Modulation of Acid Sphingomyelinase in Melanoma Reprogrammes the Tumour Immune Microenvironment

Assi, Emma; Cervia, Davide; Bizzozero, Laura; Capobianco, Annalisa; Pambianco, Sarah; Morisi, Federica; De Palma, Clara; Moscheni, Claudia; Pellegrino, Paolo; Clementi, Emilio; Perrotta, Cristiana

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/370482

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 370482 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/370482

Modulation of Acid Sphingomyelinase in Melanoma Reprogrammes the Tumour Immune Microenvironment

Emma Assi,^1,2Davide Cervia,^3,4Laura Bizzozero,^1,5Annalisa Capobianco,⁶Sarah Pambianco,³Federica Morisi,³Clara De Palma,³Claudia Moscheni,⁷Paolo Pellegrino,³Emilio Clementi,^1,3and Cristiana Perrotta³

Academic Editor: Anshu Agrawal

Received24 Feb 2015

Revised24 Apr 2015

Accepted27 Apr 2015

Published26 May 2015

Abstract

The inflammatory microenvironment induces tumours to acquire an aggressive and immunosuppressive behaviour. Since acid sphingomyelinase (A-SMase) downregulation in melanoma was shown to determine a malignant phenotype, we aimed here to elucidate the role of A-SMase in the regulation of tumour immunogenic microenvironment using in vivo melanoma models in which A-SMase was either downregulated or maintained at constitutively high levels. We found high levels of inflammatory factors in low A-SMase expressing tumours, which also displayed an immunosuppressive/protumoural microenvironment: high levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs), as well as low levels of dendritic cells (DCs). In contrast, the restoration of A-SMase in melanoma cells not only reduced tumour growth and immunosuppression, but also induced a high recruitment at tumour site of effector immune cells with an antitumoural function. Indeed, we observed a poor homing of MDSCs and Tregs and the increased recruitment of CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T lymphocytes as well as the infiltration of DCs and CD8⁺/ T lymphocytes. This study demonstrates that change of A-SMase expression in cancer cells is sufficient per se to tune in vivo melanoma growth and that A-SMase levels modulate immune cells at tumour site. This may be taken into consideration in the setting of therapeutic strategies.

1. Introduction

Malignant melanoma is a highly metastatic skin cancer characterized by rapid growth, early metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy [1]. In the past the high immunogenic capacity of melanoma has fostered the development of immunotherapeutic strategies based on the stimulation of adaptive immunity T cell mediated against specific tumour antigen [2]. However, despite initial promising studies, the overall outcomes of the clinical trials based on immunotherapy are still far from being satisfying [3]. The lack of an effective immune reactivity to tumours may be explained by the protracted inflammation that occurs in melanoma microenvironment, eventually resulting in immunosuppression and thus in the failure of immune cells to reject the tumour [4, 5]. The inflammatory microenvironment in the tumour mass is the result of the secretion of inflammatory cytokines by both melanoma and stromal cells [6, 7]. It induces cancer cells to acquire a more aggressive phenotype and allows the recruitment in the tumour lesion of different immunosuppressive cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and, consequently, regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) [5]. Various strategies have been used to decrease MDSC amounts and immunosuppressive functions in tumours, including melanomas [4, 8, 9]. However, the molecular mechanisms leading to the control of intratumoural MDSCs are poorly understood. The elucidation of these aspects may be crucial for the development of new approaches in melanoma treatment aimed at reducing MDSC-mediated immunosuppression.

In the last decades, the proapoptotic second messenger ceramide has drawn the attention as a fundamental player in cancer biology [10, 11]. Ceramide levels are significantly decreased in several tumours including melanomas, colon cancers, ovarian cancers, and gliomas; interestingly an inverse relationship has been found between ceramide levels and the stratification of tumours with high- and low-grade gliomas containing low and high levels of ceramide, respectively [12–14]. Of interest it seems particularly clear that cancer cells have evolved complex mechanisms to reduce ceramide levels, possibly through the modulation of their generating enzymes [15–17]. An example of this event is the spontaneous downregulation of the ceramide-generating enzyme acid sphingomyelinase (A-SMase) in melanoma cells during tumour progression that accounts for a more aggressive behaviour of melanomas in terms of tumour growth and metastatic ability [18].

This work has been designed to elucidate the possible role of A-SMase in determining melanoma immunogenic capacity with a specific attention on the modulation of tumour microenvironment. To this end, we analysed the immune cell infiltration in a mouse model of melanoma syngeneic transplant that is particularly aggressive and, more importantly, that recapitulates the downregulation of A-SMase during tumour progression [18]. A clone in which A-SMase is maintained at constitutively high levels during melanoma progression was analysed as well. We found that the progressive loss of A-SMase enhanced the immunosuppressive capacity of melanoma cells through the recruitment of MDSCs and Tregs at tumour site and the impairment of dendritic cells (DCs) maturation. Of importance, the upregulation of A-SMase enhanced the function of immune effector cells as DCs and cytotoxic T lymphocytes. This A-SMase-dependent modulation of microenvironment events may have a therapeutic outcome in terms of tumour growth.

2. Methods

2.1. Cell Models and Animals

The cell clones used in our experiments were generated from the murine melanoma cell line B16-F1 of American Type Culture Collection (LGC Standards, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy). As described in Bizzozero et al. [18], the low expressing A-SMase B16-W6_pSIL10 clone was generated from a subclone of the parental cell line B16-F1 (i.e., B16-W6) by transfecting the cells with the plasmid pSilencer4.1-CMV (Invitrogen-Life Technologies, Monza, Italy) harbouring a shRNA containing a sequence which gave the A-SMase silencing. The control clone used in our experiments (B16-pSILscr) was generated by transfecting B16-W6 cells with the plasmid pSilencer4.1-CMV harbouring a shRNA containing a scrambled sequence. The B16-B1A clone overexpressing A-SMase was generated as follows: the pEF1/Myc plasmid (Invitrogen-Life Technologies) containing cDNA for A-SMase [18] was transfected in B16-F1 cells using the Fugene transfection reagent (Promega, Milano, Italy), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Approximately 15 colonies resistant to the antibiotic G418 (500 μg/mL) were tested for A-SMase expression and activity (see Section 3.3). A B16-F1 clone transfected with the empty vector pEF1/Myc (B16-pEF1) was used as control. Cells were routinely tested for Mycoplasma using a BioWhittaker MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza Group, Basel, Switzerland). Cells were cultured in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS), glutamine (200 mM), and penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL) and grown at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂.

Female C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Calco, Italy), housed in a regulated environment (23 ± 1°C, 50 ± 5% humidity) with a 12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 08.00 a.m.), and provided with food and water ad libitum. All studies were conducted in accordance with the Italian law on animal care N° 116/1992 and the European Communities Council Directive EEC/609/86. The experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Milan. All efforts were made to reduce both animal suffering and the number of animals used.

2.2. Animal Handling and Tumour Growth

Mice received s.c. injections of 5 × 10⁴ cells in the lower-right flank on day 0 (ten animals per group at minimum) [18, 19]. Tumour growth was monitored every 2-3 days by means of external calliper measurements and volume calculation (length × width²/2), until mice reached IACUC euthanasia criteria, as, for instance, clinical signs of tumour or when tumour size exceeded 10% of body weight [19]. For PCR and flow cytometry analysis tumours were resected when they reached the volume of ca. 500 mm³. Late stage melanomas were explanted at a volume of ca. 1500 mm³.

2.3. Quantitative Real Time-PCR (qPCR)

The analysis of mRNA expression was performed as previously described [18, 20–22]. Briefly, total RNA from resected tumours and in vitro B16 clones was extracted with the High Pure RNA Tissue Kit and the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit, respectively (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. First-strand cDNA was generated from 1 μg of total RNA using iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). As shown in Table 1, a set of primer pairs amplifying fragments ranging from 63 to 354 bp was designed to hybridise to unique regions of the appropriate gene sequence. qPCR was performed using SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). The fold change was determined relative to the control after normalising to GAPDH (internal standard) through the use of the formula .

2.4. Flow Cytometry

After surgical excision, a single cell suspension from tumours was obtained by collagenase IV (0.2 mg/mL), dispase (2 mg/mL), and DNase I (0.1 mg/mL) treatment in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium, supplemented with 5% FBS, glutamine (200 mM), and penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL). After 30 min at 37°C in a shaking bath, the cell suspension was filtered (40 μm pore-size membrane) and washed in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) added with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Unspecific sites were blocked incubating samples for 20 min at room temperature in PBS containing 10% goat serum and 1% BSA. Cells were then incubated with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies for the staining of specific cellular markers (Table 2) in 1% BSA-PBS solution (1 h on ice). Cells were analysed by flow cytometry using a Gallios Flow Cytometer (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and the software FCS Express 4 (De Novo System, Portland, OR, USA).

2.5. Western Blotting

The analysis of protein expression from in vitro B16 clones was performed as previously described [18, 20–23]. The rabbit polyclonal anti myc-tag (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and the mouse monoclonal anti-TATA binding protein (TBP) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) primary antibodies were used in combination with the appropriate secondary antibodies HRP-conjugated (Bio-Rad). Proteins were visualised using Bio-Rad Clarity Western ECL substrate with a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imaging system. Bands were quantified for densitometry using the Bio-Rad Image Lab software.

