Review Article
The Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Prognostication, Diagnosis, and Management of Thyroid Carcinoma
Table 1
A comparison of studies examining the utility of FDG-PET in detecting malignancy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.
| First author (year) | No. of patients | No. of carcinoma (%) | Definition of FDG-PET positivity | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
| Kresnik (2003) [28] | 24 | 9 (37.5) | Focal uptake with SUV > 2 | 100 | 100 | Mitchell (2005) [29] | 24 | 11 (45.8) | Focal uptake | 60 | 91 | de Geus-Oei (2006) [30] | 44 | 6 (13.6) | Focal uptake | 100 | 66 | Sebastianes (2007) [31] | 42 | 11 (26.2) | Focal uptake | 100 | 39 | Hales (2008) [32] | 15 | 7 (46.7) | Focal uptake with SUV > 2 | 57 | 50 | Smith (2008) [33] | 23 | 5 (21.7) | Area under SUV curve > 175.5 | 100 | 44 | Traugott (2010) [34] | 51* | 8 (15.6) | Focal uptake | 100 | 59 | Vriens (2011) [35] | 225# | 58 (25.8) | Varied | 94.8 | 47.9 |
|
|
FDG-PET: fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; SUV: standardized uptake value.
*An ongoing prospective trial; #a meta-analysis.
|