- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 510243, 10 pages
Marked Independent Relationship between Circulating Interleukin-6 Concentrations and Endothelial Activation in Rheumatoid Arthritis
1Cardiovascular Pathophysiology and Genomics Research Unit, School of Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, P.O. Box 1012 Johannesburg, Melville 2109, South Africa
2Department of Rheumatology, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
3Milpark Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
4Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IFIMAV, Avenida de Valdecilla s/n, 39008 Santander, Spain
Received 17 June 2013; Revised 10 November 2013; Accepted 11 November 2013
Academic Editor: Teresa Zelante
Copyright © 2013 Patrick H. Dessein et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We examined the potential impact of conventional compared with nonconventional cardiovascular risk factors including interleukin-6 levels on endothelial activation in RA. Circulating soluble E-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 concentrations were measured in 217 African patients (112 black and 105 white) with RA. In comprehensive confounder adjusted mixed regression models, 5 conventional and 4 nonconventional cardiovascular risk factors were associated ( to <0.0001) with endothelial activation. Interleukin-6 was the only risk factor related to each endothelial activation molecule and independently contributed by 18% and significantly more than other risk factors to the variation in overall endothelial activation as estimated by an SD (z) score of endothelial activation molecule concentrations. The independent interleukin-6-overall endothelial activation relationships were reproduced in various subgroups. Interleukin-6 concentrations relate consistently, markedly, and to a larger extent than other cardiovascular risk factors to endothelial activation in RA. Assessment of interleukin-6 concentrations may enhance cardiovascular risk stratification in RA.
Atherogenesis is increasingly recognized as a dynamic and inflammatory process [1–3] and is initiated by activation of endothelial cells upon exposure to cardiovascular risk factors. This results in enhanced expression of soluble forms of selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). These molecules promote adherence of monocytes to the endothelium. Once adherent, monocytes penetrate the endothelial lining and enter the intima of the arterial wall by diapedesis between endothelial cells. This monocyte transmigration is largely effectuated by monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) that interacts with the monocyte receptor CCR2. Indeed, MCP-1 plays a unique and crucial role in the initiation of atherosclerosis .
Circulating concentrations of molecules that mediate endothelial activation associate with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the general population [5–7]. Patients with RA experience enhanced endothelial activation that associates with endothelial dysfunction as assessed by endothelial dependent flow-mediated dilatation and carotid atherosclerosis [8–11]. These observations support the contribution of systemic inflammation to the now well-documented excess cardiovascular disease burden in patients with RA [12–15]. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors and disease characteristics relate independently of one another to both atherosclerosis and cardiovascular event rates in RA [16–18]. However, these cardiovascular outcomes result from the cumulative effects of cardiovascular risk factor exposure accrued during the entire lifespan [9, 10]. By contrast, endothelial activation relates more closely to the effects of cardiovascular risk factors present at the time of evaluation and can be rapidly reversed by treatment with cardioprotective drugs [9–11] and, in RA, by effective suppression of cytokine production or cytokine blockade [19, 20]. Enhanced endothelial activation precedes increased atherosclerosis in RA . Evaluation of endothelial activation further provides insight in atherogenic mechanisms that can be disease [11, 21] and population specific . This has implications in individualized cardiovascular risk assessment .
Available data on potential determinants of endothelial activation in RA is limited . Interleukin-6 (IL-6) may be particularly important in this context [9, 23–26]. This cytokine is not only a major circulating cytokine  that relates most closely to clinical disease activity in RA  but also promotes synovitis by inducing neovascularization, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and synovial hyperplasia . Indeed, IL-6 blockade is highly effective in controlling RA activity [23, 24]. Overproduction of IL-6 further increases very-low-density lipoprotein receptor expression and may thereby mediate disease activity-related reduced lipid concentrations in RA . In this study, we systematically examined the potential impact of conventional compared with non-conventional cardiovascular risk factors including IL-6 on endothelial activation in a relatively large RA cohort.
2. Materials and Methods
The present investigation was conducted according to the principles outlined in the Helsinki declaration. The Committee for Research on Human Subjects of the University of Witwatersrand approved the protocol (approval number M06-07-33). Patients gave informed written consent. The present study design has previously been described [27–29]. Briefly, 217 African patients (112 black and 105 white) that met the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria  were enrolled at the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Milpark Hospital. All invited patients agreed to participate. Cardiovascular medication use was recorded. Disease modifying agents for rheumatic disease (DMARD) were employed in each patient at the time of the study. This included the use of biological agents (tumor necrosis alpha blockade () and rituximab ()). Amongst nonbiological DMARD, methotrexate, chloroquine, leflunomide, sulphasalazine, azathioprine, tetracycline, cyclophosphamide, and penicillamine were employed by 84.8, 66.8, 29.5, 20.3, 14.8, 10.6, 3.7, and 2.8% of patients, respectively. In 6 patients on prednisone, the doses used were 2.5 (), 5 (), 10 (), and 12 () mg daily. Data were missing in fewer than 5% of any of the recorded characteristics.
2.2. Clinical Characteristics
We recorded demographic features and smoking status (current and ever). Height, weight and waist and hip circumference were measured by standard approaches. We calculated the body mass index (BMI) as a measure of overall adiposity and abdominal adiposity and fat distribution were estimated by waist circumference and waist-hip ratio, respectively . Hypertension was defined as an average systolic blood pressure ≥140 or/and diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg or/and current use of antihypertensive agents. Fasting blood samples were taken between 8:00 and 10:00 am. Standard laboratory tests of renal function, lipids and glucose were performed. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed when the atherogenic index, that is, the cholesterol-HDL cholesterol ratio, was >4 and proatherogenic non-HDL cholesterol concentrations were calculated by subtracting HDL cholesterol from total cholesterol concentrations [31, 32]. Diabetes was identified as the use of glucose lowering agents or a fasting plasma glucose ≥7 mmol/L. We calculated the estimated glomerular infiltration rate (EGFR) using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation . Evaluated RA characteristics included disease duration, rheumatoid factor status, and the number of deformed joints as an indicator of disease severity or joint damage , the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) , and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and prednisone use. C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were evaluated by immunoturbidimetric methods. In 132 patients, this was done on the DxC/LX analyzer (Beckman Coulter Inc, Brea, USA) with a lower detection limit of 1 mg/L and the inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation of 2.5 and 5.0%, respectively; in the remaining 85 patients, CRP concentrations were quantified on the AU analyzer (Olympus, Essex, UK) with a lower detection limit of 0.05 mg/L and inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation of 1.3 and 0.4 mg/L, respectively. In the general population, a CRP concentration > 1 mg/L reportedly predicts increased incident cardiovascular disease [35, 36]. Seventy-four blood samples from subjects that did not participate in the present study were tested on both the AU and DxL/LX systems and the Spearman correlation coefficient between CRP values was 0.994. We measured IL-6 concentrations using a solid-phase sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) (Quantikine HS, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The lower detection limit ranged from 0.016 to 0.110 pg/mL and the inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 7.8 and 7.4%, respectively.
2.3. Endothelial Activation Molecules
We measured circulating soluble VCAM-1, ICAM-1, E-selectin and MCP-1 concentrations using a solid-phase sandwich ELISA (Quantikine HS, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Their lower detection limits were 0.6 ng/mL, 0.096 ng/mL, 0.009 ng/mL and 5.0 pg/mL, respectively; their inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 7.0 and 3.1, 5.5, and 4.6, 7.9, and 5.8, and 5.7 and 5.8%, respectively.
2.4. Resistin Concentrations
Patients in the present study also had their circulating resistin concentrations determined upon participation in another investigation  and employing a solid phase sandwich ELISA (Quantikine HS, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The lower detection limit was 0.026 ng/mL and the inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 7.8 and 7.4%, respectively.
2.5. Data Management and Analysis
Dichotomous variables are expressed as proportions or percentages and continuous variables as mean (SD) and median (interquartile range) when normally and nonnormally distributed, respectively. Nonnormally distributed characteristics were logarithmically transformed prior to including them in mixed regression models. An endothelial activation score was used to provide a summary measure of endothelial activation and was calculated from SD (z) scores as follows: [z (VCAM-1) + z (ICAM-1) + z (E-selectin) + z (MCP-1)]. This score was recently successfully employed in documenting a potential independent role of resistin, a proinflammatory adipokine, in cardiovascular risk and its stratification in RA .
