An Improved Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm Inspired from Cell Communication Mechanism

Table 3

Results for 30D functions.

Function	C	Range	Comparison	FOA	CFOA	PSO
	MN	[−600, 600]	Best	0.0031	0	0.0049
			Worst	0.6099	0	0.0190
			Average	0.1602	0	0.0176
			Std.Dev	0.2539	0	0.0045
	UN	[−600, 600]	Best	28.707	7.90e − 05	88.072
			Worst	108.70	0.4244	166.19
			Average	72.133	0.0811	136.16
			Std.Dev	26.257	0.1359	26.393
	US	[−600, 600]	Best	0.0029	0	0.4305
			Worst	1.5799	1.7617e − 141	1.7187
			Average	5.13e − 001	1.7617e − 142	1.1396
			Std.Dev	0.5270	5.5710e − 142	0.4359
	MN	[−600, 600]	Best	1.92e − 004	0	0.0444
			Worst	0.0588	7.40e − 003	0.1181
			Average	0.0210	7.44e − 004	0.0703
			Std.Dev	0.0236	0.0024	0.0212
	MS	[−600, 600]	Best	0.6323	0	67.382
			Worst	128.24	0	140.63
			Average	91.073	0	99.362
			Std.Dev	49.057	0	27.050
	MN	[−600, 600]	Best	0.0446	−8.8818e − 016	1.6693
			Worst	1.8229	0.5775	2.3261
			Average	0.9374	0.1225	1.9970
			Std.Dev	0.7885	0.2328	0.3511