Research Article

Composite Differential Evolution with Modified Oracle Penalty Method for Constrained Optimization Problems

Table 2

The comparison results of different methods.
(a)

Function HEA-ACT [5]ES-DE [8]
WorstBestMeanStd.WorstBestMeanStd.

−8.8−15−11.92.57320−13.0000−15.0000−14.8511
−0.6066−0.8036−0.74050.04906−0.530496−0.803311−0.738181
0−0.2864−0.01690.06382−1.0000−1.0000−1.0000
−30665.5−30665.5−30665.50−30665.54−30665.54−30665.54
5126.49655126.49655126.496505129.4205126.5005127.290
−6961.8−6961.8−6961.80−6961.814−6961.814−6961.814
29.059124.30625.0481.3716424.307724.306224.3065
−0.09582−0.09582−0.095820−0.095825−0.095825−0.095825
680.63680.63680.630680.6301680.6301680.6301
8832.127049.257290.75379.122077050.227049.2537049.418
11100.75000.75000.7500

(b)

Function DUVDE + APM [9]MOCoDE
WorstBestMeanStd.WorstBestMeanStd.

−6−15−12.52.37254−15−1515
−0.6709−0.8036−0.76880.03568−0.79818−0.80362−0.803510.00076891
−0−1.0−0.20150.34508−0.066992−1.0005−0.778060.23028
−30665.5−30665.5−30665.5030665.538730665.538730665.5387
5126.49655126.49655126.496505191.26855126.49675131.531414.322
−6961.8−6961.8−6961.80−6961.8139−6961.8139−6961.8139
121.74724.30630.40421.5683924.306224.306224.3062
−0.09582−0.09582−0.095820−0.095825−0.095825−0.095825
680.63680.63680.630.00003680.6301680.6301680.6301
8332.127049.257351.17525.624307049.2487049.2487049.248
10.750.987490.055900.74990.74990.7499

Result in boldface indicates that a better result is reached.
(c)

Function SAMO-GA [10]SAMO-DE [10]
WorstBestMeanStd.WorstBestMeanStd.

−15.0000−15.0000−15.0000−15.0000
−0.80359052−0.79604769−0.8036191−0.79873521
−1.0005−1.0005−1.0005−1.0005
−30665.5386−30665.5386−30665.5386−30665.5386
5126.4975127.9764325126.4975126.497
−6961.813875−6961.813875−6961.813875−6961.813875
24.306224.411324.306224.3096
−0.09582504−0.09582504−0.09582504−0.09582504
680.630680.634680.630680.630
7049.2487144.403117049.24817059.81345
0.74990.74990.74990.7499