The relationships of clinical characteristics including conventional cardiovascular risk factors and RA characteristics with endothelial activation molecule concentrations and the endothelial activation score were first assessed in age, sex and cardiovascular drug use adjusted multivariable models and, subsequently, in models that included age and sex and other conventional cardiovascular risk factors as well as RA characteristics. Our previous investigations showed consistent disparities in cardiovascular risk factor-cardiovascular disease associations in black compared to white African patients with RA [27–29]. Therefore, we systematically determined the impact of population origin or, in the present context, also ethnic grouping (EG) on the cardiovascular risk factor-endothelial activation relationships by the addition of interaction terms (EG x variable of interest) and their individual terms to the models and in stratified analysis, that is, in black and white patients separately [27–29].
To further ensure that the strongest cardiovascular risk factor-endothelial activation associations identified in the analysis could not be attributed to any specific characteristic including EG of the RA cohort studied, we performed sensitivity analysis separately in black and white patients, women, men, participants lesser/equal and >55 years, nonobese and obese patients, normotensives and hypertensives, participants with a cholesterol-HDL cholesterol ratio of less/equal and >4, a disease duration of less/equal and >10 years, rheumatoid factor positive and negative, no/mild and moderate/high disease activity , and less/equal and >6 deformed joints (median number of deformed joints in all patients was 6). The endothelial activation score was the dependent characteristic in these models. Sensitivity analysis was not performed in diabetic and nondiabetic patients in view of the small number of patients with this comorbidity.
A value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical computations were made using the GB Stat program (Dynamic Microsystems, Inc., Silverspring, Maryland, USA).
3.1. Clinical Characteristics and Endothelial Activation Molecule and Resistin Concentrations in Patients with RA
As given in Table 1, most conventional and non-conventional risk factors as well as endothelial activation molecule concentrations differed by ethnic grouping.
3.2. Age, Sex, and Cardiovascular Drug Adjusted Relationships of Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease Characteristics with Endothelial Activation in Patients with RA
Age and sex were not associated with any of the evaluated endothelial activation molecule concentrations (data not shown).
In age, sex, and cardiovascular drug use adjusted analysis in all patients, IL-6 concentrations were associated with those of each endothelial activation molecule (partial (), 0.244 (), 0.155 (), and 0.265 () for MCP-1, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin) as well as the endothelial activation score (partial ()). Population grouping impacted on the relationship between IL-6 and MCP-1 concentrations (interaction ). Nevertheless, in stratified analysis, IL-6 concentrations associated with those of MCP-1 in both black and white patients with RA (partial () and 0.210 (), resp.).
In all patients and irrespective of EG (interaction ), waist circumference, number of deformed joints, and ESR were additionally associated with VCAM-1 concentrations (partial (), 0.186 (), and 0.149 () resp.), ever smoking with ICAM-1 concentrations (partial ()), hypertension, diastolic blood pressure, ESR and glucose concentrations with those of E-selection (partial (), 0.144 (), 0.227 () and 0.147 () resp.) and EGFR and prednisone with the endothelial activation score (partial () and 0.157 (), resp.).
Population grouping impacted (interaction ) on the relationships of disease duration and EGFR with MCP-1 concentrations, ESR with VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 concentrations and the endothelial activation score, and LDL cholesterol concentrations with those of ICAM-1. Subsequent stratified analysis revealed that, in black patients, LDL cholesterol was associated with ICAM-1 concentrations (partial ()) and ESR with VCAM-1 concentrations and the endothelial activation score (partial () and 0.273 (), resp.); in white patients, disease duration was associated with MCP-1 concentrations and the endothelial activation score (partial () and 0.241 (), resp.) and the EGFR with MCP-1 concentrations (partial ()).
3.3. Independent Relationships between Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Endothelial Activation
The associations between modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and endothelial activation in models adjusted for age and sex as well as other cardiovascular risk factors including conventional ones (BMI, hypertension, a cholesterol-HDL cholesterol ratio >4, use of lipid lowering agents, smoking and diabetes) and RA characteristics (disease severity (number of deformed joints), DAS28, and prednisone use) as potential confounding or explanatory variables are shown in Table 2. Additionally, in black patients, LDL cholesterol concentrations were associated with those of ICAM-1 (partial ()) and ESR with VCAM-1 concentrations and the endothelial activation score (partial () and 0.283 ()) in comprehensively adjusted analysis; in white patients, disease duration associated with MCP-1 concentrations and the endothelial activation score (partial () and 0.243 ()) and EGFR with MCP-1 concentrations (partial ()).
In a separate model in all patients and in which both IL-6 concentrations and ESR were entered, each systemic inflammation marker independently associated with E-selectin concentrations (partial () and 0.190 () resp.).
As derived from the partial in the models with the endothelial activation score as the dependent variable that produced the results in Table 2, IL-6 concentrations independently contributed 17.9% to the variation in the endothelial activation score, whereas the corresponding values for EGFR and prednisone were 4.2 and 2.7% respectively. A comparison of the magnitude of the effect of interleukin-6 concentrations versus those of EGFR and prednisone use on the endothelial activation score in models in Table 2, is given in Figure 1.
In the model shown in Table 3, we entered those risk factors, except for diastolic blood pressure and disease duration (in view of their collinearity with hypertension and number of deformed joints resp.), that were independently associated with endothelial activation in the previous analysis together with other cardiovascular risk factors and with the endothelial activation score as the dependent variable. Demographic characteristics were not associated with endothelial activation. Amongst the conventional risk factors, only the EGFR was associated with the endothelial activation score. By contrast, amongst the non-conventional cardiovascular risk factors, IL-6 concentrations, ESR, and current prednisone use remained associated with endothelial activation.
Table 4 gives the results obtained in sensitivity analysis. Independent of the risk factors adjusted as in Table 2, IL-6 concentrations remained significantly associated with the endothelial activation score in black and white patients, women, men, participants lesser/equal or >55 years, nonobese and obese patients, normotensives and hypertensives, participants with a cholesterol-HDL cholesterol ratio of less/equal and >4, a disease duration of less/equal and >10 years, rheumatoid factor positive and negative (borderline with ), no/mild and moderate/high disease activity , and less/equal and >6 deformed joints. The association of the IL-6 concentrations with the endothelial activation score was also significant and approached significance in rheumatoid positive and rheumatoid factor negative patients respectively.
3.4. IL-6, Resistin, and Endothelial Activation
After adjustment for age, sex, and ethnic grouping, IL-6 concentrations were associated with those of resistin (partial ()). In a further model, both resistin concentrations and those of IL-6 were related to the endothelial activation score independent of demographic characteristics as well as one another (partial () and partial ()).
This study shows that conventional and non-conventional cardiovascular risk factors associate with circulating concentrations of molecules that mediate endothelial cell activation, the initial stage of atherosclerosis [1–4] in RA. In addition, IL-6 concentrations were found to be most markedly related to this process of early atherogenesis. Interestingly, this relationship was further noted regardless of race (both in black and white patients), sex, advanced age, classic cardiovascular risk factors (namely, obesity, hypertension, and a high atherogenic ratio), and prolonged disease duration and RA severity (moderate or high disease activity and more marked joint damage).
Increased cytokine production is strongly implicated in the documented enhanced cardiovascular disease risk in RA . IL-6 is the most abundant cytokine in the circulation [39, 40] and has increasingly recognized crucial proatherogenic properties [3, 41, 42], is released by endothelial cells upon activation, and affects T and B lymphocytes and the production of acute phase proteins including CRP and fibrinogen by the liver [42–45]. IL-6 thereby integrates endothelial cells in immunological circuits and the acute phase response . TNF-α and IL-1 are major inflammatory cytokines in RA joints and stimulate synovial fibroblasts to produce IL-6 . Concentrations of IL-6 but not TNF-α and IL-1 are reportedly associated with circulating soluble adhesion molecules in RA . IL-6 is also importantly involved in the pathogenesis of RA as evidenced by the large impact of IL-6 blockade on joint inflammation in this disease [23, 24, 46]. IL-6 concentrations predict incident cardiovascular events in the general population . In the PRIME study, CRP, IL-6, and fibrinogen concentrations each predicted future myocardial coronary death independent of traditional risk factors but only IL-6 associated with incident cardiovascular mortality when all 3 inflammatory markers were entered together in a mixed regression model . In the present investigation, in contrast to IL-6 concentrations, those of CRP were not associated with endothelial activation.
We previously reported a relationship of EGFR and IL-6 concentrations with those of adhesion molecules in RA . The main limitation of the latter study was the small cohort size that likely accounted for the limited number of identified associations  and, also, concentrations of MCP-1, an essential molecule in early atherosclerosis [3, 4], were not evaluated. In the present investigation, conventional risk factors as well as RA characteristics that increase cardiovascular risk [16, 17] and are routinely available in clinical practice contributed substantially and significantly less than IL-6 concentrations to the variation in overall early atherogenesis as estimated by an SD score of endothelial activation molecule concentrations. Indeed, IL-6 concentrations were not only associated with those of each endothelial activation molecule but additionally explained 18% of the variation in the endothelial activation score beyond other risk factors.
The current recommendations by the European League Against Rheumatism on cardiovascular risk estimation in RA comprise consideration of traditional risk factors as well as the RA characteristics of disease duration, rheumatoid factor, or antibodies to citrullinated peptide and extraarticular manifestations . However, this approach was based on available but nevertheless relatively low quality evidence  and indeed may underestimate the actual cardiovascular risk in individual patients [50, 51]. Systemic inflammation biomarker evaluation improves cardiovascular disease risk prediction in non-RA subjects [52, 53]. Importantly also, whereas consistent disparities in the associations of cardiovascular risk factors including CRP concentrations, blood pressure, lipid levels, obesity and metabolic syndrome with cardiovascular disease in black compared to white African patients with RA were recently identified by us [27–29], ethnicity did not impact the IL-6-endothelial activation relationship in the present investigation. Our results suggest that the role of IL-6 concentrations in predicting cardiovascular event rates and cardiovascular risk stratification in RA deserves further investigation.
We found 2 paradoxically inverse relationships between cardiovascular risk factors and endothelial activation. These comprised the associations of waist circumference with VCAM-1 concentrations and LDL cholesterol concentrations with those of ICAM-1 in all and African black patients with RA, respectively. Both positive and inverse relationships between adiposity indices and lipid concentrations and cardiovascular risk were reported in RA [27, 54–58]. Paradoxically inverse relationships between cardiovascular risk factors and disease may reflect confounding by inflammation [54–58] and indicate that the optimal lipid threshold for employing lipid lowering agents may be lower in patients with high-grade compared with those that have low-grade systemic inflammation in RA . In a very recently reported novel mouse model resembling RA and atherosclerosis , a lipid paradox, comprised of the presence of reduced cholesterol and HDL cholesterol concentrations and similar to that reported in patients with RA that sustain the greatest inflammatory burden [56, 60], was documented. However, treatment with etanercept, a TNF-α inhibitor, improved arthritis and atherosclerosis without affecting lipid concentrations, suggesting a noncausal relationship between dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis . Indeed, the true impact of lipid metabolism on cardiovascular disease in RA may escape identification upon considering only lipid profiles as routinely performed [61, 62]. Thus, chronic inflammation induces the appearance of proinflammatory HDLs and oxidized LDLs and VLDLs that are likely involved in cardiovascular disease amongst patients with chronic inflammatory diseases [61, 62].
The use of glucocorticoids has been reported to be complicated by enhanced atherosclerosis and proinflammatory HDLs  as well as cardiovascular event rates  in RA. Although only 6 patients in the current study were current prednisone users, this intervention was independently associated with increased endothelial activation and population origin did not impact on this relationship. However, reported evidence indicates that chronic inflammation is probably the most important mechanism associated with the increased cardiovascular mortality observed in RA. Due to this, whether the potential glucocorticoid related improvement in the inflammatory burden associated with the use of these drugs may prevail in individuals with severe disease over their adverse metabolic effects in terms of the cardiovascular outcome of RA remains to be elucidated [65, 66]. Therefore, cohorts that include numbers of patients on glucocorticoids that are larger than those in the present investigation are needed to confirm or disprove their adverse influence on endothelial activation.
We recently reported evidence for a contribution of resistin to the link between systemic inflammation and cardiovascular risk in RA . Our current finding that IL-6 concentrations relate to those of resistin and that IL-6 and resistin concentrations are associated with endothelial activation independent of one another supports our previous study  as well as the potential use of both of these biomarkers in cardiovascular risk stratification in RA.
Our study has other limitations. The cross-sectional design of this investigation precludes drawing inferences on the direction of causality. We did not record menopausal status and cumulative prednisone dose that could be important in the present context. As applies to most reported investigations on cardiovascular risk, we evaluated many relationships. Nevertheless, our main findings each originates in multiple confounder adjusted mixed regression models. In this regard, although many potentially confounding or explanatory characteristics were included in our models and some of them in Table 4 may be overfitted, a remarkable feature of our data analysis was the consistency of associations before being compared with after comprehensive adjustment. Also, when covariates were entered one at a time in separate models, IL-6 remained consistently associated with endothelial activation (data not shown). Finally, characteristics that could be of potential interest in the present context including anticyclic citrullinated antibodies, cytokines other than IL-6, shared epitope, endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis were either not routinely or not at all assessed for the purpose of the present investigation.
In conclusion, the most novel and striking finding produced by the present study is that IL-6 concentrations independently contribute markedly more than other cardiovascular risk factors to the variation in overall early endothelial activation in patients with RA. Assessment of IL-6 concentrations may enhance cardiovascular risk stratification in RA.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Thid paper is supported by a Medical Research Council Grant MRC2008_DES and the National Research Foundation (South Africa). Research performed by Miguel A. Gonzalez-Gay was supported by Grants from “Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias” PI06/0024, PS09/00748, and PII2/00060 and by RETICS Program, RD08/0075 and RD12/0009/0013 (RIER), from “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (ISCIII) (Spain).
- R. Ross, “Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 1999.
- P. Libby, P. M. Ridker, and A. Maseri, “Inflammation and atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1135–1143, 2002.
- W. Koenig and N. Khuseyinova, “Biomarkers of atherosclerotic plaque instability and rupture,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2007.
- L. Gu, Y. Okada, S. K. Clinton et al., “Absence of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 reduces atherosclerosis in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice,” Molecular Cell, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 275–281, 1998.
- S. J. Hwang, C. M. Ballantyne, A. R. Sharrett et al., “Circulating adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and incident coronary heart disease cases: the atherosclerosis risk In communities (ARIC) study,” Circulation, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 4219–4225, 1997.
- I. Martinovic, N. Abegunewardene, M. Seul et al., “Elevated monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 serum levels in patients at risk for coronary artery disease,” Circulation Journal, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 1484–1489, 2005.
- K. F. Kusano, K. Nakamura, H. Kusano et al., “Significance of the level of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human atherosclerosis—assessment in chronic hemodialysis patients,” Circulation Journal, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 671–676, 2004.
- S. Wållberg-Jonsson, J. T. Cvetkovic, K. G. Sundqvist, A. K. Lefvert, and S. Rantapää-Dahlqvist, “Activation of the immune system and inflammatory activity in relation to markers of atherothrombotic disease and atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 875–882, 2002.
- P. H. Dessein, B. I. Joffe, and S. Singh, “Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 634–643, 2005.
- A. Södergren, K. Karp, K. Boman et al., “Atherosclerosis in early rheumatoid arthritis: very early endothelial activation and rapid progression of intima media thickness,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 12, article 158, no. 4, 2010.
- Y. H. Rho, C. P. Chung, A. Oeser et al., “Inflammatory mediators and premature coronary atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1580–1585, 2009.
- D. H. Solomon, N. J. Goodson, J. N. Katz et al., “Patterns of cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 1608–1612, 2006.
- H. Maradit-Kremers, C. S. Crowson, P. J. Nicola et al., “Increased unrecognized coronary heart disease and sudden deaths in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 402–411, 2005.
- M. A. Gonzalez-Gay, C. Gonzalez-Juanatey, and J. Martin, “Rheumatoid arthritis: a disease associated with accelerated atherogenesis,” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 2005.
- C. Gonzalez-Juanatey and M. A. Gonzalez-Gay, “Inflammation, endothelial function and atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis Research and Therapys, vol. 14, article 122, no. 4, 2012.
- P. H. Dessein, B. I. Joffe, M. G. Veller et al., “Traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors are associated with atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 435–442, 2005.
- P. H. Dessein, G. R. Norton, A. J. Woodiwiss, B. I. Joffe, and F. Wolfe, “Influence of nonclassical cardiovascular risk factors on the accuracy of predicting subclinical atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 943–951, 2007.
- D. H. Solomon, J. Kremer, J. R. Curtis et al., “Explaining the cardiovascular risk associated with rheumatoid arthritis: traditional risk factors versus markers of rheumatoid arthritis severity,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1920–1925, 2010.
- P. O. Bonetti, L. O. Lerman, and A. Lerman, “Endothelial dysfunction: a marker of atherosclerotic risk,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 168–175, 2003.
- P. H. Dessein and B. I. Joffe, “Suppression of circulating interleukin-6 concentrations is associated with decreased endothelial activation in rheumatoid arthritis,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2006.
- M. A. Gonzales-Gay, M. T. Garcia-Unzueta, J. M. De Matias et al., “Influence of anti-TNF-alpha Infliximab therapy on adhesion molecules associated with atherogenesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 373–379, 2006.
- C. X. Kim, K. R. Bailey, G. G. Klee et al., “Sex and ethnic differences in 47 candidate proteomic markers of cardiovascular disease: the Mayo Clinic proteomic markers of arteriosclerosis study,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 2, Article ID 9065, 2010.
- M. Hashizume and M. Mihara, “The roles of interleukin-6 in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis, vol. 2011, Article ID 765624, 8 pages, 2011.
- R. Woodrick and E. M. Ruderman, “Anti-interleukin-6 therapy in rheumatoid arthritis,” Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 211–217, 2010.
- M. Hashizume, H. Yoshida, N. Koike, M. Suzuki, and M. Mihara, “Overproduced interleukin-6 decreases blood lipid levels via upregulation of very-low-density lipoprotein receptor,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 741–746, 2009.
- K. Shimamoto, T. Ito, Y. Ozaki, H. Amuro, A. Tanaka, T. Nishizawa, et al., “Serum interleukin 6 before and after therapy with tocilizumab is a principal biomarker in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1074–1081, 2013.
- A. Solomon, G. R. Norton, A. J. Woodiwiss, and P. H. Dessein, “Obesity and carotid atherosclerosis in African black and Caucasian women with established rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 14, article R67, no. 2, 2012.
- A. Solomon, A. J. Woodiwiss, A. T. Abdool-Carrim, B. A. Stevens, G. R. Norton, and P. H. Dessein, “The carotid atherosclerosis burden and its relation to cardiovascular risk factors in black and white Africans with established rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1798–1806, 2012.
- P. H. Dessein, G. R. Norton, B. I. Joffe, A. T. Abdool-Carrim, A. J. Woodiwiss, and A. Solomon, “Metabolic cardiovascular risk burden and atherosclerosis in African black and Caucasian women with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2013.
- F. C. Arnett, S. M. Edworthy, D. A. Bloch et al., “The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 315–324, 1988.
- A. Solomon, B. F. Christian, G. R. Norton, A. J. Woodiwiss, and P. H. Dessein, “Risk factor profiles for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in black and other africans with established rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 953–960, 2010.
- P. H. Dessein, B. F. Christian, and A. Solomon, “Which are the determinants of dyslipidemia in rheumatoid arthritis and does socioeconomic status matter in this context?” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1357–1361, 2009.
- A. S. Levey, J. P. Bosch, J. B. Lewis, T. Greene, N. Rogers, and D. Roth, “A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 461–470, 1999.
- T. T. Heiberg, T. K. Kvien, P. Mowinckel, D. Aletaha, J. S. Smolen, and K. B. Hagen, “Identification of disease activity and health status cut-off points for the symptom state acceptable to patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 967–971, 2008.
- T. A. Pearson, G. A. Mensah, R. W. Alexander et al., “Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: a statement for healthcare professionals from the centers for disease control and prevention and the american heart association,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 499–511, 2003.
- P. M. Ridker, “C-reactive protein and the prediction of cardiovascular events among those at intermediate risk: moving an inflammatory hypothesis toward consensus,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 49, no. 21, pp. 2129–2138, 2007.
- P. H. Dessein, G. R. Norton, A. J. Woodiwiss, and A. Solomon, “Independent relationship between circulating resistin concentrations and endothelial activation in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 1586–1588, 2013.
- B. Heinhuis, C. Popa, B. L. van Tits, et al., “Towards a role of interleukin 32 in atherosclerosis,” Cytokine, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 433–440, 2013.
- A. Vaglio, M. G. Cantanaso, L. Magnani, N. Pipitone, P. Macchioni, L. Spaggiari, et al., “Interleukin-6 as an inflammatory mediator and target of therapy in chronic periaortitis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 2459–2475, 2013.
- M. Fabris, L. Quartuccio, S. Lombardi et al., “Study on the possible role of the -174G>C IL-6 promoter polymorphism in predicting response to rituximabin rheumatoid arthritis,” Reumatismo, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 253–258, 2010.
- J. S. Smolen, M. M. Schoels, N. Nishimoto, et al., “Consensus statement on blocking the effects of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory conditions,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 482–492, 2013.
- Z. Lu, Y. Li, J. Jin, X. Zhang, M. F. Lopes-Virella, and Y. Huang, “Toll-like receptor 4 activation in microvascular endothelial cells triggers a robust inflammatory response and cross talk with mononuclear cells via interleukin-6,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1696–1706, 2012.
- A. Mantovani, F. Bussolino, and E. Dejana, “Cytokine regulation of endothelial cell function,” The Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 2591–2599, 1992.
- V. Marin, F. A. Montero-Julian, S. Grès et al., “The IL-6-soluble IL-6Rα autocrine loop of endothelial activation as an intermediate between acute and chronic inflammation: an experimental model involving thrombin,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 167, no. 6, pp. 3435–3442, 2001.
- C. Viedt, J. Vogel, T. Athanasiou et al., “Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 induces proliferation and interleukin-6 production in human smooth muscle cells by differential activation of nuclear factor-κB and activator protein-1,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 914–920, 2002.
- M. C. Genovese, J. D. McKay, E. L. Nasonov et al., “Interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab reduces disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: the tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy study,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2968–2980, 2008.
- G. Luc, J. M. Bard, I. Juhan-Vague et al., “C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and fibrinogen as predictors of coronary heart disease: the PRIME study,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1255–1261, 2003.
- M. J. L. Peters, D. P. M. Symmons, D. McCarey et al., “EULAR evidence-based recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 325–331, 2010.
- K. P. Liao and D. H. Solomon, “Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, inflammation and cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis.,” Rheumatology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2013.
- P. H. Dessein and A. G. Semb, “Could cardiovascular disease risk stratification and management in rheumatoid arthritis be enhanced?” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 1743–1746, 2013.
- A. Corrales, C. Gonzalez-Juanatey, M. E. Peiro, et al., “Carotid ultrasound is useful for cardiovascular risk stratification of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a population-based study,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2013.
- B. Zethelius, L. Berglund, J. Sundström et al., “Use of multiple biomarkers to improve the prediction of death from cardiovascular causes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 20, pp. 2107–2116, 2008.
- C. Prugger, G. Luc, B. Haas, P. E. Morange, J. Ferrieres, P. Amouyel, et al., “Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of ischemic stroke: the PRIME study,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 659–666, 2013.
- P. H. Dessein and B. I. Joffe, “Insulin resistance and impaired beta cell function in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 2765–2775, 2006.
- A. Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, G. S. Metsios, V. F. Panoulas et al., “Associations of obesity with modifiable risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 242–245, 2009.
- E. Myasoedova, C. S. Crowson, H. M. Kremers et al., “Lipid paradox in rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of serum lipid measures and systemic inflammation on the risk of cardiovascular disease,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 482–487, 2011.
- H. M. Kremers, P. J. Nicola, C. S. Crowson, K. V. Ballman, and S. E. Gabriel, “Prognostic importance of low body mass index in relation to cardiovascular mortality in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 3450–3457, 2004.
- A. Escalante, R. W. Haas, and I. Del Rincón, “Paradoxical effect of body mass index on survival in rheumatoid arthritis: role of comorbidity and systemic inflammation,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 165, no. 14, pp. 1624–1629, 2005.
- S. Ross, M. Eren, S. Murphy, H. Zhang, C. S. Thaxton, J. Chowaniec J, et al., “A novel mouse model that develops spontaneous arthritis and is predisposed towards atherosclerosis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2013.
- E. Choy and N. Sattar, “Interpreting lipid levels in the context of high-grade inflammatory states with a focus on rheumatoid arthritis: a challenge to conventional cardiovascular risk actions,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 460–469, 2009.
- M. McMahon, J. Grossman, J. FitzGerald et al., “Proinflammatory high-density lipoprotein as a biomarker for atherosclerosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 2541–2549, 2006.
- B. H. Hahn, J. Grossman, A. J. Ansell, B. J. Skaggs, and M. McMahon, “Altered lipoprotein metabolism in chronic inflammatory states: proinflammatory high-density lipoprotein and accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 10, article 213, no. 4, 2008.
- I. Del Rincón, D. H. O'Leary, R. W. Haas, and A. Escalante, “Effect of glucocorticoids on the arteries in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 3813–3822, 2004.
- J. M. Davis III, H. M. Kremers, C. S. Crowson et al., “Glucocorticoids and cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 820–830, 2007.
- D. J. Brotman, J. P. Girod, M. J. Garcia et al., “Effects of short-term glucocorticoids on cardiovascular biomarkers,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 3202–3208, 2005.
- M. A. Gonzalez-Gay, “Glucocorticoid-related cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in rheumatic diseases: myth or reality?” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 191–192, 2007.