Research Article
Constructing Taipei City Sports Centre Performance Evaluation Model with Fuzzy MCDM Approach Based on Views of Managers
Table 9
Weights of the main evaluation indices by FAHP.
| Criteria | Weights | Subcriteria | Local weights | Global weights |
| SP | 0.294 (1) | SP1 | 0.189 | 0.047 (10) | SP2 | 0.434 | 0.107 (1) | SP3 | 0.367 | 0.091 (3) | SP4 | 0.010 | 0.002 (22-23) |
| SC | 0.209 (3) | SC1 | 0.212 | 0.046 (11) | SC2 | 0.481 | 0.104 (2) | SC3 | 0.010 | 0.002 (22-23) | SC4 | 0.296 | 0.064 (6) |
| SQ | 0.076 (6) | SQ1 | 0.405 | 0.040 (14) | SQ2 | 0.304 | 0.030 (15) | SQ3 | 0.291 | 0.029 (16) |
| SD | 0.130 (4) | SD1 | 0.477 | 0.058 (8) | SD2 | 0.366 | 0.045 (12) | SD3 | 0.067 | 0.008 (20) | SD4 | 0.090 | 0.011 (19) |
| TC | 0.078 (5) | TC1 | 0.448 | 0.065 (5) | TC2 | 0.413 | 0.060 (7) | TC3 | 0.036 | 0.005 (21) | TC4 | 0.103 | 0.015 (17) |
| OM | 0.212 (2) | OM1 | 0.286 | 0.049 (9) | OM2 | 0.405 | 0.070 (4) | OM3 | 0.067 | 0.012 (18) | OM4 | 0.242 | 0.042 (13) |
|
|
Note: () denotes ranking order.
|