suffer from hypoxia, a lack of oxygen that is the result of an imbalance in oxygen supply and demand [56]. In hypoxic regions, the partial pressure of O2 (pO2) levels are chronically low, and, in addition, owing to intermittent blood flow acute hypoxia is produced followed by reoxygenation [52, 55, 57].

Hypoxia is deleterious to cancer and normal cells, but the conditions that are prevalent in solid tumors are believed to exert selective pressure for cancer cells to adapt and survive. During growth and metastatic progression, tumor cells encounter several kinds of microenvironmental stresses; the most critical of which is hypoxia [58]. Oxygen limitation is central in controlling neovascularization, glucose metabolism, tumor survival and spread. This pleiotropic action is orchestrated by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which is a master heterodimeric transcriptional factor mediating a wide range of physiological and cellular mechanisms; this action can be termed an angiogenic switch to overcome the limited supply of oxygen and nutrients in expanding neoplasia [58–61]. During hypoxia, HIF-1α is stabilized and translocates to the nucleus where it forms a heterodimer with HIF-1β [62]. This HIF-1 complex interacts with hypoxia-responsive elements and regulates the expression of molecules such as the major pH-regulating enzyme carbonic anhydrase IX, which allows metabolic adaptation in the cell [63, 64].

There is considerable interest in understanding the molecular mechanisms involving several oncogenes and oncogenic molecules that enhance tumor angiogenesis and malignant progression under hypoxia. Tumor hypoxia promotes metastasis via the upregulation of many genes including VEGF, c-Met, and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (also known as CD184), which are integral to metastatic tumor progression [65–69]. The hypoxic microenvironments are also associated with alterations in signaling proteins including Src, STAT3, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk, also known as mitogen-activated protein kinase), and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), which are generally considered to be prosurvival (anti-apoptotic) and are commonly activated in cancer. It was shown that HIF-1α expression requires PI3K activity and is correlated with Akt phosphorylation in invasive breast carcinomas [70]. Akt can augment HIF-1α expression by increasing its translation under both hypoxic and normoxic conditions [71]. Hypoxia-induced activation of PI3K/Akt occurs at an early stage, but prolonged hypoxia inactivates Akt and activates GSK3β, which then downregulates the HIF-1 activity through downregulation of HIF-1α accumulation [72]. Erk is also needed for hypoxia-induced HIF-1 transactivation activity because HIF-1α is phosphorylated in hypoxia by an Erk-dependent pathway [73]. Recently, it was suggested that Src activation might play a prominent role in the response to hypoxia to promote human cancer cell survival, progression, and metastasis. Src-nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) was shown to contribute to the survival of cells during hypoxia as Src inhibition causes hypoxia-induced cell death [74]. In both pancreatic and prostate carcinoma cell lines, it was shown that artificial hypoxia (by cobalt chloride)-induced VEGF expression required Src activation and resulted in increased steady-state levels of HIF-1α and increased phosphorylation of STAT3. STAT3 and HIF-1α bind simultaneously to the VEGF promoter for maximum transcription of VEGF mRNA following hypoxia [75]. STAT3 activity is responsive to acute hypoxia, whereas the signaling from Src to focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is associated with chronically hypoxic regions [76].

Hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) regulates Lck (a member of SFKs)-dependent activation of NFκB (nuclear factor κB) and modulates the expression of downstream genes that are involved in cell migration in human breast cancer cells. H/R-activated Lck mediates NFκB activation, urokinase-type plasminogen activator secretion, and cell motility through tyrosine phosphorylation of IκBα (inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B, alpha) [77]. It has been documented that a nonreceptor and non-Src family PTK, Syk, is commonly expressed in normal human breast tissue and breast tumor [78]. Syk and Lck together regulate H/R-induced breast cancer progression [79], but the molecular mechanism of Syk phosphorylation and its subsequent interaction with Lck leading to downstream signaling events are not well defined. H/R enhances the production of reactive oxygen species that cause the inhibitory oxidation of protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP), a major regulator of tyrosine kinase signaling [80]. Hypoxia has also been shown to upregulate lysyl oxidase (LOX) expression via HIF-1 binding to hypoxia-responsive elements in the LOX promoter, leading to enhanced invasion in metastatic breast cancer [81, 82]. H/R condition stimulates the LOX-dependent FAK/Src activity, which facilitates breast cancer cell migration through a mechanism mediated by hydrogen peroxide, a by-product of LOX activity [82–84]. Thus, the key molecules, for example, Src, FAK, PI3K, and LOX, involved in the anti-apoptosis process of cancer cells could be good therapeutic targets for preventing and treating metastases. However, most of the data have been obtained from in vitro experiments, but the microenvironment in the hypoxic tumor is likely to be more complicated due to the existence of pO2 gradients, temporal fluctuations in pO2, tumor/stroma interactions, and the additional effects of nutrient availability and acidosis.

3. Matrix Deprivation

Cells are held tightly in a highly structured order with each other (cell-cell contact) and with their surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) (cell-ECM contact) for their mutual benefit. These associations are principally regulated by the cellular membrane protein integrins that execute signals through cytosolic molecules for their survival when they are attached. If cells are detached or their cell-cell contact or cell-ECM contact is severed, they die by a particular type of apoptosis, “anoikis” (from the Greek word for “homelessness”), which was first described for epithelial cells but later shown also to take place in cells of nonepithelial origin [85–87]. Detachment-induced anoikis is physiologically significant for normal cellular growth and turnover. However, cancer cells are insensitive to this death process. Resistance to anoikis is very important for cancer cells because they can survive after detachment and undergo metastasis to distant organs. The molecular mechanisms by which cancer cells escape anoikis are not clearly understood, but recent study has shed some light on this issue. Integrins, transmembrane heterodimers, and two principal nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, FAK and Src, play a central role in resisting anoikis [88, 89]. In general, anoikis resistance (or anti-apoptotic signal) involves a conformational change of integrin, which recruits autophosphorylated FAK at Tyr397. Src interacts with the activated FAK through the Src’s SH2 domain, resulting in the activation of Src by tyrosine autophosphorylation. Activated Src phosphorylates FAK (Tyr861 and Tyr925) to enhance its activity further. This activated FAK/Src complex conveys the signal for anoikis resistance through the PI3K/Akt survival pathway [86, 90, 91]. Thus, the downregulation and loss of FAK/Src association are involved in anoikis sensitivity.

The role of integrins, FAK, Src, and PI3K/Akt differs depending on the cancer cell types. Anchorage-independent growth and survival of pancreatic cancer cells require the recruitment of Src to the αvβ3 cytoplasmic tail of integrins, leading to Src activation and Crk-associated substrate (also called CAS) phosphorylation but this is independent of FAK activity [92, 93]. Similarly, anoikis resistance is maintained in osteosarcoma cells through Src-dependent activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway in a manner independent of FAK activity [94]. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), not FAK or epidermal growth factor receptor/kinase (EGFR), acts as the upstream PTK responsible for the detachment-induced Src activation; in addition, Pyk2 (a nonreceptor and a non-Src family PTK), rather than PI3K/Akt or Erk, acts as the key downstream effector of Src in mediating the cell survival signals of lung tumor cells [95, 96]. Intestinal epithelial cancer cells commonly display EGFR-mediated sustained activation of Src interacting with FAK and consequent MEK/Erk activation to resist anoikis [97]. The involvement of FAK/Src activity through the PI3K/Akt pathway in decreased sensitivity to anoikis has been described for human lung cancer [98, 99] and colon tumor cell lines [100, 101]. This differential regulation of anoikis-resistance/anti-apoptosis signaling pathway might develop in different tissues during differentiation and/or at the time of tumor growth and invasion. Thus, at present, it may be concluded that the FAK/Src complex is a potential target to treat the tumors and to stop their invasion.

4. Glucose Deprivation

It was more than 80 years ago that Warburg made an observation that transformed cells employ aerobic glycolysis for their energy production, rather than electron transport chain activity in mitochondria [102]. Several oncogenes including Akt, Ras, and Src activate the Warburg effect by increasing glucose uptake, transcription of enzymes involved in glucose metabolism, and aerobic glycolysis itself [103, 104]. The mechanism by which the Warburg effect is manifested in these transformed cells is still unknown. However, studies using Src-transformed fibroblasts demonstrated that Src induces elevated expression of HIF-1α in mRNA and protein level under normoxia [105, 106]. Pancreatic and prostate cancers have also been shown to involve Src-dependent induction of VEGF through the actions of HIF-1α [75]. These features seem to be peculiar to the transformed cells because another report has shown that, in Hep3B cells, in which Src activity has been manipulated, Src activity is not involved in the upregulation of HIF-1α and other HIF-1α-dependent phenomena [107]. HIF-1α is a transcriptional regulator, whose up-regulation normally occurs under hypoxia and activates glycolysis, erythropoiesis, and angiogenesis [52, 106]. Therefore, the up-regulation of HIF-1α by an Src (or other oncogenic factor)-dependent mechanism may explain at least to some extent how the transformed cells acquire the ability to develop the Warburg effect. Other oncogenic factors that induce the expression of the mRNA and/or protein of HIF-1 𝛼 include ligands for some receptors/PTKs (e.g., EGF) [108], ErbB2/PTK [109], Ras [110], and STAT3 [111, 112]. Consequently, it is expected that glucose deprivation, or hypoglycemia, would lead to a failure of the Warburg effect to occur and affect cancer cell survival and proliferation.

In breast carcinoma MCF-7/ADR cells, glucose deprivation causes an immediate increase in tyrosine phosphorylation and activates Lyn, but not Abl, Fyn, or Lck [113]. It has been shown that the hypoglycemia-induced Lyn activation is responsible for the subsequent activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), which then phosphorylates and activates a transcription factor c-Jun. Under these conditions, the JNK/c-Jun pathway increases in terms of total glutathione, cysteine, γ-glutamylcysteine, and immunoreactive proteins, corresponding to the catalytic as well as regulatory subunits of γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase. This suggests that the synthesis of glutathione is increased as an adaptive response. These metabolically produced substances culminate in manifestation of oxidative stress in the cells and lead to cell death [114]. Thus, the results suggest that a certain kind of Src family PTK (not necessarily Src) signaling can contribute to the hypoglycemia-induced death of cancer cells. Such modulated sensitivity to cell death or apoptosis under glucose-deprived conditions is also seen in the multipotential hematopoietic cell line 32D expressing v-Src, v-Ras, and v-Abl [115]. In this cell line, these oncogenes enhance apoptosis induced by hypoglycemia but attenuate apoptosis in the absence of IL-3. Interestingly, Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase, an oncogene product of the Philadelphia chromosome, has been shown to be highly protective against hypoglycemia-induced apoptosis. These results demonstrate that PTK signaling can be either a positive or a negative regulator for the manifestation of hypoglycemia-induced survival in certain kinds of cancer cells.

5. Serum Deprivation

The cell culture condition termed serum starvation, as well as serum deprivation, depletion, removal, restriction, withdrawal, and serum limitation, has been widely and routinely used as a control point from which to examine a variety of extracellular stimuli or conditions (e.g., drugs, growth factors, hormones, and serum) [116]. However, given that cancer cells at the early stage often suffer from insufficient support by the local blood vessel, serum starvation by itself should be recognized as an important cellular condition through which to investigate cancer cell behavior. Many types of cancer and noncancer cell have been reported to adapt their growth and proliferation to serum-free culture conditions in a manner that depends on the release of growth factors or the modulation of cell surface receptors and/or intracellular kinases. Examples that have been demonstrated include growth factors such as EGF and other EGFR ligands [117–121], fibroblast growth factor-1 [122], PDGF [123], and VEGF [124, 125], PTKs such as c-Neu [126], ARK [127], and FAK [128], and serine/threonine kinases such as Akt [129–131], protein kinase C [132], GSK3β [133], adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase [116, 131, 134], mammalian target of rapamycin [131], and Erk [130]. In many of these cases, protein phosphorylation is suggested to be responsible for suppression of cell death, namely, apoptosis. Thus, serum starvation provides an experimental system to analyze how normal cells undergo apoptosis in response to a shortage of mitogenic signals, and how malignant cancer cells escape the factors inducing apoptotic responses.

The roles of protein-tyrosine phosphorylation for the anti-apoptosis of cancer cells under serum-starved conditions have recently been fully documented by our studies on bladder carcinoma cell line 5637, whose serum-independent growth involving autocrine ligands for EGFR was reported in the 1990s [119–121]. We found that the activities of the two PTKs, namely Src and EGFR became stably upregulated after several hours of serum deprivation in culture medium [135]. The activated Src and EGFR contributed to the anti-apoptotic growth of 5637 cells under serum-starved conditions through phosphorylation of the β-subunit of c-Met/hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor. In fact, inhibition of the Src/EGFR kinase activity or attenuation of the c-Met phosphorylation by knockdown (forced downregulation of c-Met by treatment with high doses of HGF) resulted in cell death accompanied by activation of caspase 3/7 and the appearance of apoptotic nuclear morphology [135]. In addition, it was demonstrated that cholesterol-dependent membrane microdomains (MDs) and their associated molecules, Src and uroplakin IIIa (UPIIIa), play important roles in signal transduction [136]. UPIIIa is a single transmembrane protein that has been originally identified as a major component of asymmetric unit membranes found in the luminal surface of mammalian urothelium [137, 138]. Its possible involvement in transmembrane (e.g. Src-dependent) signal transduction has also recently been demonstrated in uropathological bacterium infection [139] and in frog egg fertilization [140–143]. Thus, a novel signaling axis, involving MD and its associated proteins Src/EGFR/c-Met, has been identified as an anti-apoptotic mechanism that seems to be peculiar to bladder carcinoma cells. If so, further study should examine how other types of cancer cells become able to undergo malignant proliferation under serum-starved conditions.

6. Conclusion and Perspectives

The ability to survive and continue active proliferation under stressful conditions described here (i.e., hypoxia, lack of anchorage, and low or no supply of glucose or serum) is one of the fundamental features associated with cancer cells of high malignancy. Many questions need to be answered about how cancer cells sense these micro-environmental signals (MESs) and undergo their adaptive behavior. Here, we have attempted to summarize the cutting edge views based on research dealing with the molecular mechanisms by which cancer cells evade the onset of apoptosis through the activation of Src and/or other PTK signaling, which occur mainly in and around the plasma membranes (Figure 1). On the other hand, accumulating evidence also demonstrates that such anti-apoptosis mechanisms also involve reversible protein phosphorylation on serine and threonine residues, and other posttranslational modifications of proteins and a number of metabolic pathways, which occur mainly in the cytoplasm or organelles such as mitochondria. In addition to the aforementioned nongenomic responses, genomic responses, that is, gene expression in the cell nucleus, also contribute substantially. Taking these findings together, further study in this research field should be directed towards learning how these arrays of knowledge could be integrated (Figure 1): for instance, understanding how the Src signaling pathway regulates its surrounding molecular network would contribute to understanding the mechanism of sensing extracellular/intracellular environments, the modulation of cellular metabolism, and the regulation of the genomic response and stability in cancer cell-specific functions.

483796.fig.001
Figure 1: Signal transduction mechanism of anti-apoptosis in cancer cells. Highlighted here is the involvement of PTK signaling via nonreceptor PTKs such as SFKs, receptor PTKs such as EGFR, and cytoplasmic PTKs such as Abl and FAK in and around the plasma membranes. Several kinds of microenvironmental shortage for cell viability (e.g., hypoxia, lack of cell-cell or cell-ECM contact, hypoglycemia, deprivation of serum) act as signals (MESs, microenvironmental signals) for the responses of cancer cells (sensing of MESs, PTK signaling, other genomic and nongenomic signaling, and their crosstalk). These signaling networks support the cancer cells to undergo anti-apoptosis and active proliferation that lead to the other malignant features of cancer.

Abbreviations

RSV:Rous sarcoma virus
v-Src:Viral Src
c-Src:Cellular Src
PTK:Protein-tyrosine kinase
SFK:Src family kinase
SH:Src homology
VEGF:Vascular endothelial growth factor
p O 2 :Partial pressure of O2
HIF:Hypoxia-inducible factor
PI3K:Phosphoinositide (phosphatidylinositol) 3-kinase
Erk:Extracellular signal-regulated kinase
GSK3β:Glycogen synthase kinase 3 𝛽
FAK:Focal adhesion kinase
H/R:Hypoxia/reoxygenation
NFκB:Nuclear factor kappa B
IκB 𝛼 :Inhibitor of NFκB alpha
PTP:Protein-tyrosine phosphatase
LOX:Lysyl oxidase
ECM:Extracellular matrix
CAS:Crk-associated substrate
PDGFR:Platelet-derived growth factor receptor
EGFR: Epidermal growth factor receptor/kinase
JNK:c-Jun N-terminal kinase
HGF:Hepatocyte growth factor
MD:Membrane microdomain
UPIIIa:Uroplakin IIIa
MES:Micro-environmental signal.

Acknowledgments

The authors apologize to those whose work was not cited or insufficiently cited. This work is supported by a Grant-in-Aid on Innovative Areas (22112522, 24112714), a grant for collaboration research from the Asahi Kasei Corporation, and a grant for Private University Strategic Research Foundation Support Program (S0801060) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan to K. Sato.

References

  1. S. I. Hajdu, “A note from history: landmarks in history of cancer, part 1,” Cancer, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1097–1102, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. I. Hajdu, “A note from history: landmarks in history of cancer, part 2,” Cancer, vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 2811–2820, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. I. Hajdu, “A note from history: landmarks in history of cancer, part 3,” Cancer, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 1155–1168, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “The hallmarks of cancer,” Cell, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2000. View at Scopus
  5. P. Rous, “A sarcoma of the fowl transmissible by an agent separable from the tumor cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 13, pp. 397–411, 1911. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Rous, “Transmission of a malignant new growth by means of a cell-free filtrate,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 250, no. 11, pp. 1445–1449, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. P. Czernilofsky, A. D. Levinson, and H. E. Varmus, “Nucleotide sequence of an avian sarcoma virus oncogene (src) and proposed amino acid sequence for gene product,” Nature, vol. 287, no. 5779, pp. 198–203, 1980. View at Scopus
  8. A. P. Czernilofsky, A. D. Levinson, and H. E. Varmus, “Corrections to the nucleotide sequence of the src gene of Rous sarcoma virus,” Nature, vol. 301, no. 5902, pp. 736–738, 1983. View at Scopus
  9. T. Takeya, R. A. Feldman, and H. Hanafusa, “DNA sequence of the viral and cellular src gene of chickens. I. Complete nucleotide sequence of an EcoRI fragment of recovered avian sarcoma virus which codes for gp37 and pp60(src),” Journal of Virology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1982. View at Scopus
  10. T. Takeya and H. Hanafusa, “Structure and sequence of the cellular gene homologous to the RSV src gene and the mechanism for generating the transforming virus,” Cell, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 881–890, 1983. View at Scopus
  11. D. Shalloway, A. D. Zelenetz, and G. M. Cooper, “Molecular cloning and characterization of the chicken gene homologous to the transforming gene of Rous sarcoma virus,” Cell, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 531–541, 1981. View at Scopus
  12. T. Takeya and H. Hanafusa, “DNA sequence of the viral and cellular src gene of chickens. II. Comparison of the src genes of two strains of avian sarcoma virus and of the cellular homolog,” Journal of Virology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 1982. View at Scopus
  13. D. Stehelin, H. E. Varmus, J. M. Bishop, and P. K. Vogt, “DNA related to the transforming gene(s) of avian sarcoma viruses is present in normal avian DNA,” Nature, vol. 260, no. 5547, pp. 170–173, 1976. View at Scopus
  14. C. L. Abram and S. A. Courtneidge, “Src family tyrosine kinases and growth factor signaling,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 254, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Fukami, T. Nagao, T. Iwasaki, and K. I. Sato, “Inhibition and activation of c-Src: the head and tail of a coin,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 93, no. 2-3, pp. 263–270, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. S. Martin, “The hunting of the Src,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 2, pp. 467–475, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. T. J. Boggon and M. J. Eck, “Structure and regulation of Src family kinases,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 48, pp. 7918–7927, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. R. Engen, T. E. Wales, J. M. Hochrein et al., “Structure and dynamic regulation of Src-family kinases,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 65, no. 19, pp. 3058–3073, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. Sen and F. M. Johnson, “Regulation of SRC family kinases in human cancers,” Journal of Signal Transduction, vol. 2011, Article ID 865819, 14 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. T. Brown and J. A. Cooper, “Regulation, substrates and functions of src,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1287, no. 2-3, pp. 121–149, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. T. Parsons and M. J. Weber, “Genetics of src: structure and functional organization of a protein tyrosine kinase,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 147, pp. 79–127, 1989. View at Scopus
  22. R. Roskoski Jr., “Src kinase regulation by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 331, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. Yamaguchi and W. A. Hendrickson, “Structural basis for activation of human lymphocyte kinase Lck upon tyrosine phosphorylation,” Nature, vol. 384, no. 6608, p. 484, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Jian, Q. Yang, and X. Huang, “Src regulates Tyr20 phosphorylation of transferrin receptor-1 and potentiates breast cancer cell survival,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, pp. 35708–35715, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. C. Katoh, T. Osanai, H. Tomita, and K. Okumura, “Brain natriuretic peptide is released from human astrocytoma cell line U373MG under hypoxia: a possible role in anti-apoptosis,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Abu-Ghazaleh, J. Kabir, H. Jia, M. Lobo, and I. Zachary, “Src mediates stimulation by vascular endothelial growth factor of the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase at tyrosine 861, and migration and anti-apoptosis in endothelial cells,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 360, no. 1, pp. 255–264, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. I. Yajima, M. Y. Kumasaka, N. D. Thang et al., “RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling in malignant melanoma progression and therapy,” Dermatology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 354191, 5 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. K. M. Vasudevan, R. Burikhanov, A. Goswami, and V. M. Rangnekar, “Suppression of PTEN expression is essential for antiapoptosis and cellular transformation by oncogenic Ras,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 21, pp. 10343–10350, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. S. Ziegler, A. L. Kung, and M. W. Kieran, “Anti-apoptosis mechanisms in malignant gliomas,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 493–500, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. Niu, T. Bowman, M. Huang et al., “Roles of activated Src and Stat3 signaling in melanoma tumor cell growth,” Oncogene, vol. 21, no. 46, pp. 7001–7010, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. N. O. Carragher, M. A. Westhoff, V. J. Fincham, M. D. Schaller, and M. C. Frame, “A novel role for FAK as a protease-targeting adaptor protein: regulation by p42 ERK and Src,” Current Biology, vol. 13, no. 16, pp. 1442–1450, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. A. Lauffenburger and A. F. Horwitz, “Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process,” Cell, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 359–369, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. X. Pan, H. Han, L. Wang et al., “Nitidine chloride inhibits breast cancer cells migration and invasion by suppressing c-Src/FAK associated signaling pathway,” Cancer Letters, vol. 313, pp. 181–191, 2011.
  34. H. Liu, S. E. Ong, K. Badu-Nkansah, J. Schindler, F. M. White, and R. O. Hynes, “CUB-domain—containing protein 1 (CDCP1) activates Src to promote melanoma metastasis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 1379–1384, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. I. H. Gelman, “Src-family tyrosine kinases as therapeutic targets in advanced cancer,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 3, pp. 801–807, 2011.
  36. Z. Y. Chen, L. Cai, P. Bie et al., “Roles of Fyn in pancreatic cancer metastasis,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 293–301, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. Nakagawa, “Overexpression of the csk gene suppresses tumor metastasis in vivo,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 88, pp. 384–391, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. M. Guarino, “Src signaling in cancer invasion,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 14–26, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. B. Irby and T. J. Yeatman, “Role of Src expression and activation in human cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 19, no. 49, pp. 5636–5642, 2000. View at Scopus
  40. M. S. Talamonti, M. S. Roh, S. A. Curley, and G. E. Gallick, “Increase in activity and level of pp60(c-src) in progressive stages of human colorectal cancer,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 1993. View at Scopus
  41. N. E. Hynes, “Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 154–157, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. I. U. Agoulnik, A. Vaid, W. E. Bingman et al., “Role of SRC-1 in the promotion of prostate cancer cell growth and tumor progression,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 17, pp. 7959–7967, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. Masaki, M. Okada, Y. Shiratori et al., “pp60(c-src) activation in hepatocellular carcinoma of humans and LEC rats,” Hepatology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1257–1264, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. T. Masaki, M. Okada, M. Tokuda et al., “Reduced C-terminal Src kinase (Csk) activities in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 379–384, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. W. R. Cam, “Reduced C-terminal Src kinase activity is correlated inversely with pp60(c-src) activity in colorectal carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 92, pp. 61–70, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. L. C. Kim, L. Song, and E. B. Haura, “Src kinases as therapeutic targets for cancer,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 587–595, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. Aleshin and R. S. Finn, “SRC: a century of science brought to the clinic,” Neoplasia, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 599–607, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. R. S. Finn, “Targeting Src in breast cancer,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1379–1386, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. K. Fizazi, “The role of Src in prostate cancer,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1765–1773, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. L. N. Puls, M. Eadens, and W. Messersmith, “Current status of Src inhibitors in solid tumor malignancies,” Oncologist, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 566–578, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. L. Griffin and J. P. Shockcor, “Metabolic profiles of cancer cells,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 551–561, 2004. View at Scopus
  52. A. L. Harris, “Hypoxia—a key regulatory factor in tumour growth,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2002. View at Scopus
  53. T. W. Grunt, A. Lametschwandtner, and O. Staindl, “The vascular pattern of basal cell tumors: light microscopy and scanning electron microscopic study on vascular corrosion casts,” Microvascular Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 371–386, 1985. View at Scopus
  54. M. W. Dewhirst, C. Y. Tso, R. Oliver, C. S. Gustafson, T. W. Secomb, and J. F. Gross, “Morphologic and hemodynamic comparison of tumor and healing normal tissue microvasculature,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 1989. View at Scopus
  55. J. M. Brown and A. J. Giaccia, “The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy,” Cancer Research, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1408–1416, 1998. View at Scopus
  56. R. H. Thomlinson and L. H. Gray, “The histological structure of some human lung cancers and the possible implications for radiotherapy,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 9, pp. 539–549, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. M. Höckel and P. Vaupel, “Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, biologic, and molecular aspects,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 266–276, 2001. View at Scopus
  58. J. Pouysségur, F. Dayan, and N. M. Mazure, “Hypoxia signalling in cancer and approaches to enforce tumour regression,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7092, pp. 437–443, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. L. Liu and M. C. Simon, “Regulation of transcription and translation by hypoxia,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 492–497, 2004. View at Scopus
  60. G. L. Semenza and G. L. Wang, “A nuclear factor induced by hypoxia via de novo protein synthesis binds to the human erythropoietin gene enhancer at a site required for transcriptional activation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 5447–5454, 1992. View at Scopus
  61. G. L. Semenza, F. Agani, D. Feldser et al., “Hypoxia, HIF-1, and the pathophysiology of common human diseases,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 475, pp. 123–130, 2000. View at Scopus
  62. G. L. Wang, B. H. Jiang, E. A. Rue, and G. L. Semenza, “Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 5510–5514, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. C. C. Wykoff, N. J. P. Beasley, P. H. Watson et al., “Hypoxia-inducible expression of tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases,” Cancer Research, vol. 60, no. 24, pp. 7075–7083, 2000. View at Scopus
