- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 567812, 14 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/567812

## Experimental Study on Forecasting Mathematical Model of Drying Shrinkage of Recycled Aggregate Concrete

College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Three Gorges University, 780 ShaLong Road, Wanzhou District, Chongqing 414000, China

Received 19 November 2011; Accepted 16 January 2012

Academic Editor: Ireneusz Zbicinski

Copyright © 2012 Yuanchen Guo and Xue Wang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

On the basis of basic law in AASHTO2007 model, the forecasting mathematical model of drying shrinkage of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) is established by regression analysis and experimental study. The research results show that (1) with the replacement rate of RCA increases, the drying shrinkage value of RAC increases; this trend is even more obvious in the early drying time. (2) The addition of fly ash can inhibit the drying shrinkage of RAC, but the effect is not very obvious. Specifically, the addition of fly ash will increase the shrinkage to some extent when the mixing amount is 20%. (3) The addition of expansive agent can obviously inhibit the shrinkage of RAC; the inhibition affection is better than that of fly ash. (4) The forecasting mathematical models of drying shrinkage of RAC established in this paper have high accuracy and rationality according to experiment validation and error analysis.

#### 1. Introduction

Forecasting mathematical models of concrete drying shrinkage is a mathematical equation which represents the relationship of concrete shrinkage and its curing age of [1]. The models are generally fitted by regression analysis of experimental data. The common functional expressions are hyperbolic function, exponential function, and logarithmic function, and so on.

In recent years, many domestic and foreign researchers are committed to the study of forecasting mathematical models and had found a lot of computational model. However, it is very difficult to estimate the shrinkage value and its development in different age because of experimental value of concrete shrinkage having great dispersion [2]. Researchers have introduced a variety of concrete prediction computational model, but these models have some limitations and application scope. Currently, more typical forecasting mathematical models of drying shrinkage of natural aggregate concrete are shown below.

The main factors considered in forecasting mathematical model proposed by CEB/FIP [3] are relative humidity, water-cement ratio, cement content, dry age, and size of components, the proposed expression is shown in the following:
where is concrete shrinkage strain at any age , (10^{−6}); is shrinkage strain relative to humidity (10^{−6}); is correction coefficient of concrete mix proportion affection; is of concrete drying time; is correction coefficient of affection of concrete members.

Main factors what ACI proposed [4] also considered the influence of curing time before drying, curing way, aggregates content, and concrete’s air-containing except ones considered by CEB/FIP forecasting mathematical model. ACI’s recommended formula is shown in (1.1) and (1.2).

Under wet curing conditions,

Under steam curing conditions, where is shrinkage strain drying time age is limit shrinkage strain with the relative humidity 40% which is recommended by ACI; is product of correction factors of a series of consideration factors, such as wet curing cycle, exposed time, and relative humidity.

This model accords with engineering practice well, for example, last days of before drying, is considered, but the parameter is very difficult to estimate.

The forecasting mathematical model proposed by Gardner and Lockman [5] is shown in the following: where is concrete shrinkage from beginning observational age to age is shrinkage of concrete under standard conditions; is volume to surface area of concrete component; RH is relative humidity; is the impact of relative humidity; is the impact of strength grade of concrete; is the impact coefficient of curing method, taking 1.0 under the standard curing of 1.0; is influence coefficient of cement type.

In addition to the factors of humidity, component size of concrete, the model also considers the influence of concrete strength grade and cement type on concrete shrinkage.

Based on more recent experimental data, AASHTO [6] puts forward a forecasting mathematical model of concrete shrinkage by means of modifying ACI209 model and CEB/FIP model, the formula as can be seen from he following: where is shrinkage strain; is effect coefficient of component size between them: is volume to surface area of concrete component; , is humidity correlation coefficient; is humidity; is correlation coefficient of concrete strength; is correlation coefficient with the development of time is compressive strength of concrete.

This model accords well with engineering practice, and the parameter selection is simple and convenient. Therefore, the model is used widely since being proposed.

In summary, the considered factors of the existing mathematical models of concrete shrinkage are emphasized particularly, but all of these models have not considered the influence of superplasticizer, fly ash, expansive agent, and other commonly used admixtures in projects on shrinkage and also does not reflect the their positive and negative effects on drying shrinkage of concrete. So they cannot accurately predict the shrinkage of concrete mixed with additives. In addition, there is no consideration of influence of aggregate properties on concrete shrinkage.

#### 2. Parameters Considered in the Model and Its Basic Formula

##### 2.1. Parameters Considered in the Model

Besides the environmental humidity, specimen geometry, strength, and other factors, the model mainly considered the influence of replacement rate of recycled concrete aggregate (Hereinafter referred to as RCA) and the mixing amount of fly ash (FA), expansive agent on drying shrinkage of recycled aggregate concrete (hereinafter referred to as RAC) in this paper.

##### 2.2. Determination of the Basic Formula

On the basis of some basic law in AASHTO2007 model, the influence of replacement rate of RCA and the mixing amount of fly ash, expansive agent on drying shrinkage were considered simultaneously in the model of this paper. The forecasting mathematical model of drying shrinkage of RAC is obtained by fitting analysis of test results. The basic formula of the model is shown in he following: where is impact coefficient of RCA; is impact coefficient of additive; , is impact coefficient of fly ash; is impact coefficient of expansive agent; the rest of parameters meaning is same to (1.6).

#### 3. Experimental Designs

##### 3.1. Experimental Materials

Cement: P·S 32.5. Construction waste (hereinafter referred to as CW): generating from building demolition in Kunming city, china. UEA-*Ⅱ*Expansive agent (hereinafter referred to as UEA): the recommended dosage is 8–12%. I grade product fly ash (hereinafter referred to as FA): the fineness is 7.3%.

##### 3.2. Experimental Methods and Mix Proportion

Drying shrinkage test of RAC is made according to GBJ 82–85 “ordinary concrete test method of long-term performance and durability.” In the test, mix design of C30 NAC is used as reference. Specimen size is 100 mm × 100 mm × 515 mm mix proportion is shown in Table 1.

#### 4. Experimental Results and Analysis

##### 4.1. RAC Strength Grade and Its Impact on Drying Shrinkage of RAC

The influence coefficient [7] (the influence of strength grade on drying shrinkage) is shown in Table 2.

##### 4.2. Replacement Rate of RCA and Its Impact on the Drying Shrinkage of RAC

The result of the effects of replacement rate of RCA on drying shrinkage of RAC is shown in Figure 1.

The formula of forecasting mathematical model of concrete drying shrinkage considering the influence of RCA replacement rate is shown in the following:

As can be seen from Figure 1, the concrete shrinkage curve of RAC with different RCA replacement rate is in good agreement with the power function. The influence coefficient of RCA according to power function is shown in (4.2), and the corresponding shrinkage model is shown in (4.3): where is replacement rate of RCA; , are constant which are derived from experimental data fitting.

The function expression derived from regression fitting using Levenberg-Marquardt method + general global optimization method is shown in (4.4), (4.5), and the fitting parameters are shown in Table 3:

When replacement rates of RCA are 0%, 70%, 100%, the concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 3d age are 4.51 × 10^{−5}, 4.6 × 10^{−5}, 5.51 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 70% RCA is 1.02 times of the natural coarse aggregate concretes (NACs) at 3 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 100% recycled coarse aggregate is 1.2217 times of NACs at 3 d age. The concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 28 d age are 21.2 × 10^{−5} 22.1 × 10^{−5}, 23.2 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 70% recycled coarse aggregate is 1.02 times of the natural coarse aggregate concretes (NACs) at 3 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 70% recycled coarse aggregate is 1.02 times of NACs at 28 d age, the shrinkage strain of RAC with 100% recycled coarse aggregate is 1.094 times of NACs at 28 d age; the concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 60 d age are 29.7 × 10^{−5}, 29.9 × 10^{−5}, 30.85 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 70% recycled coarse aggregate is 1.007 times of the natural coarse aggregate concretes (NACs) at 60 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 100% recycled coarse aggregate is 1.009 times of NACs at 60 d age; the concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 90 d age are 32.4 × 10^{−5}, 33.1 × 10^{−5}, 33.8 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 70% recycled coarse aggregate is 1.02 times of the natural coarse aggregate concretes (NACs) at 90 d age, the shrinkage strain of RAC with 100% recycled coarse aggregate is 1.043 times of NACs at 90 d age. It can clearly be seen that with the dosage of RCA increases, the shrinkage values of RAC were gradually increasing, which is similar to the research results of Gómez-Soberón [8], Poon and Kou [9], Khatib [10]. This paper also found that the shrinkage values’ increasing trend of RAC with 100% RCA is more obvious; the increasing trend of RAC shrinkage values in early age larger than late stages, but with the drying time increase, this trend gradually becomes flat.

We can see that the increase effect of drying shrinkage caused by RCA is larger in the early time than late stage’s; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 100% RCA is larger significantly than NAC’s, This may be because RCA itself has larger shrinkage deformation and lower elastic modulus [11].

In regression (4.4), when is from 0 to 0.7, 1, is from 0.9974 to 1.031, 1.045, it is 1.033 and 1.048 times of the original, which tallies with the experimental results. As can be seen from Table 3, the model correlation coefficients are over 0.99, which explains that the forecasting mathematical model (4.5) in this paper is with high accuracy.

##### 4.3. Mixing Amount of Fly Ash and Its Impact on the Drying Shrinkage of RAC

The result of the effects of the mixing amount of fly ash on drying shrinkage of RAC is shown in Figure 2.

The formula of forecasting mathematical model of concrete drying shrinkage considering the influence of the mixing amount of fly ash is shown in the following: where “1.044” is the impact coefficient of RCA when the replacement rate of RCA is 100%.

As can be seen from Figure 2, the concrete shrinkage curve of RAC with different mixing amount of fly ash is in good agreement with the composite exponential function. The influence coefficient of fly ash according to composite exponential function is shown in (4.7), and the corresponding shrinkage model is shown in the following: where is the mixing amount of fly ash; , are constant which derived from experimental data fitting.

The function expression derived from regression fitting using Levenberg-Marquardt method + general global optimization method is shown in (4.9), (4.10), and the fitting parameters are shown in Table 3:

As can be seen from Figure 2, when the mixing amount of fly ash is 10%, 20%, 30%, the concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 3 d age are 10.26 × 10^{−5}, 10.55 × 10^{−5}, 7.17 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 20% fly ash is 1.208 times of the RACs with 10% fly ash at 3d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 30% fly ash is 0.6988 times of RACs with 10% fly ash at 3d age. The concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 28 d age are 21.6 × 10^{−5}, 21.55 × 10^{−5}, 21.46 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 20% fly ash is 0.9977 times of the RACs with 10% fly ash at 28 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 30% fly ash is 0.9935 times of the RACs with 10% fly ash at 28 d age. the concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 60 d age are 29.91 × 10^{−5}, 30.31 × 10^{−5}, 29.44 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 20% fly ash is 1.013 times of the RACs with 10% fly ash at 60 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 30% fly ash is 0.9843 times of RACs with 10% fly ash at 60 d age. The concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 90 d age are 35.46 × 10^{−5}, 35.45 × 10^{−5}, 33.47 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 20% fly ash is 0.9997 times of the RACs with 10% fly ash at 90 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 30% fly ash is 0.9439 times of the RACs with 10% fly ash at 90 d age.

The results show that the addition of fly ash will slightly increase the shrinkage of RAC in early drying time, but, generally, the addition of fly ash can inhibit the drying shrinkage of RAC; however, this effect is not very obvious. The study found that the addition of fly ash will increase the shrinkage to some extent when the mixing amount is 20%, the phenomenon is more apparent in the early time, whose conclusion is slightly different from the research result of Mandal and Gupta [12]. This maybe because the total porosity of RAC with 20% fly ash slightly higher than that with 10%, 30% fly ashes.

In regression (4.9), when is from 0.1 to 0.2, 0.3, is from 0.9675 to 0.9493, 0.9217, it is 0.9812 and 0.9527 times of the original, which tallies with the experimental results. As can be seen from Table 3, the model correlation coefficients are over 0.99, which explains that the forecasting mathematical model (4.10) in this paper is with high accuracy.

##### 4.4. Mixing Amount of Expansive Agent and Its Impact on the Drying Shrinkage of RAC

The result of the effects of the mixing amount of expansive agent on drying shrinkage of RAC is shown in Figure 3.

The formula of forecasting mathematical model of concrete drying shrinkage considering the influence of the mixing amount of expansive agent is shown in the following:

As can be seen from Figure 3, the concrete shrinkage curve of RAC with different mixing amount of expansive agent is in good agreement with the power function. The influence coefficient of fly ash according to power function is shown in (4.12), and the corresponding shrinkage model is shown in (4.13):

The function expression derived from regression fitting using Levenberg-Marquardt method + general global optimization method is shown in (4.14), (4.15), and the fitting parameters are shown in Table 3:

As can be seen from Figure 3, when the mixing amount of expansive agent are 0%, 8%, 12%, and 15%, the concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 3 d age are 4.51 × 10^{−5}, 4.47 × 10^{−5}, 4.42 × 10^{−5}, 4.24 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 8% expansive agent is 0.9911 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 3 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 12% expansive agent is 0.9800 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 3 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 15% expansive agent is 0.9401 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 3 d age. The concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 28 d age are 21.2 × 10^{−5}, 18.81 × 10^{−5}, 18.12 × 10^{−5}, 17.81 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 8% expansive agent is 0.8873 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 28 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 12% expansive agent is 0.8547 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 28 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 15% expansive agent is 0.8401 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 28 d age. The concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 60 d age are 29.7 × 10^{−5}, 26.92 × 10^{−5}, 25.03 × 10^{−5}, 23.84 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 8% expansive agent is 0.9064 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 60 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 12% expansive agent is 0.8519 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 60 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 15% expansive agent is 0.8027 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 60 d age. The concrete shrinkage values measured in the experimental at 90 d age are 32.4 × 10^{−5}, 26.85 × 10^{−5}, 26.08 × 10^{−5}, 24.32 × 10^{−5}, which is that the shrinkage strain of RAC with 8% expansive agent is 0.8287 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 90 d age; The shrinkage strain of RAC with 12% expansive agent is 0.8049 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 90 d age; the shrinkage strain of RAC with 15% expansive agent is 0.7506 times of the RACs with 0% expansive agent at 90 d age.

It can clearly be seen that the addition of expansive agent can obviously inhibit the shrinkage of RAC and the inhibition affection is better than that of fly ash, which is similar to the research result of Bissonnette et al. [13].

In regression (4.14), when is from 0 to 0.08, 0.12, 0.15, is from 0.9743 to 0.7804, 0.7382, it is 0.8624, 0.8009, and 0.7577 times of the original, which tallies with the experimental results. As can be seen from Table 3, the model correlation coefficients are over 0.99, which explains that the forecasting mathematical model (4.15) in this paper is with high accuracy.

##### 4.5. Ambient Humidity, Specimen Size, and Its Impact on the Drying Shrinkage of RAC

According to AASHTO2007 model (1.6), , when relative humidity is from 60% to 100%, value changes from 1.16 to 0.6, which decreases by 48.3%. The result show that the change of humidity having have a great impact on drying shrinkage of concrete materials.

In general, the effect of specimen size on concrete shrinkage is mainly embodied in the spread speed of internal moisture to the outside and the impact mechanism on shrinkage has the similar law to that of relative humidity [13]. The size of shrinkage test mode in this paper is 100 mm × 100 mm × 515 mm, then . The effect coefficient of specimen size is directly calculated from AASHTO2007 model (1.7).

##### 4.6. Forecasting Mathematical Models of Concrete Drying Shrinkage of RAC

With (2.1) as basic formula, in the comprehensive study in Sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5 in this paper, the forecasting mathematical models of drying shrinkage of RAC are shown in the following:
where is shrinkage strain, 10^{−5}; is effect coefficient of component size (as can be seen from (1.7)); is humidity correlation coefficient; is humidity; is correlation coefficient of concrete strength grade (as can be seen from Table 2); is correlation coefficient with the development of time ; is compressive strength of concrete at 28 d age; is replacement rate of RCA; is the mixing amount of fly ash; is the mixing amount of expansive agent. The rest of parameters’ meaning is same to those in (1.6).

#### 5. Error Analysis and Model Validation

In order to verify the accuracy of the model, GSC20 and GSC50 (the strength grade is, resp., C20, and C50), two different groups shrinkage specimen are devised and prepared in this paper. The mix design of verification experiment is shown in Table 4.

One point located on the top surface of the specimen selected as object, transforming the shrinkage values of the point into displacement, the comparison chart of calculated and experimental values of GSC20, GSC50, is shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b)

Absolute error and relative error are selected as indexes to do error analysis of displacement calculated values of RAC; the formula is shown in the following: where is absolute error value; is experimental value of displacement, mm; is calculated value of displacement, mm; is relative error value, 100%.

The absolute error values and relative error values are calculated according to (5.1) and (5.2). The error distribution curve drew by Matlab is shown in Figure 5.

Figures 5(a) and 5(b) is error chart (including absolute error and relative error) of concrete of GSC20 and GSC50. As can be seen from Figures 5(a) and 5(b), the absolute error values between calculated shrinkage value (calculated by the model built in this paper) and experimental value have small fluctuation in 180-day drying time. Especially after 60 d drying time, the absolute error values gradually approach zero, which indicates that the model built in this paper has high accuracy after 60 d drying time. The absolute error values have large fluctuation in the drying time of 0 ~ 28 d, the maximum absolute error value arises in the drying time of 14 d, absolute error value is about 0.035. The relative error values between calculated shrinkage value and experimental value have the similar law to the absolute error ones in 180-day drying time. The relative error values have large fluctuation in the early drying time, the relative maximum error value is even up to 95%, but, with the drying time increase, the relative error values are becoming smaller and smaller. Especially after 60 d drying time, the error values gradually approach zero.

So, as can be seen from Figures 4 and 5, the drying shrinkage values calculated in the use of the model of this paper are slightly smaller than those of experimental values, but, with the drying time increase, the calculated values have higher coincide degree with the experimental results. Calculated values and experimental values of RAC shrinkage are almost the same in 60 d age especially, which also shows that the forecasting mathematical models of drying shrinkage of RAC builded in this paper have high accuracy and rationality.

#### 6. Conclusion

Under the same experimental condition, the drying shrinkage values of RAC are higher than those of NAC because of the reduce of RAC inhibition effect and old cement mortar’s further shrinkage after water absorption, and this trend is even more obvious in the early drying time. With the replacement rate of RCA increases, the drying shrinkage value of RAC increases too.

The addition of fly ash can inhibit the drying shrinkage of RAC, but the effect is not very obvious. Specifically, the addition of fly ash will increase the shrinkage to some extent when the mixing amount is 20%, the phenomenon is more apparent in the early time. This is because the total porosity of RAC with 20% fly ash is slightly higher than that with 10%, 30% fly ashes.

The addition of expansive agent can obviously inhibit the shrinkage of RAC, the inhibition affection is better than that of fly ash.

Through regression analysis of large number of experimental data, the forecasting mathematical models of drying shrinkage of RAC shown as follow:

The forecasting mathematical models of drying shrinkage of RAC built in this paper have high accuracy and rationality according to experiment validation and error analysis.

#### Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Project of Science and Technology Committee of Wanzhou District of China (WZ011R003), Key Projects of Chongqing Three Gorges University (11ZD-14), Talents Project of Chongqing Three Gorges University (11RC-16), and Ph.D. Funded Projects of Chongqing Three Gorges University (11ZZ-62).

#### References

- Z. Lv and Z. Yingchen,
*Shrinkage and Creep*, China Railway Publishing House China Railway Publishing House, Beijing, China, 1994. - D. W. Mokarem, R. E. Weyers, and D. S. Lane, “Development of a shrinkage performance specifications and prediction model analysis for supplemental cementitious material concrete mixtures,”
*Cement and Concrete Research*, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 918–925, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - O. Chaalla, B. Benmokrane, and G. Ballivy, “Drying shrinkage strains: experimental versus codes,”
*ACI Materials Journal*, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 263–266, 1992. View at Scopus - ACI209 R-82, “Prediction of creep, shrinkage and temperature effects in Concrete Structures”.
- N. J. Gardner and M. J. Lockman, “Design provisions for drying shrinkage and creep of normal-strength concrete,”
*ACI Materials Journal*, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 159–167, 2001. View at Scopus - “AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications section 5: concrete structures,” in
*Proceedings of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO '07)*, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. - G. Yuanchen,
*Drying Shrinkage Properties of Recycled Aggregate/ Cement Composite*, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China, 2010. - J. M. V. Gómez-Soberón, “Porosity of recycled concrete with substitution of recycled concrete aggregate: an experimental study,”
*Cement and Concrete Research*, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1301–1311, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - C. S. Poon and S. C. Kou, “Properties of steam cured recycled aggregate concrete,” in
*Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Waste Management and Recycling*, pp. 1–12, September 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - J. M. Khatib, “Properties of concrete incorporating fine recycled aggregate,”
*Cement and Concrete Research*, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 763–769, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - K. Eguchi, K. Teranishi, and M. Narikawa, “Study on mechanism of drying shrinkage and water loss of recycled aggregate concrete,”
*Journal of Structure and Construction Engineering*, vol. 3, pp. 1–7, 2003. - S. Mandal and A. Gupta, “Strength and durability of recycled aggregate concrete,” in
*Towards a Better Built Environment Innovation, Sustainability, Information Technology*, E. Zurich, Ed., Zurich, Switzerland, 2002. - B. Bissonnette, P. Pierre, and M. Pigeon, “Influence of key parameters on drying shrinkage of cementitious materials,”
*Cement and Concrete Research*, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1655–1662, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus