The Role of Glucocorticoid Receptors in Dexamethasone-Induced Apoptosis of Neuroprogenitor Cells in the Hippocampus of Rat Pups

Sze, Chun-I; Lin, Yung-Chieh; Lin, Yuh-Jyh; Hsieh, Ting-Hui; Kuo, Yu Min; Lin, Chyi-Her

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/628094

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Macrophage-Mediated Inflammatory Disorders

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 | Article ID 628094 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/628094

The Role of Glucocorticoid Receptors in Dexamethasone-Induced Apoptosis of Neuroprogenitor Cells in the Hippocampus of Rat Pups

Chun-I Sze,¹Yung-Chieh Lin,²Yuh-Jyh Lin,²Ting-Hui Hsieh,²Yu Min Kuo,¹and Chyi-Her Lin²

Academic Editor: Kuen-Jer Tsai

Received08 Oct 2012

Accepted17 Dec 2012

Published14 Jan 2013

Abstract

Background. Dexamethasone (Dex) has been used to reduce inflammation in preterm infants with assistive ventilation and to prevent chronic lung diseases. However, Dex treatment results in adverse effects on the brain. Since the hippocampus contains a high density of glucocorticoid receptors (GCRs), we hypothesized that Dex affects neurogenesis in the hippocampus through inflammatory mediators. Methods. Albino Wistar rat pups first received a single dose of Dex (0.5 mg/kg) on postnatal day 1 (P1) and were sacrificed on P2, P3, P5, and P7. One group of Dex-treated pups (Dex-treated D1D2) was given mifepristone (RU486, a GCR antagonist) on P1 and sacrificed on P2. Hippocampi were isolated for western blot analysis, TUNEL, cleaved-caspase 3 staining for cell counts, and morphological assessment. Control pups received normal saline (NS). Results. Dex reduced the developmental gain in body weight, but had no effect on brain weight. In the Dex-treated D1D2 group, apoptotic cells increased in number based on TUNEL and cleaved-caspase 3 staining. Most of the apoptotic cells expressed the neural progenitor cell marker nestin. Dex-induced apoptosis in P1 pups was markedly reduced (60%) by pretreatment with RU486, indicating the involvement of GCRs. Conclusion. Early administration of Dex results in apoptosis of neural progenitor cells in the hippocampus and this is mediated through GCRs.

1. Introduction

Corticosteroids are used in preterm infants to suppress inflammation, to facilitate extubation, and/or to prevent chronic lung diseases [1–3]. However, such early dexamethasone (Dex) therapy can result in an adverse neurodevelopmental outcome [4, 5]. For example, Dex treatment reduces cerebral gray matter volume without affecting white matter and the basal ganglia, suggesting that Dex affects only certain cells in the brain [6–8].

Neurons in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus continue to divide after term and therefore remain vulnerable to the adverse effects of steroids during the early postnatal period [9–11]. Cells in the hippocampus have a high density of glucocorticoid receptors (GCRs) [12] suggesting that they could be affected by Dex [8–13]. Dex is known to change synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus [14]. As rat and human develop over different embryonic time scales [15], rat pups on P1 correspond to the human fetus at about week 22 to 24 of gestation. The equivalence in development is reflected in brain weight, neurochemistry, electroencephalography, and synaptogenesis [16]. Therefore, rat pups can be used as an animal model for human preterm infants undergoing drug exposure [17].

Here, we studied the effects of single-dose Dex therapy and the role of GCRs on hippocampal development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

The study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of National Cheng Kung University. Time-dated pregnant Albino Wistar rats (body weight 250–300 g) were used. Food and water were provided ad libitum. The dams were allowed to deliver naturally on gestational day 21 1. Animals were kept in a ventilated room at °C under a 12/12 h light/dark cycle. The day of birth was designated P0.

