Numerical Validation of the Delaunay Normalization and the Krylov-Bogoliubov-Mitropolsky Method

<table class="table-group" width="800px"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><img alt="927975.fig.0013a" src="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/mpe/volume-2014/927975/figures/927975.fig.0013a.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(a) </b>DN2 versus KBM2 distance error</td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><img alt="927975.fig.0013b" src="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/mpe/volume-2014/927975/figures/927975.fig.0013b.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(b) </b>Box and whisker plot of DN2 versus KBM2 distance error</td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<table>Comparison between DN2 and KBM2 distance errors near critical inclination for a time span of 7 days.</table>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig13

Figure 13

Figure 13: Numerical Validation of the Delaunay Normalization and the Krylov-Bogoliubov-Mitropolsky Method 