An Alternative Approach of Dual Response Surface Optimization Based on Penalty Function Method

Table 4

Comparison with other methods using catapult study data.

Method	Optimal settings			RMSE
VM	(0.09, 0.65, 0.00)	81.13	2.79	3.00
LT	(−0.12, 1.00, 0.39)	79.90	2.59	2.59
WMSE	(−0.14, −1.00, 0.35)	78.68	2.54	2.87
PM	(−0.12, −1.00, 0.39)	80.00	2.59	2.59