2.2. Study Design

In a preliminary study, each litter was divided into two groups: the Dex group received a dose of Dex phosphate (0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) (Oradexon, 4 mg/mL, Organon, the Netherlands) and controls received an equal volume of normal saline (NS). Compared with the controls, changes in apoptosis were only observed with Dex 0.5 mg/kg, so this dose was used in the subsequent experiments. On day 1 (P1) pups received a single dose of 0.5 mg/kg Dex or NS. On P2, P3, P5, and P7, pups were anesthetized and euthanized with 10% chloral hydrate (W/V, 300 mg/kg, Riedel-de Haen, Germany) and then infused transcardially with NS. The body and isolated brain weights were measured to the nearest milligram. Brain tissues were processed histologically following standard protocols and cut serially at 5 μm in the coronal plane.

2.3. Immunohistochemical and Immunofluorescence Staining

Brain sections were matched to the E22 coronal plates 12 to 15 of the prenatal rat brain development atlas [18]. Sections were stained by immunohistochemical (IHC) and/or immunofluorescence (IF), TUNEL, and double-IF methods, using the protocols recommended by the manufacturers or described previously [19]. The following TUNEL detection kits and primary antibodies were used: TdT-Frag EL DNA fragmentation detection kit, ApopTag Red in situ apoptosis detection kit (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), antibrain-derived neurotrophic factor (diluted 1 : 2000), and rabbit antiglucocorticoid (diluted 1 : 50) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), mouse antinestin (diluted 1 : 200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-OX-6 (diluted 1 : 50; AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK), and anti-NeuN (diluted 1 : 200; Chemi-Con, Temecula, CA), mouse antiactin and anti-pCNA (diluted 1 : 10000 and 1 : 1000, resp.; Millipore, Billerica, MA), and cleaved caspase 3 (diluted 1 : 100; Cell Signaling, Boston, MA). All sections were matched to the same anatomical sites for comparing cell counts between the Dex-treated and control groups. For IF staining, biotinylated anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgG (1 : 400; Victor, Burlingame, CA) were used as the secondary antibodies; for IHC staining goat anti-rabbit IgG, H&L Chain specific Texas Red conjugate and rat anti-mouse IgG H&L Chain specific fluorescein conjugate (diluted 1 : 400; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) were used as secondary antibodies. Sections were also double stained using the above primary antibodies and dilutions.

2.4. TUNEL Assay

The sections were subjected to TUNEL (Oncogene Research, Cambridge, MA) and IF staining. The signal was detected by the streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate and diaminobenzidine reaction.

2.5. Counts of Cells Stained for TUNEL, Cleaved-Caspase 3, and NeuN

Sections were examined by light microscopy and the images captured by a video camera coupled to a desktop computer (Eclipse 80i, Nikon, Japan). TUNEL-positive cells were identified and counted at 400x magnification. The numbers of TUNEL-positive cells in the DG, cornu ammonias 1 (CA1), CA2, and CA3 in the hippocampus were counted. For comparison with the control, sections at the same level were analyzed. Four sections were counted for each pup and the results were averaged. Cleaved-caspase 3- and NeuN-positive cells were counted at 400x magnification in four, 1 mm² areas in the DG. Data were validated by TissueGnostics FACS-like Tissue Cytometry software (Vienna, Austria). This method was also applied to IHC, IF, and double-stained cells in subsequent experiments.

2.6. Tissue Dissection and Western Blot Analysis

The hippocampi were dissected from the pups on P2, one day after Dex or NS treatment (D1D2). Western blots were performed on cytosolic and nuclear fractions of the hippocampus homogenates as described previously [19]. Briefly, 20 μg protein homogenate, determined by the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), was separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto nitrocellulose (Hy-Bond, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) and blocked with nonfat dry milk. Blots were incubated with specific primary antibody, followed by incubation with horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Bio-Rad). Samples were normalized to actin and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (pCNA) proteins (EMD Millipore). Each experiment was repeated at least three times.

