Research Article
Optimum Design of Gravity Retaining Walls Using Charged System Search Algorithm
Table 1
The optimum seismic designs comparison for the gravity retaining wall.
| Design variable | ā | Optimal values (m) | CSS | HBB-BC [15] | BB-BC [15] | PSO [15] |
| | 1.137 | 1.734 | 0.903 | 0.566 | | 0.440 | 0.553 | 0.650 | 2.000 | | 0.353 | 0.467 | 0.689 | 0.200 | | 3.200 | 3.014 | 2.691 | 2.000 | | 2.261 | 0.719 | 0.515 | 0.645 | | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0.200 | Best weight (kN) | 322.293 | 328.297 | 337.607 | 344.700 | Average weight (kN) | 329.893 | 337.860 | 345.652 | 351.189 | Number of analysis | 4,400 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | | 2.152 | 2.504 | 2.003 | 2.097 | | 1.200 | 1.200 | 1.200 | 1.200 | | 7.154 | 7.459 | 5.921 | 7.182 |
|
|