2.6. A-SMase Activity

Cells (2 × 10⁶ cells/mL) were homogenised in the acid lysis buffer (50 mM sodium acetate, 1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 5) with freshly added protease inhibitor cocktail (cOmplete, Roche Applied Science) [24]. Sphingomyelinase activity was measured using the Amplex Red Sphingomyelinase Assay Kit (Molecular Probes-Life Technologies, Monza, Italy), as described in the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.7. Apoptosis Detection

Apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry as described previously [18]. Briefly, adherent cells were detached using Enzyme-Free Cell Dissociation Buffer (Merck Millipore Billerica, MA, USA), washed twice with cold PBS, and incubated (1 × 10⁶ cells) with 5 μL of FITC-labelled annexin V (Life Technologies, Monza, Italy) to detect phosphatidylserine exposure on the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane and 5 μL of propidium iodide (PI) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) to exclude necrotic cells, in binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, and 2.5 mM CaCl₂). After 15 min of incubation at room temperature, cells were acquired using a Gallios Flow Cytometer (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and analysed by the software FCS Express 4 (De Novo System, Portland, OR, USA).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Upon verification of normal distribution, statistical significance of raw data between the groups in each experiment was evaluated using unpaired Student’s -test (single comparisons) or one-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls posttest (multiple comparisons). Data belonging from different experiments were represented and averaged in the same graph. Tumour growth was analysed using two-way ANOVA, followed by the Bonferroni posttest. The GraphPad Prism software package (Graph Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used. Results are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of the indicated values.

2.9. Materials

Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium, FBS, glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, HEPES, G418, and PBS were purchased from Euroclone (Pero, Italy). Primer pairs were obtained from Primm Biotech (Milano, Italy). Dispase and DNase I were obtained from Gibco-Life Technologies (Monza, Italy) and Roche Applied Science, respectively. Goat serum was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA). Flow cytometry antibodies were purchased as follows: CD11b and Gr1 from Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany; CD11c, CD80, MHCII, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD44, and Foxp3 from eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Downregulation of A-SMase Increases the Accumulation of MDSCs in Melanoma

We have previously demonstrated that during B16-F1 melanoma progression A-SMase is spontaneously downregulated thus conferring to melanoma cells a more aggressive phenotype [18]. To evaluate the impact of this event on the modulation of tumour microenvironment, mice were subcutaneously injected with B16-W6_pSIL10 cells, a loss-of-function model of A-SMase obtained by the knock-down of A-SMase in the parental cell line B16-F1 [18]; we then analysed the in vivo behaviour of the established skin melanoma in terms of cytokine expression and tumour-infiltrating immune cells. The parental cell line B16-pSILscr served as control.

The mRNA analysis by qPCR in the explanted melanomas of a panel of different inflammatory factors showed a significant accumulation at B16-W6_pSIL10 tumour site of interleukin- (IL-) 1β, IL-6, IL-10, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), transforming growth factor- (TGF-) β1, and tumour necrosis factor- (TNF-) α (Figure 1(a)). A sustained secretion and maintenance of inflammatory mediators during tumour progression stimulate the enrichment and activation of MDSCs then leading to immunosuppression [4]. Thus, we evaluated the presence of MDSCs (CD11b⁺/Gr1⁺ cells) in the tumour mass by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 1(b), we found a significant increase in CD11b⁺/Gr1⁺ cells infiltrating B16-W6_pSIL10 tumours with respect to control. Of notice, the percentage of MDSCs in B16-F1 tumours at a late stage of growth, in which A-SMase was spontaneously downregulated [18], was similar to that of B16-W6_pSIL10 tumours (Supplementary Figure 1(a) in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/370482). These observations support the role of A-SMase downregulation in favouring the recruitment of MDSCs at the tumour lesion.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1

Downregulation of A-SMase increases the accumulation of MDSCs in melanoma. Tumours were resected when they reached the volume of ca. 500 mm³ and treated to extract mRNA or obtain a cell suspension. (a) qPCR analysis of mRNA of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, GM-CSF, TGF-β1, and TNF-α. The histograms are representative of results obtained from at least seven to twelve different animals per experimental group. (b) Flow cytometry analysis of tumour-infiltrating immune cells. The cell suspensions obtained from different tumours were stained with anti-CD11b-APC and anti-Gr1-FITC antibodies. A representative dot plot of CD11b⁺/Gr1⁺ cells in the CD11b⁺ population cell is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the results obtained from at least ten to fifteen different animals per experimental group (lower panel). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. versus B16-pSILscr control.

