Research Article
Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility by Decision Trees in the Metropolitan Area of Istanbul, Turkey
Table 1
The distribution of the geological formations with respect to landslide in the study area.
| Formation | Symbol | Grid cells with landslides | All grid cells | LandslideDensity (%) | Frequency | % | Frequency | % |
| Quaternary | Qa | 1127 | 2.1 | 15495 | 5.54 | 7.27 | Bakirkoy fm. | Tmb | 4473 | 8.34 | 56231 | 20.1 | 7.95 | Ergene fm. | Tme | 13617 | 25.37 | 71287 | 25.49 | 19.1 | Cantakoy fm. | Toc | 5706 | 10.63 | 14210 | 5.08 | 40.15 | Danisment fm. | Tod | 4728 | 8.81 | 20650 | 7.38 | 22.9 | Ihsaniye fm. | Teoi | 1810 | 3.37 | 43337 | 15.49 | 4.18 | Kirklareli limestone | Tek | 0 | 0 | 1613 | 0.58 | 0 | Danisment fm. Acmalar m. | Toda | 17151 | 31.95 | 34213 | 12.23 | 50.13 | Ihsaniye fm. Tuff m. | Teoi2 | 66 | 0.12 | 478 | 0.17 | 13.81 | Suloglu fm. | Tos | 4996 | 9.31 | 21166 | 7.57 | 23.6 | Yassioren limestone | Teoiy | 0 | 0 | 1035 | 0.37 | 0 |
|
|