2.7. Mifepristone (RU486) Treatment

The GCR antagonist, RU486 (Tocris Bioscience, Ellisville, MO), was dissolved in 100 mM DMSO. Thirty minutes prior to Dex injection, P1 pups received 25 mg/kg RU486 or vehicle intraperitoneally [20]. The RU486- and DMSO-treated pups (D1D2) with or without Dex treatment were euthanized on P2, and morphological and biochemical analyses were carried out as described above.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Quantitative results are expressed as mean standard error (SE). Statistical analyses were performed using one- or two-way ANOVA with a multiple comparisons posttest or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test as appropriate. values 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The body and brain weight results were analyzed by mixed-model ANOVA with age as the within-subject factor and Dex as the between-subject factor.

3. Results

3.1. Body and Brain Weights

Pups that had received Dex (0.5 mg/kg) showed reduced body weights. In contrast, no difference in the developmental growth of brain weight was found between the Dex and control groups (Table 1).

3.2. Apoptotic Cell Death

More TUNEL-positive and cleaved-caspase 3-positive cells were found in the DG of P1 D1D2 Dex-treated group (Figures 1(b) and 1(e)), with an increase to 2.7- to 3-fold (Figures 1(c) and 1(f)) with respect to the control (Figures 1(a) and 1(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 1

TUNEL staining of dentate gyrus (DG) P1 D1D2 pups treated with dexamethasone (Dex) or normal saline (NS) shows apoptotic cells stained brown (arrows). The Dex-treated D1D2 DG had more apoptotic cells (b) than NS control (a). High magnification photomicrographs of TUNEL-positive cells are shown in the upper left corner. TUNEL-positive cell counts revealed that the number of apoptotic cells in the Dex-treated D1D2 DG was increased when compared to that of NS control pups (, *) (c). Cleaved-caspase 3 staining of the DG from P1 D1D2 pups with or without Dex treatment showed apoptotic cells (arrows) ((d) and (e)). High magnification photomicrographs of cleaved-caspase 3-positive cells are shown in the upper left corner. The numbers of apoptotic cells in Dex-treated pups were increased compared to those of NS control (f) (, *). Magnification, 200x; scale bars, 100 μm; inset magnification, 400x. P1 D1D2: P1 pups receiving treatment on postnatal day 1 and sacrificed on day 2.

3.3. Cell Counts and Coexpression of Apoptosis and Neuronal Maturation Markers

Representative results of TUNEL, nestin, and NeuN staining are shown in Figure 2. We found about twice as many TUNEL-positive cells in the Dex-treated D1D2 group () compared with the control (21.8 1.2; ) (Figure 3(a)). The Dex-treated group had a greater proportion of TUNEL-positive cells () that coexpressed nestin than control (0.61 0.01) (Figure 3(b)). The proportion of TUNEL-positive cells coexpressing NeuN was also greater in the Dex-treated group () than in control (0.64 0.01; ) (Figure 3(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.4. Glucocorticoid Receptors (GCRs) and Mifepristone (RU486) in Dex-Induced Apoptosis

Western blot analysis showed that the nuclear fractions of GCRs in the hippocampus were upregulated in the Dex-treated D1D2 group (Figure 4). The Dex-retarded developmental gain in body weight was blocked by RU486 while neither Dex nor RU486 affected the brain weight in this group (Table 2). Furthermore, Dex-induced apoptosis in the P1 D1D2 group was reduced by the preadministration of RU486 (Figure 5). Dex treatment alone increased the apoptotic cell count () compared to the control (); ); the number of apoptotic cells in pups treated with DMSO () or DMSO plus Dex (41.9 0.56) was similar to that in pups treated with NS or Dex alone (). RU486 treatment had no additional effect on apoptosis when compared with the NS or DMSO group. Pretreatment with RU486 followed by Dex reduced the apoptotic cell count () () (Figure 5).

(a)

(b)

Figure 4

Dexamethasone (Dex) treatment increased levels of nuclear glucocorticoid receptors (GCRs), but not cytosolic GCRs, total brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or total nestin in the hippocampus of P1 pups. (a) Representative western blots of hippocampal protein extracts obtained from P1 D1D2 pups, normal saline (NS, control) (left lane), and Dex (right lane). (b) Signals from BDNF, nestin, and cytosolic GCRs were normalized to actin and signals from nuclear GCRs were normalized to pCNA. Quantitative results showed no difference in BDNF, nestin, and cytosolic GCR expression between Dex-treated and control pups. The nuclear fraction of GCR expression in Dex-treated pups differed from control (, *). P1 D1D2: P1 pups receiving treatment on postnatal day 1 and sacrificed on day 2; white and black bars represent control and Dex-treated pups, respectively.