3.2. A-SMase-Related MDSC Accumulation Determines an Immunosuppressive Microenvironment

MDSCs exert their immunosuppressive function through the impairment of DCs (CD11c⁺ cells) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8⁺ cells) [25–27] and the recruitment of Tregs (CD4⁺/CD25⁺/Foxp3⁺ cells) [40]. Flow cytometry analysis of immune cells from explanted melanomas showed a significant decrease of CD11c⁺ cells at B16-W6_pSIL10 tumour site when compared to control (Figure 2(a)). Interestingly recruited DCs displayed an immature and anergic phenotype as indicated by the reduction of the costimulatory markers CD80 and MHCII (Figure 2(b)). Although we did not observe a difference in CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T infiltrating lymphocytes (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)), we found a significant increase in the number of Tregs in B16-W6_pSIL10 tumours with respect to control (Figure 2(e)). Similar results were obtained in B16-F1 melanoma at late stage of growth (Supplementary Figure 1(b)). Taken together, these results indicate that a low expression of A-SMase in melanoma cells induces an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2

A-SMase induced MDSC accumulation determines an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Flow cytometry analysis of tumour-infiltrating immune cells. Tumour cell suspensions obtained from resected tumours were stained with the specific fluorescent conjugated antibodies for CD11c, CD80, MHCII, CD8, CD4, CD25, and Foxp3 antibodies. (a) A representative dot plot of gated CD11c⁺ cells is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). (b) A representative dot plot of CD80⁺/MHCII⁺ cells in the CD11c⁺ cell population is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). (c-d) A representative dot plot of CD8⁺ cells (c) and CD4⁺ cells (d) is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). (e) A representative dot plot of CD25⁺/Foxp3⁺ in the CD4⁺ cell population is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). Values in each histogram are expressed as mean ± SEM. ; versus B16-pSILscr control.

3.3. Restoring A-SMase Expression Switches the Tumour Microenvironment from a Pro- to an Antitumoural Phenotype and Reduces Melanoma Growth

To demonstrate unambiguously that A-SMase expression by melanoma cells modulates tumour microenvironment, different gain-of-function models of A-SMase were generated by stable transfection of A-SMase in B16-F1 cells. Measurements of A-SMase mRNA (Figure 3(a)), protein expression (Figure 3(b)), and activity (Figure 3(c)) in these A-SMase transfected clones with respect to parental control (B16-pEF1) allowed us to select B16-B1A as the cells overexpressing A-SMase to be used for in vivo studies as follows. In particular, mice were subcutaneously injected with B16-B1A cells and the explanted melanomas analysed for A-SMase expression and the immune cell composition. The cell clone B16-pEF1 served as control. As expected, B16-B1A tumour maintained stable levels of A-SMase mRNA levels during growth (Figure 4(a)). Of interest, the number of MDSCs and Tregs decreased significantly in B16-B1A tumour when compared to control (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). This event was paralleled by the increase of DCs infiltrate (Figure 5(a)). These cells partially recovered their maturation status as demonstrated by the increase in expression of the costimulatory markers CD80 and MHCII (Figure 5(b)). Unexpectedly, even CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T infiltrating lymphocytes as well as the CD8⁺/ activated T lymphocytes were significantly higher in B16-B1A tumours with respect to B16-pEF1 ones (Figures 5(c)–5(e)); no differences were observed in the population of CD4⁺/ T lymphocytes (Figure 5(f)). These data indicate that A-SMase restoration in melanoma cells results in the establishment of an antitumoural microenvironment through both the reduction of protumoural immune cells and the recruitment of antitumoural immune cells at tumour site.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3

Generation of B16-F1 clones stably expressed A-SMase. Evaluation of A-SMase expression/activity in B16-F1-derived clones overexpressing A-SMase. The B16-pEF1 clone transfected with the empty vector (pEF1) was used as control. (a) qPCR analysis of A-SMase expression. (b) Western blotting analysis of A-SMase. Image is representative of at least three independent experiments. TBP was used as loading control. The histograms represent the densitometric values normalized on TBP. (c) A-SMase activity on cell lysates measured as sphingomyelin hydrolysis at pH 5.5. Values are expressed as fold increases over control ± SEM (). ; ; versus B16-pEF1 control.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 4

A-SMase expression reprogrammes the tumour microenvironment. (a) Analysis of A-SMase expression in B1A tumours in vivo. Tumours were resected when they reached the volume of ca. 500 mm³ (early stage) or 1500 mm³. A-SMase expression was evaluated by qPCR. The histograms represent the data obtained from five to seven animals per experimental group. (b-c) Flow cytometry analysis of tumour-infiltrating immune cells. Tumour cell suspensions obtained from resected tumours were stained with the specific fluorescent conjugated antibodies for CD11b, Gr1, CD4, CD25, and Foxp3 antibodies. (b) A representative dot plot of CD11b⁺/Gr1⁺ cells in the CD11b⁺ population cell is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). (c) A representative dot plot of CD25⁺/Foxp3⁺ in the CD4⁺ cell population is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). Values in each histogram are expressed as mean ± SEM. versus B16-pEF1 control.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 5

A-SMase expression increases the recruitment of effector antitumoural immune cells. Flow cytometry analysis of tumour-infiltrating immune cells. Tumour cell suspensions obtained from resected tumours were stained with the specific fluorescent conjugated antibodies for CD11c, CD80, MHCII, CD8, CD4, and CD44 antibodies. (a) A representative dot plot of gated CD11c⁺ cells is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). (b) A representative dot plot of CD80⁺/MHCII⁺ cells in the CD11c⁺ cell population is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). (c) A representative dot plot of CD8⁺ cells is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). (d) A representative dot plot of CD8⁺/CD44⁺ in the CD8⁺ cell population is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). (e) A representative dot plot of CD4⁺ cells is shown (upper panel). (f) A representative dot plot of CD4⁺/CD44⁺ in the CD4⁺ cell population is shown (upper panel). The histograms represent the data obtained from ten to fifteen animals per experimental group (lower panel). Values in each histogram are expressed as mean ± SEM. ; versus B16-pEF1 control.

Finally we addressed whether the overexpression of A-SMase may have therapeutic efficacy. The analysis of melanoma apoptosis in vitro revealed that the higher levels of A-SMase in B16-B1A correlate with an increase of apoptotic cell number when compared to the B16-pEF1 control cells (Figure 6(a)), thus confirming the fundamental role played by A-SMase in sensitivity to apoptosis. Of notice, as shown in the growth analysis in vivo of Figure 6, we observed a significant delay in the outgrowth of B16-B1A tumours versus control. These data are in line with our previous results in which the silencing of A-SMase resulted in an increase in melanoma growth [18] and confirms the inverse correlation between A-SMase expression and melanoma progression.

(a)

(b)

Figure 6

A-SMase expression reduces tumour growth. (a) Flow cytometry analysis of cell death of B16-pEF1 and B16-B1A cells. Apoptosis/necrosis were evaluated by the double staining with annexin V-FITC and PI. A representative dot plot for each cell clone is shown (). (b) Tumour growth analysis. BC57BL/6 mice (10 animals per group) were injected in the right flank with B16-pEF1 and B16-B1A (5 × 10⁴ cells). Tumour growth was monitored by measuring tumour volume (mm³) every 2-3 days. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. .

4. Discussion

The role of A-SMase in the response of tumours to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is a well-established concept [14]. Indeed, the enzyme contributes significantly to the cytotoxic effects of several anticancer drugs such as cisplatin, retinoids, and doxorubicin [28–32]. Moreover it has been demonstrated that the peritumoural injection of recombinant A-SMase sensitises mouse subcutaneous melanomas to the antineoplastic effects of radiotherapy [33]. Recently, A-SMase downregulation was shown to favour human and mouse melanoma ability to grow, invade, and metastasise [18]. We now show that change of A-SMase expression in cancer cells is sufficient per se to tune in vivo melanoma growth. In addition, our data indicated that A-SMase levels modulate immune cells at tumour site, thus suggesting the role of A-SMase as an immune-regulating factor of melanoma tumour microenvironment.

It is well known that the interactions between immune system components recruited into the tumour microenvironment are crucial for tumour development and progression, relying on inflammatory factors and cells that contribute to cell transformation, support cancerous cell survival, resist immunological destruction, and facilitate invasion and metastasis [6, 34]. In keeping with the notion that the protumoural microenvironment can be considered the product of a developing cross talk between cancerous cells and stromal cells, here we demonstrate a close correlation between the extent and type of tumour infiltrate and A-SMase levels. Specifically, low A-SMase in melanoma accounts for the high expression of factors involved in inflammation (i.e., IL-1β, IL-6, GM-CSF, and TNF-α), which have been positively associated with cancer onset and progression [6, 34]. In contrast with the A-SMase-mediated inhibitory effect on proinflammatory cytokines we also found that low A-SMase in melanoma accounts for the high expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β1. Of interest, both cytokines are generally accepted as major immunosuppressive cytokines expressed in tumours including melanoma, although there is still a debate on their effective role in antitumour immune response [6, 34–38]. Our data indicate that A-SMase decrease in melanoma accounts for the establishment of a high immunosuppressive and protumoural microenvironment. In this respect, tumours with low A-SMase levels, that is, B16-F1_psil10 and B16-F1 at late stage of development, display an increase of MDSCs infiltration, already known to be responsible for the establishment of immunosuppression [5, 39]. MDSCs accumulation in the tumour mass determines the impairment of DCs and cytotoxic T lymphocytes [25, 27] and the recruitment of regulatory Tregs [40]. In this line, in low A-SMase expressing tumours we found low levels of DCs; of interest these cells also showed an immature and anergic phenotype, a typical feature of melanoma infiltrating DCs resulting in the inability to trigger the activation of tumour specific CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T lymphocytes [41, 42]. Moreover low A-SMase expressing tumours displayed increased Treg infiltration which is often associated with poor clinical outcome and tumour progression in different cancers [43]. This led to the hypothesis that the naturally occurring A-SMase decrease in melanoma cells during tumour progression contributes to the induction of immune tolerance and immunosuppression in tumour microenvironment and eventually in the acquisition of the high aggressive behaviour of melanoma in vivo [18].

In support of this hypothesis, the restoration of A-SMase expression in melanoma cells not only reduces tumour growth and immunosuppression, but also accounts for a high recruitment in the tumour microenvironment of effector immune cells with an antitumoural function. Indeed, we observed a poor homing of MDSCs and Tregs in tumours in which a sustained expression of A-SMase is maintained during their progression, that is, B16-B1A. As a consequence, we observed the increased recruitment of CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T lymphocytes at the tumour lesion and especially the infiltration of mature DCs and CD8⁺/ memory/activated T lymphocytes [44–46]. The accumulation of effector immune cells such as DCs and CD8⁺ T lymphocytes into primary tumour lesions is associated with prolonged survival and a reduced incidence of metastases in patients with several types of solid cancer, including primary cutaneous melanomas [47, 48]. Based on this evidence, the current preclinical and clinical studies regarding melanoma immunotherapy are centred on the administration of DCs or CD8⁺ cells in the form of DC vaccines or adoptive T cell transfer, preceded by radiotherapy or chemotherapy to induce lymphodepletion and the ensuing elimination of immunosuppressive MDSCs and Tregs [49–52]. Consistent with these reports, our findings on the role of A-SMase upregulation in reprogramming the status of tumour microenvironment open new vistas in therapeutic perspective. In particular, the possibility that A-SMase overexpression “educates” tumour microenvironment against cancer cells encourages the use of therapeutic approaches to increase the enzyme expression/activity. This would create an antitumoural microenvironment suitable either for triggering an appropriate adaptive immune response against melanoma or for improving the efficacy of other immunotherapy strategies. In this respect, restoring A-SMase in melanomas by genetic overexpression or by recombinant protein administration, a protocol currently under examination for Niemann-Pick type B patients [53], might be considered a useful adjuvant for cancer therapy.

5. Conclusion

The evaluation of the role of A-SMase in many pathophysiological processes is a developing field [14, 28, 54–61]. This study demonstrates for the first time the central role of A-SMase expressed by melanoma cells in orchestrating the cross talk with the surrounding microenvironment. These interactions are crucial for tumour fate, lying on its rejection or progression. The discovery of this A-SMase function exerted on the tumour-infiltrating immune cells suggests that the antineoplastic effect of the enzyme goes beyond the well-established role in cancer cell death but involves a more complex network that may be taken into consideration in the setting of therapeutic strategies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by “Ministero della Salute, Giovani Ricercatori 2011-2012” grant to Clara De Palma and “Ricerca Corrente 2015” grant to Emilio Clementi, “Ministero dell’Istruzione, Università e Ricerca, PRIN2010-2011” grants to Emilio Clementi and Davide Cervia, “Università di Milano, Giovani Ricercatori-Linea B” grant to Cristiana Perrotta, and “Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) IG11365” grant to Emilio Clementi.

Supplementary Materials

B16-F1 tumours, in which A-SMase is spontaneously down regulated during melanoma progression [18], excised at late stage of growth (i.e. when they reached a volume of 1500 mm³) showed a strong increase of MDSCs and Treg cells. This is in line with the data obtained in B16-W6_pSIL10 tumours and supports the fundamental role of A-SMase in the recruitment of immune cells at the tumour lesion.

Supplementary Figure

References

D. Grossman and D. C. Altieri, “Drug resistance in melanoma: mechanisms, apoptosis, and new potential therapeutic targets,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 20, no. 1-2, pp. 3–11, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Enk, J. C. Becker, and G. Schuler, “Immunotherapy of malignant melanoma—basic principles and novel therapeutic approaches,” Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 635–645, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wu, M.-A. Forget, J. Chacon et al., “Adoptive T-cell therapy using autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for metastatic melanoma: current status and future outlook,” The Cancer Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 160–175, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Umansky, A. Sevko, C. Gebhardt, and J. Utikal, “Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in malignant melanoma,” Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1021–1027, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Meyera, A. Sevko, M. Ramacher et al., “Chronic inflammation promotes myeloid-derived suppressor cell activation blocking antitumor immunity in transgenic mouse melanoma model,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 41, pp. 17111–17116, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. I. Grivennikov, F. R. Greten, and M. Karin, “Immunity, inflammation, and cancer,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 883–899, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Navarini-Meury and C. Conrad, “Melanoma and innate immunity—active inflammation or just erroneous attraction?: melanoma as the source of leukocyte-attracting chemokines,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 84–91, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. N. Kodumudi, A. Weber, A. A. Sarnaik, and S. Pilon-Thomas, “Blockade of myeloid-derived suppressor cells after induction of lymphopenia improves adoptive T cell therapy in a murine model of melanoma,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 189, no. 11, pp. 5147–5154, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wesolowski, J. Markowitz, and W. E. Carson III, “Myeloid derived suppressor cells—a new therapeutic target in the treatment of cancer,” Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, vol. 1, article 10, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Ogretmen and Y. A. Hannun, “Biologically active sphingolipids in cancer pathogenesis and treatment,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 604–616, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. De Palma and C. Perrotta, “Ceramide as a target of chemotherapy: its role in apoptosis and autophagy,” Clinical Lipidology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 111–119, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Riboni, R. Campanella, R. Bassi et al., “Ceramide levels are inversely associated with malignant progression of human glial tumors,” Glia, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 105–113, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Prinetti, D. Millimaggi, S. D'Ascenzo et al., “Lack of ceramide generation and altered sphingolipid composition are associated with drug resistance in human ovarian carcinoma cells,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 395, no. 2, pp. 311–318, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. L. Smith and E. H. Schuchman, “The unexpected role of acid sphingomyelinase in cell death and the pathophysiology of common diseases,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 3419–3431, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. M. Mahdy, J. C. Cheng, J. Li et al., “Acid ceramidase upregulation in prostate cancer cells confers resistance to radiation: AC inhibition, a potential radiosensitizer,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 430–438, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Edmond, F. Dufour, G. Poiroux et al., “Downregulation of ceramide synthase-6 during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition reduces plasma membrane fluidity and cancer cell motility,” Oncogene, vol. 34, no. 19, pp. 996–1005, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. T. Petersen, O. D. Olsen, L. Groth-Pedersen et al., “Transformation-associated changes in sphingolipid metabolism sensitize cells to lysosomal cell death induced by inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase,” Cancer Cell, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 379–393, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Bizzozero, D. Cazzato, D. Cervia et al., “Acid sphingomyelinase determines melanoma progression and metastatic behaviour via the microphtalmia-associated transcription factor signalling pathway,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 507–520, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Perrotta, L. Bizzozero, S. Falcone et al., “Nitric oxide boosts chemoimmunotherapy via inhibition of acid sphingomyelinase in a mouse model of melanoma,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 16, pp. 7559–7564, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Perrotta, M. Buldorini, E. Assi et al., “The thyroid hormone triiodothyronine controls macrophage maturation and functions: protective role during inflammation,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 230–247, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. de Palma, F. Morisi, S. Pambianco et al., “Deficient nitric oxide signalling impairs skeletal muscle growth and performance: involvement of mitochondrial dysregulation,” Skeletal Muscle, vol. 4, article 22, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Cazzato, E. Assi, C. Moscheni et al., “Nitric oxide drives embryonic myogenesis in chicken through the upregulation of myogenic differentiation factors,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 320, no. 2, pp. 269–280, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sciorati, T. Touvier, R. Buono et al., “Necdin is expressed in cachectic skeletal muscle to protect fibers from tumor-induced wasting,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 122, part 8, pp. 1119–1125, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Opreanu, M. Tikhonenko, S. Bozack et al., “The unconventional role of acid sphingomyelinase in regulation of retinal microangiopathy in diabetic human and animal models,” Diabetes, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 2370–2378, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Schiavoni, L. Gabriele, and F. Mattei, “The tumor microenvironment: a pitch for multiple players,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 3, article 90, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. C. Rodriguez, D. G. Quiceno, and A. C. Ochoa, “L-arginine availability regulates T-lymphocyte cell-cycle progression,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1568–1573, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ostrand-Rosenberg, P. Sinha, D. W. Beury, and V. K. Clements, “Cross-talk between myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), macrophages, and dendritic cells enhances tumor-induced immune suppression,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 275–281, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Gulbins and R. Kolesnick, “Raft ceramide in molecular medicine,” Oncogene, vol. 22, no. 45, pp. 7070–7077, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lacour, A. Hammann, S. Grazide et al., “Cisplatin-induced CD95 redistribution into membrane lipid rafts of HT29 human colon cancer cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3593–3598, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Brunelli, C. Sciorati, G. D'Antona et al., “Nitric oxide release combined with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory activity prevents muscular dystrophy pathology and enhances stem cell therapy,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 264–269, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. Zeidan and Y. A. Hannun, “Activation of acid sphingomyelinase by protein kinase Cdelta-mediated phosphorylation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 15, pp. 11549–11561, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Garcia-Barros, D. Lacorazza, H. Petrie et al., “Host acid sphingomyelinase regulates microvascular function not tumor immunity,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 22, pp. 8285–8291, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. L. Smith and E. H. Schuchman, “Acid sphingomyelinase overexpression enhances the antineoplastic effects of irradiation in vitro and in vivo,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1565–1571, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kanterman, M. Sade-Feldman, and M. Baniyash, “New insights into chronic inflammation-induced immunosuppression,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 307–318, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-K. Leivonen and V.-M. Kähäri, “Transforming growth factor-β signaling in cancer invasion and metastasis,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 121, no. 10, pp. 2119–2124, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kim, R. L. Modlin, R. L. Moy et al., “IL-10 production in cutaneous basal and squamous cell carcinomas: a mechanism for evading the local T cell immune response,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 2240–2247, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Mocellin, F. M. Marincola, and H. A. Young, “Interleukin-10 and the immune response against cancer: a counterpoint,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1043–1051, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tikoo and N. K. Haass, “Friends or foes: IL-10 and TGF-beta in melanoma,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 254–255, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Umansky and A. Sevko, “Melanoma-induced immunosuppression and its neutralization,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 319–326, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Schlecker, A. Stojanovic, C. Eisen et al., “Tumor-infiltrating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells mediate CCR5-dependent recruitment of regulatory T cells favoring tumor growth,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 189, no. 12, pp. 5602–5611, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Stoitzner, L. K. Green, J. Y. Jung et al., “Inefficient presentation of tumor-derived antigen by tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 1665–1673, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ataera, E. Hyde, K. M. Price, P. Stoitzner, and F. Ronchese, “Murine melanoma-infiltrating dendritic cells are defective in antigen presenting function regardless of the presence of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID e17515, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zou, “Regulatory T cells, tumour immunity and immunotherapy,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 295–307, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Dobrzanski, J. B. Reome, and R. W. Dutton, “Type 1 and type 2 CD8⁺ effector T cell subpopulations promote long-term tumor immunity and protection to progressively growing tumor,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 916–925, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. G. Baaten, C.-R. Li, and L. M. Bradley, “Multifaceted regulation of T cells by CD44,” Communicative and Integrative Biology, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 508–512, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Dutton, L. M. Bradley, and S. L. Swain, “T cell memory,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 16, pp. 201–223, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ma, G. V. Shurin, Z. Peiyuan, and M. R. Shurin, “Dendritic cells in the cancer microenvironment,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Preynat-Seauve, P. Schuler, E. Contassot, F. Beermann, B. Huard, and L. E. French, “Tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells are potent antigen-presenting cells able to activate T cells and mediate tumor rejection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Benencia, L. Sprague, J. McGinty, M. Pate, and M. Muccioli, “Dendritic cells the tumor microenvironment and the challenges for an effective antitumor vaccination,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2012, Article ID 425476, 15 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. Duong, C. S. Yong, M. H. Kershaw, C. Y. Slaney, and P. K. Darcy, “Cancer immunotherapy utilizing gene-modified T cells: from the bench to the clinic,” Molecular Immunology, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Itzhaki, D. Levy, D. Zikich et al., “Adoptive T-cell transfer in melanoma,” Immunotherapy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Q. Phan and S. A. Rosenberg, “Adoptive cell transfer for patients with metastatic melanoma: the potential and promise of cancer immunotherapy,” Cancer Control, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 289–297, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Murray, A. M. Thompson, A. Vitsky et al., “Nonclinical safety assessment of recombinant human acid sphingomyelinase (rhASM) for the treatment of acid sphingomyelinase deficiency: the utility of animal models of disease in the toxicological evaluation of potential therapeutics,” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 217–225, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Perrotta and E. Clementi, “Biological roles of acid and neutral sphingomyelinases and their regulation by nitric oxide,” Physiology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 64–71, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Cervia, C. Perrotta, C. Moscheni, C. de Palma, and E. Clementi, “Nitric oxide and sphingolipids control apoptosis and autophagy with a significant impact on Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, vol. 27, no. 2, supplement, pp. 11–22, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Assi, D. Cazzato, C. De Palma, C. Perrotta, E. Clementi, and D. Cervia, “Sphingolipids and brain resident macrophages in neuroinflammation: an emerging aspect of nervous system pathology,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2013, Article ID 309302, 8 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Perrotta, L. Bizzozero, D. Cazzato et al., “Syntaxin 4 is required for acid sphingomyelinase activity and apoptotic function,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 51, pp. 40240–40251, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, S. Li, X. Qin et al., “The pleiotropic roles of sphingolipid signaling in autophagy,” Cell Death and Disease, vol. 5, no. 5, Article ID e1245, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. C. Luft, “Acid sphingomyelinase, autophagy, and atherosclerosis,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 429–431, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Garcia-Ruiz, J. M. Mato, D. Vance, N. Kaplowitz, and J. C. Fernández-Checa, “Acid sphingomyelinase-ceramide system in steatohepatitis: a novel target regulating multiple pathways,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 219–233, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Perrotta, D. Cervia, C. de Palma et al., “The emerging role of Acid Sphingomyelinase in autophagy,” Apoptosis, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 635–644, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Emma Assi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1440

Downloads

887

Citations