  64. A. Weidemann and R. S. Johnson, “Biology of HIF-1α,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 621–627, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. L. Deschamps, D. Bacha, V. Rebours et al., “The expression of the hypoxia markers CA9 and CXCR4 is correlated with survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the ileum,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 214–222, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. L. Xu, M. B. Nilsson, P. Saintigny et al., “Epidermal growth factor receptor regulates MET levels and invasiveness through hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in non-small cell lung cancer cells,” Oncogene, vol. 29, no. 18, pp. 2616–2627, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. F. de Nigris, V. Crudele, A. Giovane et al., “CXCR4/YY1 inhibition impairs VEGF network and angiogenesis during malignancy,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 32, pp. 14484–14489, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. P. A. Cronin, J. H. Wang, and H. P. Redmond, “Hypoxia increases the metastatic ability of breast cancer cells via upregulation of CXCR4,” BMC Cancer, vol. 10, article 225, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. T. Ide, Y. Kitajima, A. Miyoshi et al., “The hypoxic environment in tumor-stromal cells accelerates pancreatic cancer progression via the activation of paracrine hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met signaling,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2600–2607, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. E. H. Gort, A. J. Groot, T. L. P. Derks Van De Ven et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α expression requires PI 3-kinase activity and correlates with Akt1 phosphorylation in invasive breast carcinomas,” Oncogene, vol. 25, no. 45, pp. 6123–6127, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. N. Pore, Z. Jiang, H. K. Shu, E. Bernhard, G. D. Kao, and A. Maity, “Akt1 activation can augment hypoxia-inducible factor-1α expression by increasing protein translation through a mammalian target of rapamycin-independent pathway,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 471–479, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. D. Mottet, V. Dumont, Y. Deccache et al., “Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α protein level during hypoxic conditions by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/glycogen synthase kinase 3β pathway in HepG2 cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 33, pp. 31277–31285, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. E. Minet, T. Arnould, G. Michel et al., “ERK activation upon hypoxia: involvement in HIF-1 activation,” FEBS Letters, vol. 468, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. J. M. Lluis, F. Buricchi, P. Chiarugi, A. Morales, and J. C. Fernandez-Checa, “Dual role of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in hypoxia signaling: activation of nuclear factor-κB via c-SRC- and oxidant-dependent cell death,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 15, pp. 7368–7377, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. M. J. Gray, J. Zhang, L. M. Ellis et al., “HIF-1α, STAT3, CBP/p300 and Ref-1/APE are components of a transcriptional complex that regulates Src-dependent hypoxia-induced expression of VEGF in pancreatic and prostate carcinomas,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 19, pp. 3110–3120, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. N. A. Pham, J. M. M. M. Magalhaes, T. Do et al., “Activation of Src and Src-associated signaling pathways in relation to hypoxia in human cancer xenograft models,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 280–286, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. G. H. Mahabeleshwar and G. C. Kundu, “Tyrosine kinase p56lck regulates cell motility and nuclear factor κb-mediated secretion of urokinase type plasminogen activator through tyrosine phosphorylation of iκbα following hypoxia/reoxygenation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 52, pp. 52598–52612, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. P. J. P. Coopman, M. T. H. Do, M. Barth et al., “The Syk tyrosine kinase suppresses malignant growth of human breast cancer cells,” Nature, vol. 406, no. 6797, pp. 742–747, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. G. Chakraborty, H. Rangaswami, S. Jain, and G. C. Kundu, “Hypoxia regulates cross-talk between Syk and Lck leading to breast cancer progression and angiogenesis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 16, pp. 11322–11331, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. A. Sandin, M. Dagnell, A. Gonon et al., “Hypoxia followed by re-oxygenation induces oxidation of tyrosine phosphatases,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 820–826, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. J. T. Erler, K. L. Bennewith, M. Nicolau et al., “Lysyl oxidase is essential for hypoxia-induced metastasis,” Nature, vol. 440, no. 7088, pp. 1222–1226, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. L. M. Postovit, D. E. Abbott, S. L. Payne et al., “Hypoxia/reoxygenation: a dynamic regulator of lysyl oxidase-facilitated breast cancer migration,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 1369–1378, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. S. L. Payne, B. Fogelgren, A. R. Hess et al., “Lysyl oxidase regulates breast cancer cell migration and adhesion through a hydrogen peroxide-mediated mechanism,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 24, pp. 11429–11436, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. P. M. F. Siesser and S. K. Hanks, “The signaling and biological implications of FAK overexpression in cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 3233–3237, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. S. M. Frisch and H. Francis, “Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interactions induces apoptosis,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 619–626, 1994. View at Scopus
  86. S. M. Frisch, K. Vuori, E. Ruoslahti, and P. Y. Chan-Hui, “Control of adhesion-dependent cell survival by focal adhesion kinase,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 793–799, 1996. View at Scopus