Figure 5

Dexamethasone-(Dex-) induced apoptosis in P1 D1D2 pups was reduced by preadministration of RU486. Dex treatment increased apoptotic cell counts in the hippocampus compared to control (, *); P1 D1D2 pups treated with DMSO or DMSO plus Dex showed results similar to those from pups treated with either normal saline (NS) or Dex alone (, ). RU486 treatment showed apoptotic cell counts similar to those from pups treated with NS or DMSO. Pups treated with RU486 plus Dex had lower apoptotic cell counts than those with Dex or DMSO plus Dex (, ^†). P1 D1D2: P1 pups receiving treatment on postnatal day 1 and sacrificed on day 2.

3.5. Identification of Inflammatory Cells

Eosin/hematoxylin or IHC staining did not reveal any inflammatory cells in the NS and Dex-treated D1D2. Positive controls after implantation of rat brain tumor cells revealed OX-6 positive cells (stained brown) which helped identification of microglia in the brain (Figure 6).

(a)

(b)

(c)

4. Discussion

Steroids have long been used in the treatment of respiratory problems in preterm infants [21]. The complications of adverse neurological effects (such as increased risk of cerebral palsy and neurodevelopment impairment [4, 22, 23] demand the reevaluation of steroid-based therapeutic strategies in postnatal practice [23–26]. The safe timing and dosage of Dex remain undecided for preterm patients [4]. Our results from the P1 rat pups, equivalent to 24-week preterm infants, showed that Dex retarded the developmental gain in body weight, consistent with earlier reports [27–29]. Furthermore, neonatal Dex exposure leads to delayed neurodevelopment and physical maturation, suggesting that Dex permanently alters neuronal functions during this period, particularly those associated with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis [27–29]. Other studies showed that neonatal Dex exposure reduces brain weight [10, 28–32]. On the contrary, our data showed no such change. We attribute this discrepancy to the differences in timing, dosage regimes, and/or the preparation of Dex [28, 31, 32]. Among clinicians, the general consensus is that a lower dose of Dex (0.1–0.2 mg/kg/day) facilitates tracheal extubation and reduces the risk of chronic-lung disease. This study revealed no deleterious effects on the brain with single low doses of Dex (0.1–0.2 mg/kg), although it became harmful at a higher dose (0.5 mg/kg). The subgranular zone of the DG contains a reserve of neuroglial progenitor cells [33]. Apoptosis is crucial during neuronal development by eliminating excess cells and ensuring proper synaptic connectivity [34, 35]. GCRs are known to be involved in Dex-induced apoptosis [36] and are present at high levels in the hippocampus where progenitor cells capable of dividing reside in the DG. Our results showed increased apoptosis throughout the DG, suggesting that perinatal development in the hippocampus is vulnerable even to a single dose of Dex when given at a critical time. How this effect is related to the GCR density, receptor types, and the proliferation of progenitor cells remains to be studied.

It has been reported that administration of 3.0 mg/kg Dex to P7 mice increases the apoptosis of cerebellar progenitor cells and reduces the number of cerebellar neurons [37, 38]. It is likely that the dosage and timing of Dex treatment and vulnerability of neural progenitor cells to glucocorticoids together determine the effects on neonatal brain development.

Exposure to Dex in the neonatal period results in marked apoptosis among the nestin-expressing cells in the DG [39]. The importance of Dex-induced apoptosis in the hippocampus and the type of cells affected remain unknown. Our results from double staining in the Dex-treated pups showed higher ratios of cells coexpressing TUNEL and nestin to TUNEL-positive cells, indicating that Dex-induced apoptosis affects the neuroprogenitor cells. This result is consistent with previous reports that neuroprogenitor cells are sensitive to Dex during the early neonatal period [39, 40]. Since the ratio of TUNEL and NeuN coexpressing cells to TUNEL-positive cells also increased, Dex treatment might also cause apoptosis in mature neurons and be associated with a transient and acute slowing of cell proliferation during hippocampal development [41, 42]. Whether these neurons were derived from the proliferating progenitors cells or represent existing mature neurons in the DG remains to be determined.

Mifepristone (or RU-486) is a synthetic steroid with both antiprogesterone and antiglucocorticoid properties. In a recent study, mifepristone was the only GCR antagonist found to increase both mineralocorticoid receptor (MCR) and GCR binding in the rat frontal cortex [43]. The effects of mifepristone on corticosteroid receptor expression could explain the neurocognitive improvement it is reported to induce [43, 44]. RU486 has no effect on Dex regarding thymocyte composition and maturation [45]. MCR-mediated responses to glucocorticoids, rather than GCRs, are important in steroid-responsive hearing disorders [46]. GCR activity levels are high in the hippocampus during the first postnatal week [40]. The anti-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids require the presence of GCRs [47]. Interestingly, results of these studies and those of our own (60% reduction in Dex-induced apoptosis by RU486) are consistent, suggesting that the type of receptor and the timing of Dex treatment determine the effects of glucocorticoids on the hippocampus. Examining pup brain tissues stained with eosin/hematoxylin or IHC revealed no inflammatory cells in the NS and Dex-treated D1D2 groups. These results suggest that while GCRs are likely to be key players in Dex-induced neuroprogenitor cell death, inflammatory cells are not.

In summary, brain development is a dynamic process in which the growth spurt, differentiation, and cell responses to endogenous (and exogenous) steroids occur at critical times. Species differences add further complexity to the process. These species-specific developmental schedules allowed the design of animal models to study the effects of drug treatment in preterm babies, as in this study. Here, we have demonstrated that timing is a major factor in determining Dex-induced apoptosis in the hippocampus, the vulnerable cells are neuronal precursors, and the process is partly regulated by GCRs. We also provided cytological evidence that the administration of a single dose of Dex can result in deleterious effects in the brain.

List of Abbreviations

Dex:	Dexamethasone
GCR:	Glucocorticoid receptor
DG:	Dentate gyrus
CA:	Cornu ammonias
RU486:	Mifepristone
BDNF:	Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
NS:	Normal saline
P1/P0:	Day1/day 0 newborn pups
D1D2:	Pups receiving dexamethasone injection on day 1 and sacrificed on day 2
IHC:	Immunohistochemical
IF:	Immunofluorescence
TUNEL:	Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. K. S. Hsu for help with experimental design, Ms. Pei-Yu Lee for assistance in image acquisition and analysis using FACS-like Tissue Cytometry at the Center of Clinical Medicine, NCKU Hospital and support from an NCKU Academic Summit Program, Individual Research Project/Integrated Research Project (D100-35001), and the National Science Council (NSC-92-2314-B-006-073).

References

H. L. Halliday, R. A. Ehrenkranz, and L. W. Doyle, “Early (<8 days) postnatal corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 1, Article ID CD001146, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
L. W. Doyle, R. A. Ehrenkranz, and H. L. Halliday, “Dexamethasone treatment after the first week of life for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: a systematic review,” Neonatology, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 289–296, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Halliday, R. A. Ehrenkranz, and L. W. Doyle, “Late (>7 days) postnatal corticosteroids for chronic lung disease in preterm infants,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 1, p. CD001145, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
E. S. Shinwell and S. Eventov-Friedman, “Impact of perinatal corticosteroids on neuromotor development and outcome: review of the literature and new meta-analysis,” Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 164–170, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. F. Yeh, Y. J. Lin, C. C. Huang et al., “Early dexamethasone therapy in preterm infants: a follow-up study,” Pediatrics, vol. 101, no. 5, article E7, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
B. P. Murphy, T. E. Inder, P. S. Huppi et al., “Impaired cerebral cortical gray matter growth after treatment with dexamethasone for neonatal chronic lung disease,” Pediatrics, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 217–221, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ajayi-Obe, N. Saeed, F. M. Cowan, M. A. Rutherford, and A. D. Edwards, “Reduced development of cerebral cortex in extremely proterm infants,” The Lancet, vol. 356, no. 9236, pp. 1162–1163, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Modi, H. Lewis, N. Al-Naqeeb, M. Ajayi-Obe, C. J. Dore, and M. Rutherford, “The effects of repeated antenatal glucocorticoid therapy on the developing brain,” Pediatric Research, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 581–585, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Benesova and A. Pavlik, “Perinatal treatment with glucocorticoids and the risk of maldevelopment of the brain,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 89–97, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Baud, “Postnatal steroid treatment and brain development,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. F96–F100, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
B. S. McEwen, “Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 873–904, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Eddie Gabry, G. Chrousos, and P. W. Gold, “The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis: a major mediator of the adaptive responses to stress,” NeuroImmune Biology, vol. 3, pp. 379–414, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Hagberg and B. Jacobsson, “Brain injury in preterm infants—what can the obstetrician do?” Early Human Development, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 231–235, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Lin, C. C. Huang, and K. S. Hsu, “Effects of neonatal dexamethasone treatment on hippocampal synaptic function,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 939–951, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. F. Yeh, Y. J. Lin, H. C. Lin et al., “Outcomes at school age after postnatal dexamethasone therapy for lung disease of prematurity,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 350, no. 13, pp. 1304–1313, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Amaral and M. Witter, “Hippocampal formation,” in Rat Nervous System, G. Paxinos, Ed., pp. 443–494, Academy Press, Waltham, Mass, USA, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Hagberg, E. Bona, E. Gilland, and M. Puka-Sundvall, “Hypoxia-ischaemia model in the 7-day-old rat: possibilities and shortcomings,” Acta Paediatrica, vol. 86, no. 422, pp. 85–88, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Altman and S. A. Bayer, Atlas of Prenatal Rat Brain Development, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1995.
W. Y. Lin, Y. C. Chang, H. T. Lee, and C. C. Huang, “CREB activation in the rapid, intermediate, and delayed ischemic preconditioning against hypoxic-ischemia in neonatal rat,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 847–859, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Pugh, M. Fleshner, and J. W. Rudy, “Type II glucocorticoid receptor antagonists impair contextual but not auditory-cue fear conditioning in juvenile rats,” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 75–79, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Haddad, D. Y. Hsia, and S. S. Gellis, “Studies on respiratory rate in the newborn, its use in the evaluation of respiratory distress in infants of diabetic mothers,” Pediatrics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 204–213, 1956.
View at: Google Scholar
T. A. Merritt, I. D. Stuard, J. Puccia et al., “Newborn tracheal aspirate cytology: classification during respiratory distress syndrome and bronchopulmonary dysplasia,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 949–956, 1981.
View at: Google Scholar
E. S. Shinwell, M. Karplus, and D. Reich, “Early postnatal dexamethasone treatment and increased incidence of cerebral palsy,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. F177–F181, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
E. S. Shinwell, M. Karplus, D. Bader et al., “Neonatologists are using much less dexamethasone,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. F432–F433, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
M. C. Walsh, Q. Yao, J. D. Horbar, J. H. Carpenter, S. K. Lee, and A. Ohlsson, “Changes in the use of postnatal steroids for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in 3 large neonatal networks,” Pediatrics, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. e1328–e1335, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Chrysis, E. M. Ritzen, and L. Sävendahl, “Growth retardation induced by dexamethasone is associated with increased apoptosis of the growth plate chondrocytes,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 331–337, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Neal Jr., G. Weidemann, M. Kabbaj, and D. M. Vázquez, “Effect of neonatal dexamethasone exposure on growth and neurological development in the adult rat,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 287, no. 2, pp. R375–R385, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Flagel, D. M. Vázquez, S. J. Watson Jr., and C. R. Neal Jr., “Effects of tapering neonatal dexamethasone on rat growth, neurodevelopment, and stress response,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. R55–R63, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Karemaker, A. Kavelaars, M. ter Wolbeek et al., “Neonatal dexamethasone treatment for chronic lung disease of prematurity alters the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune system activity at school age,” Pediatrics, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. e870–e878, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. R. Holson, B. Gough, P. Sullivan, T. Badger, and D. M. Sheehan, “Prenatal dexamethasone or stress but not ACTH or corticosterone alter sexual behavior in male rats,” Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 393–401, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kanagawa, T. Tomimatsu, S. Hayashi et al., “The effects of repeated corticosteroid administration on the neurogenesis in the neonatal rat,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 231–238, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Baud, V. Laudenbach, P. Evrard, and P. Gressens, “Neurotoxic effects of fluorinated glucocorticoid preparations on the developing mouse brain: role of preservatives,” Pediatric Research, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 706–711, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
F. H. Gage, G. Kempermann, T. D. Palmer, D. A. Peterson, and J. Ray, “Multipotent progenitor cells in the adult dentate gyrus,” Journal of Neurobiology, vol. 36, pp. 249–266, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Deshmukh and E. M. Johnson, “Programmed cell death in neurons: focus on the pathway of nerve growth factor deprivation-induced death of sympathetic neurons,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 897–906, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Sadoul, “Bcl-2 family members in the development and degenerative pathologies of the nervous system,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 5, pp. 805–815, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
J. D. Amaral, S. Solá, C. J. Steer, and C. M. Rodriques, “Role of nuclear steroid receptors in apoptosis,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 16, pp. 3886–3902, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
S. E. Maloney, K. K. Noguchi, D. F. Wozniak, S. C. Fowler, and N. B. Farber, “Long-term effects of multiple glucocorticoid exposures in neonate mice,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 4–30, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
K. K. Noguchi, K. C. Walls, D. F. Wozniak, J. W. Olney, K. A. Roth, and N. B. Farber, “Acute neonatal glucocorticoid exposure produces selective and rapid cerebellar neural progenitor cell apoptotic death,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1582–1592, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yu, A. V. Patchev, Y. Wu et al., “Depletion of the neural precursor cell pool by glucocorticoids,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Rosenfeld, J. A. van Eekelen, S. Levine, and E. R. de Kloet, “Ontogeny of the type 2 glucocorticoid receptor in discrete rat brain regions: an immunocytochemical study,” Brain Research, vol. 470, no. 1, pp. 119–127, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Tijsseling, L. D. E. Wijnberger, D. B. Derks et al., “Effects of antenatal glucocorticoid therapy on hippocampal histology of preterm infants,” Plos ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e33369, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Rayen, D. L. van den Hove, J. Prickaerts, H. W. Steinbusch, and J. L. Pawluski, “Fluoxetine during development reverses the effects of prenatal stress on depressive-like behavior and hippocampal neurogenesis in adolescence,” Plos ONE, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e24003, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
C. G. Bachmann, A. C. Linthorst, F. Holsboer, and J. M. Reul, “Effect of chronic administration of selective glucocorticoid receptor antagonists on the rat hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1056–1067, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Llorens-Martín and J. L. Trejo, “Mifepristone prevents stress-induced apoptosis in newborn neurons and increases AMPA receptor expression in the dentate gyrus of C57/BL6 mice,” PloS ONE, vol. 6, no. 11, Article ID e28376, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Berki, L. Palinkas, F. Boldizsar, and P. Németh, “Glucocorticoid, (GC) sensitivity and GC receptor expression differ in thymocyte subpopulations,” International Immunology, vol. 14, pp. 463–469, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
D. R. Trune and J. B. Kempton, “Blocking the glucocorticoid receptor with RU-486 does not prevent glucocorticoid control of autoimmune mouse hearing loss,” Audiology and Neurotology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 423–431, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Tuckermann, A. Kleiman, R. Moriggl et al., “Macrophages and neutrophils are the targets for immune suppression by glucocorticoids in contact allergy,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1381–1390, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2013 Chun-I Sze et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

5261

Downloads

2019

Citations