Explicit Dynamic Finite Element Method for Failure with Smooth Fracture Energy Dissipations

<table>Two-dimensional discontinuity representation by two implicit functions <svg height="17.7875" id="M60" style="vertical-align:-3.56265pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 36.200001 17.7875" width="36.200001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.625,12.725)"><path d="M619 670q0 -13 -9 -26t-18 -19q-13 -10 -25 2q-36 38 -66 38q-31 0 -54.5 -50t-45.5 -185h120l-20 -31l-107 -12q-23 -138 -57 -293q-27 -122 -55 -184.5t-75 -109.5q-60 -61 -114 -61q-25 0 -47.5 15t-22.5 31q0 17 31 44q11 8 20 -1q10 -11 31 -19t35 -8q26 0 47 19
q34 34 71 253l54 315h-90l-3 12l31 30h70q28 138 90 204q35 37 75 57.5t70 20.5q26 0 45 -14t19 -28z" id="x1D453"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,11.538,12.725)"><path d="M300 -147l-18 -23q-106 71 -159 185.5t-53 254.5v1q0 139 53 252.5t159 186.5l18 -24q-74 -62 -115.5 -173.5t-41.5 -242.5q0 -130 41.5 -242.5t115.5 -174.5z" id="x28"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,17.42,12.725)"><path d="M699 25v-25h-340v25l28 2q52 3 52 28q0 21 -21 54l-101 162l-38 -51q-60 -82 -75 -107q-19 -29 -19 -46q0 -19 17.5 -28t63.5 -14v-25h-250v25q36 4 58 16t46 40l175 221l-198 291q-23 34 -38 45t-42 13v25h346v-25l-31 -2q-27 -1 -37.5 -8t-10.5 -23q0 -14 15 -37
l97 -150l56 77q38 52 47 69q11 22 11 37q0 18 -10.5 25t-40.5 10l-21 2v25h250v-25q-55 -4 -91 -31q-33 -25 -97 -115l-80 -111l182 -283q33 -52 53 -70q17 -14 44 -16z" id="x1D417"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,29.693,12.725)"><path d="M275 270q0 -296 -211 -440l-19 23q75 62 116.5 174t41.5 243t-42 243t-116 173l19 24q211 -144 211 -440z" id="x29"></path></g>
</svg> and <svg height="17.75" id="M61" style="vertical-align:-3.56265pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 47.462502 17.75" width="47.462502" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.625,12.687)"><path d="M546 430q-14 -33 -37.5 -140t-38.5 -209q-29 -195 -156 -289q-29 -21 -70 -37t-78 -16q-62 0 -102.5 37t-40.5 69q0 27 26 48q19 15 25 -3q13 -43 46.5 -69t87.5 -26q55 0 83 21q29 22 50 65t43 140q14 64 29 163h-2q-55 -81 -149 -152q-59 -44 -102 -44q-23 0 -43.5 30
t-20.5 85q0 74 32.5 145.5t84.5 117.5q40 35 100 58.5t117 23.5q21 0 65 -8q30 -6 44 -6zM456 386q-40 16 -81 16q-29 0 -64 -13q-42 -17 -85 -97q-19 -36 -31.5 -86t-12.5 -86q0 -64 30 -64q20 0 52.5 21t60.5 52q74 81 95 123q26 62 36 134z" id="x1D454"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,10.297,12.687)"><path d="M300 -147l-18 -23q-106 71 -159 185.5t-53 254.5v1q0 139 53 252.5t159 186.5l18 -24q-74 -62 -115.5 -173.5t-41.5 -242.5q0 -130 41.5 -242.5t115.5 -174.5z" id="x28"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,16.179,12.687)"><path d="M699 25v-25h-340v25l28 2q52 3 52 28q0 21 -21 54l-101 162l-38 -51q-60 -82 -75 -107q-19 -29 -19 -46q0 -19 17.5 -28t63.5 -14v-25h-250v25q36 4 58 16t46 40l175 221l-198 291q-23 34 -38 45t-42 13v25h346v-25l-31 -2q-27 -1 -37.5 -8t-10.5 -23q0 -14 15 -37
l97 -150l56 77q38 52 47 69q11 22 11 37q0 18 -10.5 25t-40.5 10l-21 2v25h250v-25q-55 -4 -91 -31q-33 -25 -97 -115l-80 -111l182 -283q33 -52 53 -70q17 -14 44 -16z" id="x1D417"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,28.452,12.687)"><path d="M95 130q31 0 61 -30t30 -78q0 -53 -38 -87.5t-93 -51.5l-11 29q77 31 77 85q0 26 -17.5 43t-44.5 24q-4 0 -8.5 6.5t-4.5 17.5q0 18 15 30t34 12z" id="x2C"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,35.149,12.687)"><path d="M324 430l-26 -36l-112 -4l-55 -265q-13 -66 7 -66q13 0 44.5 20t50.5 40l17 -24q-38 -40 -85.5 -73.5t-87.5 -33.5q-50 0 -21 138l55 262h-80l-2 8l25 34h66l25 99l78 63l10 -9l-37 -153h128z" id="x1D461"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,40.946,12.687)"><path d="M275 270q0 -296 -211 -440l-19 23q75 62 116.5 174t41.5 243t-42 243t-116 173l19 24q211 -144 211 -440z" id="x29"></path></g>
</svg>.</table>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Explicit Dynamic Finite Element Method for Failure with Smooth Fracture Energy Dissipations 