A Review on Migration Methods in B-Scan  Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging

<table>Results of the hyperbolic summation and Kirchhoff’s migration algorithms for a decreased frequency sampling interval (i.e., frequency bandwidth <svg height="11.375" id="M197" style="vertical-align:-0.17555pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 50.224998 11.375" width="50.224998" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.112)"><path d="M594 511q0 -122 -171 -157l1 -2q158 -33 158 -159q0 -52 -34.5 -95t-90.5 -65q-76 -33 -217 -33h-223l8 28q63 5 79.5 19t26.5 72l83 426q9 48 -2.5 60t-77.5 17l6 28h259q195 0 195 -139zM499 509q0 59 -37 83t-91 24q-36 0 -51 -9q-17 -9 -22 -44l-35 -195h62
q82 0 128 37t46 104zM481 199q0 71 -48 102.5t-121 31.5h-56l-37 -201q-11 -58 7.5 -77t80.5 -19q76 0 125 44.5t49 118.5z" id="x1D435"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,15.259,11.112)"><path d="M535 323h-483v50h483v-50zM535 138h-483v50h483v-50z" id="x3D"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,29.963,11.112)"><path d="M456 178h-96v-72q0 -51 12.5 -62.5t72.5 -16.5v-27h-256v27q65 5 78 17t13 62v72h-260v28q182 271 300 426h40v-407h96v-47zM280 225v295h-2q-107 -148 -196 -295h198z" id="x34"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,38.123,11.112)"><path d="M113 -12q-24 0 -39.5 16t-15.5 42q0 24 16 40.5t40 16.5t40 -16.5t16 -40.5q0 -26 -16 -42t-41 -16z" id="x2E"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,41.998,11.112)"><path d="M153 550l-26 -186q79 31 111 31q90 0 141.5 -51t51.5 -119q0 -93 -89 -166q-85 -69 -173 -71q-32 0 -61.5 11.5t-41.5 23.5q-18 17 -17 34q2 16 22 33q14 9 26 -1q61 -50 124 -50q60 0 93 43.5t33 104.5q0 69 -41.5 110t-121.5 41q-53 0 -102 -20l38 305h286l6 -8
l-26 -65h-233z" id="x35"></path></g>
</svg> GHz with 302 sampling points).</table>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig6

Figure 6

Figure 6: A Review on Migration Methods in B-Scan  Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging 