Research Article
Controller Design for Rotary Inverted Pendulum System Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Table 3
Best results of PID controllers with different
values gained by PSO, GA, and ACO algorithms in 50 runs.
| | β | | | | | % | (sec) | (sec) | (sec) | | | cost |
| GA | 1 | 0.473 | 4.118 | 0.51 | 0.356 | 36.787 | 0.008 | 0.958 | 0.29 | 0.0008 | 18.213 | 20.908 | 1.5 | 0.666 | 3.276 | 0.444 | 0.248 | 28.34 | 0.008 | 1.776 | 0.44 | 0.0046 | 22.624 | 22.519 |
| PSO | 1 | 0.551 | 3.989 | 0.398 | 0.153 | 22.243 | 0.008 | 1.301 | 0.38 | 0.001 | 17.839 | 16.189 | 1.5 | 0.529 | 3.206 | 0.35 | 0.119 | 21.805 | 0.006 | 1.24 | 0.41 | 0.0008 | 18.242 | 17.728 |
| ACO | 1 | 0.35 | 4.091 | 0.281 | 0.125 | 16.528 | 0.035 | 1.864 | 0.32 | 0.0022 | 19.904 | 15.513 | 1.5 | 0.539 | 2.821 | 0.441 | 0.23 | 17.57 | 0.008 | 1.721 | 0.28 | 0.0022 | 19.095 | 16.571 |
|
|