  87. L. A. Liotta and E. Kohn, “Cancer and the homeless cell,” Nature, vol. 430, no. 7003, pp. 973–974, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. M. P. Playford and M. D. Schaller, “The interplay between Src and integrins in normal and tumor biology,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 48, pp. 7928–7946, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. A. Manohar, S. G. Shome, J. Lamar et al., “α3β1 integrin promotes keratinocyte cell survival through activation of a MEK/ERK signaling pathway,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 117, no. 18, pp. 4043–4054, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. V. Bouchard, M. J. Demers, S. Thibodeau et al., “Fak/Src signaling in human intestinal epithelial cell survival and anoikis: differentiation state-specific uncoupling with the PI3-K/Akt-1 and MEK/Erk pathways,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 212, no. 3, pp. 717–728, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. V. Bouchard, C. Harnois, M. J. Demers et al., “β1 integrin/Fak/Src signaling in intestinal epithelial crypt cell survival: integration of complex regulatory mechanisms,” Apoptosis, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 531–542, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. J. S. Desgrosellier, L. A. Barnes, D. J. Shields et al., “An integrin αvβ3-c-Src oncogenic unit promotes anchorage-independence and tumor progression,” Nature Medicine, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1163–1169, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. J. Brábek, S. S. Constancio, P. F. Siesser, N. Y. Shin, A. Pozzi, and S. K. Hanks, “Crk-associated substrate tyrosine phosphorylation sites are critical for invasion and metastasis of Src-transformed cells,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 307–315, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. C. M. Díaz-Montero, J. N. Wygant, and B. W. McIntyre, “PI3-K/Akt-mediated anoikis resistance of human osteosarcoma cells requires Src activation,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1491–1500, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. L. Wei, Y. Yang, X. Zhang, and Q. Yu, “Altered regulation of Src upon cell detachment protects human lung adenocarcinoma cells from anoikis,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 56, pp. 9052–9061, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. L. Wei, Y. Yang, X. Zhang, and Q. Yu, “Anchorage-independent phosphorylation of p130Cas protects lung adenocarcinoma cells from anoikis,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 439–449, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. M. J. Demers, S. Thibodeau, D. Noël et al., “Intestinal epithelial cancer cell anoikis resistance: EGFR-mediated sustained activation of Src overrides Fak-dependent signaling to MEK/Erk and/or PI3-K/Akt-1,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 639–654, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. G. Liu, X. Meng, Y. Jin et al., “Inhibitory role of focal adhesion kinase on anoikis in the lung cancer cell A549,” Cell Biology International, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 663–670, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. Y. Sakuma, Y. Yamazaki, Y. Nakamura et al., “WZ4002, a thirdgeneration EGFR inhibitor, can overcome anoikis resistance in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas more efficiently than Src inhibitors,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 92, pp. 371–383, 2011.
  100. V. M. Golubovskaya, S. Gross, A. S. Kaur et al., “Simultaneous inhibition of focal adhesion kinase and Src enhances detachment and apoptosis in colon cancer cell lines,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 755–764, 2003. View at Scopus
  101. T. C. Windham, N. U. Parikh, D. R. Siwak et al., “Src activation regulates anoikis in human colon tumor cell lines,” Oncogene, vol. 21, no. 51, pp. 7797–7807, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. O. Warburg, “On the origin of cancer cells,” Science, vol. 123, no. 3191, pp. 309–314, 1956. View at Scopus
  103. J. S. Flier, M. M. Mueckler, P. Usher, and H. F. Lodish, “Elevated levels of glucose transport and transporter messenger RNA are induced by ras or src oncogenes,” Science, vol. 235, no. 4795, pp. 1492–1495, 1987. View at Scopus
  104. R. L. Elstrom, D. E. Bauer, M. Buzzai et al., “Akt stimulates aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 3892–3899, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. R. Karni, Y. Dor, E. Keshet, O. Meyuhas, and A. Levitzki, “Activated pp60c-Src leads to elevated hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α expression under normoxia,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 45, pp. 42919–42925, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. B. H. Jiang, F. Agani, A. Passaniti, and G. L. Semenza, “V-SRC induces expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and transcription of genes encoding vascular endothelial growth factor and enolase 1: involvement of HIF-1 in tumor progression,” Cancer Research, vol. 57, no. 23, pp. 5328–5335, 1997. View at Scopus
  107. J. M. Gleadle and P. J. Ratcliffe, “Induction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1, erythropoietin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and glucose transporter-1 by hypoxia: evidence against a regulatory role for Src kinase,” Blood, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 503–509, 1997. View at Scopus
  108. E. Zelzer, Y. Levy, C. Kahana, B. Z. Shilo, M. Rubinstein, and B. Cohen, “Insulin induces transcription of target genes through the hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1α/ARNT,” EMBO Journal, vol. 17, no. 17, pp. 5085–5094, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. E. Laughner, P. Taghavi, K. Chiles, P. C. Mahon, and G. L. Semenza, “HER2 (neu) signaling increases the rate of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) synthesis: novel mechanism for HIF-1-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor expression,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 3995–4004, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. C. Chen, N. Pore, A. Behrooz, F. Ismail-Beigi, and A. Maity, “Regulation of glut1 mRNA by hypoxia-inducible factor-1: interaction between H-ras and hypoxia,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 12, pp. 9519–9525, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. J. E. Darnell Jr., “STAT3, HIF-1, glucose addiction and Warburg effect,” Aging, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 890–891, 2010. View at Scopus
  112. M. Demaria, C. Giorgi, M. Lebiedzinska et al., “A STAT3-mediated metabolic switch is involved in tumour transformation and STAT3 addiction,” Aging, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 823–842, 2010. View at Scopus
  113. X. Liu, A. K. Gupta, P. M. Corry, and Y. J. Lee, “Hypoglycemia-induced c-Jun phosphorylation is mediated by c-Jun N- terminal kinase 1 and Lyn kinase in drug-resistant human breast carcinoma MCF-7/ADR cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 18, pp. 11690–11693, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. Y. J. Lee, S. S. Galoforo, J. E. Sim et al., “Dominant-negative Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK-1) inhibits metabolic oxidative stress during glucose deprivation in a human breast carcinoma cell line,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 575–584, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. M. Kansara and M. V. Berridge, “Oncogenes modulate cell sensitivity to apoptosis induced by glucose deprivation,” Anticancer Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2503–2510, 2004. View at Scopus
  116. S. Pirkmajer and A. V. Chibalin, “Serum starvation: caveat emptor,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 301, no. 2, pp. C272–C279, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. N. Martin-Orozco and C. Dong, “Inhibitory costimulation and anti-tumor immunity,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 288–298, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. R. M. Martín-Orozco, C. Almaraz-Pro, F. J. Rodríguez-Ubreva et al., “EGF prevents the neuroendocrine differentiation of LNCaP cells induced by serum deprivation: the modulator role of PI3K/Akt,” Neoplasia, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 614–624, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. A. Ruck, E. Jakobson, S. Bjorkman, and S. Paulie, “Adaptation of human bladder carcinoma cell lines to serum-free growth. Evidence for autocrine growth stimulation,” Anticancer Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 1994. View at Scopus
  120. A. Ruck and S. Paulie, “The epidermal growth factor receptor is involved in autocrine growth of human bladder carcinoma cell lines,” Anticancer Research, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1925–1931, 1997. View at Scopus
  121. A. Ruck and S. Paulie, “EGF, TGFα, AR and HB-EGF are autocrine growth factors for human bladder carcinoma cell lines,” Anticancer Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1447–1452, 1998. View at Scopus
  122. J. T. Shin, S. R. Opalenik, J. N. Wehby et al., “Serum-starvation induces the extracellular appearance of FGF-1,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1312, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. A. Simm, V. Hoppe, A. Gazit, and J. Hoppe, “Platelet-derived growth factor isoforms prevent cell death during starvation of AKR-2B fibroblasts,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 295–302, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. J. H. Baek, J. E. Jang, C. M. Kang, H. Y. Chung, N. D. Kim, and K. W. Kim, “Hypoxia-induced VEGF enhances tumor survivability via suppression of serum deprivation-induced apoptosis,” Oncogene, vol. 19, no. 40, pp. 4621–4631, 2000. View at Scopus
  125. Y. D. Jung, K. Nakano, W. Liu, G. E. Gallick, and L. M. Ellis, “Extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation is required for up- regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by serum starvation in human colon carcinoma cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 59, no. 19, pp. 4804–4807, 1999. View at Scopus
  126. R. J. Epstein, B. J. Druker, T. M. Roberts, and C. D. Stiles, “Modulation of a Mr 175,000 c-neu receptor isoform in G8/DHFR cells by serum starvation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 18, pp. 10746–10751, 1990. View at Scopus
  127. P. Bellosta, Q. Zhang, S. P. Goff, and C. Basilico, “Signaling through the ARK tyrosine kinase receptor protects from apoptosis in the absence of growth stimulation,” Oncogene, vol. 15, no. 20, pp. 2387–2397, 1997. View at Scopus
  128. Y. M. Fu, Z. X. Yu, B. A. Pelayo, V. J. Ferrans, and G. G. Meadows, “Focal adhesion kinase-dependent apoptosis of melanoma induced by tyrosine and phenylalanine deficiency,” Cancer Research, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 758–765, 1999. View at Scopus
  129. J. A. Kuzman, A. M. Gerdes, S. Kobayashi, and Q. Liang, “Thyroid hormone activates Akt and prevents serum starvation-induced cell death in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 841–844, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. M. V. Risbud, J. Fertala, E. J. Vresilovic, T. J. Albert, and I. M. Shapiro, “Nucleus pulposus cells upregulate PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK signaling pathways under hypoxic conditions and resist apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 882–889, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. R. Troncoso, J. M. Vicencio, V. Parra et al., “Energy30 preserving effects of IGF-1 antagonize starvation-induced cardiac autophagy,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 93, pp. 320–329, 2012.
  132. C. L. Chen, P. C. Chan, S. H. Wang, Y. R. Pan, and H. C. Chen, “Elevated expression of protein kinase Cδ induces cell scattering upon serum deprivation,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 17, pp. 2901–2913, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. J. Yang, Y. Takahashi, E. Cheng et al., “GSK-3β promotes cell survival by modulating Bif-1-dependent autophagy and cell death,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 861–870, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. J. K. Ching, P. Rajguru, N. Marupudi, S. Banerjee, and J. S. Fisher, “A role for AMPK in increased insulin action after serum starvation,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 299, no. 5, pp. C1171–C1179, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. N. Yamamoto, G. Mammadova, R. X. D. Song, Y. Fukami, and K. I. Sato, “Tyrosine phosphorylation of p145met mediated by EGFR and Src is required for serum-independent survival of human bladder carcinoma cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 119, no. 22, pp. 4623–4633, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. S. Kihira, J. Yoshida, Y. Kawada et al., “Membrane microdomain-associated uroplakin IIIa contributes to Src-dependent mechanisms of anti-apoptotic proliferation in human bladder carcinoma cells,” Biology Open. In press.
  137. D. Jenkins and A. S. Woolf, “Uroplakins: new molecular players in the biology of urinary tract malformations,” Kidney International, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 195–200, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. P. Khandelwal, S. N. Abraham, and G. Apodaca, “Cell biology and physiology of the uroepithelium,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 297, no. 6, pp. F1477–F1501, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. P. Thumbikat, R. E. Berry, A. J. Schaeffer, and D. J. Klumpp, “Differentiation-induced uroplakin III expression promotes urothelial cell death in response to uropathogenic E. coli,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. K. Sakakibara, K. I. Sato, K. I. Yoshino et al., “Molecular identification and characterization of Xenopus egg uroplakin III, an egg raft-associated transmembrane protein that is tyrosine-phosphorylated upon fertilization,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 15, pp. 15029–15037, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. A. K. M. Hasan, K. I. Sato, K. Sakakibara et al., “Uroplakin III, a novel Src substrate in Xenopus egg rafts, is a target for sperm protease essential for fertilization,” Developmental Biology, vol. 286, no. 2, pp. 483–492, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. A. K. M. Mahbub Hasan, Z. Ou, K. Sakakibara et al., “Characterization of Xenopus egg membrane microdomains containing uroplakin Ib/III complex: roles of their molecular interactions for subcellular localization and signal transduction,” Genes to Cells, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 251–267, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. A. K. M. Hasan, Y. Fukami, and K. I. Sato, “Gamete membrane microdomains and their associated molecules in fertilization signaling,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus