About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 989284, 18 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/989284
Research Article

The Extension of Quality Function Deployment Based on 2-Tuple Linguistic Representation Model for Product Design under Multigranularity Linguistic Environment

School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received 5 September 2012; Revised 8 November 2012; Accepted 26 November 2012

Academic Editor: Francoise Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue

Copyright © 2012 Ming Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. T. Liu, “Product design and selection using fuzzy QFD and fuzzy MCDM approaches,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 482–496, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  2. J. A. Carnevalli and P. C. Miguel, “Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD-Types of research, difficulties and benefits,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 737–754, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. X.-T. Wang and W. Xiong, “An integrated linguistic-based group decision-making approach for quality function deployment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 14428–14438, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. W. Hart, “Beating the market with customer satisfaction,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 30–32, 2007. View at Scopus
  5. G. Büyüközkan and G. Çifçi, “A new incomplete preference relations based approach to quality function deployment,” Information Sciences, vol. 206, no. 5, pp. 30–41, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. L. K. Chan and M. L. Wu, “A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example,” Omega, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 119–139, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Akao, Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements Into Product Design, Productivity Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1990.
  8. J. R. Hauser and C. Don, “The house of quality,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 66, no. 5-6, pp. 63–73, 1988.
  9. L. H. Chen and W. C. Ko, “Fuzzy linear programming models for NPD using a four-phase QFD activity process based on the means-end chain concept,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 619–632, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  10. J. Dai and J. Blackhurst, “A four-phase AHP-QFD approach for supplier evaluation: a sustainability perspective,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 50, no. 19, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. L. Y. Zhai, L. P. Khoo, and Z. W. Zhong, “A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 37, no. 5-6, pp. 613–624, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. T. Liu, “The extension of fuzzy QFD: from product planning to part deployment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 11131–11144, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. Bottani and A. Rizzi, “Strategic management of logistics service: a fuzzy QFD approach,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 585–599, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Y. Wang, “Constructing the complete linguistic-based and gap-oriented quality function deployment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 908–912, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. S. Wasserman, “On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process,” IIE Transactions, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 59–65, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. B. Han, S. K. Chen, M. Ebrahimpour, and M. S. Sodhi, “A conceptual QFD planning model,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 796–812, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. G. S. Liang, J. F. Ding, and C. K. Wang, “Applying fuzzy quality function deployment to prioritize solutions of knowledge management for an international port in Taiwan,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 83–91, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. Y. Chen, J. Tang, R. Y. K. Fung, and Z. Ren, “Fuzzy regression-based mathematical programming model for quality function deployment,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1009–1027, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  19. K. J. Kim, H. Moskowitz, A. Dhingra, and G. Evans, “Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 504–518, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  20. L. Martínez, D. Ruan, F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and P. P. Wang, “Linguistic decision making: tools and applications,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 14, pp. 2297–2298, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. M. Rodríguez, L. Martínez, and F. Herrera, “Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 109–119, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. L. Z. Lin, “Fuzzy multi-linguistic preferences model of service innovations at wholesale service delivery,” Quality and Quantity, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 217–237, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Martínez, D. Ruan, and F. Herrera, “Computing with words in decision support systems: an overview on models and applications,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 382–395, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Martínez and F. Herrera, “An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: extensions, applications and challenges,” Information Sciences, vol. 207, no. 10, pp. 1–18, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. L. A. Zadeh, “A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 149–184, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  26. M. Espinilla, J. Liu, and L. Martínez, “An extended hierarchical linguistic model for decision-making problems,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 489–512, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  27. Z. F. Zhang and X. N. Chu, “Fuzzy group decision-making for multi-format and multi-granularity linguistic judgments in quality function deployment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 9150–9158, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. O. Martin and G. J. Klir, “On the problem of retranslation in computing with perceptions,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 655–674, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  29. R. R. Yager, “A new methodology for ordinal multi-objective decisions based on fuzzy sets,” Decision Sciences, vol. 12, pp. 589–600, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. E. Herrera-Viedma, E. Peis, J. M. Morales-del-Castillo, S. Alonso, and K. Anaya, “A fuzzy linguistic model to evaluate the quality of Web sites that store XML documents,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 226–253, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. Herrera-Viedma and E. Peis, “Evaluating the informative quality of documents in SGML format from judgements by means of fuzzy linguistic techniques based on computing with words,” Information Processing and Management, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 233–249, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  32. E. Herrera-Viedma, G. Pasi, A. G. Lopez-Herrera, and C. Porcel, “Evaluating the information quality of Web sites: a methodology based on fuzzy computing with words,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 538–549, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. M. Moreno, J. M. Morales del Castillo, C. Porcel, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “A quality evaluation methodology for health-related websites based on a 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach,” Soft Computing, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 887–897, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Z. P. Fan, B. Feng, and W. L. Suo, “A fuzzy linguistic method for evaluating collaboration satisfaction of NPD team using mutual-evaluation information,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 547–557, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Z. P. Fan, B. Feng, Y. H. Sun, and W. Ou, “Evaluating knowledge management capability of organizations: a fuzzy linguistic method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 3346–3354, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Li, L. Liu, and C. B. Li, “An approach to expert recommendation based on fuzzy linguistic method and fuzzy text classification in knowledge management systems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 8586–8596, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Li and Y. J. Zhang, “The OWA-VIKOR method for multiple attributive group decision making in 2-tuple linguistic setting,” Journal of Convergence Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 184–191, 2012.
  38. G. W. Wei, “A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2-tuple linguistic information,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 7895–7900, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. L. Martınez and F. Herrera, “An overview on the 2-tuplelinguisticmodel for computing with words in decision making: extensions, applications and challenges,” Information Sciences, vol. 207, no. 10, pp. 1–18, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. F. Herrera and L. Martínez, “A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 227–234, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. H. Yamashina, T. Ito, and H. Kawada, “Innovative product development process by integrating QFD and TRIZ,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1031–1050, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus