About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2008 (2008), Article ID 792428, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/792428
Review Article

Postulated Role of Vasoactive Neuropeptide-Related Immunopathology of the Blood Brain Barrier and Virchow-Robin Spaces in the Aetiology of Neurological-Related Conditions

1Gold Coast Population Health Unit, Queensland Health, Southport, Gold Coast, Queensland 4215, Australia
2Population Health and Neuroimmunology Unit, Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland 4229, Australia

Received 17 July 2008; Accepted 16 December 2008

Academic Editor: Fulvio D'Acquisto

Copyright © 2008 D. R. Staines et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Vasoactive neuropeptides (VNs) such as pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) have critical roles as neurotransmitters, vasodilators including perfusion and hypoxia regulators, as well as immune and nociception modulators. They have key roles in blood vessels in the central nervous system (CNS) including maintaining functional integrity of the blood brain barrier (BBB) and blood spinal barrier (BSB). VNs are potent activators of adenylate cyclase and thus also have a key role in cyclic AMP production affecting regulatory T cell and other immune functions. Virchow-Robin spaces (VRSs) are perivascular compartments surrounding small vessels within the CNS and contain VNs. Autoimmunity of VNs or VN receptors may affect BBB and VRS function and, therefore, may contribute to the aetiology of neurological-related conditions including multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. VN autoimmunity will likely affect CNS and immunological homeostasis. Various pharmacological and immunological treatments including phosphodiesterase inhibitors and plasmapheresis may be indicated.

1. Introduction

Vasoactive neuropeptides (VNs) (e.g., pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)) are widely distributed in the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) including autonomic nervous system (ANS) and peripheral tissues including heart, lung, pancreas, adrenal gland, gonads, and gastrointestinal tract as well as immune cells and lymphatic system [1].

VNs have critical roles and functions as neurotransmitters and neuroregulators, neurotrophic stimulators, hormonal regulators, vasodilators (including perfusion and hypoxia regulators), as well as immune and nociception modulators. They have key roles in blood vessel function in the CNSand contribute to high-level neurological functions including memory and learning [2]. They have a well-described neuroprotective role [3] and act as inflammatory mediators in microglial activation [4].

VNs exert potent effects in metabolism as they have a vital role in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production and regulation through adenylate cyclase (AC) activation. Immunological dysregulation of vital biochemical and/or epigenetic mechanisms affecting VNs resulting in down-regulation of cAMP are possible pathways by which disease entities become manifest. Their role along with other neurotrophic factors [5] in maintaining cAMP levels [6] may be of vital importance for the integrity of blood brain barrier (BBB) and blood spinal barrier (BSB).

BBB and BSB have traditionally been regarded as the main barriers between the brain and spinal cord parenchyma and the intravascular compartment and are, therefore, important in keeping immune cells and macromolecules from interfering with brain and spinal neurological processes. However, disruption of BBB and BSBis well known in certain pathological states suggesting that they function more as a “sieve” rather than an absolute barrier.

Virchow-Robin spaces (VRSs) are compartments surrounding small vessels within the CNS which contain interstitial fluid and, whilesome functional contact with subarachnoid spaces may occur for solute exchange, they may not contain CSF as commonly thought [7]. VRSs have important connections with lymphatic drainage of the head and neck [8], having intricate pial relations and providing a surface for activity of neuropeptides, hormones, and cytokines. Pial cells may have a role in protecting the brain from exogenous catecholamines [9], and VRS may have a complex role in leukocyte recruitment across the BBB [10].

VNs are known to have neuroprotective effects through hypoxia protection on passage through the BBB [11] via a transport mechanism which enables the intact peptides to enter the parenchymal space of the brain [12]. Additionally, VNs have protective effects on neurons and glial cells [13]. VNs may have a significant role in blood BBB/BSB function and likely assist in immune regulation of VRS in the brain and spinal cord. The present paper asserts that in view of the many vital roles of VNs in CNS neuroregulatory and immunological function including BBB function, autoimmunity to VNs or VN receptors will have significant effects on homeostasis resulting in disease states.

2. Vasoactive Neuropeptides in Immunological Control

VNs exert influence over inflammatory control mechanisms including influencing Th1 to Th2 shift, and the suppression of TNF alpha [14] has been established in cAMP participation in vascular dysfunction involving endothelial cells [15]. The VRS has been identified as a location for immunoreactive lymphocytes in penetration of neuronal parenchyma [16]. Also, VIP has been identified in connection with neuronal function and VRS suggesting that VIP may have a regulatory function associated with vasodilatation [17]. We assert that important immunoregulation occurs in VRS and that this may involve VN regulation. Many regulatory functions are dependent on IL-10 and IL-4, these may be compromised in VN failure. Moreover, leakiness in BBB and BSB functions may encourage development or relapses in neurological conditions, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) [18].

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) function to control autoreactive T cells in the periphery [19]. Moreover, Treg function is substantially influenced by VNs [20] and may also have influence over Th17 direction [21]. Loss of Treg function in VRS will, therefore, have significant implications for inflammatory control. Moreover, Th17 development occurs under IL-6 and TGF beta influence [22], and this may be a key switching point from a protective Treg to an autoimmune Th17 phenotype. Certainly, Th1 and Th17 ratios are important in brain and spinal inflammation regulation [23].

Interestingly, a number of seemingly unrelated disorders may be implicated in this postulated pathology. For example, Crohn's disease (CD) and MS are inflammatory disorders with known Th1-directed cytokines and loss of Foxp3 Treg function [24, 25].

As VRS have important roles in controlling macrophage and perivascular infiltrates in MS [26], their immunological function in relation to VNs becomes of considerable interest. Complement-fixing myelinolytic antigens have been identified in the VRS in early MS [27], indicating the possible involvement of VRS in immune activity.

3. Postulated Vasoactive Neuropeptide Autoimmunity and the Blood Brain Barrier

VN autoimmunity has been postulated as a contributing cause for some fatigue-related conditions [28]. The present paper explores the possible role VN immune dysregulation may have on VRS function and CNS activity as this anatomical pathway may have a significant bearing on disease aetiology.

Because VNs are widely distributed in the CNS, neurovascular, and immune systems, they exert extraordinary influence on neurological, vascular, and immunological functions. Significantly, VNs exert mostly anti-inflammatory activities and loss of their function, for example, through autoimmune compromise, could become manifest as unmodulated activation of immune responses. Autoimmunity directed at VN guanine protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is currently unproven and loss-of-function autoimmunity to GPCRs generally is not widely documented. However, parallels exist with other conditions such as Sjogren's syndrome which has T cell and/or B cell antibody targeting of acetylcholine GPCRs [29]. The role of VNs in linking the innate and acquired immune systems [30] suggests that there would be significant effects on homeostasis if compromised.

Pain, fatigue, and dysregulation of nociception may be prominent features in these syndromes as a result of VN compromise in the CNS. Pain and nociception are mediated through spinal and cerebral pathways particularly via spinothalamic, spinoreticular, and spinomesencephalic structures. The periaqueductal grey (PAG) region surrounding the third ventricle and cerebral aqueduct is a key area for regulation of noxious stimuli. This area has high-density VN presence and may be a prominent target for VN autoimmune compromise. Similarly, VRS have a critical role in maintaining the interstitial fluid immunological milieu and may be a vulnerable area for VN compromise.

It is likely that BBB, BSB, and VRS play an important role in immunological maintenance and homeostasis within the CNS. Macrophages in VRS express MHC class II antigens and interact with lymphocytes from the blood in initiating and promoting immune responses to foreign antigens in the brain. Immunological activity within VRS may have a role in a number of neurological conditions. Moreover, sites deficient in BBB include the subarachnoid space and pial surface, and circumventricular organs may be more prone to macromolecule penetration of CSF, and this may have implications regarding autoimmune dysfunction within the CNS [31]. Collections of macrophages may occur in VRS following trauma in a proinflammatory context [32] and pathological dilatation of VRS may occur from a variety of causes including ischaemia [33].

VRS distribution in anatomically specific locations reflects the functional attributes of these locations. For example, VRS in the nucleus tractus solitarius in the dorsal medulla oblongata suggests they may have a role in viscerosensory and autonomic functions [34]. Capillary diversity within the subfornical organ (SFO) and area postrema (AP) may function as low-resistance pathways for the rapid dispersion of blood-borne hormones inside their organ boundaries and this may have a role in the regulation of blood pressure and body fluids [35]. Hence, these functions linked to VRS microanatomy may be particularly susceptible to VN compromise.

4. Postulated Cerebrovascular and CNS Effects of VN Failure

Vascular compromise within the CNS possibly as a result of VN compromise may give rise to features consistent with certain forms of dementia. Fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) is a neurodegenerative disease in which a vascular component is suggested and immunoreactivity of Bax, a proapoptotic protein regulated in part by VNs in astrocytes, suggests a role for autoimmunity in the pathology of FTD [36]. Astrogliosis in FTD corresponds with SPECT hypoperfusion, suggesting that astrocyte disruption may be related to disturbances of cerebral perfusion in FTD [37]. Cognitive dysfunction is associated with reduced cerebral blood flow in different types of dementia [38]. Moreover, VRS dilatation associated with microvessel abnormality may contribute to the diagnosis of vascular dementias [39]. Changes in social behaviour occur in cerebrovascular comprise and may result from an FTD-like syndrome [40]. Similarly, reduction in cortical blood flow has been identified in CFS patients [41, 42]; however, these findings were not replicated in a study of twins with CFS [43].

Astroglial water channel aquaporin (AQP4) is essential for the maintenance of blood-brain barrier integrity [44]. Antibodies to AQP4 have a highly specific role in neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and characteristically bind to cerebral microvessels, pia mater, and VRSs [45]. Secretin is important for other aquaporin expression via vasopressin. Secretin receptor-null mice, for example, have reduced renal expression of AQP2 and AQP4 [46]. Interestingly, VIP, which is related to secretin, also has a relationship with aquaporin distribution and function. An association with VRS has been identified supporting the view that cortical nerve cells release VIP in the perivascular space during periods of activity and thus contribute to local vasodilatation associated with neuronal function. There is an important relationship whereby ATP over expression has a down-regulatory impact on AQP4 expression [47]. Adenylate cyclase compromise could have an impact on ATP levels by failure to convert to cAMP, arguably maintaining high levels of ATP with adverse consequences for AQP4 function. Thus, VN failure may present with dementia-like signs and symptoms.

5. Conclusions

Neurological conditions often present with fatigue and other symptoms including memory and concentration loss, emotional lability, and confusion. Multisystem involvement including cerebrospinal effects of these conditions may be explained in part through VN compromise. In particular, cerebrovascular and spinovascular compromise acting at the ultra-microscopic level involving BBB and BSB may contribute to these disorders. Compromise of VN receptors critical to BBB and BSB functioning may have a role in these disorders and should be the subject of further research.

This paper asserts that CNS vascular compromise including immunological dysfunction of the VRS may be linked to postulated VN autoimmunity. Evidence for compromise of VN receptors at different levels including VN receptor mRNA, protein transcription, cellular migration and trafficking, cell membrane localisation, as well as possible antibody or T cell targeting will be required to support this hypothesis.

There are significant treatment implications from this hypothesis. VNs, such as PACAP and VIP, exert potent effects in metabolism as they have a vital role in cAMP production and regulation through AC activation. Phosphodiesterase (PDE) enzymes metabolise cAMP as a means of feedback regulation of cAMP levels. VN compromise will result in impaired AC activation and hence impaired cAMP production. Thus, phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDEIs), novel therapeutic substances used to promote cAMP levels, may have a role in treatment of VN autoimmune conditions.

Proof of this hypothesis will require demonstration of pathological antibodies or T cells specific to VN immunological pathology. Alternatively, antagonistic variants of VNs themselves may exist.

References

  1. D. Vaudry, B. J. Gonzalez, M. Basille, L. Yon, A. Fournier, and H. Vaudry, “Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and its receptors: from structure to functions,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 269–324, 2000.
  2. C. J. Zhou, S. Shioda, T. Yada, N. Inagaki, S. J. Pleasure, and S. Kikuyama, “PACAP and its receptors exert pleiotropic effects in the nervous system by activating multiple signalling pathways,” Current Protein and Peptide Science, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 423–439, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. D. E. Brenneman, “Neuroprotection: a comparative view of vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide,” Peptides, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1720–1726, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Delgado, J. Leceta, and D. Ganea, “Vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide inhibit the production of inflammatory mediators by activated microglia,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 155–164, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. Y. Igarashi, H. Utsumi, H. Chiba, et al., “Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor induces barrier function of endothelial cells forming the blood-brain barrier,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 261, no. 1, pp. 108–112, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Baranczyk-Kuzma, K. L. Audus, F. L. Guillot, and R. T. Borchardt, “Effects of selected vasoactive substances on adenylate cyclase activity in brain, isolated brain microvessels and primary cultures of brain microvessel endothelial cells,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 209–214, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. H. Öztürk and Ü. Aydingöz, “Comparison of MR signal intensities of cerebral perivascular (Virchow-Robin) and subarachnoid spaces,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 902–904, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. M. M. Esiri and D. Gay, “Immunological and neuropathological significance of the Virchow-Robin space,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 100, no. 1-2, pp. 3–8, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. E. T. Zhang, C. B. E. Inman, and R. O. Weller, “Interrelationships of the pia mater and the perivascular (Virchow-Robin) spaces in the human cerebrum,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 170, pp. 111–123, 1990.
  10. I. Bechmann, I. Galea, and V. H. Perry, “What is the blood-brain barrier (not)?” Trends in Immunology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. N. Takeda, M. Murozono, S. Watanabe, A. Isshiki, and Y. Watanabe, “Neuroprotective effects of novel derivatives of vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide in two brain ischemic models on mice,” Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 240–248, 2005.
  12. W. A. Banks, D. Uchida, A. Arimura, A. Somogyvári-Vigh, and S. Shioda, “Transport of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide across the blood-brain barrier and the prevention of ischemia-induced death of hippocampal neurons,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 805, pp. 270–279, 1996.
  13. O. Masmoudi-Kouki, P. Gandolfo, H. Castel, et al., “Role of PACAP and VIP in astroglial functions,” Peptides, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1753–1760, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Delgado, C. Abad, C. Martinez, et al., “PACAP in immunity and inflammation,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 992, pp. 141–157, 2003.
  15. S. Koga, S. Morris, S. Ogawa, et al., “TNF modulates endothelial properties by decreasing cAMP,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 268, no. 5, pp. C1104–C1113, 1995.
  16. H. Tomimoto, I. Akiguchi, H. Akiyama, J. Kimura, and T. Yanagihara, “T-cell infiltration and expression of MHC class II antigen by macrophages and microglia in a heterogeneous group in leukoencephalopathy,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 579–586, 1993.
  17. E.-T. Zhang, J. D. Mikkelsen, J. Fahrenkrug, M. Møller, D. Kronborg, and M. Lauritzen, “Prepro-vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-derived peptide sequences in cerebral blood vessels of rats: on the functional anatomy of metabolic autoregulation,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 932–938, 1991.
  18. F. Odoardi, N. Kawakami, W. E. F. Klinkert, H. Wekerle, and A. Flügel, “Blood-borne soluble protein antigen intensifies T cell activation in autoimmune CNS lesions and exacerbates clinical disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 47, pp. 18625–18630, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Romagnani, “Regulation of the T cell response,” Clinical & Experimental Allergy, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1357–1366, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Delgado, A. Chorny, E. Gonzalez-Rey, and D. Ganea, “Vasoactive intestinal peptide generates CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in vivo,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1327–1338, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Leceta, R. P. Gomariz, C. Martinez, M. Carrión, A. Arranz, and Y. Juarranz, “Vasoactive intestinal peptide regulates Th17 function in autoimmune inflammation,” NeuroImmunoModulation, vol. 14, no. 3-4, pp. 134–138, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. Oukka, “Interplay between pathogenic Th17 and regulatory T cells,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 66, supplement 3, pp. iii87–iii90, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. I. M. Stromnes, L. M. Cerretti, D. Liggitt, R. A. Harris, and J. M. Goverman, “Differential regulation of central nervous system autoimmunity by TH1 and TH17 cells,” Nature Medicine, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 337–342, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. I. Ricciardelli, K. J. Lindley, M. Londei, and S. Quaratino, “Anti tumour necrosis-α therapy increases the number of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in children affected by Crohn's disease,” Immunology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 178–183, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. A. A. Vandenbark, N. E. Culbertson, R. M. Bartholomew, et al., “Therapeutic vaccination with a trivalent T-cell receptor (TCR) peptide vaccine restores deficient FoxP3 expression and TCR recognition in subjects with multiple sclerosis,” Immunology, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 66–78, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. van Horssen, L. Bö, C. M. P. Vos, I. Virtanen, and H. E. de Vries, “Basement membrane proteins in multiple sclerosis-associated inflammatory cuffs: potential role in influx and transport of leukocytes,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 722–729, 2005.
  27. F. W. Gay, “Early cellular events in multiple sclerosis: intimations of an extrinsic myelinolytic antigen,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 234–240, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. D. R. Staines, “Postulated vasoactive neuropeptide autoimmunity in fatigue-related conditions: a brief review and hypothesis,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 25–39, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. T. P. Gordon, A. I. Bolstad, M. Rischmueller, R. Jonsson, and S. A. Waterman, “Autoantibodies in primary Sjögren's syndrome: new insights into mechanisms of autoantibody diversification and disease pathogenesis,” Autoimmunity, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 2001.
  30. M. Delgado and D. Ganea, “Inhibition of IFN-γ-induced Janus kinase-1-STAT1 activation in macrophages by vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 165, no. 6, pp. 3051–3057, 2000.
  31. R. D. Broadwell and M. V. Sofroniew, “Serum proteins bypass the blood-brain fluid barriers for extracellular entry to the central nervous system,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 245–263, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. C.-A. Mueller, H. J. Schluesener, S. Conrad, R. Meyermann, and J. M. Schwab, “Spinal cord injury induces lesional expression of the proinflammatory and antiangiogenic cytokine EMAP II,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1007–1015, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. K. Shiratori, M. Mrowka, A. Toussaint, G. Spalke, and S. Bien, “Extreme, unilateral widening of Virchow-Robin spaces: case report,” Neuroradiology, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 990–992, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. P. M. Gross, K. M. Wall, J. J. Pang, S. W. Shaver, and D. S. Wainman, “Microvascular specializations promoting rapid interstitial solute dispersion in nucleus tractus solitarius,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 259, no. 6, pp. R1131–R1138, 1990.
  35. P. M. Gross, “Morphology and physiology of capillary systems in subregions of the subfornical organ and area postrema,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 1010–1025, 1991.
  36. K. E. Nichol, R. Kim, and C. W. Cotman, “Bcl-2 family protein behavior in frontotemporal dementia implies vascular involvement,” Neurology, vol. 56, no. 11, supplement 4, pp. S35–S40, 2001.
  37. J. A. Martinac, D. K. Craft, J. H. Su, R. C. Kim, and C. W. Cotman, “Astrocytes degenerate in frontotemporal dementia: possible relation to hypoperfusion,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 195–207, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. A. Osawa, S. Maeshima, Y. Shimamoto, et al., “Relationship between cognitive function and regional cerebral blood flow in different types of dementia,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 739–745, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. T. F. Patankar, D. Mitra, A. Varma, J. Snowden, D. Neary, and A. Jackson, “Dilatation of the Virchow-Robin space is a sensitive indicator of cerebral microvascular disease: study in elderly patients with dementia,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1512–1520, 2005.
  40. S. Nakano, T. Asada, F. Yamashita, et al., “Relationship between antisocial behavior and regional cerebral blood flow in frontotemporal dementia,” NeuroImage, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 301–306, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. M. Ichise, I. E. Salit, S. E. Abbey, et al., “Assessment of regional cerebral perfusion by 99Tcm-HMPAO SPECT in chronic fatigue syndrome,” Nuclear Medicine Communications, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 767–772, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. K. Yoshiuchi, J. Farkas, and B. H. Natelson, “Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome have reduced absolute cortical blood flow,” Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 83–86, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. D. H. Lewis, H. S. Mayberg, M. E. Fischer, et al., “Monozygotic twins discordant for chronic fatigue syndrome: regional cerebral blood flow SPECT,” Radiology, vol. 219, no. 3, pp. 766–773, 2001.
  44. J. Zhou, H. Kong, X. Hua, M. Xiao, J. Ding, and G. Hu, “Altered blood-brain barrier integrity in adult aquaporin-4 knockout mice,” NeuroReport, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2008.
  45. S. Jarius, F. Paul, D. Franciotta, et al., “Mechanisms of disease: aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica,” Nature Clinical Practice Neurology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 202–214, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. J. Y. S. Chu, S. C. K. Chung, A. K. M. Lam, S. Tam, S. K. Chung, and B. K. C. Chow, “Phenotypes developed in secretin receptor-null mice indicated a role for secretin in regulating renal water reabsorption,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 2499–2511, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. M. Lee, S.-J. Lee, H.-J. Choi, et al., “Regulation of AQP4 protein expression in rat brain astrocytes: role of P2X7 receptor activation,” Brain Research, vol. 1195, pp. 1–11, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar